User Panel
Posted: 12/20/2010 8:59:25 AM EDT
[Last Edit: RTUtah]
Originally Posted By PSYWAR1-0:
The Recce platform was something that sprung up within the NSW and 5th SFG communities that first became the Special Purpose Receiver built by Crane, which was supposed to be installed on any M4 lower. After a time when the perfect storm of the users wanting a match-grade trigger and the bolt-bounce issue was identified, the Special Purpose Receiver morphed into a complete rifle that was type-classified as the Mk12. Mk12: A BRIEF HISTORY (as authored by "LGT" & "FL") Mk12 Special Purpose Rifle (SPR) Scoped versions of the M16 rifle existed as far back as the 1960s. Like nearly all historic military rifles, the M16 went through decades of efforts to improve its accuracy, both in the military and civilian marksmanship communities. The need for the SPR dates back to the late 1980s and early 1990s when the 7.62mm M21 sniper rifle, a semi-automatic weapon of Vietnam vintage, was replaced by the M24 sniper rifle, a bolt action weapon. The M24 was originally specified to be a .300 Winchester Magnum, but the Army decided to field it in 7.62 NATO for a variety of economic reasons. This left the M24 in the unenviable position of being the worst of both worlds in the eyes of snipers at the time, since it lost the fast-shooing, semiautomatic capability of the M21, but did not gain the range advantage of the .300WM. This compromise left a vacant requirement for a fast-shooting semi-automatic sniper rifle. This need was most apparent in the US Army Special Forces (SF) community, since the other commands within the Special Operations Forces structure filled that need with Knights Armament Corporation's SR-25 sniper rifle. Army SF, being prohibited by its leadership from procuring the SR-25, sought the next best alternative, namely a Special Purpose Receiver (SPR) kit to convert the Army SF M4 carbines into highly accurate rifles. In late 1998, at the request of SFC Steve Holland of 5th Special Forces Group, and the approval of the SOPMOD joint IPT, the Special Operations Peculiar Modifications (SOPMOD) Program Manager, Troy Smith, authorized the purchase of 5 sets of commercial items as an SPR experiment. The original requirement was for USASOC, mainly the SF Groups, as WARCOM had the MK11, 7.62mm system. Once the SPR requirement was developed and demonstrated through experimentation, most of the other commands in USSOCOM added themselves to the Basis of Issue Plan (BOIP). The USSOCOM requirement for the SPR, with improved ammunition, was approved in July 1999, as part of the SOPMOD Kit, Operational Requirements Document, Version 5 (ORD 5). Further initial development included several variants of the SPR and new ammunition that were compatible with the M4 carbine's lower receiver. It was found that standard issue M855 5.56mm ammunition was not consistent enough to meet the requirement. In 2000, based on an upgrade requirement to provide a match-grade trigger to the design, Mr. Paul Miller, the SPR project manager, discovered an opportunity to pick through over 15,000 M16A1s that had been sent to Crane for destruction. Realizing that these M16A1 rifles, some of which were virtually new, could be used as "free lumber" to build full SPR weapons, Paul selected several thousand rifles to be set aside for the new SPR project. The SPR underwent a minor but significant name change, with the R having originally stood for "Receiver" now standing for "Rifle" The new weapon system was worthless without a matching round of ammunition to obtain the performance required. The PEO-SP USSOCOM authorized the new round that became Mk262 as part of the Mk12 system in August 2000. Paul Miller and his SPR team refined the 77-grain prototype ammunition and built approximately 124 SPR Rifles in the summer of 2001. These were finished just in time to ship out to Army SF in late October 2001, to be used in the first invasion of Afghanistan. The SPR rifles were extremely well-received, and the SOF combat units ordered hundreds more. In May 2002, USSOCOM removed the Mk12 and other complete weapons projects from the SOPMOD Program and placed them under the newly-formed USSOCOM Weapons Program. The fielded weapons included two versions (Mk12 Special Purpose Rifle Mod0 and Mod1). Fielding has since been structured for Mk12 Mod1 Special Purpose Rifle only. This rifle is used by Joint USSOCOM Commands and the USMC in combination with M262 (AA53, 77 grain) ammunition. Formal fielding of the full-rate production version of the Mk12 rifle and ammunition occurred in May 2003 and was completed in FY '04. In 2012, as the decade of war on terrorism was winding down and the SCAR weapon system began replacing the requirement for the Mk12, USSOCOM and Naval Special Warfare divested themselves of the Mk12 weapons system, and the Mk12 is now being looked at to fill a Designated Marksman Role within Brown Water Navy commands. View Quote The following parts lists and substitution parts was compiled by lancecriminal86 over the course of a LOT of research. Read up and pay attention! Below are the 100% .mil-spec parts lists to build a true SPR or Mk12 clone. Some of these parts are no longer manufactured and will require much effort and money to locate through forums and online brokers. Keep in mind the rifles were built off donor M16A1s, hence the prevalent A1 parts in the lower receivers and the BCGs. They were also first configured using parts available from 1998-2004, and most are inferior in some ways to newer designs. If this bothers you too much, STOP NOW. The rifles were issued as a kit in a Pelican 1700 case with cutouts. The kits included the rifle with suppressor, optic, bipod, an Eagle TAS-1 UMSS sling (unobtanium and also absolute crap), with a Dewey 1-piece cleaning rod plus Otis cleaning kit, and a cutout for magazines. An operator's manual was also included, however these have not been officially released for public consumption. However, the manuals are out there, and some companies building Mk12 uppers include one. Whether these are official .mil operator's manuals or specially made is currently unclear as the manual itself still contains language that it is not for distribution. - Alternate .mil-spec parts due to NFA, NLA parts, or changes in name/markings for current production in [brackets] - Extra notes about parts or availability are in (parenthesis) LOWER Lower receivers were standard across the SPR/Mk12 variants and the only variations would be between grips, stocks, and buffers. Most were marked either Colt or GM Hydramatic. All other parts were the same in regards to the lower parts. One caveat is the trigger, as the program originally selected the Knight's Armament 2-stage Full Auto Match trigger. Later on, some issues regarding negligent discharges occurred, and Geissele SSF triggers ultimately found their way into the Mk12 family. Whether 100% of all Mk12s eventually received the Geissele trigger isn't clear, so either is acceptable.
The upper receivers, which ultimately differentiate the four variants of the Mk12, have the most variation between each other. Early SPR/Mod0
ModH, Mod "Holland"
Naturally, once these rifles were issued to units, operators and even Marines used various non-issued parts. Here is a short summary of what has been seen: Early SPR/Mod0: Both Leupold 3.5-10x40mm and 3-9x36mm scopes have been used. Many have had carbine stocks like the old CAR-style, enhanced M4, SOPMOD Gen I, or even the Tactical DuoStock swapped on. Mod1: One 3rd SFG-issued rifle pictured with SSgt Robert J. Miller (MoH recipient) used an A.R.M.S #36 S-EX 5.56mm rail, and a Leupold M3X 10x fixed-power scope, possibly pulled from an M-24 or SR-25 rifle. Another has been seen with a Magpul PRS, LaRue mount, and a Premier Reticles 3-15x used by an AMU shooter, and a similar rifle was pictured on a FOB in a very posed-looking photo. Further, a USMC-issued Mod1 was seen using #22 Medium rings instead of High rings, and a LaRue mount has been spotted as well. Grips have varied from the usual A1, A2, and ERGO, and at least one Magpul MIAD has been used. As with the Mod0s, carbine stocks like the SOPMOD and M4 have been used on Mod1s. ModH: The Mod "Holland" was already a small-batch configuration, but even as soon as they were issued to 5th SFG units, some Ace SOCOM stocks were replaced with Magpul ACS and CTR stocks. Optics are basically anything existing in the unit's inventory, from S&B ShortDots still in the system, the 3-9x and 3.5-10x Leupold scopes from earlier Mod0s, and there's even a photo of an ELCAN on a Mod1 floating around. No non-magnified optics like EOTechs or regular Aimpoint M2/M4s, but Micros have been seen on offset mounts. Backup iron sights, as a whole, were almost entirely left unmounted. Grips were again the same usual selection. Parts Alternatives for Clone Building Many parts are rare, expensive, and/or both. Despite this, there are some alternatives to a 100% pure clone that will still provide the same visual look and performance. While not a museum-grade clone, most would be hard-pressed to discern the difference. Just know there are those of us out there that will haze and peer-pressure you into further moving your build towards a true clone. Barrel: Popular options are the White Oak Armament SPR barrel (rifle gas), BCM's SPR barrel, Rainier's Match and Ultramatch offerings (ensure it's the SPR contour with 12th Model profile), Ballistic Advantage's SPR barrel. Compass Lake Engineering can also spin a Mk12 profiled barrel with a Criterion chrome-lined blank, or even a Krieger, which was one of the original contenders for the program. The DPMS Mk12 barrels are NOT properly profiled for a clone. Optics & Rings: In the case of the Leupold 3-9x or 3.5-10x, it's generally okay to go for a non-illuminated version of either, sometimes with M1 or other turrets and reticles. As far as the NightForce scope, the 2.5-10x24mm is not generally released to the public anymore (with one recent exception through Sniper's Hide), so many use the 32mm or even 42mm versions with the #22 High rings. As for the rings, any of the recent produced A.R.M.S. #22s with the lever-stop humps are functionally the same, the desire for non-lever-stops is purely aesthetic when going for the most authentic look. As LaRue LT-104s have been seen in use, it is justifiable to use one depending on whether you have a specific rifle you want to copy, or even just if you absolutely cannot acquire #22 High rings. A.R.M.S. #38 SWAN Sleeve: The #38 family of sleeves are no longer available. Finding them secondhand usually cost $250-$300 easy, more for rarer early variants. Fortunately, PRi's copies of the sleeves look and function almost identically, with minor visual differences. PRi and other builders supply these currently for complete Mod0 builds. FSB: While the set-screw version of PRi's FSB is spec, most use the cross-bolt, clamp-style version. They are extremely robust, and when aligned and torqued, have been shown to hold strong enough that you'll probably shear your barrel extension pin or upper before it budges. This is mainly how Mod0 uppers are supplied by most vendors, including PRi themselves. Suppressor, Brake/Collar: Diverging from the OPS Inc. or AEM brake and collar will get you MAJOR flak. Trust me, I've been running an AAC SPR/M4 for years now and it took a LONG time to not get clubbed every time I posted it. The Allen Engineering AEM5 is basically the current production of the OPS Inc. 12th Model, as they were originally made by Ron Allen and his team in the first place. Only minor differences separate original OPS Inc. cans from AE cans, and these are only obvious to trained eyes. As far as the rest, you can swap Colt parts out for any other .mil-spec parts, like BCM, DD, CMT, etc. Any billet uppers/lowers, funky BCG coatings, extended bolt releases, etc. are extremely frowned upon. Remember, once you start going down the path of building a "better" rifle rather than what was spec, you're quickly beyond clone territory and would have been better off building a custom 16" or 20" rifle. Cloning is generally viewed as all-in or not at all. * * * * * * * * * * Complete Mk12 Mod0 / Mod1 Uppers Bravo Company Manufacturing High Caliber Sales Precision Reflex Inc. Specific Mk12 Tech Augee's side-by-side comparison of the original ARMS SWAN Sleeve and PRI reproduction PEQ Sleeves: bottom of p136 KOBK's side-by-side comparison of PRI Gen I, II, and III handguards, and Gen I and Gen II FSBs, and SWANs: middle of p137 Augee's Mod1 gas block tech: top half of p357 Glass1's Early Mod0 photo breakdown: middle of p449 tamboi's Leupold Vari-X, TS30, and TS30A2 scope history/lineage, and part numbers, p.792 Attached File |
|
MACV-SOG nut.
|
Cage Codes:13269/1S002/3J629/0BJZ8/3S679
"Handle that rifle like you've got ice in your veins." "What's wrong with you, Abu Hajaar?" |
Originally Posted By tbturner47:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/24/4c/c0/244cc0a44c8671b105455b601c9d1371.jpg Which scope is this? View Quote |
|
WTB:
URX II for SR-25(7.62) carbine length. A.R.M.S #36 swan sleeve-PEQ-2 or MOD with no notches for gen 3 PRI tube |
Originally Posted By IronBalaclava:
Dragging my ass with the pics: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v454/IronBalaclava/MK12%20Mod%201%20SPR/DSC04598%20-%20Copy_zpspv1ocoqc.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v454/IronBalaclava/MK12%20Mod%201%20SPR/DSC04605%20-%20Copy_zpsgcjnab9q.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v454/IronBalaclava/MK12%20Mod%201%20SPR/DSC04610%20-%20Copy_zpsrrz8yxjf.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v454/IronBalaclava/MK12%20Mod%201%20SPR/DSC04614%20-%20Copy_zpsaklpmsmx.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v454/IronBalaclava/MK12%20Mod%201%20SPR/DSC04616%20-%20Copy_zpsyiukkqg3.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v454/IronBalaclava/MK12%20Mod%201%20SPR/DSC04622%20-%20Copy_zpsmjusztmc.jpg ETA: don't think i'm gonna be shelling out $300 for NLS ARMS #22Hs. View Quote |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Samson-Dogg:
My guess is mark 4 2.5-8x36. By the time they went to the Holland that was the scope being used the most I think. Just a guess. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Samson-Dogg:
Originally Posted By tbturner47:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/24/4c/c0/244cc0a44c8671b105455b601c9d1371.jpg Which scope is this? |
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Has this been posted before? Don't recall ever seeing it, but this thread is massive so I'm willing to bet it has: Afghanistan - 2006 http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/sniper-team-scan-the-nearby-hills-after-three-wounded-us-army-from-picture-id71788570 View Quote |
|
"I'll tell you what war is about, you've got to kill people, and when you've killed enough they stop fighting." GEN Curtis LeMay
"Someday this war's gonna end..." LTC William Kilgore |
http://www.amazon.com/Gentle-Propositions-J-S-Economos/dp/0615997635
|
Originally Posted By mrsaturn7085:
p/n A613 = Gen2/3 carbine length tube, as mentioned earlier: http://i.imgur.com/J3aLIwK.jpg http://i.imgur.com/kDrolqm.jpg http://i.imgur.com/j8fsr7X.jpg ...and the original (already sold - no PMs, please): http://i.imgur.com/2PQPyoc.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By mrsaturn7085:
Originally Posted By Samson-Dogg:
Would you mind posting a picture of your stock and what parts you ordered and explaining all that. If you don't mind. http://i.imgur.com/J3aLIwK.jpg http://i.imgur.com/kDrolqm.jpg http://i.imgur.com/j8fsr7X.jpg ...and the original (already sold - no PMs, please): http://i.imgur.com/2PQPyoc.jpg Also CLE didn't take very long at all to mill flats on my barrel and do the barrel coating. 2-3 weeks. I started reassembling my early MOD 0 upper last night with that barrel. The PRI gen 2 repro tube is a pain in the ass. I don't know who designed that nightmare but WTF!!? When I saw the baggie of 10 set screws I knew this would be bad. |
|
WTB:
URX II for SR-25(7.62) carbine length. A.R.M.S #36 swan sleeve-PEQ-2 or MOD with no notches for gen 3 PRI tube |
Originally Posted By bachn2324:
I've already spend a thousand dollars into this build and it can't even shoot #CloneLife http://i1060.photobucket.com/albums/t456/henrygb24/IMG_0503_zpsqb0cprkr.jpg View Quote |
|
|
|
A few more "2004-2005" images from Google; all showing the round latch and solid end-plate loop:
I am also seeing the square latch show up around 2007 (though one image was from 2006, below): USAF Photo - Fort Bragg, Oct. 7, 2007: USAF Image The EARLIEST I could find of the square latch was this Saiga from 2006: Saiga Link May/June of 2006 appears to be the crossover point where people are posting recent builds showing both the round and square latch. Prior to that, it was only round latch stocks. You'll also notice that all 2007+ stocks with the square button use the sling swivel (or are not mounted on an AR). This seems to indicate to me that the Gen 2 stock (square latch, machined loop) was a very limited run item (~6 months), probably only sold until the remaining sling loops from the Gen 1 stocks were depleted. Case in point - 2 posts from mid-2006 showing round button stocks: Build 1 Build 2 According to images I have of PRI certificates of authenticity for Mod 0 uppers (serial no. -2, -6, and -12) re-sold to the public, the rebuilds took place on or around April 2007. I rest my case. |
|
|
So opinions on this idea.... in the next couple days I'm going to run one of my scopes down to a laser etching place I just talked to who says they can duplicate the TS-30
A1 And TS-30 A2 Markings you see on the side of the military scopes. They seemed pretty confident and it doesn't look to hard. Attached File Attached File |
|
WTB:
URX II for SR-25(7.62) carbine length. A.R.M.S #36 swan sleeve-PEQ-2 or MOD with no notches for gen 3 PRI tube |
Originally Posted By Samson-Dogg:
So opinions on this idea.... in the next couple days I'm going to run one of my scopes down to a laser etching place I just talked to who says they can duplicate the TS-30 A1 And TS-30 A2 Markings you see on the side of the military scopes. They seemed pretty confident and it doesn't look to hard. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/330914/IMG-3127-190168.JPGhttps://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/330914/IMG-3129-190167.JPG View Quote |
|
-Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American G.I. ~ One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
|
Thanks S-D, my payment along with a token of my appreciation sent!
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Samson-Dogg:
so what I have found is the 3 items together were $44 and some change when broken down. so basically the bore guide, ballistic card and a round count log is $45. shipping from texas to Georgia was $10 shipped priority. understand some will pay a little more than actual shipping but some will also pay less than actual shipping just because its impossible to do anything besides average the shipping costs. box,bubble wrap, tape and plastic bag to put the round count log in about $4-$5 per set. i figured $60.00 per unit. you get 1-black anodized bore guide, i heavy laminated black hills ballistic card and 1-round count log. shipped priority. I'm a little disappointed the packing and shipping jacked the price up like it did. shipping regular non-priority was only 30 cents less. i am not making a dime off these. actually with the manuals and this project i end up putting money in on things. which is totally fine. all these things are for the guys in this thread period and i enjoy doing it. i have the following people down for these. i believe if everyone on the list gets theirs i will have maybe 8-10 extra for late comers. i can not do another run of the bore guides. i bought all the guy had. i do have some extra round count log books. if somebody wants a couple extra i can include them for $4.00 each extra until they are gone. please EMAIL EMAIL EMAIL me if i missed you or any other comms. [email protected]. please contact me if you asked for multiples so i can account for them. also please everybody speak up if you have ideas to ship these any cheaper. i just didn't want to risk damage to anything since it cant be replaced.i also want to thank the people that helped out on some of the things i needed like the round count log. you know who you are. that being said i think everything came out great and everybody should really like them. KavonTN Mad4wd Sommer54 DSLMGK _B_ PRaddict Gunnut003-5 Blbennett1288 engineer5 armedferet CJWD2 Dobs13 KOBK aaron580 emc9001 hairymoose unstable johnnymoses ichiban11 NHM16 Vanquishings stampcollector bbuenme djc106 stxdobie haveblue83 prskiller tinman44 ironbalaclava ejc204 minuteman1636 t_stone daojag lonewolfgun-3 oldtusko lancecriminal coilcrafter frbaseball-round count logs only? tahoelt View Quote Thanks again for doing these. |
|
|
I apologize for missing any emails. I'm trying to keep it straight. I only had 25 extra round count logs made. They are about gone. The extras that is. If you have already talked to me I have yours put aside. I'll count later and see how many extra are left. If there is a big enough demand I will have more made.
|
|
WTB:
URX II for SR-25(7.62) carbine length. A.R.M.S #36 swan sleeve-PEQ-2 or MOD with no notches for gen 3 PRI tube |
Originally Posted By Samson-Dogg:
I apologize for missing any emails. I'm trying to keep it straight. I only had 25 extra round count logs made. They are about gone. The extras that is. If you have already talked to me I have yours put aside. I'll count later and see how many extra are left. If there is a big enough demand I will have more made. View Quote |
|
[quote]Originally Posted By Movistar:
Shooting unsuppressed is for the birds and criminals[/quote] |
Guys.... PLEASE DO NOT write messages in PayPal about gun related items OR that you are paying for goods and services with friends and family option. I appreciate all of your kind words and the extra dollars some of you have contributed. i can't express that enough. I also can't have my PayPal account terminated. Please be careful about that. I'm not calling anyone out publicly but I received a payment with a note that did both. I don't know how on top of that PayPal is. Hopefully it just slides by them.
Does anyone have any experience with this situation? Please email me. I'm trying to decide if I should just shut it down for a day or two in order to see what happens. |
|
WTB:
URX II for SR-25(7.62) carbine length. A.R.M.S #36 swan sleeve-PEQ-2 or MOD with no notches for gen 3 PRI tube |
Strength Determination Merciless Forever
PA, USA
|
I'm going to show my ass here, but....
The only mk12 optics are: Leupy 2.5-8x36 (3-9) M2 Leupy 3.5-10 M3 NF 2.5-10x24 NF 3.5-15x50 Correct? |
|
|
Originally Posted By SDMF_Rebel:
I'm going to show my ass here, but.... The only mk12 optics are: Leupy 2.5-8x36 (3-9) M2 Leupy 3.5-10 M3 NF 2.5-10x24 NF 3.5-15x50 Correct? View Quote |
|
|
Strength Determination Merciless Forever
PA, USA
|
Are M1 turrets kosher-ish?
I'm glad I bought my TS30 when I did.... Whew. |
|
given up hope finding an ARMS #38 rail, 2 years of scouring EE and ebay
|
|
|
Originally Posted By drago6:
given up hope finding an ARMS #38 rail, 2 years of scouring EE and ebay View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By Dobs013:
Keep at it....I found mine by luck. I happened to check the thread just as someone posted they had one. You never know what will pop up when, it gets discouraging but then it makes it a million times better when you find it. I will say the well seems to have gone dry on those. View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By mrsaturn7085:
Yet another part that I simply called A.R.M.S. with the correct part number and they had it as new-old-stock... I'm showing my hand here, but since I have no rare parts I'm currently hunting for, you'd be truly surprised how many 'unobtainium' parts I've easily sourced for Mk 12, Mk 14, and Mk 18 clones over the last 5-6 years by simply calling the manufacturer and talking to the right person. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By mrsaturn7085:
Originally Posted By Dobs013:
Keep at it....I found mine by luck. I happened to check the thread just as someone posted they had one. You never know what will pop up when, it gets discouraging but then it makes it a million times better when you find it. I will say the well seems to have gone dry on those. |
|
|
Originally Posted By mrsaturn7085:
Yet another part that I simply called A.R.M.S. with the correct part number and they had it as new-old-stock... I'm showing my hand here, but since I have no rare parts I'm currently hunting for, you'd be truly surprised how many 'unobtainium' parts I've easily sourced for Mk 12, Mk 14, and Mk 18 clones over the last 5-6 years by simply calling the manufacturer and talking to the right person. View Quote Those days of calling up the company and seeing what they have in the back are pretty much over for the MK12 stuff |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Samson-Dogg:
Guys.... PLEASE DO NOT write messages in PayPal about gun related items OR that you are paying for goods and services with friends and family option. I appreciate all of your kind words and the extra dollars some of you have contributed. i can't express that enough. I also can't have my PayPal account terminated. Please be careful about that. I'm not calling anyone out publicly but I received a payment with a note that did both. I don't know how on top of that PayPal is. Hopefully it just slides by them. Does anyone have any experience with this situation? Please email me. I'm trying to decide if I should just shut it down for a day or two in order to see what happens. View Quote Mahalo |
|
PSALMS 144-1 Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teacheth my hands to warre, and my fingers to fight:
|
Originally Posted By Dobs013:
What model number 38 though? Was it a peq-2-3 or a mod 1? The mod 1 is technically only correct for the 6.8 proto View Quote In late 2014 I directly ordered a "38SPR PEQ2-3" (Gen 3) and in late 2015 I ordered a "38SPRPEQ MOD-L" which is the PEQ-2-3 for Gen 1/2 hand guards. All I had to do was send an e-mail and get the correct part no. sorted out. As mentioned in the last page or two, I called up DoubleStar and ordered a square-latch carbine buffer tube over the last month. I'm local to Crimson Trace and walked right into their HQ and bought an IR laser for a HK45C-T within the last year or two. You'd be shocked what you can easily find when you stop assuming things are only available on the second-hand or grey market. |
|
|
What's the consensus on running a non-illuminated 2.5-8x36?
|
|
|
Totally kosher. Seen in the wild on several earlier mod 1's
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By lancecriminal86:
Negative, it's very subjective. Those early ones had a unique housing for the elevation/windage turrets. It's not a blanket thing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By lancecriminal86:
Originally Posted By CoilCrafter:
Totally kosher. Seen in the wild on several earlier mod 1's Those early ones had a unique housing for the elevation/windage turrets. It's not a blanket thing. M1 knobs are a no go PERIOD. they never have been accepted. I tried and pled my case for months because I found 3-9 with M1 knobs but never M3 knobs. I finally gave up when I found my first 3-9 with M3's. Now I just want TS30 on the side of my scope. Gotta figure that out. As for nonilluminated glass I thought there were some 3.5-10 scopes that were not illuminated in some pictures posted many pages back. On issued rifles. If you were running the fixed 10x it was not illuminated wasn't it? I would like to find a nonilluminated 3.5-10 to go on my early mod 0. I've seen them at 600-700 in the EE but not lately. I just scored another 3-9 illuminated M3 so I'll use that instead. If I find the 3.5-10 I would need to get rid of something to make room. Everything has glass now. |
|
WTB:
URX II for SR-25(7.62) carbine length. A.R.M.S #36 swan sleeve-PEQ-2 or MOD with no notches for gen 3 PRI tube |
Everything I find has M1 knobs
|
|
|
Originally Posted By spermgewehr44:
http://s25.postimg.org/f83690yr3/mk12night.jpg http://s25.postimg.org/c2n5wk5in/wpmk12.jpg View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By Samson-Dogg:
Guys.... PLEASE DO NOT write messages in PayPal about gun related items OR that you are paying for goods and services with friends and family option. I appreciate all of your kind words and the extra dollars some of you have contributed. i can't express that enough. I also can't have my PayPal account terminated. Please be careful about that. I'm not calling anyone out publicly but I received a payment with a note that did both. I don't know how on top of that PayPal is. Hopefully it just slides by them. Does anyone have any experience with this situation? Please email me. I'm trying to decide if I should just shut it down for a day or two in order to see what happens. View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By bachn2324:
I've already spend a thousand dollars into this build and it can't even shoot #CloneLife http://i1060.photobucket.com/albums/t456/henrygb24/IMG_0503_zpsqb0cprkr.jpg View Quote Nice 80% lower, gotta get one and run it through my 5D jig. I picked up a KAC lower for now. |
|
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms
Thomas Jefferson If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. - Thomas Jefferson |
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms
Thomas Jefferson If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. - Thomas Jefferson |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.