User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:18:35 PM EDT
[#1]
Meh, weak cause to champion. Must have secret forums.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:19:50 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Smiley was that dude in middle school who had his dad's playboys and charged other kids to look at them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:20:03 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor Shit I would be happy if you would say "if the FTC says its cool for primetime or a billboard" its cool here. It's not like we want to turn this into /b |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:20:55 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor We need another chance  I promise no donkey gifs.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:21:03 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I was with you until that. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: This is fucking stupid. The way it used to be is just like you described. It was fine as long as BOTD was in the title. Well, people would use random memes and shit from all over so the OP would need to monitor his own thread, or site staff would have to go in and edit the title. It worked fine for the most part, but people on the internet are stupid children, and members kept pushing the envelope. So then we had limited BOTD only threads in GD. There were only so many allowed at a time. We couldn't handle that either, and an all out ban was put in place. Then the specific forums were created, but even those are heavily policed. If you want to see porn and half naked women, use Bing and get the real stuff. If you get the shakes after having not seen a woman in a bikini in the last five minutes on a gun forum, then maybe you have a bigger problem. I was with you until that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:21:29 PM EDT
[#6]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:21:54 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Google blocks porn links. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This is fucking stupid. The way it used to be is just like you described. It was fine as long as BOTD was in the title. Well, people would use random memes and shit from all over so the OP would need to monitor his own thread, or site staff would have to go in and edit the title. It worked fine for the most part, but people on the internet are stupid children, and members kept pushing the envelope. So then we had limited BOTD only threads in GD. There were only so many allowed at a time. We couldn't handle that either, and an all out ban was put in place. Then the specific forums were created, but even those are heavily policed. If you want to see porn and half naked women, use Bing and get the real stuff. If you get the shakes after having not seen a woman in a bikini in the last five minutes on a gun forum, then maybe you have a bigger problem. I was with you until that. Not on my settings. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:22:20 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We need another chance
I promise no donkey gifs.
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor We need another chance
I promise no donkey gifs.
People can just report the post. There are plenty of other forums that allow pictures of girls as long as there is no nudity, and they aren't covered in porn threads/pics. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:22:27 PM EDT
[#9]
Preach it man, it's one of the only things I think arfcom is stupid about! A bikini...if a spouse loses her shit over you scrolling past that in a thread, you'rve got issues way beyond what a website can affect.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:22:28 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
Lets change the BOTD rule. Here is my proposed change. (also this isn't the first thread I've made on this, but ya'll old people forget quick and need reminded. )
Current rule: 9) BOTD specific.
Changed rule: 9) BOTD specific.
Done and done. Bring BOTD to the GD Yeah I know it's not my site yadda yadda eat a dick. I'm a paying member and can inject my opinions when I feel like it. LEO list gate is not over. full and complete disclosure of the is and all members involved and elimination of that forum is needed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:22:39 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Shit I would be happy if you would say "if the FTC says its cool for primetime or a billboard" its cool here. It's not like we want to turn this into /b Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor Shit I would be happy if you would say "if the FTC says its cool for primetime or a billboard" its cool here. It's not like we want to turn this into /b Exactly. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:23:05 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Meh, I would rather accidentally see a scantly clad chick then have a complete black out of anything less then a pant suited female. You guys failed then, that doesn't mean we would fail now. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: This is fucking stupid. The way it used to be is just like you described. It was fine as long as BOTD was in the title. Well, people would use random memes and shit from all over so the OP would need to monitor his own thread, or site staff would have to go in and edit the title. It worked fine for the most part, but people on the internet are stupid children, and members kept pushing the envelope. So then we had limited BOTD only threads in GD. There were only so many allowed at a time. We couldn't handle that either, and an all out ban was put in place. Then the specific forums were created, but even those are heavily policed. If you want to see porn and half naked women, use Bing and get the real stuff. If you get the shakes after having not seen a woman in a bikini in the last five minutes on a gun forum, then maybe you have a bigger problem. Meh, I would rather accidentally see a scantly clad chick then have a complete black out of anything less then a pant suited female. You guys failed then, that doesn't mean we would fail now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:23:43 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor Would penguin porn be fine ? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:24:13 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't care what the rules are or how they're administered. I just like posting pictures of Christina Hendricks'a monster knockers. I like where this is headed! I like looking at Christina Hendrick's monster knockers. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:24:16 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Smiley was that dude in middle school who had his dad's playboys and charged other kids to look at them. And never gave the money back when half the damn pages were stuck together......
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:24:30 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not on my settings. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This is fucking stupid. The way it used to be is just like you described. It was fine as long as BOTD was in the title. Well, people would use random memes and shit from all over so the OP would need to monitor his own thread, or site staff would have to go in and edit the title. It worked fine for the most part, but people on the internet are stupid children, and members kept pushing the envelope. So then we had limited BOTD only threads in GD. There were only so many allowed at a time. We couldn't handle that either, and an all out ban was put in place. Then the specific forums were created, but even those are heavily policed. If you want to see porn and half naked women, use Bing and get the real stuff. If you get the shakes after having not seen a woman in a bikini in the last five minutes on a gun forum, then maybe you have a bigger problem. I was with you until that. Not on my settings. Do you even porn hub bra |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:25:29 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor I am not advocating changing the rules to allow BOTD in GD but could you make the punishment for injecting a BOTD picture in a non-BOTD labeled post a ban hammer type offense? I mean permanent site ban none of this wussy 3 day timeout shit. Break the rules and you are gone....no warnings..no excuses...just gone. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:26:02 PM EDT
[#18]
Agree with op
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:27:03 PM EDT
[#19]
The "It's too hard to police" seems like a copout when as Smiley pointed out you guys have successfully banned words or phrases when used in certain context in the recent past. A picture is a good bit easier to see than the context of a word in a block of text.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:27:25 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Disagree, GD is twice as retarded now as it was 10 years ago, plus there are more people. Hell, even in the BOTD forum people can't keep their shit straight. GD would be Mos Eisley. It might be twice as retarded but the pool of mods/staff is larger. Have you seen how fast posts get edited these days? I've reported porn and had it edited in less then a minute. I don't think the problems of old would be a problem these days. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:27:33 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Meh, I would rather accidentally see a scantly clad chick then have a complete black out of anything less then a pant suited female. You guys failed then, that doesn't mean we would fail now. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
This is fucking stupid. The way it used to be is just like you described. It was fine as long as BOTD was in the title. Well, people would use random memes and shit from all over so the OP would need to monitor his own thread, or site staff would have to go in and edit the title. It worked fine for the most part, but people on the internet are stupid children, and members kept pushing the envelope. So then we had limited BOTD only threads in GD. There were only so many allowed at a time. We couldn't handle that either, and an all out ban was put in place. Then the specific forums were created, but even those are heavily policed. If you want to see porn and half naked women, use Bing and get the real stuff. If you get the shakes after having not seen a woman in a bikini in the last five minutes on a gun forum, then maybe you have a bigger problem. Meh, I would rather accidentally see a scantly clad chick then have a complete black out of anything less then a pant suited female. You guys failed then, that doesn't mean we would fail now. Yes it does. The population of assholes on the internet hasn't changed since Al Gore opened the doors. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:28:07 PM EDT
[#22]
Hell, you could just state that all "non sharia" images must be contained in spoiler tags.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:29:32 PM EDT
[#24]
I would buy a membership tomorrow if this rule changes to a "ok in prime time/billboard" ok in gd style rule. Permaban whoever breaks it for all I care, it's just a little relaxation of rules that's needed, not a free for all. Anyone else up for buying a membership if it changes?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:30:09 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't care what the rules are or how they're administered. I just like posting pictures of Christina Hendricks'a monster knockers. You and me both. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:30:38 PM EDT
[#26]
I will say/admit that I leave GD up nearly all day in the office. Gotta do something while waiting on supposedly fast computers. Would not mind IF all the threads had a warning like NSFW.
Watching people blown to bits, heads removed, burned alive, run over by steamroller, etc is fine. Boobies on the screen in the office tend to raise eyebrows. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:30:48 PM EDT
[#27]
smileymill thread
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:31:36 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Now that's a woman Edited for coc http://i1204.photobucket.com/albums/bb404/Shorties2001gt/Mobile%20Uploads/556D7C2D-0082-408E-83BD-E330BFBD9825.jpg Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: I don't care what the rules are or how they're administered. I just like posting pictures of Christina Hendricks'a monster knockers. I like where this is headed! I like looking at Christina Hendrick's monster knockers. Now that's a woman Edited for coc http://i1204.photobucket.com/albums/bb404/Shorties2001gt/Mobile%20Uploads/556D7C2D-0082-408E-83BD-E330BFBD9825.jpg I can see the bottom of her nose. Reported. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:32:23 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor So what's the problem? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:33:02 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor What's stopping people from posting that shit now? How does allowing swimsuit threads open up the gate to donkey porn? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:33:16 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
smileymill thread 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:33:56 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What's stopping people from posting that shit now? How does allowing swimsuit threads open up the gate to donkey porn? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor What's stopping people from posting that shit now? How does allowing swimsuit threads open up the gate to donkey porn? Fair point. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:34:12 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Google blocks porn links. As of last night they didn't. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:34:38 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I will say/admit that I leave GD up nearly all day in the office. Gotta do something while waiting on supposedly fast computers. Would not mind IF all the threads had a warning like NSFW. Watching people blown to bits, heads removed, burned alive, run over by steamroller, etc is fine. Boobies on the screen in the office tend to raise eyebrows. Or you guys playing on GD at work could find other ways to spend your employer's money. Why should everyone else have to abide by YOUR employer's HR department? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:35:03 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What's stopping people from posting that shit now? How does allowing swimsuit threads open up the gate to donkey porn? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor What's stopping people from posting that shit now? How does allowing swimsuit threads open up the gate to donkey porn? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:35:40 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes it does. The population of assholes on the internet hasn't changed since Al Gore opened the doors. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This is fucking stupid. The way it used to be is just like you described. It was fine as long as BOTD was in the title. Well, people would use random memes and shit from all over so the OP would need to monitor his own thread, or site staff would have to go in and edit the title. It worked fine for the most part, but people on the internet are stupid children, and members kept pushing the envelope. So then we had limited BOTD only threads in GD. There were only so many allowed at a time. We couldn't handle that either, and an all out ban was put in place. Then the specific forums were created, but even those are heavily policed. If you want to see porn and half naked women, use Bing and get the real stuff. If you get the shakes after having not seen a woman in a bikini in the last five minutes on a gun forum, then maybe you have a bigger problem. Meh, I would rather accidentally see a scantly clad chick then have a complete black out of anything less then a pant suited female. You guys failed then, that doesn't mean we would fail now. Yes it does. The population of assholes on the internet hasn't changed since Al Gore opened the doors. No way, human nature has TOTALLY changed in the last 15 years. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:37:22 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't care what the rules are or how they're administered. I just like posting pictures of Christina Hendricks'a monster knockers. And I still love you
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:38:52 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: As of last night they didn't. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Google blocks porn links. As of last night they didn't. If you google "glory hole" you might get a few porn pics, but most of it will just be a hole. If you go to Bing and search "glory hole" it's all going to be porn. You used to be able to switch from filtered and unfiltered search, but now nearly everything has some degree of filter to it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:39:50 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No way, human nature has TOTALLY changed in the last 15 years. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: This is fucking stupid. The way it used to be is just like you described. It was fine as long as BOTD was in the title. Well, people would use random memes and shit from all over so the OP would need to monitor his own thread, or site staff would have to go in and edit the title. It worked fine for the most part, but people on the internet are stupid children, and members kept pushing the envelope. So then we had limited BOTD only threads in GD. There were only so many allowed at a time. We couldn't handle that either, and an all out ban was put in place. Then the specific forums were created, but even those are heavily policed. If you want to see porn and half naked women, use Bing and get the real stuff. If you get the shakes after having not seen a woman in a bikini in the last five minutes on a gun forum, then maybe you have a bigger problem. Meh, I would rather accidentally see a scantly clad chick then have a complete black out of anything less then a pant suited female. You guys failed then, that doesn't mean we would fail now. Yes it does. The population of assholes on the internet hasn't changed since Al Gore opened the doors. No way, human nature has TOTALLY changed in the last 15 years. Human nature isn't the issue. Moderation, clear rules, and enforcement is what has changed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:41:12 PM EDT
[#40]
Also, BOTD has nothing to do with porn.
I'm not talking fap material here, just woman sans burkas. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:42:10 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What's stopping people from posting that shit now? How does allowing swimsuit threads open up the gate to donkey porn? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor What's stopping people from posting that shit now? How does allowing swimsuit threads open up the gate to donkey porn? If someone posts a hateful word, they did it, you can lock them. But with images, there is a degree of subjectiveness to it. You're all thinking cleavage pics and black underwear, but what also gets posted is see through wet white tshirts, and g-strings with lots of lips (  ) sticking out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:42:14 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:  Something about the avatar made me read it in his voice like that question was retarded as it is Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Do people not know how to find porn on the internet? No I have never found porn on the internet. Something about the avatar made me read it in his voice like that question was retarded as it is |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:42:28 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Do people not know how to find porn on the internet? There's porn on the internet?! Icky. 
Dude, you can NEVER see too many boobs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:43:31 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't care what the rules are or how they're administered. I just like posting pictures of Christina Hendricks'a monster knockers.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:43:47 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Because there is a massive grey area between swimsuit pics and donkey porn. If someone posts a hateful word, they did it, you can lock them. But with images, there is a degree of subjectiveness to it. You're all thinking cleavage pics and black underwear, but what also gets posted is see through wet white tshirts, and g-strings with lots of lips ( ) sticking out. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor What's stopping people from posting that shit now? How does allowing swimsuit threads open up the gate to donkey porn? If someone posts a hateful word, they did it, you can lock them. But with images, there is a degree of subjectiveness to it. You're all thinking cleavage pics and black underwear, but what also gets posted is see through wet white tshirts, and g-strings with lots of lips ( ) sticking out. Clear rules is what stops that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:44:13 PM EDT
[#46]
Quoted:
but ya'll old people forget quick and need reminded. You mean the same people who remember why the rules have evolved to what they are? 
But yeah, human nature having changed so much with the current generation of young adults, I'm sure that this and socialism will be stunningly successful. This time.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:46:43 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You mean the same people who remember why the rules have evolved to what they are? But yeah, human nature having changed so much with the current generation of young adults, I'm sure that this and socialism will be stunningly successful. This time. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: but ya'll old people forget quick and need reminded. You mean the same people who remember why the rules have evolved to what they are? But yeah, human nature having changed so much with the current generation of young adults, I'm sure that this and socialism will be stunningly successful. This time.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:48:00 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Clear rules is what stops that. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: We have been around and around on this a million times behind the scenes and while I agree the botd rules are stupid you guys cannot resist posting donkey porn in gd if we allow swimsuit threads. It's just impossible to monitor What's stopping people from posting that shit now? How does allowing swimsuit threads open up the gate to donkey porn? If someone posts a hateful word, they did it, you can lock them. But with images, there is a degree of subjectiveness to it. You're all thinking cleavage pics and black underwear, but what also gets posted is see through wet white tshirts, and g-strings with lots of lips ( ) sticking out. Clear rules is what stops that. 2.) Posting pictures* or links to images which contain pornography, nudity+, animal cruelty, racism, or sexism. (Any images of violence which are extreme will be removed and may result in a warning or worse.) *Posts with images of violence or photos of scantly clad men or women should contain a warning in the title. These types of images will not be tolerated if inserted at random in other discussions. +Nudity includes any photo which contains a clear view of genitalia or female nipples. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:49:10 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Also, BOTD has nothing to do with porn. I'm not talking fap material here, just woman sans burkas. Full American sharia must be enforced or the potneedle perverts will win |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 3:49:45 PM EDT
[#50]
Hell, there was even a COCK in the logo.
 |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
