User Panel
Posted: 12/20/2010 8:59:25 AM EDT
[Last Edit: RTUtah]
Originally Posted By PSYWAR1-0: The Recce platform was something that sprung up within the NSW and 5th SFG communities that first became the Special Purpose Receiver built by Crane, which was supposed to be installed on any M4 lower. After a time when the perfect storm of the users wanting a match-grade trigger and the bolt-bounce issue was identified, the Special Purpose Receiver morphed into a complete rifle that was type-classified as the Mk12. Mk12: A BRIEF HISTORY (as authored by "LGT" & "FL") Mk12 Special Purpose Rifle (SPR) Scoped versions of the M16 rifle existed as far back as the 1960s. Like nearly all historic military rifles, the M16 went through decades of efforts to improve its accuracy, both in the military and civilian marksmanship communities. The need for the SPR dates back to the late 1980s and early 1990s when the 7.62mm M21 sniper rifle, a semi-automatic weapon of Vietnam vintage, was replaced by the M24 sniper rifle, a bolt action weapon. The M24 was originally specified to be a .300 Winchester Magnum, but the Army decided to field it in 7.62 NATO for a variety of economic reasons. This left the M24 in the unenviable position of being the worst of both worlds in the eyes of snipers at the time, since it lost the fast-shooing, semiautomatic capability of the M21, but did not gain the range advantage of the .300WM. This compromise left a vacant requirement for a fast-shooting semi-automatic sniper rifle. This need was most apparent in the US Army Special Forces (SF) community, since the other commands within the Special Operations Forces structure filled that need with Knights Armament Corporation's SR-25 sniper rifle. Army SF, being prohibited by its leadership from procuring the SR-25, sought the next best alternative, namely a Special Purpose Receiver (SPR) kit to convert the Army SF M4 carbines into highly accurate rifles. In late 1998, at the request of SFC Steve Holland of 5th Special Forces Group, and the approval of the SOPMOD joint IPT, the Special Operations Peculiar Modifications (SOPMOD) Program Manager, Troy Smith, authorized the purchase of 5 sets of commercial items as an SPR experiment. The original requirement was for USASOC, mainly the SF Groups, as WARCOM had the MK11, 7.62mm system. Once the SPR requirement was developed and demonstrated through experimentation, most of the other commands in USSOCOM added themselves to the Basis of Issue Plan (BOIP). The USSOCOM requirement for the SPR, with improved ammunition, was approved in July 1999, as part of the SOPMOD Kit, Operational Requirements Document, Version 5 (ORD 5). Further initial development included several variants of the SPR and new ammunition that were compatible with the M4 carbine's lower receiver. It was found that standard issue M855 5.56mm ammunition was not consistent enough to meet the requirement. In 2000, based on an upgrade requirement to provide a match-grade trigger to the design, Mr. Paul Miller, the SPR project manager, discovered an opportunity to pick through over 15,000 M16A1s that had been sent to Crane for destruction. Realizing that these M16A1 rifles, some of which were virtually new, could be used as "free lumber" to build full SPR weapons, Paul selected several thousand rifles to be set aside for the new SPR project. The SPR underwent a minor but significant name change, with the R having originally stood for "Receiver" now standing for "Rifle" The new weapon system was worthless without a matching round of ammunition to obtain the performance required. The PEO-SP USSOCOM authorized the new round that became Mk262 as part of the Mk12 system in August 2000. Paul Miller and his SPR team refined the 77-grain prototype ammunition and built approximately 124 SPR Rifles in the summer of 2001. These were finished just in time to ship out to Army SF in late October 2001, to be used in the first invasion of Afghanistan. The SPR rifles were extremely well-received, and the SOF combat units ordered hundreds more. In May 2002, USSOCOM removed the Mk12 and other complete weapons projects from the SOPMOD Program and placed them under the newly-formed USSOCOM Weapons Program. The fielded weapons included two versions (Mk12 Special Purpose Rifle Mod0 and Mod1). Fielding has since been structured for Mk12 Mod1 Special Purpose Rifle only. This rifle is used by Joint USSOCOM Commands and the USMC in combination with M262 (AA53, 77 grain) ammunition. Formal fielding of the full-rate production version of the Mk12 rifle and ammunition occurred in May 2003 and was completed in FY '04. In 2012, as the decade of war on terrorism was winding down and the SCAR weapon system began replacing the requirement for the Mk12, USSOCOM and Naval Special Warfare divested themselves of the Mk12 weapons system, and the Mk12 is now being looked at to fill a Designated Marksman Role within Brown Water Navy commands. View Quote * * * * * * * * * * The following parts lists and substitution parts was compiled by lancecriminal86 over the course of a LOT of research. Read up and pay attention! Below are the 100% .mil-spec parts lists to build a true SPR or Mk12 clone. Some of these parts are no longer manufactured and will require much effort and money to locate through forums and online brokers. Keep in mind the rifles were built off donor M16A1s, hence the prevalent A1 parts in the lower receivers and the BCGs. They were also first configured using parts available from 1998-2004, and most are inferior in some ways to newer designs. If this bothers you too much, STOP NOW. The rifles were issued as a kit in a Pelican 1700 case with cutouts. The kits included the rifle with suppressor, optic, bipod, an Eagle TAS-1 UMSS sling (unobtanium and also absolute crap), with a Dewey 1-piece cleaning rod plus Otis cleaning kit, and a cutout for magazines. An operator's manual was also included, however these have not been officially released for public consumption. However, the manuals are out there, and some companies building Mk12 uppers include one. Whether these are official .mil operator's manuals or specially made is currently unclear as the manual itself still contains language that it is not for distribution. - Alternate .mil-spec parts due to NFA, NLA parts, or changes in name/markings for current production in [brackets] - Extra notes about parts or availability are in (parenthesis) LOWER Lower receivers were standard across the SPR/Mk12 variants and the only variations would be between grips, stocks, and buffers. Most were marked either Colt or GM Hydramatic. All other parts were the same in regards to the lower parts. One caveat is the trigger, as the program originally selected the Knight's Armament 2-stage Full Auto Match trigger. Later on, some issues regarding negligent discharges occurred, and Geissele SSF triggers ultimately found their way into the Mk12 family. Whether 100% of all Mk12s eventually received the Geissele trigger isn't clear, so either is acceptable.
The upper receivers, which ultimately differentiate the four variants of the Mk12, have the most variation between each other. Early SPR/Mod0
ModH, Mod "Holland"
Naturally, once these rifles were issued to units, operators and even Marines used various non-issued parts. Here is a short summary of what has been seen: Early SPR/Mod0: Both Leupold 3.5-10x40mm and 3-9x36mm scopes have been used. Many have had carbine stocks like the old CAR-style, enhanced M4, SOPMOD Gen I, or even the Tactical DuoStock swapped on. Mod1: One 3rd SFG-issued rifle pictured with SSgt Robert J. Miller (MoH recipient) used an A.R.M.S #36 S-EX 5.56mm rail, and a Leupold M3X 10x fixed-power scope, possibly pulled from an M-24 or SR-25 rifle. Another has been seen with a Magpul PRS, LaRue mount, and a Premier Reticles 3-15x used by an AMU shooter, and a similar rifle was pictured on a FOB in a very posed-looking photo. Further, a USMC-issued Mod1 was seen using #22 Medium rings instead of High rings, and a LaRue mount has been spotted as well. Grips have varied from the usual A1, A2, and ERGO, and at least one Magpul MIAD has been used. As with the Mod0s, carbine stocks like the SOPMOD and M4 have been used on Mod1s. ModH: The Mod "Holland" was already a small-batch configuration, but even as soon as they were issued to 5th SFG units, some Ace SOCOM stocks were replaced with Magpul ACS and CTR stocks. Optics are basically anything existing in the unit's inventory, from S&B ShortDots still in the system, the 3-9x and 3.5-10x Leupold scopes from earlier Mod0s, and there's even a photo of an ELCAN on a Mod1 floating around. No non-magnified optics like EOTechs or regular Aimpoint M2/M4s, but Micros have been seen on offset mounts. Backup iron sights, as a whole, were almost entirely left unmounted. Grips were again the same usual selection. Parts Alternatives for Clone Building Many parts are rare, expensive, and/or both. Despite this, there are some alternatives to a 100% pure clone that will still provide the same visual look and performance. While not a museum-grade clone, most would be hard-pressed to discern the difference. Just know there are those of us out there that will haze and peer-pressure you into further moving your build towards a true clone. Barrel: Popular options are the White Oak Armament SPR barrel (rifle gas), BCM's SPR barrel, Rainier's Match and Ultramatch offerings (ensure it's the SPR contour with 12th Model profile), Ballistic Advantage's SPR barrel. Compass Lake Engineering can also spin a Mk12 profiled barrel with a Criterion chrome-lined blank, or even a Krieger, which was one of the original contenders for the program. The DPMS Mk12 barrels are NOT properly profiled for a clone. Optics & Rings: In the case of the Leupold 3-9x or 3.5-10x, it's generally okay to go for a non-illuminated version of either, sometimes with M1 or other turrets and reticles. As far as the NightForce scope, the 2.5-10x24mm is not generally released to the public anymore (with one recent exception through Sniper's Hide), so many use the 32mm or even 42mm versions with the #22 High rings. As for the rings, any of the recent produced A.R.M.S. #22s with the lever-stop humps are functionally the same, the desire for non-lever-stops is purely aesthetic when going for the most authentic look. As LaRue LT-104s have been seen in use, it is justifiable to use one depending on whether you have a specific rifle you want to copy, or even just if you absolutely cannot acquire #22 High rings. A.R.M.S. #38 SWAN Sleeve: The #38 family of sleeves are no longer available. Finding them secondhand usually cost $250-$300 easy, more for rarer early variants. Fortunately, PRi's copies of the sleeves look and function almost identically, with minor visual differences. PRi and other builders supply these currently for complete Mod0 builds. FSB: While the set-screw version of PRi's FSB is spec, most use the cross-bolt, clamp-style version. They are extremely robust, and when aligned and torqued, have been shown to hold strong enough that you'll probably shear your barrel extension pin or upper before it budges. This is mainly how Mod0 uppers are supplied by most vendors, including PRi themselves. Suppressor, Brake/Collar: Diverging from the OPS Inc. or AEM brake and collar will get you MAJOR flak. Trust me, I've been running an AAC SPR/M4 for years now and it took a LONG time to not get clubbed every time I posted it. The Allen Engineering AEM5 is basically the current production of the OPS Inc. 12th Model, as they were originally made by Ron Allen and his team in the first place. Only minor differences separate original OPS Inc. cans from AE cans, and these are only obvious to trained eyes. As far as the rest, you can swap Colt parts out for any other .mil-spec parts, like BCM, DD, CMT, etc. Any billet uppers/lowers, funky BCG coatings, extended bolt releases, etc. are extremely frowned upon. Remember, once you start going down the path of building a "better" rifle rather than what was spec, you're quickly beyond clone territory and would have been better off building a custom 16" or 20" rifle. Cloning is generally viewed as all-in or not at all. * * * * * * * * * * Complete Mk12 Mod0 / Mod1 Uppers Bravo Company Manufacturing High Caliber Sales Precision Reflex Inc. Specific Mk12 Tech Augee's side-by-side comparison of the original ARMS SWAN Sleeve and PRI reproduction PEQ Sleeves: bottom of p136 KOBK's side-by-side comparison of PRI Gen I, II, and III handguards, and Gen I and Gen II FSBs, and SWANs: middle of p137 Augee's Mod1 gas block tech: top half of p357 Glass1's Early Mod0 photo breakdown: middle of p449 tamboi's Leupold Vari-X, TS30, and TS30A2 scope history/lineage, and part numbers, p.792 * * * * * * * * * * As of 16 May 2024, Ron Allen is still making custom parts for his suppressors: View Quote * * * * * * * * * * Attached File |
|
MACV-SOG nut.
|
Originally Posted By vanquishings:
That's a decent start. Here's the barrel for $157 . . . . Use code BA25 to get that deal. FF RAS can be had for $350, but you're more likely to pay $400. 99051 front sight is $185 new, more if you want them in Taupe. Rear sight isn't nearly as bad, thankfully. You can save a little bit of money on the upper receiver by going with an Anderson/Aero. Correct scope rings are another $200, you can save $100 if you want the almost correct lever stop version. Optics will obviously add on more. Suppressor is another $900. SSA/SSAE is $200. SOPMOD LMT is $150, but you can save about half by going with a B5. A2 can be cheaper, A1 for clone correct and non adjustable. Lower for $40 LPK for another $40. Bipod is $90 BCG is $100 or so. Then you'll be well on your way. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By vanquishings:
That's a decent start. Here's the barrel for $157 . . . . Use code BA25 to get that deal. FF RAS can be had for $350, but you're more likely to pay $400. 99051 front sight is $185 new, more if you want them in Taupe. Rear sight isn't nearly as bad, thankfully. You can save a little bit of money on the upper receiver by going with an Anderson/Aero. Correct scope rings are another $200, you can save $100 if you want the almost correct lever stop version. Optics will obviously add on more. Suppressor is another $900. SSA/SSAE is $200. SOPMOD LMT is $150, but you can save about half by going with a B5. A2 can be cheaper, A1 for clone correct and non adjustable. Lower for $40 LPK for another $40. Bipod is $90 BCG is $100 or so. Then you'll be well on your way. I've heard Anderson receivers are sometimes sub-par, it that not the case? I was considering going Aero for my upper, considering my lower is Aero. As far as optics and mounts go, I just bought a Vortex Strike Eagle and an ADM QD mount, so I will be getting good use out of those before I'm back in the market for a Leupold. I love A1/A2 stocks, so I'm keeping my A2 for now. When I want to go clone I'll get the A1, and when I want to go thuper thecret thquirrel I'll grab a SOPMOD I've already got an Aero M-16 BCG. Will the Colt be any different, other than clone accuracy? I will be happy with what I'm getting for a little while, but I definitely want to grab a bipod, SSAE trigger, and sling system sooner than later. Originally Posted By Samson-Dogg:
Go with an A1 stock if possible and the cage code marked toolcraft bcg. Your shop gave you a great deal on the FF RAS at 300 and front sight at 100 so I wouldn't sweat 20 bucks. |
|
|
Speaking of slings, what's the consensus here on sling systems (considering I'm running an A2 stock right now)? Looking at both historical photos and clone photos on this thread, it seems using a QD end plate or a wrap-around-stock system (I can't find the real name) are both popular methods.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By EagleBeak:
That is a smokin' deal on that barrel. Thanks for sharing the code!! I've heard Anderson receivers are sometimes sub-par, it that not the case? I was considering going Aero for my upper, considering my lower is Aero. As far as optics and mounts go, I just bought a Vortex Strike Eagle and an ADM QD mount, so I will be getting good use out of those before I'm back in the market for a Leupold. I love A1/A2 stocks, so I'm keeping my A2 for now. When I want to go clone I'll get the A1, and when I want to go thuper thecret thquirrel I'll grab a SOPMOD I've already got an Aero M-16 BCG. Will the Colt be any different, other than clone accuracy? I will be happy with what I'm getting for a little while, but I definitely want to grab a bipod, SSAE trigger, and sling system sooner than later. Good to know, thanks for the input! View Quote This thread really does get in your head when building a MK12. |
|
|
Originally Posted By EagleBeak:
After, visiting my local shop, I don't think I'll be buying the BCM Mk12 upper anymore! My gun shop gave me this deal to get me good start on my Mk12 build Ballistic Advantage 18" SPR: $175 KAC FF RAS rail: $300 KAC front BUIS: $100 Ops-Inc brake and collar:$150 Rifle length gas tube: $17 low profile Gas Block: $40 Armalite upper reciever $150 Total: $932 And if I buy the brake and collar unstabl linked, that'll save me $20 Sound like a deal? View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By rbgonoles:
Not too bad. Like noted above, you can do a little better on the barrel. Also, you can probably score a colt upper for $150. Make sure that low profile gas block is the correct M12 (DD/Badger Ord). It's visible on the Mod 1, so use the correct one. $100 seems low for a KAC BUIS, make sure its the correct model 98474, not the micro. View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By EagleBeak:
After, visiting my local shop, I don't think I'll be buying the BCM Mk12 upper anymore! My gun shop gave me this deal to get me good start on my Mk12 build Ballistic Advantage 18" SPR: $175 KAC FF RAS rail: $300 KAC front BUIS: $100 Ops-Inc brake and collar:$150 Rifle length gas tube: $17 low profile Gas Block: $40 Armalite upper reciever $150 Total: $932 And if I buy the brake and collar unstabl linked, that'll save me $20 Sound like a deal? View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By EagleBeak:
After, visiting my local shop, I don't think I'll be buying the BCM Mk12 upper anymore! My gun shop gave me this deal to get me good start on my Mk12 build Ballistic Advantage 18" SPR: $175 KAC FF RAS rail: $300 KAC front BUIS: $100 Ops-Inc brake and collar:$150 Rifle length gas tube: $17 low profile Gas Block: $40 Armalite upper reciever $150 Total: $932 And if I buy the brake and collar unstabl linked, that'll save me $20 Sound like a deal? View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By reswob:
Jonny Kim of Seal Team 3 https://www.nasa.gov/astronauts/biographies/jonny-kim/biography Screen cap from this video...in another still from the video it looks like he has an SR-25 also, so I hope I am not bamboozled here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m43RSoibhw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m43RSoibhw https://i.imgur.com/9IoX4sD.jpg View Quote |
|
PSALMS 144-1 Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teacheth my hands to warre, and my fingers to fight:
|
|
Originally Posted By JackHass:
I'm in for one. Been looking for one for a long time! NY sucks! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By JackHass:
Originally Posted By HARMS4X:
Question for you guys, how many people would be interested in a FAKE Suppressor for your MK12's? These would be for guys who live in the ban states or just don't want to go NFA. These would attach to the Allen or Ops brake and collar like a real one. I floated the idea to and he said its interesting. If I am out of line or crossing a line I will step back from the line. |
|
|
Originally Posted By EagleBeak:
That is a smokin' deal on that barrel. Thanks for sharing the code!! I've heard Anderson receivers are sometimes sub-par, it that not the case? I was considering going Aero for my upper, considering my lower is Aero. As far as optics and mounts go, I just bought a Vortex Strike Eagle and an ADM QD mount, so I will be getting good use out of those before I'm back in the market for a Leupold. I love A1/A2 stocks, so I'm keeping my A2 for now. When I want to go clone I'll get the A1, and when I want to go thuper thecret thquirrel I'll grab a SOPMOD I've already got an Aero M-16 BCG. Will the Colt be any different, other than clone accuracy? I will be happy with what I'm getting for a little while, but I definitely want to grab a bipod, SSAE trigger, and sling system sooner than later. Good to know, thanks for the input! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By EagleBeak:
That is a smokin' deal on that barrel. Thanks for sharing the code!! I've heard Anderson receivers are sometimes sub-par, it that not the case? I was considering going Aero for my upper, considering my lower is Aero. As far as optics and mounts go, I just bought a Vortex Strike Eagle and an ADM QD mount, so I will be getting good use out of those before I'm back in the market for a Leupold. I love A1/A2 stocks, so I'm keeping my A2 for now. When I want to go clone I'll get the A1, and when I want to go thuper thecret thquirrel I'll grab a SOPMOD I've already got an Aero M-16 BCG. Will the Colt be any different, other than clone accuracy? I will be happy with what I'm getting for a little while, but I definitely want to grab a bipod, SSAE trigger, and sling system sooner than later. Good to know, thanks for the input! The stock is really personal preference. I went sopmod because the cheek weld is infitely better with the correct scope rings, and I throw this thing in my truck, or cases, so the adjustability is a huge help for me. I run mine on an A5 buffer system, which runs smoother for the system, IMO. BCG-wise, no one will give you a hard time about Aero BCGs. Aero BCGs are a little overpriced, IMO, but they do the same thing an Aim, or PSA do. I think a nice Colt/LMT/BCM is the way to go, but that's just because I've seen cheaper ones die after a few thousand rounds. Battlefield Vegas has BCGs with 20k on em, and none of em are the cheaper ones. But for what you're probably using it for, I don't think the Aero will give you any problems. Originally Posted By revottuneda4:
This thread really does get in your head when building a MK12. |
|
WTB:
- LED ACOG 4x TA02-D-100393 - Aimpoint T2 - A.R.M.S #23 |
Originally Posted By vanquishings:
Amen to that, I went in thinking I'd do a psedo Mk12. It can't be done once you've set foot in here. View Quote Attached File which ultimately became this Attached File |
|
|
Originally Posted By Hunterex:
Truth. I started with this https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/59096/Deltamod0-232118.JPG which ultimately became this https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/59096/CorrectMod0-232119.JPG View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By Hunterex:
Truth. I started with this https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/59096/Deltamod0-232118.JPG which ultimately became this https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/59096/CorrectMod0-232119.JPG View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By vanquishings:
That's a decent start. Here's the barrel for $157 http://www.monmouthreloading.com/shop/ballistic-advantage-223-wylde-premium-series-18-spr-barrel-ops12/ Use code BA25 to get that deal. Then you'll be well on your way. View Quote I was about to jump on the barrel that you linked until I realized 2 things. 1: This barrel is a natural shiny finish. Although in the link they use a photo of a black finished barrel, you'll see down below in the description that the finish is bead blasted. I definitely need to find this barrel in Black or at least matte gray. 2: This barrel is chambered in .223 Wylde. I don't have anything against .223 Wylde, I just want to make sure this is the correct spec (the true clones are in 5.56, correct?) |
|
|
Originally Posted By Hunterex:
Truth. I started with this https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/59096/Deltamod0-232118.JPG which ultimately became this https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/59096/CorrectMod0-232119.JPG View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By EagleBeak:
So . . . I was about to jump on the barrel that you linked until I realized 2 things. 1: This barrel is a natural shiny finish. Although in the link they use a photo of a black finished barrel, you'll see down below in the description that the finish is bead blasted. I definitely need to find this barrel in Black or at least matte gray. 2: This barrel is chambered in .223 Wylde. I don't have anything against .223 Wylde, I just want to make sure this is the correct spec (the true clones are in 5.56, correct?) View Quote If you're worried about spec, you shouldn't be buying the BA barrel. True spec is only obtainable from HCS, chambered specifically for Mk262 ammo and in the weird grey durakote finish. 223 Wylde is just optimized to run 556 and 223 equally well as opposed to it preferring one or the other. It'll shoot anything you put through it. Someone smarter than me can actually tell you what makes it different. The true to spec Douglas will probably run you twice as much as the BA. Most people will tell you to get the $157 BA and throw an extra $3 into spray paint. |
|
WTB:
- LED ACOG 4x TA02-D-100393 - Aimpoint T2 - A.R.M.S #23 |
Originally Posted By vanquishings:
That barrel is indeed a bead blast finish. It's a dull/matte silver finish. Easily fixed with some cans of the rattle variation. If you're worried about spec, you shouldn't be buying the BA barrel. True spec is only obtainable from HCS, chambered specifically for Mk262 ammo and in the weird grey durakote finish. 223 Wylde is just optimized to run 556 and 223 equally well as opposed to it preferring one or the other. It'll shoot anything you put through it. Someone smarter than me can actually tell you what makes it different. The true to spec Douglas will probably run you twice as much as the BA. Most people will tell you to get the $157 BA and throw an extra $3 into spray paint. View Quote Is it a good idea to rattle can a barrel? Still being a noob to ARs, I figured it would melt off and get into threads or cause other issues. If this isn't the case then that'll save me on a cerakote job! Once again, thanks so much to all of you guys. You've taken me from 0 to 100+ in about 3 days of help. I promise to soon pay you back in profusely borderline tacticool-erotic Mk12 pics! |
|
|
Originally Posted By EagleBeak:
I was hoping you'd say as much about the .223 Wylde. I've always hear that it's supposed to run 5.56 and .223, but its just always sounded too good to be true! If it is the case, why isn't it an industry standard? I just wanted to run it by this group to get one more source that agrees that .223 Wylde is good to go (and no, I don't really care about it not being clone worthy. One day and many fat stacks from now I may care) Is it a good idea to rattle can a barrel? Still being a noob to ARs, I figured it would melt off and get into threads or cause other issues. If this isn't the case then that'll save me on a cerakote job! Once again, thanks so much to all of you guys. You've taken me from 0 to 100+ in about 3 days of help. I promise to soon pay you back in profusely borderline tacticool-erotic Mk12 pics! View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By HARMS4X:
Question for you guys, how many people would be interested in a FAKE Suppressor for your MK12's? These would be for guys who live in the ban states or just don't want to go NFA. These would attach to the Allen or Ops brake and collar like a real one. I floated the idea to and he said its interesting. If I am out of line or crossing a line I will step back from the line. View Quote |
|
USAF veteran
|
Originally Posted By exhogflyer:
Count me in for 1, maybe 2!!!! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By exhogflyer:
Originally Posted By HARMS4X:
Question for you guys, how many people would be interested in a FAKE Suppressor for your MK12's? These would be for guys who live in the ban states or just don't want to go NFA. These would attach to the Allen or Ops brake and collar like a real one. I floated the idea to and he said its interesting. If I am out of line or crossing a line I will step back from the line. I bought one for the hell of it a while ago and it threads on fine. |
|
|
Originally Posted By StevieJ309:
They already make fake (airsoft) 12th Model suppressors. King Arms OPS 12th Model Silencer for S.P.R. Flash Hider. I bought one for the hell of it a while ago and it threads on fine. View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By EagleBeak:
I was hoping you'd say as much about the .223 Wylde. I've always hear that it's supposed to run 5.56 and .223, but its just always sounded too good to be true! If it is the case, why isn't it an industry standard? I just wanted to run it by this group to get one more source that agrees that .223 Wylde is good to go (and no, I don't really care about it not being clone worthy. One day and many fat stacks from now I may care) Is it a good idea to rattle can a barrel? Still being a noob to ARs, I figured it would melt off and get into threads or cause other issues. If this isn't the case then that'll save me on a cerakote job! Once again, thanks so much to all of you guys. You've taken me from 0 to 100+ in about 3 days of help. I promise to soon pay you back in profusely borderline tacticool-erotic Mk12 pics! View Quote Rattle canning a barrel should be fine unless you're doing mag dumps. I've heard some guys using grill paint that's graded for high heat, but I've seen guys just use regular and get away with it. Obviously, you want to mask off everything you want painted like the threads, receiver pin, gas port, etc. Either way, I probably wouldn't paint anything from the collar to the brake. That'll get exceptionally hot with the suppressor running on it. And it'll be covered up with the can, anyways. You can flip through a few pages and see guys who have painted it, and guys who have left it off. Cerakote will last longer, but many of us here don't baby our guns, so they'll get beat up either way. Rattle can is about 10x cheaper, and you can retouch it/change it up whenever you want/need. |
|
WTB:
- LED ACOG 4x TA02-D-100393 - Aimpoint T2 - A.R.M.S #23 |
Originally Posted By vanquishings:
It's not an industry standard because barrels chambered in 556 can handle 223 just fine. Someone just thought they could fix something that wasn't already broken. At least those are my thoughts. You won't hurt your 556 shooting 223, but a Wylde barrel isn't a bad thing, either. It'll shoot whatever you load into it, as long as that's 223/556. Rattle canning a barrel should be fine unless you're doing mag dumps. I've heard some guys using grill paint that's graded for high heat, but I've seen guys just use regular and get away with it. Obviously, you want to mask off everything you want painted like the threads, receiver pin, gas port, etc. Either way, I probably wouldn't paint anything from the collar to the brake. That'll get exceptionally hot with the suppressor running on it. And it'll be covered up with the can, anyways. You can flip through a few pages and see guys who have painted it, and guys who have left it off. Cerakote will last longer, but many of us here don't baby our guns, so they'll get beat up either way. Rattle can is about 10x cheaper, and you can retouch it/change it up whenever you want/need. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By vanquishings:
It's not an industry standard because barrels chambered in 556 can handle 223 just fine. Someone just thought they could fix something that wasn't already broken. At least those are my thoughts. You won't hurt your 556 shooting 223, but a Wylde barrel isn't a bad thing, either. It'll shoot whatever you load into it, as long as that's 223/556. Rattle canning a barrel should be fine unless you're doing mag dumps. I've heard some guys using grill paint that's graded for high heat, but I've seen guys just use regular and get away with it. Obviously, you want to mask off everything you want painted like the threads, receiver pin, gas port, etc. Either way, I probably wouldn't paint anything from the collar to the brake. That'll get exceptionally hot with the suppressor running on it. And it'll be covered up with the can, anyways. You can flip through a few pages and see guys who have painted it, and guys who have left it off. Cerakote will last longer, but many of us here don't baby our guns, so they'll get beat up either way. Rattle can is about 10x cheaper, and you can retouch it/change it up whenever you want/need. Originally Posted By revottuneda4:
For some reason I like those delta forearms but god damn that mod0 is a work of art. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Hunterex:
Truth. I started with this https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/59096/Deltamod0-232118.JPG which ultimately became this https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/59096/CorrectMod0-232119.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Hunterex:
Originally Posted By vanquishings:
Amen to that, I went in thinking I'd do a psedo Mk12. It can't be done once you've set foot in here. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/59096/Deltamod0-232118.JPG which ultimately became this https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/59096/CorrectMod0-232119.JPG |
|
WTB:
A.R.M.S #36 swan sleeve-PEQ-2 or MOD with no notches for gen 3 PRI tube |
Originally Posted By prskiller:
I have 20s and 30s but prefer the 30s myself. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By prskiller:
Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Do you guys prefer 20rd mags or 30rd mags on your Mod 1s? Guess I'll have to buy some 20's to try them out for myself. I hear the 20's make it easier to shoot prone, but I just always extended the bipod legs out more when using 30rd mags. Never seemed to be a problem for me... |
|
|
Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Anyone else? Guess I'll have to buy some 20's to try them out for myself. I hear the 20's make it easier to shoot prone, but I just always extended the bipod legs out more when using 30rd mags. Never seemed to be a problem for me... View Quote |
|
WTB:
- LED ACOG 4x TA02-D-100393 - Aimpoint T2 - A.R.M.S #23 |
Has anyone heard of or used Ram Precision Ammo? They had MK262 loads (pretty sure the box said factory new ammo) for about 25 bucks. Didn't want to get any until I got an opinion. They're based just outside of Wichita, KS and from what I understand, and only sell at gun shows.
|
|
The ARFCOM 4 for NRA BOD
http://www.lou4nra.org/ http://www.knight4nra.com/ http://www.adamkraut.com/ |
Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Anyone else? Guess I'll have to buy some 20's to try them out for myself. I hear the 20's make it easier to shoot prone, but I just always extended the bipod legs out more when using 30rd mags. Never seemed to be a problem for me... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Originally Posted By prskiller:
Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Do you guys prefer 20rd mags or 30rd mags on your Mod 1s? Guess I'll have to buy some 20's to try them out for myself. I hear the 20's make it easier to shoot prone, but I just always extended the bipod legs out more when using 30rd mags. Never seemed to be a problem for me... |
|
http://www.amazon.com/Gentle-Propositions-J-S-Economos/dp/0615997635
|
Originally Posted By HARMS4X:
Question for you guys, how many people would be interested in a FAKE Suppressor for your MK12's? These would be for guys who live in the ban states or just don't want to go NFA. These would attach to the Allen or Ops brake and collar like a real one. I floated the idea to and he said its interesting. If I am out of line or crossing a line I will step back from the line. View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By bigbryce31186:
Has anyone heard of or used Ram Precision Ammo? They had MK262 loads (pretty sure the box said factory new ammo) for about 25 bucks. Didn't want to get any until I got an opinion. They're based just outside of Wichita, KS and from what I understand, and only sell at gun shows. View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By ABNglocker:
I used to see it all the time at the wichita and collisium shows. I have not used any of his match ammo. But didn't have any problems with just regular plinking ammo from him. Locally, I haven't heard anything bad about it. View Quote |
|
The ARFCOM 4 for NRA BOD
http://www.lou4nra.org/ http://www.knight4nra.com/ http://www.adamkraut.com/ |
Originally Posted By unstabl:
If anyone is needing a brake/collar setup, Capital Armory has them in stock. AEMB Brake, thread protector and crush washer $99 SPR collar $29 Shipping was $3.95 to me. View Quote |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By EagleBeak:
Hey, unstabl. I pulled the trigger on that brake and collar offer you shared. Good spot man! You saved me at least 20 bucks, probably more with that awesome shipping deal, and the hassle of research I've never done business with Capitol Armory, but I've have to keep them in mind now! View Quote |
|
"Attitudes are contagious. Mine might kill you."
|
HAPPY FATHERS DAY GUYS!!
HAVE A GREAT ON!! Off to the fiancée's LTC class. She practiced all day yesterday. |
|
WTB:
A.R.M.S #36 swan sleeve-PEQ-2 or MOD with no notches for gen 3 PRI tube |
|
Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Anyone else? Guess I'll have to buy some 20's to try them out for myself. I hear the 20's make it easier to shoot prone, but I just always extended the bipod legs out more when using 30rd mags. Never seemed to be a problem for me... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Originally Posted By prskiller:
Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Do you guys prefer 20rd mags or 30rd mags on your Mod 1s? Guess I'll have to buy some 20's to try them out for myself. I hear the 20's make it easier to shoot prone, but I just always extended the bipod legs out more when using 30rd mags. Never seemed to be a problem for me... I always liked them for range use/plinking and Mk12 use. 30's for SHTF. |
|
|
Originally Posted By HaveBlue83:
https://s8.postimg.org/nkpce5k9h/20170617_185541.jpg 1k. again. #shortbarrelclub View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By bigbryce31186:
Has anyone heard of or used Ram Precision Ammo? They had MK262 loads (pretty sure the box said factory new ammo) for about 25 bucks. Didn't want to get any until I got an opinion. They're based just outside of Wichita, KS and from what I understand, and only sell at gun shows. View Quote |
|
|
Still need an A.R.M.S. #36-EX 5.56 long rail to raise the 22M rings. I just keep missing the ones that pop up.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By StevieJ309:
They already make fake (airsoft) 12th Model suppressors. King Arms OPS 12th Model Silencer for S.P.R. Flash Hider. I bought one for the hell of it a while ago and it threads on fine. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By StevieJ309:
Originally Posted By exhogflyer:
Originally Posted By HARMS4X:
Question for you guys, how many people would be interested in a FAKE Suppressor for your MK12's? These would be for guys who live in the ban states or just don't want to go NFA. These would attach to the Allen or Ops brake and collar like a real one. I floated the idea to and he said its interesting. If I am out of line or crossing a line I will step back from the line. I bought one for the hell of it a while ago and it threads on fine. Can you shoot it though? |
|
|
I am trying to find the post that had the A.R.M.S.® #36™ S-Ex AR-10 they modded for the rear nights sight. I am thinking of buying the 3.5-15x50 F1 in the EE to run on my gun kinda like the Seal in the pics
|
|
|
Originally Posted By HARMS4X:
Question for you guys, how many people would be interested in a FAKE Suppressor for your MK12's? These would be for guys who live in the ban states or just don't want to go NFA. These would attach to the Allen or Ops brake and collar like a real one. I floated the idea to and he said its interesting. If I am out of line or crossing a line I will step back from the line. View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By SSOUNN:
Hope I'm late, but I'm INTERESTED in 1 maybe 2.. View Quote davey shot off the endcap on a king arms can lol. dont shoot with em |
|
|
Getting back into the Mk12 game and wondering if the Mk4 FDE is appropriate? I don't believe I have seen one mounted in the wild. Attached File
Optics Planet has a good deal with 10% off right now. Or stick with the more traditional Mk4 ? Attached File |
|
Trump is like having Godzilla as President -Aimless
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By revottuneda4:
I got a thing today... https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/181541/IMG-3455-233841.JPG View Quote |
|
- Looking for: FF Medium RAS
|
Originally Posted By eMc9001:
Now it begins. View Quote Attached File ETA: and paint..... |
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.