Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » Ammunition
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Site Notices
Page / 20
Link Posted: 11/19/2006 10:24:20 AM EDT
[#1]

Originally Posted By UPSguy:
This may have been answered somewhere in this 16 pages and if so, sorry for asking again.  Your wind probe, did you make that or purchase it?  If bought, were from?


Neither, it was a parting gift received after Molon's extra terrestrial encounter; he doesn't like to talk about it much, and since then he's vowed never to have a colonoscopy.
Link Posted: 11/19/2006 1:22:08 PM EDT
[#2]
I didn't get one on my alien encounter, all I got was a wife
Link Posted: 11/20/2006 12:05:13 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Molon] [#3]

Originally Posted By CitySlicker:

Originally Posted By UPSguy:
This may have been answered somewhere in this 16 pages and if so, sorry for asking again.  Your wind probe, did you make that or purchase it?  If bought, were from?


Neither, it was a parting gift received after Molon's extra terrestrial encounter; he doesn't like to talk about it much, and since then he's vowed never to have a colonoscopy.





The Wind Probe was created by, and is produced by Gene Beggs of bench-rest competition notoriety.  I purchased mine directly from him.
Link Posted: 11/20/2006 2:07:23 PM EDT
[#4]

Originally Posted By Molon:

Originally Posted By Section1_Operations:

Originally Posted By Molon:

Originally Posted By Section1_Operations:

Originally Posted By Molon:
Has anyone down-loaded the .pdf or .htm files from this thread?  I'm just wondering if they are working OK.

Molon


IIRC,

Some of the Pics stil showed as"X"


Did this occur with the .htm or .pdf file?


It was the .htm download, the .pdf seems fine although the page alignments a bit off.

I love the pics of Island Lake and believe I saw you out there one day setting up -- your wind instrument looks familiar.


The .pdf format definitely got skewed when converting, but it's easier to download.  The .htm file looks much better, but you have to make sure the graphics folder is under the same directory as the main file for it to work properly.

Certainly not too many people hauling a Wind Probe out to the Island Lake range.  If you see a short guy wearing a LaRue Tactical hat setting up a Wind Probe it's probably me.




img176.imageshack.us/img176/698/islandlake21fe7.jpg




img176.imageshack.us/img176/9834/windprobe02ff6.jpg




img176.imageshack.us/img176/1081/windprobeinaction01cb6.jpg



Yep, that's the spot, lane #13, where I took my LWRC piston conversion to when I got it back in order to sight in my Accupoint.

I just don't know how you can deal with the a$$hole DNR range officers.

One guy tried to give me a safety lecture about how unsafe it was to dial in scope adjustment with a round in the chamber and safety off between rounds.  He wanted me to unload the rifle in order to make adjustment.

I kindly thanked him, held out my right index finger, pointed to my brain and said this is the ultimate safety, (wiggled my index finger) and this is all the back up that's required.

He seemed stumped stupid on that one as I thanked him again for his advice, and then he walked off.
Link Posted: 11/20/2006 3:22:44 PM EDT
[#5]

Originally Posted By Section1_Operations:

Originally Posted By Molon:

Originally Posted By Section1_Operations:

Originally Posted By Molon:

Originally Posted By Section1_Operations:

Originally Posted By Molon:
Has anyone down-loaded the .pdf or .htm files from this thread?  I'm just wondering if they are working OK.

Molon


IIRC,

Some of the Pics stil showed as"X"


Did this occur with the .htm or .pdf file?


It was the .htm download, the .pdf seems fine although the page alignments a bit off.

I love the pics of Island Lake and believe I saw you out there one day setting up -- your wind instrument looks familiar.


The .pdf format definitely got skewed when converting, but it's easier to download.  The .htm file looks much better, but you have to make sure the graphics folder is under the same directory as the main file for it to work properly.

Certainly not too many people hauling a Wind Probe out to the Island Lake range.  If you see a short guy wearing a LaRue Tactical hat setting up a Wind Probe it's probably me.




img176.imageshack.us/img176/698/islandlake21fe7.jpg




img176.imageshack.us/img176/9834/windprobe02ff6.jpg




img176.imageshack.us/img176/1081/windprobeinaction01cb6.jpg



Yep, that's the spot, lane #13, where I took my LWRC piston conversion to when I got it back in order to sight in my Accupoint.

I just don't know how you can deal with the a$$hole DNR range officers.

One guy tried to give me a safety lecture about how unsafe it was to dial in scope adjustment with a round in the chamber and safety off between rounds.  He wanted me to unload the rifle in order to make adjustment.

I kindly thanked him, held out my right index finger, pointed to my brain and said this is the ultimate safety, (wiggled my index finger) and this is all the back up that's required.

He seemed stumped stupid on that one as I thanked him again for his advice, and then he walked off.


should of been on safe.  
Link Posted: 11/20/2006 4:18:10 PM EDT
[#6]

Originally Posted By infsqdldr:

Originally Posted By Section1_Operations:

Originally Posted By Molon:

Originally Posted By Section1_Operations:

Originally Posted By Molon:

Originally Posted By Section1_Operations:

Originally Posted By Molon:
Has anyone down-loaded the .pdf or .htm files from this thread?  I'm just wondering if they are working OK.

Molon


IIRC,

Some of the Pics stil showed as"X"


Did this occur with the .htm or .pdf file?


It was the .htm download, the .pdf seems fine although the page alignments a bit off.

I love the pics of Island Lake and believe I saw you out there one day setting up -- your wind instrument looks familiar.


The .pdf format definitely got skewed when converting, but it's easier to download.  The .htm file looks much better, but you have to make sure the graphics folder is under the same directory as the main file for it to work properly.

Certainly not too many people hauling a Wind Probe out to the Island Lake range.  If you see a short guy wearing a LaRue Tactical hat setting up a Wind Probe it's probably me.




img176.imageshack.us/img176/698/islandlake21fe7.jpg




img176.imageshack.us/img176/9834/windprobe02ff6.jpg




img176.imageshack.us/img176/1081/windprobeinaction01cb6.jpg



Yep, that's the spot, lane #13, where I took my LWRC piston conversion to when I got it back in order to sight in my Accupoint.

I just don't know how you can deal with the a$$hole DNR range officers.

One guy tried to give me a safety lecture about how unsafe it was to dial in scope adjustment with a round in the chamber and safety off between rounds.  He wanted me to unload the rifle in order to make adjustment.

I kindly thanked him, held out my right index finger, pointed to my brain and said this is the ultimate safety, (wiggled my index finger) and this is all the back up that's required.

He seemed stumped stupid on that one as I thanked him again for his advice, and then he walked off.


should of been on safe.  


Not when your dialing in 1 or 2 clicks but then again it seems some people believe Mangina is a good thing as well as the pacification of society.
Link Posted: 11/21/2006 1:38:31 PM EDT
[#7]
Here is a graph showing the trajectories of 75 grain TAP FPD and 75 grain 5.56 TAP when fired from a 16" barrel using an Aimpont sight in an A.R.M.S. mount.

height of sight above bore = 2.8"

muzzle velocity of TAP FPD = 2528 fps
muzzle velocity of 5.56 TAP = 2713 fps






Link Posted: 11/21/2006 4:05:16 PM EDT
[#8]
Molon,

Can you plug 75 grain .223 TAP (Red Box) into this graph? I'd like to see the difference between the 5.56 and .223 flavors.

TIA

GL
Link Posted: 11/21/2006 7:57:31 PM EDT
[#9]
I may be wrong, but I think the red one on the graph IS the 223-75 gr FPD load.
Link Posted: 11/21/2006 8:03:46 PM EDT
[Last Edit: goloud] [#10]
I was under the impression that the .223 FPD load was the black box/nickle plated version, not the TAP red box brass-cased .223? From the thread, the two .223 loads have different cases and charges. Anyone

ETA:

Does the red-box TAP have the extruded or ball powder?
Link Posted: 11/21/2006 8:18:24 PM EDT
[Last Edit: goloud] [#11]

Originally Posted By goloud:
I was under the impression that the .223 FPD load was the black box/nickle plated version, not the TAP red box brass-cased .223? From the thread, the two .223 loads have different cases and charges. Anyone

ETA:

Does the red-box TAP have the extruded or ball powder?


I pulled a round from a red box .223 brass-cased TAP (Lot 80265) from a shipment from about a month ago. It has the extruded powder.

I would guess that the only difference are the cases and T1/T2. So the graph is the comparison I was looking for.

Thanks.

ETA: T1 vs T2
Link Posted: 11/22/2006 12:29:46 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Molon] [#12]
goloud,

It sounds like you are referring to the 75 grain BTHP TAP PRECISION load which is a SAAMI pressure load and is basically the same as the TAP FPD load without the black nickel cases.







The TAP FPD load uses the same projectile as the 75 grain TAP Precision load (not the T2 bullet ) and both loads are loaded to approximately the same muzzle velocity using extruded power.   Consequently, they both have the same trajectory.

Also, the number 80265 is the catalog number, not the lot number.  The lot number can be found at the bottom of the label.

Molon
Link Posted: 11/22/2006 1:01:10 AM EDT
[Last Edit: goloud] [#13]
Sorry, my fault, it's Lot#3060397. Came direct from Hornady about three weeks ago.

Same catalog number, but newer box? Seems like it is the same round.

Quick picture:


I accidently ordered the .223 TAP when I ordered a bunch of the .223 practice. I wanted more 5.56, which finally came today.

I haven't had a chance to shoot any out of either batch yet.

GL
Link Posted: 11/22/2006 10:54:18 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Molon] [#14]

Originally Posted By goloud:
Sorry, my fault, it's Lot#3060397. Came direct from Hornady about three weeks ago.

Same catalog number, but newer box? Seems like it is the same round.

Quick picture:
img90.imageshack.us/img90/6576/223tappu2.th.jpg</a>

I accidently ordered the .223 TAP when I ordered a bunch of the .223 practice. I wanted more 5.56, which finally came today.

I haven't had a chance to shoot any out of either batch yet.

GL


It looks like they just dropped the "Precision" nomenclature for the box label.  Odd that the load is no longer listed in their on-line catalog.  When it warms up in the spring I'll have to get a hold of some for chronographing, but with it still having the same catalog number as the 75 grain TAP Precision load I imagine the velocities are still going to be similar.
Link Posted: 11/22/2006 12:35:10 PM EDT
[#15]

It looks like they just dropped the "Precision" nomenclature for the box label. Odd that the load is no longer listed in their on-line catalog. When it warms up in the spring I'll have to get a hold of some for chronographing, but with it still having the same catalog number as the 75 grain TAP Precision load I imagine the velocities are still going to be similar.


I'll send you some now if you want to play with it. Just let me know.
Link Posted: 11/22/2006 4:01:33 PM EDT
[#16]

Originally Posted By goloud:

It looks like they just dropped the "Precision" nomenclature for the box label. Odd that the load is no longer listed in their on-line catalog. When it warms up in the spring I'll have to get a hold of some for chronographing, but with it still having the same catalog number as the 75 grain TAP Precision load I imagine the velocities are still going to be similar.


I'll send you some now if you want to play with it. Just let me know.


Thank you for the very gracious offer.  Set a box aside and if I can't find any in the spring I'll take you up on your offer.

Molon
Link Posted: 11/23/2006 11:54:42 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Molon] [#17]
Here are a few pics from the latest production lot of 5.56 TAP that I have.  Note the primer pocket sealant.




















Link Posted: 11/26/2006 6:23:14 AM EDT
[#18]

Originally Posted By DevL:

Originally Posted By FMJ:

Originally Posted By MrKasab:
Reading Bushmaster's reveiw here it sounds to me like their 40 gr. bullets would be the best thing for inside your house. I wonder if anyone knows how it would perform out of a 1:7 twist barrel.



I would HATE to be hit in the CHEST with that round


Lets keep it in context though.  If you were to shoot someone in their arm before the chest as in a shot from the side the bullet would completely fail to penetrate the torso.  I cannot think of a more ill-suited round for home defense or LE use.



AGREED

as I said in the chest

My SHTF mags are loaded with M193 since the 80`s

but have change to Black Hills 75gr Last year
and I use MK262 as Back up until I get the NATO 75gr pressure loads
Link Posted: 11/27/2006 6:32:40 PM EDT
[#19]
Here's a graph of the trajectories of 5.56 TAP and TAP FPD fired from a 14.5" M4 barrel using an Aimpoint sight.

5.56 TAP muzzle velocity:  2627 fps
TAP FPD muzzle velocity:   2450 fps






Link Posted: 11/27/2006 6:53:44 PM EDT
[#20]
I found some interesting charts in a police publication.
Thought I'd share:








Link Posted: 11/30/2006 10:35:37 PM EDT
[#21]
Wow. I just finished reading this entire thing. My eyes are bleeding. But very informative. Thank you very much for your time and effort sir. It is very much appreciated.
Link Posted: 12/1/2006 5:12:10 PM EDT
[#22]

Originally Posted By XSentinel:
Wow. I just finished reading this entire thing. My eyes are bleeding. But very informative. Thank you very much for your time and effort sir. It is very much appreciated.


You're welcome.  I'm glad you found the information useful.
Link Posted: 12/5/2006 2:35:56 PM EDT
[Last Edit: hunterwarrior] [#23]
Molon

Reading your posts with much interest. Much appreciated.

What is your bore cleaning regimen while testing?

Thanks HW
Link Posted: 12/6/2006 11:57:00 AM EDT
[#24]

Originally Posted By hunterwarrior:
Molon

Reading your posts with much interest. Much appreciated.

What is your bore cleaning regimen while testing?

Thanks HW


Barrels are cleaned prior to the beginning of testing each new load.  A few fouling rounds are fired and testing begins.  No other cleaning is done during the testing of a particular load.  

High Power shooters can fire more than 80 rounds over a course of fire with no time for cleaning in between strings and the most critical shots (from 600 yards) are fired at the end of the course of fire.  I can easily go through 150+ rounds in a single practice session.  I personally have no use for a barrel/load that can only fire 5-10 shots before accuracy degrades and the barrel needs cleaning.
Link Posted: 12/7/2006 7:13:47 PM EDT
[Last Edit: hunterwarrior] [#25]

Originally Posted By Molon:
Barrels are cleaned prior to the beginning of testing each new load.  A few fouling rounds are fired and testing begins.  No other cleaning is done during the testing of a particular load.  

......

I can easily go through 150+ rounds in a single practice session.


That was the answer I was hoping for.


I personally have no use for a barrel/load that can only fire 5-10 shots before accuracy degrades and the barrel needs cleaning.


I agree.

Thanks HW
Link Posted: 12/11/2006 10:44:22 AM EDT
[#26]
Molon for President!
Link Posted: 12/11/2006 12:44:01 PM EDT
[#27]

Originally Posted By Rcd567:
Molon for President!


Old Painless for president with Molon as vice president; that's the ticket!
Link Posted: 12/23/2006 2:46:21 PM EDT
[#28]
Great post Molon, answered many of my questions about the Hornady bullets. One question I do have, and I may have missed it while taking in all the info, since the ballistics of the .223 75g BTHP and the .223 75g TAP seem to almost mirror each other do you think it's safe to say that minus the black case and the cannelured bullet that the two are an almost identical round? I noticed that you used the bthp match bullet in your reloading recipe for your TAP copy and it seems quite similar to the Hornady version. Since the TAP seems to run about $4 bucks more a box of 20 than the 75g BTHP would one still be getting about the same performance self defense wise. I have several hunred rounds of each but from a financial standpoint it would be cheaper to stock up the on the later.-Since you seem to be pretty up on the subject and I trust your judgement I thought I'd ask-Thanks
Link Posted: 12/24/2006 1:31:19 PM EDT
[#29]

Originally Posted By One2thehead:
Great post Molon, answered many of my questions about the Hornady bullets. One question I do have, and I may have missed it while taking in all the info, since the ballistics of the .223 75g BTHP and the .223 75g TAP seem to almost mirror each other do you think it's safe to say that minus the black case and the cannelured bullet that the two are an almost identical round? I noticed that you used the bthp match bullet in your reloading recipe for your TAP copy and it seems quite similar to the Hornady version. Since the TAP seems to run about $4 bucks more a box of 20 than the 75g BTHP would one still be getting about the same performance self defense wise. I have several hunred rounds of each but from a financial standpoint it would be cheaper to stock up the on the later.-Since you seem to be pretty up on the subject and I trust your judgement I thought I'd ask-Thanks


That has been my observation.  That and the fact that the BTHP Match load actually runs the tiniest bit faster than the TAP FPD load with the lots that I've chronographed.  (Bigbore posted chrono data for these two different loads in one of his threads with similar findings.)

While the BTHP Match load does not use a cannelured bullet there is a slight taper crimp used at the case mouth.  I've never had an issue with set-back with the BTHP Match load.  (I've also never been in a car accident, but I still carry auto insurance.)



Link Posted: 12/24/2006 6:15:44 PM EDT
[#30]

Originally Posted By Molon:

Originally Posted By One2thehead:
Great post Molon, answered many of my questions about the Hornady bullets. One question I do have, and I may have missed it while taking in all the info, since the ballistics of the .223 75g BTHP and the .223 75g TAP seem to almost mirror each other do you think it's safe to say that minus the black case and the cannelured bullet that the two are an almost identical round? I noticed that you used the bthp match bullet in your reloading recipe for your TAP copy and it seems quite similar to the Hornady version. Since the TAP seems to run about $4 bucks more a box of 20 than the 75g BTHP would one still be getting about the same performance self defense wise. I have several hunred rounds of each but from a financial standpoint it would be cheaper to stock up the on the later.-Since you seem to be pretty up on the subject and I trust your judgement I thought I'd ask-Thanks


That has been my observation.  That and the fact that the BTHP Match load actually runs the tiniest bit faster than the TAP FPD load with the lots that I've chronographed.  (Bigbore posted chrono data for these two different loads in one of his threads with similar findings.)


I've been shooting alot of the "match" 75Gn Hornady. Its very accurate IME and has been completely reliable in the 3 or four rifles i have used it in. I got a bunch of it from Botach of all places for $2.80 a box when they had an ammo closeout a few years back. Even at around $11.00 a box is significantly cheaper than TAP FPD.
Link Posted: 12/24/2006 6:20:56 PM EDT
[#31]

Originally Posted By AR15fan:
I've been shooting alot of the "match" 75Gn Hornady. Its very accurate IME and has been completely reliable in the 3 or four rifles i have used it in. I got a bunch of it from Botach of all places for $2.80 a box when they had an ammo closeout a few years back. Even at around $11.00 a box is significantly cheaper than TAP FPD.



jesus, best botach deal/experience I have ever heard.    Congrats on that!    I think I'd have bought all they had as well at the very moment I learned about that, then drive down there to pick it up to make damn certain I got every last box that I ordered.
Link Posted: 12/24/2006 6:26:27 PM EDT
[Last Edit: AR15fan] [#32]

Originally Posted By uglygun:

Originally Posted By AR15fan:
I've been shooting alot of the "match" 75Gn Hornady. Its very accurate IME and has been completely reliable in the 3 or four rifles i have used it in. I got a bunch of it from Botach of all places for $2.80 a box when they had an ammo closeout a few years back. Even at around $11.00 a box is significantly cheaper than TAP FPD.



jesus, best botach deal/experience I have ever heard.    Congrats on that!    I think I'd have bought all they had...


I did.  I raced over to Staples, faxed my DL and ammo statement then called them and told them i wanted all of it. Ended up being over 4300 rounds.

First 5-rnd group at 100 meters out of my Colt CAR-A3 HBAR Elite was .85" its good stuff and I've been hooked on the hornady 75Gn loads ever since.

www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=16&t=307680
Link Posted: 1/6/2007 2:57:05 PM EDT
[#33]
Here's a graph comparing the trajectories of 5.56 TAP fired from 14.5", 16" and 20" barrels.






Link Posted: 1/7/2007 5:55:00 PM EDT
[#34]
Here is the velocity data to go with the trajectories in the above post.










Link Posted: 2/22/2007 1:18:25 AM EDT
[#35]
Coming this spring - - -Black Hills 75 grain Match HP - - - red box versus blue box






Link Posted: 2/22/2007 6:19:16 AM EDT
[Last Edit: DevL] [#36]
When Brouhaha and I chronoed those we had a 200 fps difference with the red box being the hotter load.  It was at 5.56 velocity and when we posted our findings at firearmstactical.com Black Hills promtly assured us the Red Box was over pressure and asked it to be returned for testing.  They found it to be some small figure slower and gave us several replacement boxes of Red Box.  Their findings were not correct though... you could literally hear and feel the difference it was so great and his chrono was working fine.  The Red Box 75 was the same accuracy as the Blue Box so I pitched in on an order Brouhaha made on the BB  for 1000 rounds and was very pleased with its performance.  I doubt you will find any differences in accuracy and any velocity difference is a lot to lot variance IMO.  Id try more than one lot of ammo if possible to see how much velocity variance BH actually has.  If they can have a 200 fps screw up I wonder how big a fluke that was or if they have large lot to lot variances... that would be my biggest question.
Link Posted: 2/22/2007 10:23:48 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Molon] [#37]
Speaking of variations in Black Hills’ ammunition, here is an interesting find for those of you who haven’t already come across this.  Apparently, Black Hills ran short on their “223 Match” brass that is normally used to load their 75 grain Match HP “red box” ammunition.  Suposedly, in order to meet their deadline, they substituted the WCC 06 brass that is used to load their MK262 ammunition.

The WCC brass has sealed and crimped primers.  So, the 75 grain Match HP ammunition that was loaded using this brass has the “T1C” 75 grain Hornady BTHP bullet with a cannelure and crimped case neck and now sealed and crimped primers.  











Link Posted: 2/22/2007 11:07:57 PM EDT
[#38]
...  too bad there moly coated thou...
Link Posted: 2/23/2007 10:51:47 AM EDT
[#39]

Originally Posted By Corsair:
...  too bad there moly coated thou...


Rumor has it that some of the non-moly version was also loaded using the WCC brass, although I personally haven't seen any of it.
Link Posted: 2/25/2007 9:25:42 PM EDT
[#40]
great info. Thanks
Link Posted: 2/26/2007 1:54:29 PM EDT
[#41]

Originally Posted By john575:
great info. Thanks


Shiny!
Link Posted: 3/14/2007 10:17:44 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Molon] [#42]
Coming this summer.

6.8mm SPC:  Hornady 110 grain TAP versus Hornady 110 grain V-MAX.





Link Posted: 3/14/2007 11:08:33 PM EDT
[Last Edit: paulosantos] [#43]

Originally Posted By Molon:
Coming this summer.

6.8mm SPC:  Hornady 110 grain TAP versus Hornady 110 grain V-MAX.



www.box.net/shared/static/t88hzl3hqp.jpg



Nice.  You have a 6.8 or are you getting one?  I can save you some trouble and tell you which one of the two rounds is better, but I'll let you test it out for yourself.

Edit to add:  I just realized they are both V-Max.  How about testing all four of the Hornady 6.8 versions?  I'll chip in some boxes if you need ammo.
Link Posted: 3/14/2007 11:35:50 PM EDT
[#44]

Originally Posted By paulosantos:

You have a 6.8 or are you getting one?   .


I still have a little work to do on my 6.8mm build, but I'm off to a good start.  (Current status of build pictured below.)  I'm basing the build around a 16" Noveske Recon barrel.










I can save you some trouble and tell you which one of the two rounds is better


No holdin' out on us now!





How about testing all four of the Hornady 6.8 versions?


Man, my OCD is already flaring up over this, so knowing me . . .
Link Posted: 3/15/2007 8:09:34 AM EDT
[#45]

Originally Posted By Molon:

Originally Posted By paulosantos:

You have a 6.8 or are you getting one?   .


I still have a little work to do on my 6.8mm build, but I'm off to a good start.  (Current status of build pictured below.)  I'm basing the build around a 16" Noveske Recon barrel.


www.box.net/shared/static/qovkta60tp.jpg







I can save you some trouble and tell you which one of the two rounds is better


No holdin' out on us now!





How about testing all four of the Hornady 6.8 versions?


Man, my OCD is already flaring up over this, so knowing me . . .


Well, from my 6.8 SPC, using Denny's 16.1" recon barrel, the Hornady 110 Gr. V-Max and the 110 Gr. V-Max TAP are more accurate than the Hornady 110 Gr. BTHP counterparts.  I should be going to the range again soon and I will test out 3 of the 4 again.  I don't have any more of the 110 Gr. BTHP TAP so I won't be able to test them.  Last time I went out I was getting right around 1MOA with the 110 Gr. V-Max TAP, but it was only 5 round shot groups.
Link Posted: 3/15/2007 11:31:59 AM EDT
[#46]

Originally Posted By paulosantos:

Originally Posted By Molon:

Originally Posted By paulosantos:

You have a 6.8 or are you getting one?   .


I still have a little work to do on my 6.8mm build, but I'm off to a good start.  (Current status of build pictured below.)  I'm basing the build around a 16" Noveske Recon barrel.


www.box.net/shared/static/qovkta60tp.jpg







I can save you some trouble and tell you which one of the two rounds is better


No holdin' out on us now!





How about testing all four of the Hornady 6.8 versions?


Man, my OCD is already flaring up over this, so knowing me . . .


Well, from my 6.8 SPC, using Denny's 16.1" recon barrel, the Hornady 110 Gr. V-Max and the 110 Gr. V-Max TAP are more accurate than the Hornady 110 Gr. BTHP counterparts.  I should be going to the range again soon and I will test out 3 of the 4 again.  I don't have any more of the 110 Gr. BTHP TAP so I won't be able to test them.  Last time I went out I was getting right around 1MOA with the 110 Gr. V-Max TAP, but it was only 5 round shot groups.


If you would shoot a 10-shot group from 100 yards of each load and post your results, it would be greatly appreciated.
Link Posted: 3/15/2007 12:19:23 PM EDT
[Last Edit: paulosantos] [#47]
I just ordered a case of the Hornady 110 Gr. BTHP TAP and when I get it, I can test out all 4.  I will also do the 10 round shot group, but the results might not be pretty.  FYI, the price went up from $130 to $145 per case


Also, when I spoke with the Hornady Rep, she said that the TAP and the Civilian versions were basically the same except for the prices and the packaging.  We'll just have to see what exactly "basically" means.
Link Posted: 3/15/2007 12:20:03 PM EDT
[Last Edit: paulosantos] [#48]
.
Link Posted: 3/15/2007 5:55:49 PM EDT
[#49]

Originally Posted By paulosantos:
I just ordered a case of the Hornady 110 Gr. BTHP TAP and when I get it, I can test out all 4.  I will also do the 10 round shot group,


Great!
Link Posted: 3/27/2007 11:33:28 AM EDT
[#50]
Lets move this to top of list.    This is great.   Waiting on Black Hills report.
Page / 20
Page AR-15 » Ammunition
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top