User Panel
Quoted: I hate to be a needy bitch but can someone help me out with links? ( I know some of them were posted in this thread but I aint going back to read) Site search is working for me... Also, does anyone have Dindu_Nuffin getting found familiar? I can't remember the thread. Thanks guys View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I'm debating unlocking him, I think I'll wait to see what the Second Guessing Committee says. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Damn Aimless is on a rampage!( don't ban me bro) http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1733166_RIP_SJPD_officer_Michael_Johnson_.html&page=1#i52791463 Looks like InfiniteGrim and nchapa got banninated. Poor Infinitegrin. It really is dangerous to be right in the face of wrong. Not the hill I would of chosen to die on, but I have to commend him for standing for his principles Fuck him. And I actually agree with nchapa's ban. Condemning site staff or moderators for letting that shit go on is retarded. Eh, he didn't really do anything wrong. He wasn't directly accusing the mods IMO. I think he was collateral damage resulting from the severely rustled jimmies caused by the other guy. Unlock Vito instead |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Fuck him. And I actually agree with nchapa's ban. Condemning site staff or moderators for letting that shit go on is retarded. Eh, he didn't really do anything wrong. He wasn't directly accusing the mods IMO. I think he was collateral damage resulting from the severely rustled jimmies caused by the other guy. He didn't do anything wrong. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Alright I belive I have fixed my spreadsheet issues. What do ya'll think? (Still a work in progress)
View Quote troll accounts need id'd....as in zaminskiy: troll account for nationwide, samtsx: troll/retread account for dantsx, thespaniard: troll account for gseriesfal, etc. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
View Quote I'm pretty sure there is a correlation between mental retardation and SKS ownership. |
|
Spent_Casing got banned a few weeks back so I added him to the list.
As well as a few others. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Someone in this thread seems.....familiar.... Go on.... Hint: he joined this month. Hint, I joined before they were banned. Hell, the one guy got banned for pretty much sticking up for cops. Seems like a bad ban, whatever. Not my circus, not my monkeys. |
|
|
|
|
In response to the spreadsheet - there's only one "t" in vito113
|
|
View Quote I'm pretty sure it will reference something about missing fingers. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
In response to the spreadsheet - there's only one "t" in vito113 Its fixed in the OP spreadsheet. You realize that your professor just deducted 5 points from your final , right? Edit because smart phones are really stupid. |
|
Quoted:
You realize that your professor just deducted 5 p points from your final , right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
In response to the spreadsheet - there's only one "t" in vito113 Its fixed in the OP spreadsheet. You realize that your professor just deducted 5 p points from your final , right? Some day, DKProf will have an arfcommer in his class. I don't know whether it'd be better if they knew or not. |
|
Quoted: You realize that your professor just deducted 5 points from your final , right? Edit because smart phones are really stupid. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: In response to the spreadsheet - there's only one "t" in vito113 Its fixed in the OP spreadsheet. You realize that your professor just deducted 5 points from your final , right? Edit because smart phones are really stupid. I liked it better before your edit |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
In response to the spreadsheet - there's only one "t" in vito113 Its fixed in the OP spreadsheet. You realize that your professor just deducted 5 points from your final , right? Edit because smart phones are really stupid. I liked it better before your edit |
|
|
|
|
Arock?? nobody in the august hierarchy coming up with earlier bans from the awesome archives? I remember Sgtar15, and I'm pretty sure some crashed between him and Arock. Arock c&b just before I got here.
I'm pretty sure that the guy that bragged about almost shooting the bum at the carwash twanged the magic twanger. (And that was one of my favorite threads of all time.) |
|
|
Apparently you can't accuse the mods of supporting ISIS, JDtalon didn't know that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Alright I belive I have fixed my spreadsheet issues. What do ya'll think? (Still a work in progress)
View Quote The reason column should probably say something more detailed than "General COC violations", like what actually got them banned. We know it was a COC violation, otherwise they would not be banned. Or is it just a place holder until you can get the specific reason? For instance, 36_gauge got banned for posting large chunks of the sample text in a bunch of threads, allowed back in, followed by the original arfcockalypse. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quoted:
The reason column should probably say something more detailed than "General COC violations", like what actually got them banned. We know it was a COC violation, otherwise they would not be banned. Or is it just a place holder until you can get the specific reason? For instance, 36_gauge got banned for posting large chunks of the sample text in a bunch of threads, allowed back in, followed by the original arfcockalypse. View Quote I wasn't aware that 36_gauge did a arfcockalypse. I thought he just did the text. |
|
Quoted: I wasn't aware that 36_gauge did a arfcockalypse. I thought he just did the text. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The reason column should probably say something more detailed than "General COC violations", like what actually got them banned. We know it was a COC violation, otherwise they would not be banned. Or is it just a place holder until you can get the specific reason? For instance, 36_gauge got banned for posting large chunks of the sample text in a bunch of threads, allowed back in, followed by the original arfcockalypse. I wasn't aware that 36_gauge did a arfcockalypse. I thought he just did the text. Ya, that's new. I'm updating the reasons for those banned as much as I can. The OP has about half updated so far. |
|
Quoted:
Ya, that's new. I'm updating the reasons for those banned as much as I can. The OP has about half updated so far. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The reason column should probably say something more detailed than "General COC violations", like what actually got them banned. We know it was a COC violation, otherwise they would not be banned. Or is it just a place holder until you can get the specific reason? For instance, 36_gauge got banned for posting large chunks of the sample text in a bunch of threads, allowed back in, followed by the original arfcockalypse. I wasn't aware that 36_gauge did a arfcockalypse. I thought he just did the text. Ya, that's new. I'm updating the reasons for those banned as much as I can. The OP has about half updated so far. 36_gauge was banned for repeated posting of huge amounts of text. He did not participate in arfcockalypse. I'm not sure where not_sure came up with that info. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Surprised no one has called Bama to the Pit over that yet. View Quote To what end? Bama's comment was about an ACCIDENTAL shooting of a woman involved in a domestic dispute, when the officer correctly fired his weapon at an attacking dog during a somewhat chaotic situation. It's the observation of a police officer who may have been involved in similar situations, and presumably reflects the pragmatic observation that "shit happens" in dangerous situations reality. InfiinteGrim's comment was about the MURDER of a police officer on duty by a psychotic criminal, and only posted in order to shit in the thread. It's the observation of a passive-aggressive smartass bitch, reflecting his own butthurt and desire to troll. . And, FYI, he was banned, not for that comment alone, but on the basis of his FOUR PRIOR BANS on his account. |
|
Quoted:
To what end? Bama's comment was about an ACCIDENTAL shooting of a woman involved in a domestic dispute, when the officer correctly fired his weapon at an attacking dog during a somewhat chaotic situation. It's the observation of a police officer who may have been involved in similar situations, and presumably reflects the pragmatic observation that "shit happens" in dangerous situations reality. InfiinteGrim's comment was about the MURDER of a police officer on duty by a psychotic criminal, and only posted in order to shit in the thread. It's the observation of a passive-aggressive smartass bitch, reflecting his own butthurt and desire to troll. . And, FYI, he was banned, not for that comment alone, but on the basis of his FOUR PRIOR BANS on his account. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Surprised no one has called Bama to the Pit over that yet. To what end? Bama's comment was about an ACCIDENTAL shooting of a woman involved in a domestic dispute, when the officer correctly fired his weapon at an attacking dog during a somewhat chaotic situation. It's the observation of a police officer who may have been involved in similar situations, and presumably reflects the pragmatic observation that "shit happens" in dangerous situations reality. InfiinteGrim's comment was about the MURDER of a police officer on duty by a psychotic criminal, and only posted in order to shit in the thread. It's the observation of a passive-aggressive smartass bitch, reflecting his own butthurt and desire to troll. . And, FYI, he was banned, not for that comment alone, but on the basis of his FOUR PRIOR BANS on his account. "The officer was later cleared of any wrongdoing." One shooting has been cleared by the DA the other was not. |
|
Quoted:
To what end? Bama's comment was about an ACCIDENTAL shooting of a woman involved in a domestic dispute, when the officer correctly fired his weapon at an attacking dog during a somewhat chaotic situation. It's the observation of a police officer who may have been involved in similar situations, and presumably reflects the pragmatic observation that "shit happens" in dangerous situations reality. InfiinteGrim's comment was about the MURDER of a police officer on duty by a psychotic criminal, and only posted in order to shit in the thread. It's the observation of a passive-aggressive smartass bitch, reflecting his own butthurt and desire to troll. . And, FYI, he was banned, not for that comment alone, but on the basis of his FOUR PRIOR BANS on his account. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Surprised no one has called Bama to the Pit over that yet. To what end? Bama's comment was about an ACCIDENTAL shooting of a woman involved in a domestic dispute, when the officer correctly fired his weapon at an attacking dog during a somewhat chaotic situation. It's the observation of a police officer who may have been involved in similar situations, and presumably reflects the pragmatic observation that "shit happens" in dangerous situations reality. InfiinteGrim's comment was about the MURDER of a police officer on duty by a psychotic criminal, and only posted in order to shit in the thread. It's the observation of a passive-aggressive smartass bitch, reflecting his own butthurt and desire to troll. . And, FYI, he was banned, not for that comment alone, but on the basis of his FOUR PRIOR BANS on his account. Simmer down man, you'll note that I'm not sporting an avatar or sigline about the incident. I was merely commenting that, given how many folks are upset about it, it was surprising no one had actually done anything about it. Not endorsing any such course of action. |
|
Lets list the things InfiniteGrim has been given a timeout over…
1) Cheaper Than Dirt “Edit” LINK 2) Calling out a guy in the EE selling knockoffs LINK 3) Changing title of EE add to include “Sold” in bold to save people time from clicking it. This was before you could mark ads as sold/closed 4) Using the Phrase “Jew Him Down” over something given out to a select group on arfcom and was never meant to be sold. Think Cola Warrior SWAG but much worse. LINK Such Heinous Crimes. Clearly those locks indicate a pattern of trolling and just a shitty member. Good thing that shitbird didn’t contribute anything in the tech forums or anything… |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.