User Panel
[#3]
I have a gen2 G19 that I bought in 1991.
that gun has accurately fired about 3k rounds without a failure to feed, fire, or extract. |
|
[#4]
|
|
[#5]
Those things can't be picked up by metal detectors and cost more than I make in a month!!
|
|
[#8]
They should have stayed with that grip.
All the money being spent to have the finger grooves removed speaks volumes on why Glock shouldn't have them on their guns. |
|
[#9]
|
|
[#10]
I remember that article. I bought my first 23 not long after.
|
|
[#11]
Thanks for the blast from the past. I read this way back then.
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
[#12]
That article actually convinced me to buy a Glock 22 as my first handgun.
|
|
[#13]
I have a hard time getting past the major league derpage of the FBI loading the 10mm Auto so it underperforms the 40 Short and Weak, and using that as a reason to abandon the 10mm in favor of the 40.
|
|
[#14]
Quoted: They should have stayed with that grip. All the money being spent to have the finger grooves removed speaks volumes on why Glock shouldn't have them on their guns. View Quote If our brilliant federal government hadn't inserted their limp dicks in the gun business Glock would never have put the idiotic finger grips on it in the first place.
|
|
[#15]
I got my G22 w/NY Trigger in the summer of 1991.
Still have it to this day, with the Tupperware case. Chris |
|
[#16]
|
|
[#18]
Quoted:
<a href="http://s4.photobucket.com/user/phuzzygnu/media/glock006.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y109/phuzzygnu/glock006.jpg</a> I still have my old G20. Hell, and that picture is like 10 years old. The ol' girl has even more holster wear and character. And 10,000+ rounds downrange. -p. View Quote Looks a lot like mine. I bought it in March of 1991. |
|
[#20]
Quoted:
I have a hard time getting past the major league derpage of the FBI loading the 10mm Auto so it underperforms the 40 Short and Weak, and using that as a reason to abandon the 10mm in favor of the 40. View Quote Why carry a .45 frame when you can meet the standards with a 9mm sized pistol? |
|
[#21]
|
|
[#24]
|
|
[#25]
Quoted:
<a href="http://s4.photobucket.com/user/phuzzygnu/media/glock006.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y109/phuzzygnu/glock006.jpg</a> I still have my old G20. Hell, and that picture is like 10 years old. The ol' girl has even more holster wear and character. And 10,000+ rounds downrange. -p. View Quote Very nice |
|
[#26]
That was an oldie. I remember having that Shooting Times issue back in the day and reading about the Glock. I wasn't even old enough to own a firearm yet
|
|
[#27]
|
|
[#29]
|
|
[#30]
what does it say about "Browning's first 284 lever gun"? cause i have one of those i bought new back then.
GR |
|
[#31]
Quoted: Because the 10mm was a training issue for average and weak shooters and needlessly powerful for shooting people. A position I think they were right to take. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I love my g20 Why are the FBI loads underpowered? Because the 10mm was a training issue for average and weak shooters and needlessly powerful for shooting people. A position I think they were right to take. It gave birth to the best service cartridge ever, the .40 S&W!
|
|
[#33]
Quoted:
Quoted:
They should have stayed with that grip. All the money being spent to have the finger grooves removed speaks volumes on why Glock shouldn't have them on their guns. If you like your finger grooves, you can keep your finger grooves. |
|
[#34]
Quoted:
If you like your finger grooves, you can keep your finger grooves. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They should have stayed with that grip. All the money being spent to have the finger grooves removed speaks volumes on why Glock shouldn't have them on their guns. If you like your finger grooves, you can keep your finger grooves. Cool. I like them too. I haven't lathered it up in dishwashing soap and practiced retention with it, but I imagine the finger grooves help with retention. |
|
[#35]
Quoted: If you like your finger grooves, you can keep your finger grooves. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: They should have stayed with that grip. All the money being spent to have the finger grooves removed speaks volumes on why Glock shouldn't have them on their guns. If you like your finger grooves, you can keep your finger grooves. |
|
[#38]
|
|
[#39]
OP, thanks for posting that article. Brought back some memories of when it came out.
|
|
[#41]
What year did Glock start stamping .40 instead of .40SW on the slide?
|
|
[#42]
|
|
[#43]
Quoted:
Quoted:
What year did Glock start stamping .40 instead of .40SW on the slide? I guess they used SW off and on? Because my 1995 production G23 is stamped "40 SW" No dot before 40 and a space between 40 and SW. Now they are just ".40" |
|
[#44]
Quoted: I guess they used SW off and on? Because my 1995 production G23 is stamped "40 SW" No dot before 40 and a space between 40 and SW. Now they are just ".40" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: What year did Glock start stamping .40 instead of .40SW on the slide? I guess they used SW off and on? Because my 1995 production G23 is stamped "40 SW" No dot before 40 and a space between 40 and SW. Now they are just ".40" Similar to what Colt did with Smith & Wesson designed cartridges on their revolvers back in the day. .38 S&W was .38 Colt, etc...
|
|
[#46]
Quoted:
Hmmm... I was always under the impression that they dropped the S&W from the stamping ASAP since they didn't want to advertise Smith & Wesson on their guns. Similar to what Colt did with Smith & Wesson designed cartridges on their revolvers back in the day. .38 S&W was .38 Colt, etc... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What year did Glock start stamping .40 instead of .40SW on the slide? I guess they used SW off and on? Because my 1995 production G23 is stamped "40 SW" No dot before 40 and a space between 40 and SW. Now they are just ".40" Similar to what Colt did with Smith & Wesson designed cartridges on their revolvers back in the day. .38 S&W was .38 Colt, etc... I was as well. Which is why an article from 1990 showing ".40" surprised me. i assumed they were always "40 SW" until they were not... |
|
[#48]
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.