Typically when a communist government has emerged in Central America, or the Carribean, then the U.S. government has funded insurgent groups and rebels within those countries who are willing to fight against Communism.
In the eighties we funded the Contras in Nicaragua. We funded dozens of other groups and other governments which were willing to fight Communism in South America, South East Asia and other parts of the world. We even attacked Grenada and replaced its Communist government with a new benevolent ruler.
Can we do any less for the oppressed people in California? Don't we owe it to them to start funding rebel cells throughout the Golden State who are willing to fight in the name of Capitalism and the American way?
Should we provide insurgent groups with Stinger Missiles, Anti-aircraft guns, radar and long range ground to air missiles so that they can prevent the spread of Communism via the skyways of California?
Should we send in the Special Forces to train and equip rebel forces? Should we provide resistance fighters in California with machine guns, rocket launcers, morters, anti-tank guns and other light weaponry?
Should we escalate the war by providing restistance fighters with heavy equipment, including tanks, armored personel carriers and helicopters?
Should we surround California with a wall of troops and iron to prevent Californian Communism from spreading like a sick socialist disease?
Or should we skip the above steps and move straight to military intervention.
Can we afford to rule out the "nuclear" option?????
-SS