Will not comply

removed...krp

Untrue. This is about demoralizing the assholes.

nice pussy

You sure this isn't a 100 years ago today story?

My thoughts exactly. Seems like they wouldn't send you to prison for butt fucking.....crazy world.

Ok, so will they be arresting all the gay men for this or do they get a pass being a protected class?

Still stupid. I don't care if someone sticks in int another dude, or goat. Both are disgusting acts to me but I honestly do not give a shit if folks want to do it.

The goat might have some legitimate concerns on the topic though.

 
No other problems in America need addressing. Fucking party of dumb.

The law is already unconstitutional, and a waste of everyone's fucking time. DUMB SHIT BE DUMB.

snort

Well, what would be the difference?  Buttholes are still buttholes.

It's basically the gayest thing you can do with a woman.

I try to explain that to people from time to time.

The extreme left and extreme right aren't on a line, it's more like a loop with a small gap between the ends, just with different interests.

Did the Republicans introduce this? Michigan is a huge Democratic/Lib state.

Democrats want a big enough government to control everything. Republicans want a small enough government to fit in your bedroom.

I take it you are opposed to blow jobs too, because dudes have mouths as well?

You're right, it is unconstitutional and this discussion is a waste of everyone's time. Because MI did not pass a new law prohibiting oral or anal sex. End of story. The article is a blatant lie designed to stir up controversy and it seems it has been quite successful in doing so.

The law that was passed merely expanded the definition of animal abuse and created a new state prohibition on animal abusers adopting new animals from shelters for a period of five years post-conviction. Somehow, this animal statute's failure to amend the prohibition on oral/anal sex out of a much older (now unconstitutional) statute has been construed by the source of the article as "REPUBLICANS BAN ORAL/ANAL SEX!!!!!11111ONE!!!" Unfortunately, it seems that many here have fallen for the lie hook, line, and sinker.

Yep. Our roads are as smooth as glass now, a real thing to envy.

I think it made news because the law was under review, and they had a chance to change it, and didn't.

but the replies that gloss over every post concerning dog dick or goathole and just read the op will keep coming, I assure you

Should be that way all over the country.

Read Romans 1 starting at verse 26.

Between abortion and homos our nation is in for some real bad times if it doesn't get fixed

Does this mean the MI gov will now have to stop fucking the public in the ass?

They will never learn. And the hard left uses this shit to sway the younger voters.

Bullshit.

 
Florida....




798.02 Lewd and lascivious behavior.—If any man and woman, not being married to each other, lewdly and lasciviously associate and cohabit together, or if any man or woman, married or unmarried, engages in open and gross lewdness and lascivious behavior, they shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.




800.02 Unnatural and lascivious act.—A person who commits any unnatural and lascivious act with another person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. A mother’s breastfeeding of her baby does not under any circumstance violate this section.


 

Was going to be surprised if not on page 1.

I think we have bigger fish to fry than dudes banging.

This type of language will trigger the hurt feels and cause many GD posters to need a safe space.

Ya know how I keep hearing about how there is no blue law left and all that...

yeah, here's a case in point in why I have nothing but contempt for the religious right.

now, don't confuse that with religion...because that's not what I'm saying.  I'm saying it's why religion and politics can never be joined at the hip.

 

They just can't help themselves.  They start feeling good about their election chances, and they just feel compelled to start with the Wargarrbbl and throw it all away again.

by get fixed, you mean follow your religious law....I presume.

and if that is your meaning....come and make me because I will go out of my way to disobey any blue law I can (that is...without banging a dude) just to be spiteful.

THIS LAW IS ABOUT NOT FUCKING GOATS OR SUCKING DOG DICK

it amended an EXISTING STATUTE which contained provisions ALREADY STRUCK DOWN BY THE SC

I was just assured in another thread that morality would NEVER be pushed by representatives in government.

This is now a coming out thread. Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile

You probably don't see the irony of your post.



 

Reductionism doesn't work here.  Most people also have hands, therefore masturbation is gay.  See?  It's nonsensical.  Besides, that's not what I'm saying anyhow.

I'm saying buttfucking is the most gay thing you can do with a woman.


Consider it this way.  Penile-vaginal intercourse is "straight sex," unquestionably.  As soon as you do anything else, it calls into question whether it's even "sex" or not.  Obviously, there are legal definitions related to penetration of the body, but socially and colloquially, there are a lot of folks who, for example, don't consider a handy to be "sex," per se.  For another example, clothing-on dry humping, even to mutual climax, "doesn't count as sex" to a lot of high school kids.

Even if you do consider these things to be sex, there is a common social hierarchy of the acts, loosely ranking them based upon intimacy.  A handy might be "sex" to you, but it's a low form of intimacy within that spectrum.  A beej might be next (AKA "third base"), but intercourse is at the top (AKA "scoring," "home run," etc).

Buttfucking is the highest possible level of intimacy for two gay men.  It's the most gay thing that they can do.


For straight relationships, the highest possible level of intimacy is penile-vaginal intercourse.  Buttfucking is less intimate than that, plus it's a conscious rejection of the highest level of intimacy.  You're deliberately choosing NOT to fuck her right in the pussy, and instead pick the hole that has poop inside of it.

Unlike the use of manual or oral stimulation within foreplay (with the ultimate goal of "going all the way"), the anus is pretty much a dead end road.  Going ass to vag is asking for an uncomfortable infection.  I know they do it in the movies, but it's really inadvisable.  It's done for its own sake, on purpose, and in rejection of the vagina.


When a man rejects women entirely when it comes to sexual activity, that man is gay (we'll ignore the animal fuckers and solo adventurers for a moment).

When you partially reject a woman - especially the portions of her body which specifically make her feminine - I mean, maybe it doesn't make you completely gay, but it makes you partially gay.

In the case of buttfuckery, this is the most gay you can be while still having sex with a woman.  You've specifically rejected the vagina and sought out that act which is also the highest possible level of intimacy for gay men.

My object all sublime
I shall achieve in time —
To let the punishment fit the crime —
The punishment fit the crime;
And make each prisoner pent
Unwillingly represent
A source of innocent merriment!
Of innocent merriment!

and that's a fucking mistake, buttfuckers

That seems like way more of a breakdown than it needs to be.

I don't really see how giving a woman what she wants is in any way gay, but I don't read into it too much, I would rather just get busy and see where it ends up.

If you like to get intimate with the opposite sex, straight. If you like to get intimate with the same sex, gay. If you like to get intimate with both....party animal.

That information is incorrect.  Sodomy in the 4th degree was amended and listed as unconstitutional YEARS ago in Kentucky.  There is no law that targets same sex sexual relations in Kentucky.  It may still be in the lawbook but says in black and white it is unconstitutional and therefore unenforceable.  I was a Leo for 5 years here and worked a bunch of sexual assault cases.  The only sodomy statute that is enfocable here is forced (or in the case of the victim being underage, or unable to consent for some other reason).

ETA: It appears that the online searchable KRS still shows it listed with no amendments or footnotes.  Interesting.  The text version I've seen is different.

What if "what the woman wants" is to toss on a strap-on and do you in the butt?  If not pegging, then maybe some whips and chains type stuff?  When the car battery comes out, do you say the safe word?

The point here is not to solicit your personal limits of comfort, but simply to demonstrate that you surely have them.

Therefore, hiding behind an excuse that "Well, she likes it up the butt!" doesn't fly.  You have agency in this - take ownership of your actions.  You're still a consenting party to buttfuckery.


And look, if you want to stick your dick in poop for fun, that's none of my or anyone's business.  All I'm saying is, it's the most gay thing you can do with a woman.

Then you picked the wrong woman....at least for me anyway, but some straight dudes are probably into it.

However. I would contend even that isn't gay. It's still a man and a woman getting intimate, in whatever freaky kink they are into.