Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 1178
Posted: 12/20/2010 8:59:25 AM EDT
[Last Edit: RTUtah]
Originally Posted By PSYWAR1-0:

The Recce platform was something that sprung up within the NSW and 5th SFG communities that first became the Special Purpose Receiver built by Crane, which was supposed to be installed on any M4 lower. After a time when the perfect storm of the users wanting a match-grade trigger and the bolt-bounce issue was identified, the Special Purpose Receiver morphed into a complete rifle that was type-classified as the Mk12.

Mk12: A BRIEF HISTORY (as authored by "LGT" & "FL")

Mk12 Special Purpose Rifle (SPR)

Scoped versions of the M16 rifle existed as far back as the 1960s. Like nearly all historic military rifles, the M16 went through decades of efforts to improve its accuracy, both in the military and civilian marksmanship communities.

The need for the SPR dates back to the late 1980s and early 1990s when the 7.62mm M21 sniper rifle, a semi-automatic weapon of Vietnam vintage, was replaced by the M24 sniper rifle, a bolt action weapon. The M24 was originally specified to be a .300 Winchester Magnum, but the Army decided to field it in 7.62 NATO for a variety of economic reasons. This left the M24 in the unenviable position of being the worst of both worlds in the eyes of snipers at the time, since it lost the fast-shooing, semiautomatic capability of the M21, but did not gain the range advantage of the .300WM. This compromise left a vacant requirement for a fast-shooting semi-automatic sniper rifle. This need was most apparent in the US Army Special Forces (SF) community, since the other commands within the Special Operations Forces structure filled that need with Knights Armament Corporation's SR-25 sniper rifle.

Army SF, being prohibited by its leadership from procuring the SR-25, sought the next best alternative, namely a Special Purpose Receiver (SPR) kit to convert the Army SF M4 carbines into highly accurate rifles. In late 1998, at the request of SFC Steve Holland of 5th Special Forces Group, and the approval of the SOPMOD joint IPT, the Special Operations Peculiar Modifications (SOPMOD) Program Manager, Troy Smith, authorized the purchase of 5 sets of commercial items as an SPR experiment.

The original requirement was for USASOC, mainly the SF Groups, as WARCOM had the MK11, 7.62mm system. Once the SPR requirement was developed and demonstrated through experimentation, most of the other commands in USSOCOM added themselves to the Basis of Issue Plan (BOIP). The USSOCOM requirement for the SPR, with improved ammunition, was approved in July 1999, as part of the SOPMOD Kit, Operational Requirements Document, Version 5 (ORD 5).

Further initial development included several variants of the SPR and new ammunition that were compatible with the M4 carbine's lower receiver. It was found that standard issue M855 5.56mm ammunition was not consistent enough to meet the requirement. In 2000, based on an upgrade requirement to provide a match-grade trigger to the design, Mr. Paul Miller, the SPR project manager, discovered an opportunity to pick through over 15,000 M16A1s that had been sent to Crane for destruction. Realizing that these M16A1 rifles, some of which were virtually new, could be used as "free lumber" to build full SPR weapons, Paul selected several thousand rifles to be set aside for the new SPR project. The SPR underwent a minor but significant name change, with the R having originally stood for "Receiver" now standing for "Rifle"

The new weapon system was worthless without a matching round of ammunition to obtain the performance required. The PEO-SP USSOCOM authorized the new round that became Mk262 as part of the Mk12 system in August 2000. Paul Miller and his SPR team refined the 77-grain prototype ammunition and built approximately 124 SPR Rifles in the summer of 2001. These were finished just in time to ship out to Army SF in late October 2001, to be used in the first invasion of Afghanistan. The SPR rifles were extremely well-received, and the SOF combat units ordered hundreds more.

In May 2002, USSOCOM removed the Mk12 and other complete weapons projects from the SOPMOD Program and placed them under the newly-formed USSOCOM Weapons Program. The fielded weapons included two versions (Mk12 Special Purpose Rifle Mod0 and Mod1). Fielding has since been structured for Mk12 Mod1 Special Purpose Rifle only. This rifle is used by Joint USSOCOM Commands and the USMC in combination with M262 (AA53, 77 grain) ammunition. Formal fielding of the full-rate production version of the Mk12 rifle and ammunition occurred in May 2003 and was completed in FY '04.

In 2012, as the decade of war on terrorism was winding down and the SCAR weapon system began replacing the requirement for the Mk12, USSOCOM and Naval Special Warfare divested themselves of the Mk12 weapons system, and the Mk12 is now being looked at to fill a Designated Marksman Role within Brown Water Navy commands.
View Quote
* * * * * * * * * *

The following parts lists and substitution parts was compiled by lancecriminal86 over the course of a LOT of research. Read up and pay attention!

Below are the 100% .mil-spec parts lists to build a true SPR or Mk12 clone. Some of these parts are no longer manufactured and will require much effort and money to locate through forums and online brokers. Keep in mind the rifles were built off donor M16A1s, hence the prevalent A1 parts in the lower receivers and the BCGs. They were also first configured using parts available from 1998-2004, and most are inferior in some ways to newer designs. If this bothers you too much, STOP NOW.

The rifles were issued as a kit in a Pelican 1700 case with cutouts. The kits included the rifle with suppressor, optic, bipod, an Eagle TAS-1 UMSS sling (unobtanium and also absolute crap), with a Dewey 1-piece cleaning rod plus Otis cleaning kit, and a cutout for magazines. An operator's manual was also included, however these have not been officially released for public consumption. However, the manuals are out there, and some companies building Mk12 uppers include one. Whether these are official .mil operator's manuals or specially made is currently unclear as the manual itself still contains language that it is not for distribution.

- Alternate .mil-spec parts due to NFA, NLA parts, or changes in name/markings for current production in [brackets]

- Extra notes about parts or availability are in (parenthesis)

LOWER
Lower receivers were standard across the SPR/Mk12 variants and the only variations would be between grips, stocks, and buffers. Most were marked either Colt or GM Hydramatic. All other parts were the same in regards to the lower parts. One caveat is the trigger, as the program originally selected the Knight's Armament 2-stage Full Auto Match trigger. Later on, some issues regarding negligent discharges occurred, and Geissele SSF triggers ultimately found their way into the Mk12 family. Whether 100% of all Mk12s eventually received the Geissele trigger isn't clear, so either is acceptable.
  • Lower: M16A1 pattern [Nodak Spud NDSA1 or 80% re-profiled/finished/engraved]
  • Trigger: Knight's 2-Stage Full Auto Match Trigger or Geissele SSF [KAC semi-auto Match or Geissele SSA/SSA-E]
  • Grip: A1, A2, ERGO Original
  • Stock: Originally issued with A1 stocks, both solid D and trapdoor E types; as A1 stocks dwindled, A2 were used; ModH rifles rebuilt with Ace SOCOM stocks
  • Small parts: Standard M16A1 parts

UPPER
The upper receivers, which ultimately differentiate the four variants of the Mk12, have the most variation between each other.


Early SPR/Mod0
  • Upper: Colt, Diemaco, or Armalite marked, flat top, M4 feed-ramps
  • Barrel: Douglas 416r SS, 18" SPR contour, 1/7 twist, flats milled for PRi FSB (Compass Lake, Centurion Arms, High Caliber Sales, and PRi can all supply barrels that meet the appropriate spec minus FSB flats)
  • BCG: Colt M-16
  • Handguard: Precision Reflex Gen I carbon fiber free-float Handguard, rifle length (identified by button-head screws and one vent hole near barrel nut on lower half; no heat shields)
  • A.R.M.S. #38 SPR MOD Sleeve (either the PEQ version or with uneven spacing on the front  but not the full 1913 railed version)
  • FSB: PRi early folding front sight base and gas manifold, set-screw, with elevation wheel
  • Charging handle: PRi Gas Buster M-84 with military latch
  • Muzzle device: OPS Inc 12th Model brake/collar, and 12th Model suppressor [Allen Engineering AEM5 and brake/collar]
  • Rear iron sight: A.R.M.S. #40
  • Scope rings: A.R.M.S. #22 Medium rings, #22 Tactical Ring Cap and #22 Tactical Ring Rail (rings should not include "lever-stop" hump as produced later by A.R.M.S.)
  • Optic: Leupold Vari-X III 3.5-10x40mm LR, M3 turrets, illuminated Mil-Dot reticle (use .308 turret) [Leupold LR/T 3.5-10x40 LR, M3 turrets, Illuminated Mil-Dot reticle]
  • Bipod: Versa-Pod with A.R.M.S. #42, or a Harris with A.R.M.S. #32 (Versa-Pod far inferior to Harris)
Late Mod0
  • Upper: Colt or Diemaco marked, flat top, M4 feed-ramps
  • Barrel: Douglas 416r SS, 18" SPR contour, 1/7 twist, flats milled for PRi FSB (Compass Lake, Centurion Arms, High Caliber Sales, and PRi can all supply barrels that meet the appropriate spec minus FSB flats)
  • BCG: Colt M-16.
  • Handguard: Precision Reflex Gen III carbon fiber free-float handguard, rifle length
  • A.R.M.S. #38 SPR-PEQ-2-3 Sleeve
  • FSB: PRi folding FSB, set-screw, .750 (original production had PRi's full address engraved on sight tower; those engraved with "PRi USA" are later manufacture)
  • Charging handle: PRi Gas Buster M-84 with military latch
  • Muzzle device: OPS Inc. 12th Model brake/collar, and 12th Model suppressor [Allen Engineering AEM5 and brake/collar]
  • Rear iron sight: A.R.M.S. #40
  • Scope Rings: A.R.M.S. #22 Medium rings (rings should not include "lever-stop" hump as produced later by A.R.M.S.)
  • Optic: Leupold 3-9x36mm TS-30, Mk4 MR/T 2.5-8x36mm TS-30A2, M2 turrets with Mk262 BDC, illuminated TMR reticle
  • Bipod: Harris with either A.R.M.S. #32 or KAC RAS bipod adapter
SPR/A, SPR/B, Mod1
  • Upper: Colt or Diemaco marked, flat top, M4 feed-ramps
  • Barrel: Douglas 416r SS, 18" SPR contour, 1/7 twist, flats milled for PRi FSB (Compass Lake, Centurion Arms, High Caliber Sales, and PRi can all supply barrels that meet the appropriate spec minus FSB flats)
  • BCG: Colt M-16
  • Handguard: Knight's Armament M4 Match FF RAS, rifle length (now called the SR15/16 Match FF RAS)
  • Gas block: NSWC Crane pattern (Badger Ordnance parkerized/NSN version is correct, has open front of gas tube hole)
  • Charging handle: PRi Gas Buster M-84 with military latch
  • Muzzle device: OPS Inc. 12th Model brake/collar, and 12th Model suppressor [Allen Engineering AEM5 and brake/collar]
  • Scope rings: A.R.M.S. #22 High rings (A.R.M.S. rings should not include "lever-stop" hump as produced later by A.R.M.S.)
  • Optic: Leupold Mk4 MR/T 2.5-8x36mm TS-30A2, M2 turrets with Mk262 BDC, illuminated TMR reticle or NightForce 2.5-10x24 (optionally with NightForce rings)
  • Bipod: Harris with KAC RAS bipod adapter (BRM-S, A.R.M.S. #32 could still optionally be used)

ModH, Mod "Holland"

  • Upper: Colt or Diemaco marked, flat top, M4 feed-ramps
  • Barrel: Noveske 16" Recon, mid-length gas system, profiled for OPS Inc. 12th Model brake/collar (will require aftermarket contouring of most barrels)
  • BCG: Colt M-16
  • Handguard: Precision Reflex Gen III carbon fiber free-float handguard, FDE, rifle length
  • Charging handle: PRi Gas Buster M-84 with military latch
  • Muzzle Device: OPS. Inc. 12th Model brake/collar, and 12th Model suppressor [Allen Engineering AEM5 and brake/collar]
  • Scope Rings: A.R.M.S. #22 Medium rings on PRi recce rail (rings should not include "lever-stop" hump as produced later by A.R.M.S.) or LaRue LT-104 SPR mount
  • Optic: Leupold 3-9x36mm TS-30, Mk4 MR/T 2.5-8x36mm TS-30A2, M2 turrets with Mk262 BDC, illuminated TMR reticle, Leupold Vari-X III 3.5-10x40mm LR, M3 turrets, illuminated Mil-Dot reticle (use .308 turret) [Leupold LR/T 3.5-10x40mm LR, M3 turrets, illuminated Mil-Dot reticle]; S&B Short-Dot
  • Bipod: Harris with either A.R.M.S. #32 or KAC RAS bipod adapter
  • Iron sights: (apparently PRI were supplied but never used)

In the Wild
Naturally, once these rifles were issued to units, operators and even Marines used various non-issued parts. Here is a short summary of what has been seen:

Early SPR/Mod0:
Both Leupold 3.5-10x40mm and 3-9x36mm scopes have been used. Many have had carbine stocks like the old CAR-style, enhanced M4, SOPMOD Gen I, or even the Tactical DuoStock swapped on.

Mod1:
One 3rd SFG-issued rifle pictured with SSgt Robert J. Miller (MoH recipient) used an A.R.M.S #36 S-EX 5.56mm rail, and a Leupold M3X 10x fixed-power scope, possibly pulled from an M-24 or SR-25 rifle. Another has been seen with a Magpul PRS, LaRue mount, and a Premier Reticles 3-15x used by an AMU shooter, and a similar rifle was pictured on a FOB in a very posed-looking photo. Further, a USMC-issued Mod1 was seen using #22 Medium rings instead of High rings, and a LaRue mount has been spotted as well. Grips have varied from the usual A1, A2, and ERGO, and at least one Magpul MIAD has been used. As with the Mod0s, carbine stocks like the SOPMOD and M4 have been used on Mod1s.

ModH:
The Mod "Holland" was already a small-batch configuration, but even as soon as they were issued to 5th SFG units, some Ace SOCOM stocks were replaced with Magpul ACS and CTR stocks. Optics are basically anything existing in the unit's inventory, from S&B ShortDots still in the system, the 3-9x and 3.5-10x Leupold scopes from earlier Mod0s, and there's even a photo of an ELCAN on a Mod1 floating around. No non-magnified optics like EOTechs or regular Aimpoint M2/M4s, but Micros have been seen on offset mounts. Backup iron sights, as a whole, were almost entirely left unmounted. Grips were again the same usual selection.

Parts Alternatives for Clone Building
Many parts are rare, expensive, and/or both. Despite this, there are some alternatives to a 100% pure clone that will still provide the same visual look and performance. While not a museum-grade clone, most would be hard-pressed to discern the difference. Just know there are those of us out there that will haze and peer-pressure you into further moving your build towards a true clone.

Barrel:
Popular options are the White Oak Armament SPR barrel (rifle gas), BCM's SPR barrel, Rainier's Match and Ultramatch offerings (ensure it's the SPR contour with 12th Model profile), Ballistic Advantage's SPR barrel. Compass Lake Engineering can also spin a Mk12 profiled barrel with a Criterion chrome-lined blank, or even a Krieger, which was one of the original contenders for the program. The DPMS Mk12 barrels are NOT properly profiled for a clone.

Optics & Rings:
In the case of the Leupold 3-9x or 3.5-10x, it's generally okay to go for a non-illuminated version of either, sometimes with M1 or other turrets and reticles. As far as the NightForce scope, the 2.5-10x24mm is not generally released to the public anymore (with one recent exception through Sniper's Hide), so many use the 32mm or even 42mm versions with the #22 High rings. As for the rings, any of the recent produced A.R.M.S. #22s with the lever-stop humps are functionally the same, the desire for non-lever-stops is purely aesthetic when going for the most authentic look. As LaRue LT-104s have been seen in use, it is justifiable to use one depending on whether you have a specific rifle you want to copy, or even just if you absolutely cannot acquire #22 High rings.

A.R.M.S. #38 SWAN Sleeve:
The #38 family of sleeves are no longer available. Finding them secondhand usually cost $250-$300 easy, more for rarer early variants. Fortunately, PRi's copies of the sleeves look and function almost identically, with minor visual differences. PRi and other builders supply these currently for complete Mod0 builds.

FSB:
While the set-screw version of PRi's FSB is spec, most use the cross-bolt, clamp-style version. They are extremely robust, and when aligned and torqued, have been shown to hold strong enough that you'll probably shear your barrel extension pin or upper before it budges. This is mainly how Mod0 uppers are supplied by most vendors, including PRi themselves.

Suppressor, Brake/Collar:
Diverging from the OPS Inc. or AEM brake and collar will get you MAJOR flak. Trust me, I've been running an AAC SPR/M4 for years now and it took a LONG time to not get clubbed every time I posted it. The Allen Engineering AEM5 is basically the current production of the OPS Inc. 12th Model, as they were originally made by Ron Allen and his team in the first place. Only minor differences separate original OPS Inc. cans from AE cans, and these are only obvious to trained eyes.

As far as the rest, you can swap Colt parts out for any other .mil-spec parts, like BCM, DD, CMT, etc. Any billet uppers/lowers, funky BCG coatings, extended bolt releases, etc. are extremely frowned upon. Remember, once you start going down the path of building a "better" rifle rather than what was spec, you're quickly beyond clone territory and would have been better off building a custom 16" or 20" rifle. Cloning is generally viewed as all-in or not at all.

* * * * * * * * * *

Complete Mk12 Mod0 / Mod1 Uppers
Bravo Company Manufacturing
High Caliber Sales
Precision Reflex Inc.

Specific Mk12 Tech
Augee's side-by-side comparison of the original ARMS SWAN Sleeve and PRI reproduction PEQ Sleeves: bottom of p136
KOBK's side-by-side comparison of PRI Gen I, II, and III handguards, and Gen I and Gen II FSBs, and SWANs: middle of p137
Augee's Mod1 gas block tech: top half of p357
Glass1's Early Mod0 photo breakdown: middle of p449
tamboi's Leupold Vari-X, TS30, and TS30A2 scope history/lineage, and part numbers, p.792

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 6/15/2018 12:47:52 AM EDT
[#1]
KAC is good stuff
Link Posted: 6/15/2018 12:49:19 AM EDT
[#2]
what butler creek cover did you use ?

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Conner378:
Listed this ts30a2 in the ee today. Just got it not to long ago but I don’t really need 3.
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/448813/2656BE15-142A-4697-951D-7A0FB172F1B7-571428.JPG
View Quote
Link Posted: 6/15/2018 2:53:16 AM EDT
[#3]
I've been collecting parts to put together a Mk 12 build. Do I go for the Mod 0 or Holland? I've always wanted a Mod 0, but the Holland seems to do everything, but in a lighter, more compact package...
Link Posted: 6/15/2018 3:04:40 AM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By akrox:
I've been collecting parts to put together a Mk 12 build. Do I go for the Mod 0 or Holland? I've always wanted a Mod 0, but the Holland seems to do everything, but in a lighter, more compact package...
View Quote
Both

But the H does seem to do all the good stuff while leaving behind the negatives of a 0 (and quite a bit cheaper to build as well).
Link Posted: 6/15/2018 3:21:46 AM EDT
[#5]
M1 knobs to M3...can it be done? Have a lead on a decently priced 3.5-10 but it has M1 knobs. If it can be done and isn't stupidly priced, I might just snag it.
Link Posted: 6/15/2018 9:28:37 AM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:
M1 knobs to M3...can it be done? Have a lead on a decently priced 3.5-10 but it has M1 knobs. If it can be done and isn't stupidly priced, I might just snag it.
View Quote
Get the serial number and call Leupold. I think that is the only way to find out.
Link Posted: 6/15/2018 12:50:01 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By sbye:
Get the serial number and call Leupold. I think that is the only way to find out.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By sbye:
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:
M1 knobs to M3...can it be done? Have a lead on a decently priced 3.5-10 but it has M1 knobs. If it can be done and isn't stupidly priced, I might just snag it.
Get the serial number and call Leupold. I think that is the only way to find out.
I had emailed them last night but asked in here just in case it took forever to get a response. They said they can do it.
Link Posted: 6/15/2018 1:39:59 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:

I had emailed them last night but asked in here just in case it took forever to get a response. They said they can do it.
View Quote
Awesome. I think whether they can do it or not depends on the year of manufacture, which you would verify by the serial. I could be wrong though...
Link Posted: 6/15/2018 2:06:20 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By sbye:
Awesome. I think whether they can do it or not depends on the year of manufacture, which you would verify by the serial. I could be wrong though...
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By sbye:
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:

I had emailed them last night but asked in here just in case it took forever to get a response. They said they can do it.
Awesome. I think whether they can do it or not depends on the year of manufacture, which you would verify by the serial. I could be wrong though...
He didn't say if he needed the s/n, so who knows. They said $225 and 4-6 weeks. That bumps the price up to right around where I could grab one that already has the correct turrets (and wouldn't have to wait).
Link Posted: 6/15/2018 7:41:24 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:
M1 knobs to M3...can it be done? Have a lead on a decently priced 3.5-10 but it has M1 knobs. If it can be done and isn't stupidly priced, I might just snag it.
View Quote
Is it a var-x iii or a mk4?
Link Posted: 6/15/2018 7:46:02 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tamboi:
Is it a var-x iii or a mk4?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tamboi:
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:
M1 knobs to M3...can it be done? Have a lead on a decently priced 3.5-10 but it has M1 knobs. If it can be done and isn't stupidly priced, I might just snag it.
Is it a var-x iii or a mk4?
Mk4
Link Posted: 6/15/2018 11:06:07 PM EDT
[#12]
If you haven't bought the Gen Juan LMT yet, use "fathersday" and get 20% off. Comes out to $94 shipped (unless you live in IL and forget they're here too )
Link Posted: 6/16/2018 11:13:34 AM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:
If you haven't bought the Gen Juan LMT yet, use "fathersday" and get 20% off. Comes out to $94 shipped (unless you live in IL and forget they're here too )
View Quote
You cost me money today sir. On a side note I think it's gunna be a paint the Nightforce F1 kinda weekend.
Link Posted: 6/16/2018 11:23:00 AM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By eMc9001:

You cost me money today sir. On a side note I think it's gunna be a paint the Nightforce F1 kinda weekend.
View Quote
No time like the present.
Link Posted: 6/16/2018 11:28:34 AM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By RTUtah:

No time like the present.
View Quote
Except the ATF. They got my AEM5's back in time.
Link Posted: 6/16/2018 11:46:12 AM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By eMc9001:

Except the ATF. They got my AEM5's back in time.
View Quote
Worry about only that which you directly control. Just like rock climbing. #3FootWorld
Link Posted: 6/16/2018 11:49:15 AM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By RTUtah:

Worry about only that which you directly control. Just like rock climbing. #3FootWorld
View Quote
That's the only thing I regret not doing on my last Utah trip. Time just flew over there, Angel's landing was bitchin though.
Link Posted: 6/16/2018 3:38:26 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By eMc9001:
You cost me money today sir. On a side note I think it's gunna be a paint the Nightforce F1 kinda weekend.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By eMc9001:
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:
If you haven't bought the Gen Juan LMT yet, use "fathersday" and get 20% off. Comes out to $94 shipped (unless you live in IL and forget they're here too )
You cost me money today sir. On a side note I think it's gunna be a paint the Nightforce F1 kinda weekend.
Link Posted: 6/16/2018 5:15:48 PM EDT
[#19]
Still need to strip my collar . Finally painted atleast, might need a touch up or two and some more webbing.




Found this little neat section while looking through my Nightforce booklet.
Link Posted: 6/16/2018 6:17:32 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:

He didn't say if he needed the s/n, so who knows. They said $225 and 4-6 weeks. That bumps the price up to right around where I could grab one that already has the correct turrets (and wouldn't have to wait).
View Quote
I just sent a MK4 3-9×36mm in for the same thing. I filled out their online service form. Printed It. Stuffed both in a box. They called to get paid and I had it back in about 3 weeks total from the time I shipped it to them.

Now on the other side of the spectrum, I sent my MK6 in last week and got an email yesterday that said it would take 24 business days to fix it. That one had what looked like anodizing in the tube, seen at 1x and 2x.
Link Posted: 6/16/2018 10:12:20 PM EDT
[#21]
For a Holland, how important is having the illuminated rectile? Found a Mk4 3.5-10 without illum for $800. Can't remember the last time I've used illum on anything else I own, but if I'm going to drop the coin I want it to be correct.
Link Posted: 6/17/2018 9:36:08 AM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:
For a Holland, how important is having the illuminated rectile? Found a Mk4 3.5-10 without illum for $800. Can't remember the last time I've used illum on anything else I own, but if I'm going to drop the coin I want it to be correct.
View Quote
Run it in a LaRue and yo'd be correct, no Recce rail
Link Posted: 6/17/2018 10:33:13 AM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By lancecriminal86:
Run it in a LaRue and yo'd be correct, no Recce rail
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By lancecriminal86:
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:
For a Holland, how important is having the illuminated rectile? Found a Mk4 3.5-10 without illum for $800. Can't remember the last time I've used illum on anything else I own, but if I'm going to drop the coin I want it to be correct.
Run it in a LaRue and yo'd be correct, no Recce rail
Oh yeah.........I pulled the trigger on it last night. The enablers in the H thread peer pressured me into it.
Link Posted: 6/17/2018 1:48:46 PM EDT
[#24]
Link Posted: 6/17/2018 1:56:59 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Norinco982lover:
Let me know if y’all find a lead on a MK12 Mod 0 optic.

Don’t need anything pristine under 8 would be great.
View Quote
Thought about this one but you'd need to convert to M3.
Link Posted: 6/17/2018 5:11:47 PM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:

Thought about this one but you'd need to convert to M3.
View Quote
I Sold it this morning
Link Posted: 6/17/2018 5:18:44 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Houlds:
I Sold it this morning
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Houlds:
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:

Thought about this one but you'd need to convert to M3.
I Sold it this morning
Yours is the one I contacted Leupold about converting. Was going to snag it if they could do it cheaply.
Link Posted: 6/17/2018 6:03:32 PM EDT
[#28]



Range session yesterday, verified my zero at 100m and went out to 300m. Forgot to take pictures of the groups, but they were quite reasonable.
ARs sure are something different to handle when you're used to bolt actions. With my M40A3 replica i'm much more comfortable at the moment, well i've had that one for some months now.
Still need to correctly position the collar, but i don't have the correct allen size. 1/16" is still way too big, anyone know the correct size?
Link Posted: 6/17/2018 6:13:02 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Philipp:
https://i.imgur.com/KNjLFfr.png
https://i.imgur.com/PrD9Uoz.jpg

Range session yesterday, verified my zero at 100m and went out to 300m. Forgot to take pictures of the groups, but they were quite reasonable.
ARs sure are something different to handle when you're used to bolt actions. With my M40A3 replica i'm much more comfortable at the moment, well i've had that one for some months now.
Still need to correctly position the collar, but i don't have the correct allen size. 1/16" is still way too big, anyone know the correct size?
View Quote
.050
Link Posted: 6/18/2018 2:11:32 PM EDT
[#30]
Candid shot from range day last weekend.

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 6/20/2018 3:13:52 PM EDT
[#31]
Here's a picture of one of my recent leverstop removal jobs for a customer. Send me a PM if you are wanting the leverstops removed on your ARMS rings!

Link Posted: 6/20/2018 5:32:30 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CoilCrafter:
Here's a picture of one of my recent leverstop removal jobs for a customer. Send me a PM if you are wanting the leverstops removed on your ARMS rings!

https://i.imgur.com/AWRXXJB.jpg
View Quote
Did you cut that TRR/TRC down?
Link Posted: 6/20/2018 7:38:45 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CoilCrafter:
Here's a picture of one of my recent leverstop removal jobs for a customer. Send me a PM if you are wanting the leverstops removed on your ARMS rings!

https://i.imgur.com/AWRXXJB.jpg
View Quote
Nice work.
Link Posted: 6/20/2018 9:04:01 PM EDT
[#34]
So...A1....and....

Link Posted: 6/21/2018 1:00:29 AM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Firejareen:
So...A1....and....

https://i.imgur.com/7b7KFyc.jpg?1
View Quote
Link Posted: 6/21/2018 12:48:38 PM EDT
[#36]
Can someone recommend me a uni-mount? Rifle is a Mod 1 and glass is a Nightforce.
Link Posted: 6/21/2018 12:56:41 PM EDT
[#37]
I tried Badger Ordnance and Kac and the Badger 306-97 is it for me.  Very solid mount for the NF 3.5-15x50.
Link Posted: 6/21/2018 12:58:38 PM EDT
[#38]
Link Posted: 6/21/2018 9:27:55 PM EDT
[#39]
Vortex be gone!

Link Posted: 6/21/2018 9:35:07 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Rothperson87:
Vortex be gone!

http://i63.tinypic.com/35c0wn8.jpg
View Quote
Wanna trade for the one right above your post?
Link Posted: 6/22/2018 11:59:05 AM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By iluvmy86:
Can someone recommend me a uni-mount? Rifle is a Mod 1 and glass is a Nightforce.
View Quote
I went with the Nightforce unimount for my 3.5-15x50 F1. It is the perfect amount of cantilever to work with an A1 stock and get proper eye relief. The Badger Unimount is another option, however the rings are farther apart and some guys were having issues with not being able to push it forward enough to work with an A1 stock. If you are using a Sopmod stock then any mount should work as it adjusts further back.

Link Posted: 6/22/2018 1:55:00 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JSchell1309:

I went with the Nightforce unimount for my 3.5-15x50 F1. It is the perfect amount of cantilever to work with an A1 stock and get proper eye relief. The Badger Unimount is another option, however the rings are farther apart and some guys were having issues with not being able to push it forward enough to work with an A1 stock. If you are using a Sopmod stock then any mount should work as it adjusts further back.

https://i.imgur.com/5LOPL6M.jpg
View Quote
This. Although I have a SOPMOD I prefer the NF over the KAC, Badger, LT111 having tried all 4.
Link Posted: 6/22/2018 3:25:29 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By eMc9001:
This. Although I have a SOPMOD I prefer the NF over the KAC, Badger, LT111 having tried all 4.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By eMc9001:
Originally Posted By JSchell1309:

I went with the Nightforce unimount for my 3.5-15x50 F1. It is the perfect amount of cantilever to work with an A1 stock and get proper eye relief. The Badger Unimount is another option, however the rings are farther apart and some guys were having issues with not being able to push it forward enough to work with an A1 stock. If you are using a Sopmod stock then any mount should work as it adjusts further back.

https://i.imgur.com/5LOPL6M.jpg
This. Although I have a SOPMOD I prefer the NF over the KAC, Badger, LT111 having tried all 4.
What about a Geissele mount?

Link Posted: 6/22/2018 3:48:45 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By A_Friendly_Manatee:

What about a Geissele mount?

View Quote
I wish there was one in the wild lol.
Link Posted: 6/22/2018 6:34:03 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:

Wanna trade for the one right above your post?
View Quote
@secretsquirell sent you an email.
Link Posted: 6/22/2018 6:40:24 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By eMc9001:
I wish there was one in the wild lol.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By eMc9001:
Originally Posted By A_Friendly_Manatee:

What about a Geissele mount?

I wish there was one in the wild lol.
Just send one out to Combat_Diver and have him mock it up on a bunch of SOF guns and post pics in order to allow the cloning community to go nuts about it.
Link Posted: 6/22/2018 7:06:41 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By A_Friendly_Manatee:

Just send one out to Combat_Diver and have him mock it up on a bunch of SOF guns and post pics in order to allow the cloning community to go nuts about it.
View Quote
I like your style.
Link Posted: 6/22/2018 8:03:39 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Rothperson87:
@secretsquirell sent you an email.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Rothperson87:
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:

Wanna trade for the one right above your post?
@secretsquirell sent you an email.
Sorry....I saw your email then spaced it by the time I got home.
Link Posted: 6/23/2018 9:37:54 PM EDT
[#49]
Held off posting pictures of mine since I’m sure some one will bitch about the optic. But decided to anyway
Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File


Upper and lower are colt. Rest of it is the usual stuff.  I like the atlas bipod better than the Harris so it’s on there for my usual shooting duties.  SSA trigger though.
Link Posted: 6/23/2018 10:31:24 PM EDT
[#50]
Forgot to post here.

Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 1178
Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top