User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/9/2016 10:51:23 AM EDT
[#1]
I've seen folks do an A2 rear sight in the M92.
https://www.ar15.com/mobile/topic.html?b=4&f=98&t=161037 |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/9/2016 3:32:18 PM EDT
[#2]
I prefer the PAP, as it's a Krink, but the Draco has a chrome lined barrel. The choice is your's. GARY
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/9/2016 9:39:10 PM EDT
[#3]
I decided to go with the draco, Got it today.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/9/2016 10:03:16 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I prefer the PAP, as it's a Krink, but the Draco has a chrome lined barrel. The choice is your's. GARY I'd disagree, but I've argued that in other threads already. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/18/2016 9:15:51 PM EDT
[#5]
Does any one know the sight radius difference between them?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2016 11:42:09 AM EDT
[#6]
About 1.5". Measured my Draco at 11" and on AK files a user that the m92 is 12.5"
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2016 1:09:11 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
About 1.5". Measured my Draco at 11" and on AK files a user that the m92 is 12.5" Mine measured at 11.5" when dropping a rod on a closed bolt. Neither the PAP nor the Draco are Krinks so I don't know what the whole "the PAP is a krink" deal is... the barrel length is off, handguards and other parts aren't interchangeable, it isn't really the right caliber, ect. They are probably great but I'm just completely turned off to yugos. I'm honestly not sure what I would list as an advantage for the M92 when comparing it to a Draco other than the shorter OAL which is really an inch or less i think. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2016 2:30:05 PM EDT
[#8]
He was asking about the sight radius, not barrel length
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2016 3:34:45 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He was asking about the sight radius, not barrel length Makes sense considering the M92 barrel is not 12.5"  . Definite fail on my part... sorry about that.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/20/2016 11:00:53 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I decided to go with the draco, Got it today. Right on! I grabbed one today, Classic had a good enough deal and the FFL selection was easy. I have some take off furniture and muzzle device from my WASR I'm going to switch to. I've heard all Draco's have at least a virgin under folder rear trunnion. Leaning toward that once I get my stamp, but I'm also intrigued by a storm works folder. Thoughts? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/20/2016 11:16:57 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Right on! I grabbed one today, Classic had a good enough deal and the FFL selection was easy. I have some take off furniture and muzzle device from my WASR I'm going to switch to. I've heard all Draco's have at least a virgin under folder rear trunnion. Leaning toward that once I get my stamp, but I'm also intrigued by a storm works folder. Thoughts? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I decided to go with the draco, Got it today. Right on! I grabbed one today, Classic had a good enough deal and the FFL selection was easy. I have some take off furniture and muzzle device from my WASR I'm going to switch to. I've heard all Draco's have at least a virgin under folder rear trunnion. Leaning toward that once I get my stamp, but I'm also intrigued by a storm works folder. Thoughts? I believe it was just the "C" models that were equipped with the under folder trunnion. I think the regular models just have a basic rear trunnion specifically for the pistols. I could be wrong though |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/20/2016 11:51:44 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I believe it was just the "C" models that were equipped with the under folder trunnion. I think the regular models just have a basic rear trunnion specifically for the pistols. I could be wrong though Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: I decided to go with the draco, Got it today. Right on! I grabbed one today, Classic had a good enough deal and the FFL selection was easy. I have some take off furniture and muzzle device from my WASR I'm going to switch to. I've heard all Draco's have at least a virgin under folder rear trunnion. Leaning toward that once I get my stamp, but I'm also intrigued by a storm works folder. Thoughts? I believe it was just the "C" models that were equipped with the under folder trunnion. I think the regular models just have a basic rear trunnion specifically for the pistols. I could be wrong though  |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/20/2016 11:52:14 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I believe it was just the "C" models that were equipped with the under folder trunnion. I think the regular models just have a basic rear trunnion specifically for the pistols. I could be wrong though Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I decided to go with the draco, Got it today. Right on! I grabbed one today, Classic had a good enough deal and the FFL selection was easy. I have some take off furniture and muzzle device from my WASR I'm going to switch to. I've heard all Draco's have at least a virgin under folder rear trunnion. Leaning toward that once I get my stamp, but I'm also intrigued by a storm works folder. Thoughts? I believe it was just the "C" models that were equipped with the under folder trunnion. I think the regular models just have a basic rear trunnion specifically for the pistols. I could be wrong though No they all had underfolder trunnions, the only thing that the "C" model has is the holes already in the trunnion for the UF stock. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/21/2016 12:26:45 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No they all had underfolder trunnions, the only thing that the "C" model has is the holes already in the trunnion for the UF stock. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I decided to go with the draco, Got it today. Right on! I grabbed one today, Classic had a good enough deal and the FFL selection was easy. I have some take off furniture and muzzle device from my WASR I'm going to switch to. I've heard all Draco's have at least a virgin under folder rear trunnion. Leaning toward that once I get my stamp, but I'm also intrigued by a storm works folder. Thoughts? I believe it was just the "C" models that were equipped with the under folder trunnion. I think the regular models just have a basic rear trunnion specifically for the pistols. I could be wrong though No they all had underfolder trunnions, the only thing that the "C" model has is the holes already in the trunnion for the UF stock. Interesting. Learned something new. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/21/2016 1:29:29 PM EDT
[#15]
So the ones currently at Atlantic have underfolder trunions?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/21/2016 5:50:44 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So the ones currently at Atlantic have underfolder trunions? All AK pistols imported are going to have underfolder trunnions, I very much doubt they're going to tool up and make a pistol specific trunnion when all they got to do is chuck an un-drilled UF trunnion in the receiver. That being said If you want an underfolder stock on it just send it to an AK smith to get the holes drilled, after you get your F1 back of course. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/21/2016 8:50:12 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
All AK pistols imported are going to have underfolder trunnions, I very much doubt they're going to tool up and make a pistol specific trunnion when all they got to do is chuck an un-drilled UF trunnion in the receiver. That being said If you want an underfolder stock on it just send it to an AK smith to get the holes drilled, after you get your F1 back of course. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
So the ones currently at Atlantic have underfolder trunions? All AK pistols imported are going to have underfolder trunnions, I very much doubt they're going to tool up and make a pistol specific trunnion when all they got to do is chuck an un-drilled UF trunnion in the receiver. That being said If you want an underfolder stock on it just send it to an AK smith to get the holes drilled, after you get your F1 back of course. Yup.... exactly what I did with mine. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/8/2016 10:57:16 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No they all had underfolder trunnions, the only thing that the "C" model has is the holes already in the trunnion for the UF stock. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I decided to go with the draco, Got it today. Right on! I grabbed one today, Classic had a good enough deal and the FFL selection was easy. I have some take off furniture and muzzle device from my WASR I'm going to switch to. I've heard all Draco's have at least a virgin under folder rear trunnion. Leaning toward that once I get my stamp, but I'm also intrigued by a storm works folder. Thoughts? I believe it was just the "C" models that were equipped with the under folder trunnion. I think the regular models just have a basic rear trunnion specifically for the pistols. I could be wrong though No they all had underfolder trunnions, the only thing that the "C" model has is the holes already in the trunnion for the UF stock. They did not. Early model C's had the underfolder trunnion WITH the holes drilled. Later versions of the C's had a "underfolder trunnion" un-drilled. Must have looked at 30+ C's before I found the one below (with the trunnion and holes) 
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
