User Panel
Posted: 10/30/2014 1:10:16 PM EDT
Video link for phones
12 gauge Remington #4 buckshot (27 pellet) fired from 18.5" barrel Mossberg 500A cylinder bore into calibrated 10% gelatin. BB: 590.5 fps, 3.7" Impact velocity: 1,245 fps Min penetration: 11.0" Max penetration: over 14" Pellet weight: 19.2 gr Pellet diameter: 0.249" *Note: 7 pellets exited the back of the 14" block. That means that 62.5% of the pellets that were captured in the block exceeded the 12" minimum requirement. |
|
[#1]
Thank you for your test.
Any idea what each #4 pellet weighs? Or what the diameter is? Just straight lead? Copper plated? With a buffer? |
|
[#2]
Pellet weight: 19.2 gr
Pellet diameter: 0.249" Straight lead, no plating, buffered. |
|
[#3]
Nice test. I like number four. Though mosylt recommend one or bigger.
Good video. Thanks for the effort. Shotguns suck anyway though. Ar15 all the way. |
|
[#4]
My favorite shotgun load. Picked up a few more boxes just last week.
|
|
[#6]
One of my neighbors swore by it for up close and personal social encounters; three tours in Vietnam, two w/ 5th Special Forces, and a bad case of PTSD and he had some pretty guesome pictures to back up his argument.
|
|
[#7]
This my preferred load for coyotes. I use #1 buck in my HD shottie.
|
|
[#8]
|
|
[#10]
It has been a proven deer load. Shot shells kill by multiple wound paths, not by lucky golden BBs hitting critical areas. This means pattern density is crucial, a few blue whistlers in an open pattern is far from ideal.
|
|
[#11]
Quoted:
Nice test. I like number four. Though mosylt recommend one or bigger. Good video. Thanks for the effort. Shotguns suck anyway though. Ar15 all the way. View Quote Thank you. I agree. My HD rifle is a suppressed SBR. Our shotgun is loaded with Federal low recoil 00 buck. Might be a good choice for apartment dwellers. |
|
[#12]
Quoted:
Doesn't matter, I only use two shots in the air of birdshot for home defense..... http://replygif.net/i/1459.gif View Quote I thought we were supposed to shoot through the door. |
|
[#13]
Quoted:
It has been a proven deer load. Shot shells kill by multiple wound paths, not by lucky golden BBs hitting critical areas. This means pattern density is crucial, a few blue whistlers in an open pattern is far from ideal. View Quote Does this mean you would favor #4 buck or prefer something heavier? |
|
[#14]
Quoted: Does this mean you would favor #4 buck or prefer something heavier? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It has been a proven deer load. Shot shells kill by multiple wound paths, not by lucky golden BBs hitting critical areas. This means pattern density is crucial, a few blue whistlers in an open pattern is far from ideal. Does this mean you would favor #4 buck or prefer something heavier? |
|
[#15]
I've been a firm believer in #4 buck for use on humans for many years.
|
|
[#16]
|
|
[#17]
An AR-15 cant do that kinda damage with a 40 rd mag. And that's one shot from a 12 ga.
|
|
[#18]
Old_Painless has an extensive write-up on 4-buck over on Box o Truth, IIRC
ETA: Oops, it was 1-buck |
|
[#19]
A triple tap of .223 (in a proper bullet design) would almost certainly do more damage than that.
AR15>Shotgun. Always |
|
[#20]
|
|
[#21]
|
|
[#22]
OMG SHOULD WE HAVE THE SHOTGUN VS AR FOR HOME DEFENSE ARGUMENT AGAIN?!?!?!?!
*fingers crossed*
|
|
[#23]
|
|
[#24]
I like #4 buck just because it was used in Vietnam with good results. Old Painless has shown there are other options.
|
|
[#25]
Quoted:
A triple tap of .223 (in a proper bullet design) would almost certainly do more damage than that. AR15>Shotgun. Always View Quote Of course. But it would be silly and dogmatically short-sighted to not understand the strengths and weaknesses of other weapons. When bad things happen, I'm very comfortable in the knowledge that I can effectively use whatever weapon is lying around. |
|
[#26]
|
|
[#27]
Great, and I just picked up some replacement 00 Buck with flite control.
|
|
[#28]
Quoted: What kind of effective range do you get with #4 or say #3 buck with a cylinder bore? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: This my preferred load for coyotes. I use #1 buck in my HD shottie. What kind of effective range do you get with #4 or say #3 buck with a cylinder bore? |
|
[#29]
Quoted:
I load one barrel with 3" magnum number 4 buck and the other with 3" magnum number one buck. The magnum number 4 has 41 pellets. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I've been a firm believer in #4 buck for use on humans for many years. I load one barrel with 3" magnum number 4 buck and the other with 3" magnum number one buck. The magnum number 4 has 41 pellets. Holy shit, that's a lot of holes. |
|
[#30]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I've been a firm believer in #4 buck for use on humans for many years. I load one barrel with 3" magnum number 4 buck and the other with 3" magnum number one buck. The magnum number 4 has 41 pellets. Holy shit, that's a lot of holes. I love that load. My home defense shotgun is loaded with 5 rounds of 3" mag #4 buck. 41 pellets per shell like that man said. I imagine it'll do the job. |
|
[#31]
|
|
[#32]
|
|
[#34]
|
|
[#35]
Shit. #4 is da bomb? What am I going to do with all of this #00?
|
|
[#38]
|
|
[#39]
I've used #4 buck on Coyotes - It works pretty well. Often drops them in their tracks within 25 yds.
The 3" loads are also impressive in my opinion. Original Bee Hive Round! |
|
[#40]
Quoted:
Quoted:
A triple tap of .223 (in a proper bullet design) would almost certainly do more damage than that. AR15>Shotgun. Always I scoff at your assessment No matter how many shotgun threads we have, no matter how many times shotguns are debunked as the "best" weapon for HD, there are always more of you. The science is not on your side. |
|
[#41]
Quoted:
Shit. #4 is da bomb? What am I going to do with all of this #00? View Quote Not sure if cereal. If so, this particular version of #4 buck appears to be adequate at close range and might be favored by people living in an apartment or who might otherwise be very concerned about penetration. It almost certainly has pretty bad barrier performance and likely loses steam pretty quickly with distance. #00 buck is still favored for general purpose defense. |
|
[#43]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OMG SHOULD WE HAVE THE SHOTGUN VS AR FOR HOME DEFENSE ARGUMENT AGAIN?!?!?!?! *fingers crossed* Can we argue about whether a 9mm AR is better than a .45 shotgun? Get both! http://i40.tinypic.com/swpb84.jpg I don't care how impractical that is. I still want one some day. Maybe based off a Serbu Super Shorty, though. |
|
[#44]
Quoted:
No matter how many shotgun threads we have, no matter how many times shotguns are debunked as the "best" weapon for HD, there are always more of you. The science is not on your side. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
A triple tap of .223 (in a proper bullet design) would almost certainly do more damage than that. AR15>Shotgun. Always I scoff at your assessment No matter how many shotgun threads we have, no matter how many times shotguns are debunked as the "best" weapon for HD, there are always more of you. The science is not on your side. Not to put words in his mouth, but it seemed to me that he was only taking issue with the categorical statement that an AR15 is better than a shotgun at everything. I do prefer an AR for home defense but I've always maintained that the best weapon for YOU is the one with which YOU are most proficient. Lots of folks cut their teeth on guns wing shooting and those guys would have to spend tens of thousands of dollars getting the training that would make them as proficient with an AR as they already are with an 870. |
|
[#45]
Quoted:
Not to put words in his mouth, but it seemed to me that he was only taking issue with the categorical statement that an AR15 is better than a shotgun at everything. I do prefer an AR for home defense but I've always maintained that the best weapon for YOU is the one with which YOU are most proficient. Lots of folks cut their teeth on guns wing shooting and those guys would have to spend tens of thousands of dollars getting the training that would make them as proficient with an AR as they already are with an 870. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
A triple tap of .223 (in a proper bullet design) would almost certainly do more damage than that. AR15>Shotgun. Always I scoff at your assessment No matter how many shotgun threads we have, no matter how many times shotguns are debunked as the "best" weapon for HD, there are always more of you. The science is not on your side. Not to put words in his mouth, but it seemed to me that he was only taking issue with the categorical statement that an AR15 is better than a shotgun at everything. I do prefer an AR for home defense but I've always maintained that the best weapon for YOU is the one with which YOU are most proficient. Lots of folks cut their teeth on guns wing shooting and those guys would have to spend tens of thousands of dollars getting the training that would make them as proficient with an AR as they already are with an 870. Aside from all that 27 .24 caliber pellets in one trigger pull has a lot of stop to it. |
|
[#46]
I had to check last night.
my 1300 is loaded with #4 And (2) 00 & (2) slugs in side saddle I havent shot that gun in years. |
|
[#47]
I always intended to get some for coyote hunting.
This reminds me to go do that |
|
[#48]
I've said it before.
If you don't think a shotgun is a viable and effective home defense weapon, than you don't know shit about shotguns. If you think your shotgun is superior to your AR for home defense, than you don't know shit about ARs. Shotgun threads around here always turn into TardCon. |
|
[#49]
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.