User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
MT, USA
|
Posted: 10/2/2015 9:50:50 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Conqueror:
Something fishy going on with those pics. The first pic (with the case and magazine) shows a barrel with the flash hider right up against the gas block. The third picture shows a barrel with the 1-inch "choad". My ARX barrel looks like the first picture but it it well under 10" long by ATF-style measurement. I think you will get a barrel like pic #3 if you buy the factory 10.25" Beretta barrel. The Botach site is also fishy. The pictured barrel is a 12.5" military barrel for use with the 15-slot handguards. And the pictured rifles are photoshopped but show the flash hider right against the gas block, which is again impossible for a 10.25" barrel on a production ARX. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Conqueror:
Originally Posted By ak47Dennis:
Did anyone see this, Got an email from there web sight saying they are available. http://www.berettausa.com/en-us/arx100-10-25-in-barrel-kit-barrel-kit/jxc111/ Seems odd they have them listed under kits & parts and not barrels Something fishy going on with those pics. The first pic (with the case and magazine) shows a barrel with the flash hider right up against the gas block. The third picture shows a barrel with the 1-inch "choad". My ARX barrel looks like the first picture but it it well under 10" long by ATF-style measurement. I think you will get a barrel like pic #3 if you buy the factory 10.25" Beretta barrel. The Botach site is also fishy. The pictured barrel is a 12.5" military barrel for use with the 15-slot handguards. And the pictured rifles are photoshopped but show the flash hider right against the gas block, which is again impossible for a 10.25" barrel on a production ARX. Here's what you get. 
|
|
|
MT, USA
|
Posted: 10/3/2015 5:20:18 PM EDT
[#2]
I case you aren't aware there is a guy on eBay selling enhanced charging handles. They provide a significant amount of surface area which makes charging the weapon a lot easier on your finger. I am in no way associated with the seller.
I should have a factory enhanced knob in soon to compare. |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 10/3/2015 7:31:59 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sunnybean:
I case you aren't aware there is a guy on eBay selling enhanced charging handles. They provide a significant amount of surface area which makes charging the weapon a lot easier on your finger. I am in no way associated with the seller. <a href="http://s897.photobucket.com/user/AssSupt/media/ARX100/305FBF71-F3B6-422F-B3CE-7D423E1C83D7_zps8kgqlgpk.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i897.photobucket.com/albums/ac180/AssSupt/ARX100/305FBF71-F3B6-422F-B3CE-7D423E1C83D7_zps8kgqlgpk.jpg</a> <a href="http://s897.photobucket.com/user/AssSupt/media/ARX100/8124CE1A-5AE5-4AC4-9673-3EA1A351649C_zpsfci1stzn.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i897.photobucket.com/albums/ac180/AssSupt/ARX100/8124CE1A-5AE5-4AC4-9673-3EA1A351649C_zpsfci1stzn.jpg</a> I should have a factory enhanced knob in soon to compare. I've seen those. They still allow switching L/R side. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/3/2015 8:11:49 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryI've seen those. They still allow switching L/R side. This is in the selling description. Hassle free installation. No modifications are needed to your rifle. The Enhanced Charging Handle is larger than the factory charging handle providing a more positive method of charging, especially in stress fire situations. Ribbed body reduces the chance of your fingers or hand slipping off the charging handle during stress fire situations. Rounded edges provide a snag free operation. All edges are deburred for the shooters safety. The Enhanced Charging Handle retains the ambidextrous functionality of the factory charging handle. Manufactured from carbon steel. Manganese phosphate finished matte black per mil-spec. I may pick one of these up. I actually don't mind the charging handle, but i wouldn't complain if it was easier on the hands. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/3/2015 8:12:40 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Double0Fox]
[#5]
|
|
|
|
MT, USA
|
Posted: 10/3/2015 8:15:03 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Master_Blaster:
I've seen those. They still allow switching L/R side. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Master_Blaster:
Originally Posted By sunnybean:
I case you aren't aware there is a guy on eBay selling enhanced charging handles. They provide a significant amount of surface area which makes charging the weapon a lot easier on your finger. I am in no way associated with the seller. <a href="http://s897.photobucket.com/user/AssSupt/media/ARX100/305FBF71-F3B6-422F-B3CE-7D423E1C83D7_zps8kgqlgpk.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i897.photobucket.com/albums/ac180/AssSupt/ARX100/305FBF71-F3B6-422F-B3CE-7D423E1C83D7_zps8kgqlgpk.jpg</a> <a href="http://s897.photobucket.com/user/AssSupt/media/ARX100/8124CE1A-5AE5-4AC4-9673-3EA1A351649C_zpsfci1stzn.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i897.photobucket.com/albums/ac180/AssSupt/ARX100/8124CE1A-5AE5-4AC4-9673-3EA1A351649C_zpsfci1stzn.jpg</a> I should have a factory enhanced knob in soon to compare. I've seen those. They still allow switching L/R side. Yes. This handle does not change function of the switchable handle at all. The added length and width does not effect anything but increased surface area for your finger. I do believe the factory enhancement does not allow for the handle to pass through the port unless it is pulled off (held on by a spring clip) and then put back on. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/3/2015 8:18:57 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Double0Fox]
[#7]
Install Video:
|
|
|
|
MT, USA
|
Posted: 10/3/2015 8:25:36 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryHadnt seen that but should help those that haven't done this before. At about 2:30 in that video is where I had the punch slip and just about poke a hole in my thumbnail. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/17/2015 9:31:21 AM EDT
[#9]
Thread needs a bump
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/19/2015 5:50:46 PM EDT
[#10]
Bought one of the handles. Will post a quick review when it comes. I described this exact design when the ARX first came out, it always seemed like a taller/wider handle would still be able to pass through the ejection port.
|
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 10/21/2015 9:51:28 AM EDT
[#11]
Just got my ARX 100 in and seem to really like it so far, has anybody cut to 14.5" and permed a flash hider? Would it require any gas port work?
Thanks- Shea |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 10/22/2015 3:31:05 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Master_Blaster]
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Shea77:
Just got my ARX 100 in and seem to really like it so far, has anybody cut to 14.5" and permed a flash hider? Would it require any gas port work? Thanks- Shea Haven't cut the bbl., but 1.5" reduction shouldn't cause functional issues, really. My concern would be that there wouldn't be a shoulder to torque the FH against. |
|
|
ITA
|
Posted: 10/22/2015 1:08:39 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Master_Blaster:
Haven't cut the bbl., but 1.5" reduction shouldn't cause functional issues, really. My concern would be that there wouldn't be a shoulder to torque the FH against. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Master_Blaster:
Originally Posted By Shea77:
Just got my ARX 100 in and seem to really like it so far, has anybody cut to 14.5" and permed a flash hider? Would it require any gas port work? Thanks- Shea Haven't cut the bbl., but 1.5" reduction shouldn't cause functional issues, really. My concern would be that there wouldn't be a shoulder to torque the FH against. A shouder can ve added with a sort of washer the same way it's done with pencil barrel AR |
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 10/22/2015 2:25:02 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Master_Blaster:
Haven't cut the bbl., but 1.5" reduction shouldn't cause functional issues, really. My concern would be that there wouldn't be a shoulder to torque the FH against. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Master_Blaster:
Originally Posted By Shea77:
Just got my ARX 100 in and seem to really like it so far, has anybody cut to 14.5" and permed a flash hider? Would it require any gas port work? Thanks- Shea Haven't cut the bbl., but 1.5" reduction shouldn't cause functional issues, really. My concern would be that there wouldn't be a shoulder to torque the FH against. Thank you, I was thinking 1.5" shouldn't be an issue. |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 10/22/2015 3:16:01 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Frens:
A shouder can ve added with a sort of washer the same way it's done with pencil barrel AR Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Frens:
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:
Originally Posted By Shea77:
Just got my ARX 100 in and seem to really like it so far, has anybody cut to 14.5" and permed a flash hider? Would it require any gas port work? Thanks- Shea Haven't cut the bbl., but 1.5" reduction shouldn't cause functional issues, really. My concern would be that there wouldn't be a shoulder to torque the FH against. A shouder can ve added with a sort of washer the same way it's done with pencil barrel AR How does a washer mitigate translating the pressure into the narrowed bbl profile? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2015 6:51:59 PM EDT
[Last Edit: ak47Dennis]
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sunnybean: I case you aren't aware there is a guy on eBay selling enhanced charging handles. They provide a significant amount of surface area which makes charging the weapon a lot easier on your finger. I am in no way associated with the seller. http://i897.photobucket.com/albums/ac180/AssSupt/ARX100/305FBF71-F3B6-422F-B3CE-7D423E1C83D7_zps8kgqlgpk.jpg http://i897.photobucket.com/albums/ac180/AssSupt/ARX100/8124CE1A-5AE5-4AC4-9673-3EA1A351649C_zpsfci1stzn.jpg I should have a factory enhanced knob in soon to compare. My charging handle arrived today. Easy to install and construction appears to be better then the original. This is the charging handle Beretta should have installed.  |
|
|
|
OR, USA
|
Posted: 10/22/2015 7:30:52 PM EDT
[Last Edit: AubrayJ]
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Master_Blaster:
How does a washer mitigate translating the pressure into the narrowed bbl profile? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Master_Blaster:
Originally Posted By Frens:
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:
Originally Posted By Shea77:
Just got my ARX 100 in and seem to really like it so far, has anybody cut to 14.5" and permed a flash hider? Would it require any gas port work? Thanks- Shea Haven't cut the bbl., but 1.5" reduction shouldn't cause functional issues, really. My concern would be that there wouldn't be a shoulder to torque the FH against. A shouder can ve added with a sort of washer the same way it's done with pencil barrel AR How does a washer mitigate translating the pressure into the narrowed bbl profile? A washer is a thin plate (typically disk-shaped) with a hole (typically in the middle) that is normally used to distribute the load of a threaded fastener, such as a screw or nut. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washer_(hardware) AJ |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2015 10:59:51 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AubrayJ: A washer is a thin plate (typically disk-shaped) with a hole (typically in the middle) that is normally used to distribute the load of a threaded fastener, such as a screw or nut. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washer_(hardware) AJ Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AubrayJ: Originally Posted By Master_Blaster: Originally Posted By Frens: Originally Posted By Master_Blaster: Originally Posted By Shea77: Just got my ARX 100 in and seem to really like it so far, has anybody cut to 14.5" and permed a flash hider? Would it require any gas port work? Thanks- Shea Haven't cut the bbl., but 1.5" reduction shouldn't cause functional issues, really. My concern would be that there wouldn't be a shoulder to torque the FH against. A shouder can ve added with a sort of washer the same way it's done with pencil barrel AR How does a washer mitigate translating the pressure into the narrowed bbl profile? A washer is a thin plate (typically disk-shaped) with a hole (typically in the middle) that is normally used to distribute the load of a threaded fastener, such as a screw or nut. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washer_(hardware) AJ Do we have to point out that if the base of the flash hider is larger than the torque shoulder of the barrel, using an even larger washer will accomplish fuck-all? Actually look at the Beretta barrel, specifically 1.5 inches back from the muzzle. |
|
|
|
ITA
|
Posted: 10/23/2015 4:35:41 PM EDT
[#19]
I meant a step bushing like you can see in this thread
https://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=577750 |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2015 11:07:36 PM EDT
[Last Edit: ak47Dennis]
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Frens: I meant a step bushing like you can see in this thread https://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=577750 Hey wait a minute your in Italy, how about hooking us up with the Military ARX160 flash hiders  So we can chop our barrels to 16" with the flash hider. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/25/2015 9:25:22 PM EDT
[#21]
I ordered one of those enhanced charging handles. I will report back.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/26/2015 3:34:18 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CFII:
I ordered one of those enhanced charging handles. I will report back. I just got mine yesterday and it looks good. Have not installed yet. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2015 8:05:05 AM EDT
[#23]
I installed my new charging handle. Some thoughts...
1. It is NOT hot-swappable from side to side. It runs into the front of the ejection port. It is about 3-4mm too long to successfully swing through. You can swap it side-to-side if you partially field strip the gun like you are going to remove the bolt carrier. 2. It is a flat black phosphate finish rather than the glossy nitriding of the BCG and factory handle, so it looks a little out of place. 3. That said, it is definitely a better charging handle. The size and shape are a significant improvement over the stock handle. I will be keeping it on my rifle but I am disappointed that it does not work ambidextrously as advertised. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2015 9:56:12 AM EDT
[#24]
I installed mine as well and actually went back to the stock one for the reasons the previous post stated. It is a well made part and a good idea just not quite what it needs to be for me.
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 10/28/2015 4:18:18 PM EDT
[#25]
Maybe grind it down enough to swing through the port?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2015 4:33:45 PM EDT
[#26]
You could certainly do that and it would likely work fine. I just am not into modifying parts much. It works as is and is made very well just doesn't do everything the stock one will so I will just stick with the stock one and throw this one in EE for $20 shipped and call it a day.
|
|
|
|
ITA
|
Posted: 10/29/2015 8:23:53 AM EDT
[#27]
Unless you're changing the CH side dozen of times every range trip I dont really see the issue
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2015 10:58:10 AM EDT
[#28]
It's not an issue, I just decided I prefer the stock one and decided to use it.
|
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 10/29/2015 11:24:37 AM EDT
[#29]
I have no issues at all with the stock charging handle but I'm happy to see an aftermarket starting to come out for the ARX.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2015 3:27:36 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Frens:
Unless you're changing the CH side dozen of times every range trip I dont really see the issue True for most users. I am a lefty and I teach a lot of righties so I really liked the rapid swap feature. But it's not the end of the world. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2015 6:07:26 PM EDT
[#31]
Got the CH. Seems like a nice piece. Need to install it.
|
|
|
|
MT, USA
|
Posted: 10/31/2015 11:37:19 AM EDT
[Last Edit: sunnybean]
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Conqueror:
I installed my new charging handle. Some thoughts... 1. It is NOT hot-swappable from side to side. It runs into the front of the ejection port. It is about 3-4mm too long to successfully swing through. You can swap it side-to-side if you partially field strip the gun like you are going to remove the bolt carrier. 2. It is a flat black phosphate finish rather than the glossy nitriding of the BCG and factory handle, so it looks a little out of place. 3. That said, it is definitely a better charging handle. The size and shape are a significant improvement over the stock handle. I will be keeping it on my rifle but I am disappointed that it does not work ambidextrously as advertised. You do not need to field strip anything. Just go about swapping it like normal. The only difference is that when you pull the handle out so that it can swing around you just pull back on the handle so the carrier moves the 3-4mm to the rear. Then hold the carrier back in that position with your thumb/finger and the handle swings through without hitting the ejection port. |
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 11/4/2015 1:59:14 PM EDT
[#33]
I think most of us lurk around the Beretta forum so maybe you have already seen this thread but here it is for those of you that don't lurk around the Beretta forum.
T&E prototype ARX triggers have been sent out to a few people for testing and you can see it here. > Link. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/5/2015 6:36:51 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
I think most of us lurk around the Beretta forum so maybe you have already seen this thread but here it is for those of you that don't lurk around the Beretta forum. T&E prototype ARX triggers have been sent out to a few people for testing and you can see it here. > Link. That's nice to see! I hope it works well.. and doesn't cost a fortune. It would be a nice advance for the ARX to have at least one aftermarket trigger option that resolves the heavy trigger issue. |
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 11/5/2015 11:33:37 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 556Cliff]
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Matthew_Q:
That's nice to see! I hope it works well.. and doesn't cost a fortune. It would be a nice advance for the ARX to have at least one aftermarket trigger option that resolves the heavy trigger issue. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Matthew_Q:
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
I think most of us lurk around the Beretta forum so maybe you have already seen this thread but here it is for those of you that don't lurk around the Beretta forum. T&E prototype ARX triggers have been sent out to a few people for testing and you can see it here. > Link. That's nice to see! I hope it works well.. and doesn't cost a fortune. It would be a nice advance for the ARX to have at least one aftermarket trigger option that resolves the heavy trigger issue. It's surprising to me that Geissele will not make a trigger for the ARX when they supposedly had an ARX earlier than anyone. I would love to hear their reasons for deciding not to make one. |
|
|
OR, USA
|
Posted: 11/5/2015 5:09:12 PM EDT
[#36]
Art is good people and great to deal with, besides making very nice gear.
I have his SCAR and Tavor triggers, and they are excellent pieces of work. AJ |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/5/2015 10:08:02 PM EDT
[#37]
What's the general consensus on the ARX-100?
|
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 11/6/2015 12:08:03 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cyclone:
What's the general consensus on the ARX-100? I think the general consensus is that most people won't even consider the ARX when choosing from all of the Gen 3 rifles that are out there based off of it's looks alone. Though the few people that put features and function ahead of looks seem to be pretty happy with the ARX. The way it looks grows on you as well.
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/6/2015 3:06:41 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
I think the general consensus is that most people won't even consider the ARX when choosing from all of the Gen 3 rifles that are out there based off of it's looks alone. Though the few people that put features and function ahead of looks seem to be pretty happy with the ARX. The way it looks grows on you as well. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By cyclone:
What's the general consensus on the ARX-100? I think the general consensus is that most people won't even consider the ARX when choosing from all of the Gen 3 rifles that are out there based off of it's looks alone. Though the few people that put features and function ahead of looks seem to be pretty happy with the ARX. The way it looks grows on you as well. Aesthetic appeal is relative, but I've never had a problem with it. Looks even better as an SBR. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/6/2015 7:30:19 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cyclone:
What's the general consensus on the ARX-100? A lot of people don't like it, mostly based on aesthetics, but it's a very reliable and clever rifle. I have only heard of one person having problems, but he was using Wolf ammo, and didn't change the gas port setting. (It has a setting for lower powered ammo) There are a few quirks, one being the heavy trigger. It's about 10lb or so, but it does break pretty cleanly. Also the buttstock is a little short for us taller Americans. Those are about the only two gripes I have. It won't take Gen 3 Pmags, but that's easy to work around. Overall, I think it's not as popular as it should be. I think if the price comes down a bit more, they'll get more popular. |
|
|
|
OR, USA
|
Posted: 11/6/2015 10:47:38 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cyclone:
What's the general consensus on the ARX-100? It gets you most of the advantages of a FN SCAR 16 for about 1/2 the price, and it's better for lefties too. AJ |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/6/2015 12:27:18 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cyclone: What's the general consensus on the ARX-100? As someone that owns my fair share of higher end AR's such as KAC, Noveske, BCM, Colts etc and also the FN Scar, Tavor, soon will have either a AUG Nato & RDB I like my ARX. So my judgement is based on this and how it compares to the upper end AR market  The 10 pound trigger isn't so bad, the reset is very very short do I hope somebody makes a better trigger defiantly. I love the quick change barrels,with the 10.25" SBR barrel it will be killer. I have owned mine since December so far it has performed flawlessly with an Acog TA31RCO, my purchase price was in the $1500 range some guys have been able to catch a good price from Botach for less, but overall I think at $1500 its price competitively with the AUGS/Tavors/Scars and the new Cz Bren on the market. (considering my 10" scar barrel was nearly the same price as the ARX rifle) I am waiting on the FDE version, hopefully thats still in the works. I would also like to see someone offer a new lower that allows the use of AR grips and Gen 3 P-mags along with the release of the Italian ARX Flash Hider. How often do we get to buy current foreign military rifles for so little |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/6/2015 12:30:29 PM EDT
[#43]
This thread pretty much sold me on them. Botach blew out the last of their ARXs a few weeks ago at $1150 so I couldn't say no. Practically a steal at that price.
Haven't been able to go to the range yet, but I like it a lot. The trigger isn't as bad as I was expecting. Heavy, but short take up and a clean break. I can live with that. Ergos on the rifle are pretty good, everything is well laid-out and easy to use. My bolt catch is a little finicky but I think that's a product of the rifle being new. The stock is short at it's most collapsed position, but I did find a perfect position one or two clicks out. It's really light as well, surprisingly so. I've gotten used to AKs and bullpups as that's where my interests have been lately so it was a positive feeling. The Gen3 PMAG thing doesn't bother me because I'm heavily invested in USGI and other mags because I was an early adopter on the FS2000 which shares the same sort of mag fitment challenge. Everything I've seen about reliability is positive, and it seems to digest pretty much any ammo as long as you switch to "non-standard" when you use crap ammo. The ARX is basically everything the ACR was supposed to be but better. If Beretta comes through with any of the caliber conversions, it'll be even more. That quick change barrel is slick. I'm not going to go the SBR route on mine but it is very promising that they've released the 10.5 barrels. And the box for those seems to indicate they have plans for 7.62x39, 6.8SPC, .300BLK, and 5.45x39. It was a contender in the canceled improved carbine trials here, and in the top 5 finalists for the new French service rifle competition. Seems like it has a good military pedigree. Say what you want about Italy's military presence on the world stage, but Beretta knows gunmaking. I'm excited about this one in a way I haven't been for a while. |
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 11/6/2015 7:04:54 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 556Cliff]
[#44]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGY1N3Kypo8
Even though I don't agree with some of the things that were said in this video, this is pretty much the general consensus of the ARX-100. The comments section as always, is full of herp-de-durp with ba-durrp sprinkles. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/6/2015 7:10:54 PM EDT
[#45]
I bought mine shortly after it came out.
It's been reliable with all kinds of brass cased ammo I've put through it. Wolf Gold, Geco, XM855/193, CBC 77gr, IMI Razor core, Federal Fusion MSR, etc. Issues: The trigger is on the heavier side. However, it is CLEAN. No grit, super clean break, fast reset, just all around excellent except for the weight. The safety was very stiff, but worked itself to a more "normal" feel very quickly. The stock is too short, another couple of inches and it'd be perfect (That's not what she said to me  )The charging handle needs more meat on it. I did buy the extended one off of Ebay, but I haven't installed it yet, and probably won't. I'd like to send it out and get it melonited/nitrided first. The third magazine release, that's also locks the bolt open, worked great for locking the bolt open but very poorly for releasing the magazine, it was just too stiff. That didn't matter much to me, I just used the AR style magazine releases. However, a couple weeks back I tried using it to release a mag and it worked like a champ. I could even hit it at an angle and drop the mag just fine. It must have needed some loosening up too, like the safety. Overall, I'm very pleased with it, especially as a lefty. It canceled my plans to perhaps buy a SCAR 16 or Robinson XCR. |
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 11/6/2015 7:39:13 PM EDT
[#46]
The stock being too short gets brought up quite a bit, I'm 6 foot 2 inches tall and the stock is perfect for me in the third position (one short of fully extended) with the second position also being usable in a more squared off stance.
I guess we must have a lot of really tall guys here. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/6/2015 10:28:03 PM EDT
[#47]
Interesting.............I was considering a SIG MCX, but the ARX has intrigued me since it came out. I was worried about the rails and the innards of the rifle, but from all accounts, its well made and reliable............might make me consider one even more now since I have handled it
|
|
|
|
OR, USA
|
Posted: 11/6/2015 11:56:18 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cyclone:
Interesting.............I was considering a SIG MCX, but the ARX has intrigued me since it came out. I was worried about the rails and the innards of the rifle, but from all accounts, its well made and reliable............might make me consider one even more now since I have handled it It's well made and has been utterly reliable. I took mine out rabbit hunting and had lots of fine alkali dust in everything. No problems and the insides of the rifle were pretty clean after I got it home. AJ |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 9:14:13 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By ak47Dennis:
As someone that owns my fair share of higher end AR's such as KAC, Noveske, BCM, Colts etc and also the FN Scar, Tavor, soon will have either a AUG Nato & RDB I like my ARX. So my judgement is based on this and how it compares to the upper end AR market
The 10 pound trigger isn't so bad, the reset is very very short do I hope somebody makes a better trigger defiantly. I love the quick change barrels,with the 10.25" SBR barrel it will be killer. I have owned mine since December so far it has performed flawlessly with an Acog TA31RCO, my purchase price was in the $1500 range some guys have been able to catch a good price from Botach for less, but overall I think at $1500 its price competitively with the AUGS/Tavors/Scars and the new Cz Bren on the market. (considering my 10" scar barrel was nearly the same price as the ARX rifle) I am waiting on the FDE version, hopefully thats still in the works. I would also like to see someone offer a new lower that allows the use of AR grips and Gen 3 P-mags along with the release of the Italian ARX Flash Hider. How often do we get to buy current foreign military rifles for so little
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By ak47Dennis:
Originally Posted By cyclone:
What's the general consensus on the ARX-100? As someone that owns my fair share of higher end AR's such as KAC, Noveske, BCM, Colts etc and also the FN Scar, Tavor, soon will have either a AUG Nato & RDB I like my ARX. So my judgement is based on this and how it compares to the upper end AR market
The 10 pound trigger isn't so bad, the reset is very very short do I hope somebody makes a better trigger defiantly. I love the quick change barrels,with the 10.25" SBR barrel it will be killer. I have owned mine since December so far it has performed flawlessly with an Acog TA31RCO, my purchase price was in the $1500 range some guys have been able to catch a good price from Botach for less, but overall I think at $1500 its price competitively with the AUGS/Tavors/Scars and the new Cz Bren on the market. (considering my 10" scar barrel was nearly the same price as the ARX rifle) I am waiting on the FDE version, hopefully thats still in the works. I would also like to see someone offer a new lower that allows the use of AR grips and Gen 3 P-mags along with the release of the Italian ARX Flash Hider. How often do we get to buy current foreign military rifles for so little
I don't think a lower that will accept Gen 3 Pmags is feasible. The 'shelf' on the G3 Pmags interferes with the ARX bolt stop. I guess you could delete that, but then you'd only be able to manipulate the bolt using the charging handle... and you wouldn't be able to lock the bolt open manually. I would like to be able to use AR pistol grips and have aftermarket triggers, tho. Shit, I need to get around to grinding off the A2 hump on mine. |
|
|
|
ITA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 10:15:49 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
The stock being too short gets brought up quite a bit, I'm 6 foot 2 inches tall and the stock is perfect for me in the third position (one short of fully extended) with the second position also being usable in a more squared off stance. I guess we must have a lot of really tall guys here. We should always keep in mind it's .mil weapon Made for soldiers wearing body armor. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
