User Panel
Posted: 4/21/2024 1:20:07 PM EDT
What the hivemind think about this scope? Seems like a deal for the price
https://bkingsfirearms.com/shop/optics/leupold-mark-3hd-rifle-scope-3-9x40mm-30mm-p5-mildot-reticle/ |
|
|
Depending on what you’re looking to do and if you like mil dot, not a bad choice. At 15.6 ounces paired with a light weight mount, a top mount or offset MRDS and it could be a slick set up, lighter than similar LPVO set-ups.
At that price I’m tempted… Ymmv |
|
|
I have one on a 12.5" SBR and love it. Not bulky at all. They were on a big sale last year for like $399. Can't remember the website.
|
|
If he's lucky, he will die young, 200 feet beneath the waves, for that is the closest he'll ever get to being a hero.
|
Looks like their MarkAR cheapy line with a new joke name. I wouldn’t buy such a low end scope.
|
|
|
The 4-12× version is the exact same size and offers adjustable side parallax, a better reticle, and more magnification, all for just a half ounce more weight.
Keep in mind, none of these have illuminated reticles. |
|
|
Originally Posted By DevL: The 4-12× version is the exact same size and offers adjustable side parallax, a better reticle, and more magnification, all for just a half ounce more weight. Keep in mind, none of these have illuminated reticles. View Quote Does the 4-12 have adjustable parallax? I can do without illumination because I will piggyback a reflex, but I'd like side focus. D'oh, I see it in the top line. Reading is fun-duh-mental, ha. |
|
|
TR20-2G does same with illumination and lighter weight at the cost of $200 more. Ymmv.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By s4s4u: Does the 4-12 have adjustable parallax? I can do without illumination because I will piggyback a reflex, but I'd like side focus. View Quote If it's the magnification and parralax you want try the TR26 w/milldot, but you'll pay a little more in weight. |
|
|
|
|
I have the Mark AR version, haven't shot it yet but I like the clarity and reticle. It's replacing a Vortex 2-10 HD LH, the reticle on that was too fine for me. I think I can shoot the 3-9 with both eyes open on 3x.
|
|
When a coyote rapes your hamster don't come running to Kemp.
|
I picked up one of these late last year trying to make my mk12 look more clone correct without being clone correct and it does that. The scope is decent and the reticle is bare bones mil.
That being said I’m upgrading to the mk4 2-10 because I have given up on having it be clonish looking. The scope will serve you well. Attached File |
|
|
Originally Posted By DirtDivision: I picked up one of these late last year trying to make my mk12 look more clone correct without being clone correct and it does that. The scope is decent and the reticle is bare bones mil. That being said I’m upgrading to the mk4 2-10 because I have given up on having it be clonish looking. The scope will serve you well. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/245997/EAB615BF-FD67-4D4C-9DC1-CC39B3FCE4E2_jpe-3196273.JPG View Quote There comes a time when we all realize that the devil is in the ACTUAL details. Newbies, take note of the DOPE card |
|
|
I've never used one, but have read about them fairly extensively.
Between the 3x9 and 4x12, I think the one to get is the 3x9. Both are light and simple. Downsides are the eye relief changes substantially with magnification. IIRC, there is about a 1.5" variance in eye relief between low and high magnification. Also, elevation dialing window is comparably small to other offerings. Having said that, I think the 3x9 Firedot version with an MRDS would cover a lot of ground. |
|
|
Originally Posted By rauchman: I've never used one, but have read about them fairly extensively. Between the 3x9 and 4x12, I think the one to get is the 3x9. Both are light and simple. Downsides are the eye relief changes substantially with magnification. IIRC, there is about a 1.5" variance in eye relief between low and high magnification. Also, elevation dialing window is comparably small to other offerings. Having said that, I think the 3x9 Firedot version with an MRDS would cover a lot of ground. View Quote That i was thinking too. |
|
|
Originally Posted By PistoleroJesse: TR20-2G does same with illumination and lighter weight at the cost of $200 more. Ymmv. View Quote That TR20 has a MIL-dot reticle, but MOA turrets. Deal-breaker. At least the Leupold has matching reticle & turret adjustments. I like my old VX-R Patrol 3-9x40 Firedot, though I'm not sure how the glass compares with this new VX3HD. |
|
|
|
I have a VX5 HD 1-6 on my Grendel and I like it a lot. 300mm tube makes a big difference
|
|
|
I may be resurrecting this thread from the dead, but I do have 2 cents to add.
I have a 16” Sionics that has lived in many configurations from red dot, to LPVO, to medium power. Last year, I confidently decided to move away from a Viper PST II 1-6 LPVO to a medium power optic. I bought a modern SwampFox Warhawk 2-10 and a Leupold VX-R Patrol TMR Firedot 3-9x40. On paper, the SwampFox had all the great features I was looking for, but with a mount and MRDS it was a 2.5LB pig that destroyed usability. I kept the Leupold and have loved it. Similar to someone above, I call that setup my Mock-12, but it’s an incredible set-up. The MK3 HD looks like the modern predecessor and I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend it. Pair it with a piggyback dot and I really do have all the capability I need for the 5.56 round. GPR, lightweight, NV capable, and fairly precise out to 400M at 9x |
|
|
Originally Posted By ct78: I may be resurrecting this thread from the dead, but I do have 2 cents to add. I have a 16” Sionics that has lived in many configurations from red dot, to LPVO, to medium power. Last year, I confidently decided to move away from a Viper PST II 1-6 LPVO to a medium power optic. I bought a modern SwampFox Warhawk 2-10 and a Leupold VX-R Patrol TMR Firedot 3-9x40. On paper, the SwampFox had all the great features I was looking for, but with a mount and MRDS it was a 2.5LB pig that destroyed usability. I kept the Leupold and have loved it. Similar to someone above, I call that setup my Mock-12, but it’s an incredible set-up. The MK3 HD looks like the modern predecessor and I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend it. Pair it with a piggyback dot and I really do have all the capability I need for the 5.56 round. GPR, lightweight, NV capable, and fairly precise out to 400M at 9x View Quote Don't dbe afraid to bring it back. This is the kind of info that's needed. Thanks. |
|
|
I just got a credo 2-10x36. Mil reticle, illuminated but doesn’t have parallax.
Is it really that important on a AR at 500 yds and under? Not shooting groups, just plates. Attached File |
|
" Don't cry, nobody shoots Glocks anymore."
"But the new Admin. is a Master in IDPA" "MASTER in IDPA..." "is like C Class in IPSC!" |
Originally Posted By doom1430: Don't be afraid to bring it back. This is the kind of info that's needed. Thanks. View Quote Glad to hear it! I’m thinking of any follow up info to pass on after using the 3-9X for the last year. I’ll say at 15 yards and out I do not struggle to use the 3x as a minimum magnification at all. 0 to 50 I find a piggyback more than usable (assuming you have a standard height mount and the piggyback isn’t sky high) I truly think the lightweight nature of these Leupold scopes at or under 15oz is truly underrated. It allows you to really make a setup more versatile because you can get away with adding an IR laser or bipod. With other scopes you already suffer a weight penalty because your optic weighs double (13-15oz vs 25-28oz) Like the other poster mentioned, I don’t find lack of parallax to be an issue. I’m not shooting at distances with a 9X maximum magnification where parallax will ruin my shot (in my experience thus far) I haven’t seen anything come to market for under $1K that makes me want to jump from this older SFP 3-9X platform yet. I think a good, sub 18oz 2-12x FFP would make that happen but they don’t seem to exist |
|
|
There is nowhere left to go... this is it.
USA
|
Originally Posted By hydrostatic_cling: Looks like their MarkAR cheapy line with a new joke name. I wouldn’t buy such a low end scope. View Quote There were a couple MarkAR’s in my shooting groups and I hated them. The turrets will move if you look at them wrong, definitely not an optic for anything but bench use. Taking the rifle out of the case was a guaranteed way to have the turrets turn. |
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Ben Franklin |
There is nowhere left to go... this is it.
USA
|
|
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Ben Franklin |
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.