User Panel
|
Another reason for gun owners to dump sports, but you won't. So STFU and quit your bitching and enjoy your shit sandwich. |
|
Quoted:
Wasn't dismissing your point, just trying to pin down the reason for the difference in numbers. The JPFO article was concerned about the remaining billionaires gun control positions being vague and hard for them to pin down. Warren Buffet got knocked down this year from his #3 spot and I know he supports Democrats but I don't know who the new #3 Amazon's Jeff Bezos supports or if he donates to gun control like Paul Allen or Bill Gates do. Hillary seems to have a tremendous amount of $ for her campaign and commercials at her disposal and she's scheduled to return to Hollywood next month to fundraise even more. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Forbes lists 540 current U.S. Billionaires. https://www.billionairemailinglist.com/billionaires-list.html It is a fair bet there are at least double that number. There are many people who's wealth is under the radar. The Forbes list is not gospel, it is just a best guess of who they know about. Anyways even using 397 instead of 500, it does not change the reality of my point by altering the % much. Which again, is, this is not a 1% vs the 99% issue. That is a flawed statement. This is a negligible % of the 1% and a very small % of billionaires. Wasn't dismissing your point, just trying to pin down the reason for the difference in numbers. The JPFO article was concerned about the remaining billionaires gun control positions being vague and hard for them to pin down. Warren Buffet got knocked down this year from his #3 spot and I know he supports Democrats but I don't know who the new #3 Amazon's Jeff Bezos supports or if he donates to gun control like Paul Allen or Bill Gates do. Hillary seems to have a tremendous amount of $ for her campaign and commercials at her disposal and she's scheduled to return to Hollywood next month to fundraise even more. Tech billionaires are, on the whole, extremely socialist, especially the .com ones. Their entire wealth rests upon the premise that they DO know better, and they firmly believe that they could solve everyone's problems if they were given all the data and sufficient control. |
|
Turns out you can have a shit ton of money and still be stupid.
|
|
Cuban doesn't give two shits about Hilary and I bet he would rather vote Trump. Remember the companies he owns and tv programs he is on. That man will say and do anything to make sure he is not called a racist so he doesn't lose his precious maves.
|
|
|
Mark Cuban was never anything more than a huckster. He sold off his vaporware companies to compuserve (where are they now) and then made a killing selling a streaming video system to yahoo, that doesn't exist anymore, and I never heard anyone mention it. So that one had a hand in sinking yahoo eventuall too.
The man has never created anything that stands the test of time. |
|
Quoted:
Exactly. How many of those billionaires are busy getting rid of all the armed security, both personal and at their properties/holdings? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, they can afford to hire security so...... Aloha, Mark Exactly. How many of those billionaires are busy getting rid of all the armed security, both personal and at their properties/holdings? I can tell you for fact that Rupert Murdoch just after 9-11did not want any armed security, but the Board put it upon him. He agreed to have one retired LE officer. |
|
The billionaires are afraid of the people they are screwing over.
|
|
Quoted:
Yep, he's just another liberal shitbag that got lucky...and then invested well. He can go fuck himself.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't know much about him. Didn't he get rich by getting lucky in the dot com boom? Yep, he's just another liberal shitbag that got lucky...and then invested well. He can go fuck himself.... This and this and this and this |
|
Mark Cuban is from Mt. Lebanon, PA., therefore, he was probably a smug solid middle class left leaning white trash dick before
probably still spits on the sidewalk, picks his nose in public and runs stop lights too |
|
I thought that liberal shitbag came out a couple years back and claimed he regretted voting for Barry the 2nd time around? or that he believed Barry wasn't helping the country but rather hurting it? now he wants 4-8 years of worse than Obama?
FUCK CUBAN |
|
Quoted:
In the U.S, there are over 3 million people in the 1% and over 500 billionaires. 28 turds in the punch bowl is not representative of the 1%. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Why does the 1% want to disarm the 99%? In the U.S, there are over 3 million people in the 1% and over 500 billionaires. 28 turds in the punch bowl is not representative of the 1%. |
|
|
Add Starbucks to the list http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/07/news/economy/howard-schultz-hillary-clinton/
|
|
Good for him. Have his secretary type that up in triplicate, with appropriate citations. Then have Mark fold all three copies into a tight square, bend over and shove it up his ass.
|
|
Well, if they get their wish on gun control, I hope those SOB's are taxed into oblivion by the liberals.
Why? Because fuck those elitist assholes. |
|
|
Quoted:
Maybe it's because they're assfucking the entire world simultaneously. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Why does the 1% want to disarm the 99%? Maybe it's because they're assfucking the entire world simultaneously. Werd. An unflinching position in the world of authoritarianism since day one. |
|
I will listen to a billionaire when it comes to business.
Their opinion on any other subject is no more valid than any other asshole's. In short, FUCK YOU, BILLIONAIRES. |
|
So Mr. Cuban is an idiot. He still makes a damn good sandwich. Maybe he should stay in the kitchen and shut up.
|
|
|
|
31 people who will never be threatened, who will always have security around their families and who control the power of the GOV through the influence of their money want gun control. I'm shocked.
|
|
Quoted: Bingo, Gun control is an offshoot of population control The only reason the state of Michigan has pistol registration was so they could deny minorities and certain immigrants View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I wonder why they want us disarmed so badly Good question - chicken or the egg since many of them live in California or the left coast (Bill Gates) so I assume they're liberal aka progressives aka Democrats or were they the ones pushing Democrats to put it on the platform? Old timers how long have Dems been pushing gun control and how did it get started? Kennedy? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/02/billionaire-george-soros-director-steven-spielberg-among-top-donors-to-hillary-clintons-super-pac/ Nope, Jim crow Bingo, Gun control is an offshoot of population control The only reason the state of Michigan has pistol registration was so they could deny minorities and certain immigrants |
|
Quoted:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mark-cuban-voting-hillary-clinton-thinks/story?id=41013611 and today http://www.businessinsider.com/mark-cuban-hillary-bill-clinton-foundation-2016-8 View Quote |
|
|
|
|
More everyday https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/08/a-friend-of-hillary/
|
|
Quoted:
Why does the 1% want to disarm the 99%? View Quote I don't think it's what I think you thing it is. We've shown the powerful that they have nothing to fear. If we haven't taken this country back by now, from a goddamned leftist dictator, we're never going to. Nope, what they fear are actually unarmed SJW/FSA/BLM/BBQ activists who have learned that to get what they want they can simply harass corporations who want to avoid any sort of bad publicity at ALL costs. These leftist freaks hate rich white people. What better way to pander to the FSA masses than to side with them on an issue that means nothing whatsoever to the wealthy? |
|
|
Quoted:
Mark Cuban also said this and I agree with it especially after the shit the GOPe pulled this year in fighting Trump and pushing their establishment candidates. "The Republican Party does everything possible to discourage leadership. They want dogma. They want conformity. They want to conserve their romanticized past. That's a shame. I wish they wanted to conserve the best of what America is today and find a leader that can take us to new places that make our future better." View Quote lol, Hillary is the greatest conformity candidate of all time. If you don't conform and can't be bribed, SHE KILLS YOU. And dogma? Holy shit balls, the democrats have created entire religious orders around bullshit like radical environmentalism. If you DON'T believe, you're fucked. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
Quoted:
Mark Cuban also said this and I agree with it especially after the shit the GOPe pulled this year in fighting Trump and pushing their establishment candidates. "The Republican Party does everything possible to discourage leadership. They want dogma. They want conformity. They want to conserve their romanticized past. That's a shame. I wish they wanted to conserve the best of what America is today and find a leader that can take us to new places that make our future better." View Quote That is some grade A bullshit right there. 1. "The best of what America is today" is being crushed by the worst of what America is today. Someone has to deal with that "worst" part. That's leadership. 2. "They want to conserve their romanticized past." (WTF?) This is the problem with progressives. They automatically consider your founding principles to be "the past" , as if they are something to be discarded as we hurl ourselves in some "new direction". Just because you're abandoning your current position doesn't mean you are going FORWARD. |
|
Um, where exactly was a mention of gun control in that article?
|
|
31 billionaires huh? Well over 100,000,000 gun owners don't give a shit what they think. One would think that a billionaire would be better at math. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
If I was a billionaire that was a power player in a sector or two (as most billionaires are) I would kiss the ass of those with political power as well. Not only do I depend on it but so do thousands upon thousands of people, if not millions. Again, this is a large part of Trumps message. He has had to do it and seems to want to be honest about it and how corrupt the system is. Most of that corruption is not the very rich trying to run their empires. It is the government trying to control those empires. Having said that, the very wealthy are not a monolithic group of people who all have the same interests. There are sectors that do better under democratic administrations just like there are sectors that do well under republican administrations. The issue is not billionaires, even if some of them are horrible cock suckers. It is the shitty mission of government to get you to blame each other, and then offer a solution by getting bigger. The common enemy to most everyone, rich and working class, is the government. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's a lot of fucking turds in one punch bowl. Isn't it pretty much punch in the turd bowl at that point? Is there even any room left for punch? It is representative of about 5% of billionaires. It is representative of about 1 millionth% of the 1%. When someone says "why does the 1% what to...." This is not the place where such a statement has any meaning. Probably but every week it seems like one more billionaire gets added to Hillary's list http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/08/california-green-billionaire-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president/ If I was a billionaire that was a power player in a sector or two (as most billionaires are) I would kiss the ass of those with political power as well. Not only do I depend on it but so do thousands upon thousands of people, if not millions. Again, this is a large part of Trumps message. He has had to do it and seems to want to be honest about it and how corrupt the system is. Most of that corruption is not the very rich trying to run their empires. It is the government trying to control those empires. Having said that, the very wealthy are not a monolithic group of people who all have the same interests. There are sectors that do better under democratic administrations just like there are sectors that do well under republican administrations. The issue is not billionaires, even if some of them are horrible cock suckers. It is the shitty mission of government to get you to blame each other, and then offer a solution by getting bigger. The common enemy to most everyone, rich and working class, is the government. Cronyism wraps itself in the cloak of conservatism, just as the despotism of an oligarchy wraps itself in the cloak of socialism. They present themselves to the public as bitter rivals while dancing hand in hand w/in gilded halls. |
|
how about 31 billionaires and mark cuban suck a truckload of aids infested pus oozing dicks.
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.