Trigger pull is kind of "junky" in terms of it's kind of spongy and stagey, at least as compared to a Colt, Ruger, or Smith & Wesson. That's because of all the complicated parts in the lockwork to transfer the firing pin to the bottom cylinder, it's not an easy task engineering-wise.
OTOH, the trigger pull not bad if you compare it to autopistols, especially striker-fired polymer-framed pistols. It's just awful for a revolver. However, it's at least not exceptionally heavy in DA, but it's just not very crisp in SA either.
Fit and finish is more Taurus-y than Smith & Wesson-y. Or maybe like "If Keltec made a revolver, but didn't use any plastic." For the fit and finish, and overall quality, I think a Rhino ought to command about 2/3rds to 3/4's what they actually retail for. If they did, I'd own one by now.
The one thing that really shines on the Rhino is that the low bore axis and bottom firing from the cylinder really really works. Recoil/muzzle-flip mitigation is crazy good. .357 125gr full house loads feel like .38's. .38's feel like, I dunno... .22mag or something. It's insane how good the actual recoil feels when you fire it.