User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:22:41 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They just can't help themselves. They start feeling good about their election chances, and they just feel compelled to start with the Wargarrbbl and throw it all away again. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Dear Republicans, Just shut the fuck up about sex. Stick to limited government. Thanks. They just can't help themselves. They start feeling good about their election chances, and they just feel compelled to start with the Wargarrbbl and throw it all away again. So you two are pro-beastiality. Gotcha. Because you know, the senate bill in the article has nothing to do with consensual human relations at all, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:24:30 PM EDT
[#2]
This is fake, right?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:27:07 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, let me get this straight... they want to send a person to 15 years in prison for having anal sex; a place where having anal sex is part of the daily routine. It actually sounds pretty logical, when you put it that way. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:34:31 PM EDT
[#4]
So anal sex gets you 15. Where all you get is anal?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:37:03 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Stuff like this is why Republicans catch a lot of flak. Nothing in this bill improves the Nation or Economy. Gays are still going to pack fudge behind closed doors. You know, that's interesting actually. What do law makers say about gay marriage that is all the rage with new law like this? A.W.D. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:43:26 PM EDT
[#6]
This thread is an example of how stupid the voting public really is.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:45:37 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I might only be able to carry ten rounds....but at least I can legally get a blow job. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.frontiersmedia.com/frontiers-blog/2016/02/08/michigan-senate-passes-bill-that-makes-anal-sex-punishable-by-15-years-in-prison/ Oral too. Damn Michigan...you boring.  I might only be able to carry ten rounds....but at least I can legally get a blow job. This is sig line material. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:46:44 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Hey look! Republicans shooting their chances of reelection in the foot by passing stupid laws. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:47:13 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So you two are pro-beastiality. Gotcha. Because you know, the senate bill in the article has nothing to do with consensual human relations at all, right? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Dear Republicans, Just shut the fuck up about sex. Stick to limited government. Thanks. They just can't help themselves. They start feeling good about their election chances, and they just feel compelled to start with the Wargarrbbl and throw it all away again. So you two are pro-beastiality. Gotcha. Because you know, the senate bill in the article has nothing to do with consensual human relations at all, right? "Republican Senator Rick Jones’ SB 219 updates the ban to read: "A person who commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature either with mankind or with any animal is guilty of a felony.”" I think you may want to read that again. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:48:11 PM EDT
[#10]
They've never had a Sodomy law before?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:51:12 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
From the article: "Republican Senator Rick Jones’ SB 219 updates the ban to read: "A person who commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature either with mankind or with any animal is guilty of a felony.”" I think you may want to read that again. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Dear Republicans, Just shut the fuck up about sex. Stick to limited government. Thanks. They just can't help themselves. They start feeling good about their election chances, and they just feel compelled to start with the Wargarrbbl and throw it all away again. So you two are pro-beastiality. Gotcha. Because you know, the senate bill in the article has nothing to do with consensual human relations at all, right? "Republican Senator Rick Jones’ SB 219 updates the ban to read: "A person who commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature either with mankind or with any animal is guilty of a felony.”" I think you may want to read that again. yeah except the part you highlighted was already in the statute 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:53:45 PM EDT
[#12]
Grand Rapids is going to have a fit.
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:54:03 PM EDT
[#13]
Whatever that media source is they are biased and full of shit. I just read the bill, it does not add anything about sodomy or oral sex. That part is already in the existing law. The only changes to the laws is the section on penalties. The author of the story is pissed that the bill didn't remove the wording "abominable and detestable crime against nature either with mankind" from the existing law.
Read the bill yourself. Bold capital letters is what was added and strike throughs were removed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:55:41 PM EDT
[#14]
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2015-2016/billengrossed/Senate/htm/2015-SEBS-0219.htm
scroll to the very bottom the bolded bits are additions, strikethroughs are deletions, obviously ETA: beat 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:56:24 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: yeah except the part you highlighted was already in the statute Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: They just can't help themselves. They start feeling good about their election chances, and they just feel compelled to start with the Wargarrbbl and throw it all away again. So you two are pro-beastiality. Gotcha. Because you know, the senate bill in the article has nothing to do with consensual human relations at all, right? "Republican Senator Rick Jones’ SB 219 updates the ban to read: "A person who commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature either with mankind or with any animal is guilty of a felony.”" I think you may want to read that again. yeah except the part you highlighted was already in the statute |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:56:30 PM EDT
[#16]
Queen Victoria will be Pleased. Ha! Queen Victoria was no prude. Why do you think Prince Albert had a stud through his penis? All the British royals have been particularly perverse in their sexual predilections. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:58:31 PM EDT
[#17]
The "news" source is a biased liberal agenda drive site. Here are other "news" articles.
Louisiana House Votes to Retain Anti-Sodomy Law Will California’s Porn Stars Be Required to Wear Safety Goggles On Set? California Judge Rules Sexual Orientation Covered by 1972 Discrimination Law Michigan Voids 300 Same-Sex Marriages Which ‘Never Existed’ Being HIV Positive Is Not A Crime The Top 5 Sex Toys for Gay Men 10 Moments When 'American Horror Story' Went Balls-to-the-Wall Gay |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:00:43 PM EDT
[#18]
As usual, the senate has exempted itself from the laws it passes.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:00:43 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
From the article: "Republican Senator Rick Jones’ SB 219 updates the ban to read: "A person who commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature either with mankind or with any animal is guilty of a felony.”" I think you may want to read that again. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Dear Republicans, Just shut the fuck up about sex. Stick to limited government. Thanks. They just can't help themselves. They start feeling good about their election chances, and they just feel compelled to start with the Wargarrbbl and throw it all away again. So you two are pro-beastiality. Gotcha. Because you know, the senate bill in the article has nothing to do with consensual human relations at all, right? "Republican Senator Rick Jones’ SB 219 updates the ban to read: "A person who commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature either with mankind or with any animal is guilty of a felony.”" I think you may want to read that again. Sigh. As noted several times already, the 'mankind' bit was already on the books. Probably passed back when most of the people in this thread learned reading comprehension on little chalkboards, and null and void since 2003. SB219 is a law about animal abuse, not chocolate starfish abuse. So at best, the GD SJW Brigade can whine about Senator Jones not repealing that section, I suppose. But every idiot in this thread who thinks this article is about the evil GOP trying to stop the spread of blowjobs can now officially dub themselves a 'low information voter'. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:03:59 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ha! Queen Victoria was no prude. Why do you think Prince Albert had a stud through his penis? All the British royals have been particularly perverse in their sexual predilections. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Queen Victoria will be Pleased. Ha! Queen Victoria was no prude. Why do you think Prince Albert had a stud through his penis? All the British royals have been particularly perverse in their sexual predilections. Interdasting... so that's why it's named after him.... didn't know that.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:04:13 PM EDT
[#21]
Having solved all other pressing issues...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:08:43 PM EDT
[#22]
from the amendment:
Sec. 49. (1) As used in this section, "animal" means a vertebrate other than a human. Does that mean anal sex with invertebrates is legal in Michigan? I won't buy any more lobsters if they come from there! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:10:06 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Sigh. As noted several times already, the 'mankind' bit was already on the books. Probably passed back when most of the people in this thread learned reading comprehension on little chalkboards, and null and void since 2003. SB219 is a law about animal abuse, not chocolate starfish abuse. So at best, the GD SJW Brigade can whine about Senator Jones not repealing that section, I suppose. But every idiot in this thread who thinks this article is about the evil GOP trying to stop the spread of blowjobs can now officially dub themselves a 'low information voter'. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Dear Republicans, Just shut the fuck up about sex. Stick to limited government. Thanks. They just can't help themselves. They start feeling good about their election chances, and they just feel compelled to start with the Wargarrbbl and throw it all away again. So you two are pro-beastiality. Gotcha. Because you know, the senate bill in the article has nothing to do with consensual human relations at all, right? "Republican Senator Rick Jones’ SB 219 updates the ban to read: "A person who commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature either with mankind or with any animal is guilty of a felony.”" I think you may want to read that again. Sigh. As noted several times already, the 'mankind' bit was already on the books. Probably passed back when most of the people in this thread learned reading comprehension on little chalkboards, and null and void since 2003. SB219 is a law about animal abuse, not chocolate starfish abuse. So at best, the GD SJW Brigade can whine about Senator Jones not repealing that section, I suppose. But every idiot in this thread who thinks this article is about the evil GOP trying to stop the spread of blowjobs can now officially dub themselves a 'low information voter'. Dude. No moar BJs. You just committed a felony because your opinion sucks dick. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:10:59 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What if "what the woman wants" is to toss on a strap-on and do you in the butt? If not pegging, then maybe some whips and chains type stuff? When the car battery comes out, do you say the safe word? The point here is not to solicit your personal limits of comfort, but simply to demonstrate that you surely have them. Therefore, hiding behind an excuse that "Well, she likes it up the butt!" doesn't fly. You have agency in this - take ownership of your actions. You're still a consenting party to buttfuckery. And look, if you want to stick your dick in poop for fun, that's none of my or anyone's business. All I'm saying is, it's the most gay thing you can do with a woman. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I don't really see how giving a woman what she wants is in any way gay, but I don't read into it too much, I would rather just get busy and see where it ends up. What if "what the woman wants" is to toss on a strap-on and do you in the butt? If not pegging, then maybe some whips and chains type stuff? When the car battery comes out, do you say the safe word? The point here is not to solicit your personal limits of comfort, but simply to demonstrate that you surely have them. Therefore, hiding behind an excuse that "Well, she likes it up the butt!" doesn't fly. You have agency in this - take ownership of your actions. You're still a consenting party to buttfuckery. And look, if you want to stick your dick in poop for fun, that's none of my or anyone's business. All I'm saying is, it's the most gay thing you can do with a woman. "But I poop from there". |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:14:27 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Stuff like this is why Republicans catch a lot of flak. Nothing in this bill improves the Nation or Economy. Gays are still going to pack fudge behind closed doors. Pretty much. It's a 100% unenforceable law that will tossed by the supreme court like a bad salad. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:15:17 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"But I poop from there". Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't really see how giving a woman what she wants is in any way gay, but I don't read into it too much, I would rather just get busy and see where it ends up. What if "what the woman wants" is to toss on a strap-on and do you in the butt? If not pegging, then maybe some whips and chains type stuff? When the car battery comes out, do you say the safe word? The point here is not to solicit your personal limits of comfort, but simply to demonstrate that you surely have them. Therefore, hiding behind an excuse that "Well, she likes it up the butt!" doesn't fly. You have agency in this - take ownership of your actions. You're still a consenting party to buttfuckery. And look, if you want to stick your dick in poop for fun, that's none of my or anyone's business. All I'm saying is, it's the most gay thing you can do with a woman. "But I poop from there". true story, poop chute is a 1-way street brah |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:17:01 PM EDT
[#27]
Republicans...still trying to tell people how to fuck...sheesh
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:39:49 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Sigh. As noted several times already, the 'mankind' bit was already on the books. Probably passed back when most of the people in this thread learned reading comprehension on little chalkboards, and null and void since 2003. SB219 is a law about animal abuse, not chocolate starfish abuse. So at best, the GD SJW Brigade can whine about Senator Jones not repealing that section, I suppose. But every idiot in this thread who thinks this article is about the evil GOP trying to stop the spread of blowjobs can now officially dub themselves a 'low information voter'. Even with the updates several of us has posted about the source of the article being a biased liberal group and the statements that the wording was already in the existing law not in the new bill, people here still aren't paying attention. The problem is the GOP used to do that type of thing, so for many it isn't a far stretch to think it is still happening. Recent example is "pregnancy from rape is a blessing" and Republicans trying to block birth control from being covered by insurance. Since it is an election year the "ban all abortions" statements have been made. Last year it was the ban on gay marriage. All these social issues that the Republicans keep bringing up and pushing are why people don't question a news article like this. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:40:58 PM EDT
[#29]
1. The news stories are misleading, just like they were in Virginia.
2. Republicans can rightly say "hey, we didn't write that, that was already there", just like they could in Virginia. 3. Democrats will use the story locally and nationally, and it will have an effect, just like it did in Virginia. Just like in Virginia, this isn't about Republicans wanting to ban blow jobs- it's about the Republicans' obdurate unwillingness to play defensive ball. If there's legislation or excerpts thereof that are "null and void", then Republicans need to be the first ones to be lining up to get rid of it, even if, nay, especially if that means having to answer uncomfortable questions about other people's personal choices from constituents. As it is, Democrats will continue to capitalize on a narrative that Republicans want only freedom and small government for straight white guys, and they'll do it by claiming that Republicans either inserted the language, or when confronted with facts will assert that Republicans actively choose to leave that kind of language intact because they hope to someday actually use it. I'm not even sure that's wrong at this point. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:42:36 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Hey look! Republicans shooting their chances of reelection in the foot by passing stupid laws. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:08:42 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Damn, when they wanted to fix the lead pipes in the state, they really fixed the pipes! they need all the gays that they plan on locking up. you wanna clean pipes then clean Flints pipes. Nomo-homo pro-bono. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:20:46 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
true story, poop chute is a 1-way street brah Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
"But I poop from there". true story, poop chute is a 1-way street brah If your pooper reversed directions for any other reason, you'd be going to a doctor real quick to get them to fix the problem. But, apparently, if it's a penis, well, that somehow makes perfect sense in Buttfuckerland. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:23:33 PM EDT
[#33]
Why are they so worried about buttholes?
Fucking jackoffs have nothing better to do |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:25:44 PM EDT
[#34]
A sodomy law... time for a joke. Do you know the difference between oral sex and anal sex? Oral sex makes your day... anal sex makes your whole week (hole weak)
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:28:12 PM EDT
[#35]
The irony right?
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So consensual participation of anal could lead to forcible participation of anal? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:28:15 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Even though this bill is obsentively intended for fixing the menace that is animal buggery in Michigan...is this really even a problem so big in Michigan that it demands legislative action? If you're the kind of sick fuck would would nail a dog in the ass or suck his dick...threatening you with felony charges isn't going to have any effect on your behavior whatsoever. And if you are that type of person, you need the professional services of a psychiatrist, not prison. same could be said of any law, to include murder. either elected officials have the right to pass laws or they don't. federalism, how does it work? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:28:56 PM EDT
[#37]
Better send every one of those chumps away for ass fucking their constituents, with no Vaseline.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:32:28 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, let me get this straight... they want to send a person to 15 years in prison for having anal sex; a place where having anal sex is part of the daily routine. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:34:41 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
So, let me get this straight... they want to send a person to 15 years in prison for having anal sex; a place where having anal sex is part of the daily routine. well if its up the ass they want then they wont mind going will they. once word gets out it will be like a regular Home interior party in there. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:35:35 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"But I poop from there". Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't really see how giving a woman what she wants is in any way gay, but I don't read into it too much, I would rather just get busy and see where it ends up. What if "what the woman wants" is to toss on a strap-on and do you in the butt? If not pegging, then maybe some whips and chains type stuff? When the car battery comes out, do you say the safe word? The point here is not to solicit your personal limits of comfort, but simply to demonstrate that you surely have them. Therefore, hiding behind an excuse that "Well, she likes it up the butt!" doesn't fly. You have agency in this - take ownership of your actions. You're still a consenting party to buttfuckery. And look, if you want to stick your dick in poop for fun, that's none of my or anyone's business. All I'm saying is, it's the most gay thing you can do with a woman. "But I poop from there". Doing a woman up the ass is gay? Who knew. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:37:26 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Hey look! Republicans shooting their chances of reelection in the foot by passing stupid laws. We got stuck with Terry in Virginia for the same fucking issue!!! Go ahead and nominate Cruz you fucking fools. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:38:52 PM EDT
[#42]
Guess I'll have to visit a different state for my horsefuckery fix.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:42:16 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Even though this bill is obsentively intended for fixing the menace that is animal buggery in Michigan...is this really even a problem so big in Michigan that it demands legislative action? If you're the kind of sick fuck would would nail a dog in the ass or suck his dick...threatening you with felony charges isn't going to have any effect on your behavior whatsoever. And if you are that type of person, you need the professional services of a psychiatrist, not prison. Agreed, having laws like this is stupid, you are not gonna stop it. Just like the war on drugs, you can't stop people from committing such acts. Hell, I've known a couple of girls in High School that liked that kinda stuff. Lord knows how far into it they are or what they done. Just stick to the current Animal Cruelty laws and leave it be. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:47:50 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So you two are pro-beastiality. Gotcha. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Dear Republicans, Just shut the fuck up about sex. Stick to limited government. Thanks. They just can't help themselves. They start feeling good about their election chances, and they just feel compelled to start with the Wargarrbbl and throw it all away again. So you two are pro-beastiality. Gotcha. Hey, I'm not the one from Michigan - where apparently fucking your pet in the ass is such a common problem that the state legislature had to drop all other important business to address the issue. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:53:19 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Doing a woman up the ass is gay? Who knew. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't really see how giving a woman what she wants is in any way gay, but I don't read into it too much, I would rather just get busy and see where it ends up. What if "what the woman wants" is to toss on a strap-on and do you in the butt? If not pegging, then maybe some whips and chains type stuff? When the car battery comes out, do you say the safe word? The point here is not to solicit your personal limits of comfort, but simply to demonstrate that you surely have them. Therefore, hiding behind an excuse that "Well, she likes it up the butt!" doesn't fly. You have agency in this - take ownership of your actions. You're still a consenting party to buttfuckery. And look, if you want to stick your dick in poop for fun, that's none of my or anyone's business. All I'm saying is, it's the most gay thing you can do with a woman. "But I poop from there". Doing a woman up the ass is gay? Who knew. I would have thought someone would have posted the punchline by now
Check it and see... But I Poop From There |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:56:53 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Wait.....Did they need to pass this because people were fucking animals in a ass? WTF Michigan? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:57:38 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Doing a woman up the ass is gay? Who knew. In GD it is, but checking someones oil in the locker room is all in good fun. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:59:37 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Guess I'll have to visit a different state for my horsefuckery fix. Now we're losing our tourists. Great. Just great. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:00:34 PM EDT
[#49]
"But I poop from there".
And this is why I keep coming back to GD. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:03:46 PM EDT
[#50]
I should be happy when I see conservative politicians in other states being as stupid as the ones from the south, but oddly I'm not.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
