User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:52:32 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No significant advantage. At least you are finally accepting that despite not accepting a slide fire, the scar 16 is still better than the m4 platform, just not significantly better. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: snip No significant advantage. At least you are finally accepting that despite not accepting a slide fire, the scar 16 is still better than the m4 platform, just not significantly better. I don't care for them because of the goofy ass recoil impulse, and the unnecessarily huge and long operating rod. What's the point of using an AR-18 BCG If you're going to use an op rod like that? Why not use the lighter version of what they copied the G36?  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 1:10:20 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Umm... That was the military that stated that as the reason it was dropped like a hot rock. I don't care for them because of the goofy ass recoil impulse, and the unnecessarily huge and long operating rod. What's the point of using an AR-18 BCG If you're going to use an op rod like that? Why not use the lighter version of what they copied the G36? http://www.strelec.si/forum/uploads/FileUpload/10/7f5e86f70a169ed95737355a70d23c.jpg Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
snip No significant advantage. At least you are finally accepting that despite not accepting a slide fire, the scar 16 is still better than the m4 platform, just not significantly better. I don't care for them because of the goofy ass recoil impulse, and the unnecessarily huge and long operating rod. What's the point of using an AR-18 BCG If you're going to use an op rod like that? Why not use the lighter version of what they copied the G36? http://www.strelec.si/forum/uploads/FileUpload/10/7f5e86f70a169ed95737355a70d23c.jpg wow thats crazy I had no idea the guts were that close. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 1:32:57 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: wow thats crazy I had no idea the guts were that close. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: snip wow thats crazy I had no idea the guts were that close. The ACR is similar  And of course, it all stems from the AR-18.  One major differance being the AR-18 uses dual guide rods that pin into the front trunion to locate the BCG in the receiver vs rails. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 6:13:37 AM EDT
[#4]
So far, this has been the most interesting part of the thread. Thanks for posting those pics. BTW I own a SCAR-16 and love it. I don't think it's perfect but I prefer it over my AR's.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 6:19:33 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: LOL yea... They didn't put a lot of effort into changing things, besides adding a TON of mass. The ACR is similar http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v600/jj762c/ACR%20bolt%20assembly/1ACRCompleteboltandcarrier.jpg And of course, it all stems from the AR-18. http://50ae.net/collection/ar180/ar180-19-cs.jpg One major differance being the AR-18 uses dual guide rods that pin into the front trunion to locate the BCG in the receiver vs rails. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: snip wow thats crazy I had no idea the guts were that close. The ACR is similar http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v600/jj762c/ACR%20bolt%20assembly/1ACRCompleteboltandcarrier.jpg And of course, it all stems from the AR-18. http://50ae.net/collection/ar180/ar180-19-cs.jpg One major differance being the AR-18 uses dual guide rods that pin into the front trunion to locate the BCG in the receiver vs rails. Jeezus, I wonder who patented the AR-18 BCG. They should be making a shitload of money just from everyone trying to copy it.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 6:46:38 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Jeezus, I wonder who patented the AR-18 BCG. They should be making a shitload of money just from everyone trying to copy it.
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
snip wow thats crazy I had no idea the guts were that close. The ACR is similar http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v600/jj762c/ACR%20bolt%20assembly/1ACRCompleteboltandcarrier.jpg And of course, it all stems from the AR-18. http://50ae.net/collection/ar180/ar180-19-cs.jpg One major differance being the AR-18 uses dual guide rods that pin into the front trunion to locate the BCG in the receiver vs rails. Jeezus, I wonder who patented the AR-18 BCG. They should be making a shitload of money just from everyone trying to copy it.
The patents ran out long ago. That's why everyone and their mother are copying it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 7:41:09 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Scopes designed for M24 and MK13 ate dick on a scar Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't see the SCAR ever getting to the same point, especially if the current atmosphere is "It's perfect like it is". Especially if people continue claiming incompatible accessories are a design fault of the weapon itself. Scopes designed for M24 and MK13 ate dick on a scar Cool, but neither of those bolt guns have recoil impulses the same as a SCAR (or an AR for that matter)... So why do you expect them to behave identically on two different systems if you've already identified the causation for this issue? As I told Madcap, I don't view this as a problem with the SCAR. I view this as a problem with putting those optics on the SCAR, and certainly a problem for those stuck with no other option. Given ancillary equipment tailored to or compatible with the SCAR's recoil impulse this issue would cease to be any matter of concern. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 9:13:42 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So far, this has been the most interesting part of the thread. Thanks for posting those pics. Agreed. Never had the opportunity to disassemble those others. Learning has occured. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 9:38:37 AM EDT
[#9]
I'm beginning to think the AR18 is the most copied system out there LOL
SA-80 BCG  Steyr AUG  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 9:48:18 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm beginning to think the AR18 is the most copied system out there LOLSA-80 BCGhttp://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o283/Archerofloaf/Germany160.jpg Steyr AUG http://www.gunmart.net/images/content/gun_reviews/54/05.jpg Except in the AUG the rods are incorporated into the carrier, rather than going through the carrier? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 9:49:26 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Except in the AUG the rods are incorporated into the carrier, rather than going through the carrier? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I'm beginning to think the AR18 is the most copied system out there LOLSA-80 BCGhttp://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o283/Archerofloaf/Germany160.jpg Steyr AUG http://www.gunmart.net/images/content/gun_reviews/54/05.jpg Except in the AUG the rods are incorporated into the carrier, rather than going through the carrier? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 10:48:01 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The patents ran out long ago. That's why everyone and their mother are copying it. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: snip wow thats crazy I had no idea the guts were that close. The ACR is similar http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v600/jj762c/ACR%20bolt%20assembly/1ACRCompleteboltandcarrier.jpg And of course, it all stems from the AR-18. http://50ae.net/collection/ar180/ar180-19-cs.jpg One major differance being the AR-18 uses dual guide rods that pin into the front trunion to locate the BCG in the receiver vs rails. Jeezus, I wonder who patented the AR-18 BCG. They should be making a shitload of money just from everyone trying to copy it. The patents ran out long ago. That's why everyone and their mother are copying it. Firearms designers, especially modern ones, copy everything. The M60 is like it was designed by a committee.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:00:13 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm beginning to think the AR18 is the most copied system out there LOL Steyr AUG Bushmaster Combat Rifle   Leader Dynamics t-25 MK 2  Interesting here, they used a triangle bolt like and AK for simple machining.  The T-25 is now back for the low low price of $800 that give you a lot of the functionality of a SCAR at a fraction of the broken optics.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:18:36 AM EDT
[#14]
Madcap, does the Slidefire work on the MPAR? Can Handl Defense make a tapco fucked receiver for it?
If so, that's all you. Good job BRO! And with stamped steel, it's only a pound heavier than the SCAR! That should definitely help with recoil and accuracy out of that shit barrel! FUCK YEA! Madcap, you're the man! |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:20:42 AM EDT
[#15]
Here's a vert der ferk and a new one to me.... A breakdown suitcase... gun. DRD Paratus Carbine .308, SCAR like, but the whole thing is tooless to disassemble.  But here's the neat part... It's like an AR-16 and AR-10 bolt had a baby....  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:23:00 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Madcap, does the Slidefire work on the MPAR? Can Handl Defense make a tapco fucked receiver for it? If so, that's all you. Good job BRO! And with stamped steel, it's only a pound heavier than the SCAR! That should definitely help with recoil and accuracy out of that shit barrel! FUCK YEA! Madcap, you're the man! http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1641834_Slide_Fire_haters__The_OFFICIAL_bumpfire_stock_hate_thread_.html Wanna hate on slide fires? Man up and hit that thread instead of swimming around the edges like a punk. ETA - Also the great thing about no being a weak bitch is not worrying about the weight of a pound or two. (Or in the case of the MPAR vs scar a half pound, but fuck math) Then again, my AR-180 weighs something like a half pound less than the SCAR... So you're right, if FN wanted to make a lighter rifle, stamped steel may have been the way to go. Or get rid of the half pound of metal they added to the G-36 bolt they use  Do you have a real argument at all or are you just making noise? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:27:20 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What's your problem? http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1641834_Slide_Fire_haters__The_OFFICIAL_bumpfire_stock_hate_thread_.html Wanna hate on slide fires? Man up and hit that thread instead of swimming around the edges like a punk. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Madcap, does the Slidefire work on the MPAR? Can Handl Defense make a tapco fucked receiver for it? If so, that's all you. Good job BRO! And with stamped steel, it's only a pound heavier than the SCAR! That should definitely help with recoil and accuracy out of that shit barrel! FUCK YEA! Madcap, you're the man! http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1641834_Slide_Fire_haters__The_OFFICIAL_bumpfire_stock_hate_thread_.html Wanna hate on slide fires? Man up and hit that thread instead of swimming around the edges like a punk. I'm not going to read a thread dedicated to slide fires. I'm sure you probably have 500 posts in there though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:30:29 AM EDT
[#18]
Nothing wrong with not wanting to go to a thread where you know you'll get shown your ass.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:33:05 AM EDT
[#19]
For those wondering what wonders that slidefire thread contain, and why it's so funny homeboy is avoiding it...
Here's one of the OP's video's. I'd put a SF on a SCAR, MPAR whatever... the things work, and work well.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:33:37 AM EDT
[#20]
SCAR16's reciprocating mass is gigantic. Now imagine the SCAR17.
Much heavier and more punishing on optics.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:41:44 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm not going to read a thread dedicated to slide fires. I'm sure you probably have 500 posts in there though. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Wanna hate on slide fires? Man up and hit that thread instead of swimming around the edges like a punk. I'm not going to read a thread dedicated to slide fires. I'm sure you probably have 500 posts in there though.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:42:01 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
SCAR16's reciprocating mass is gigantic. For a reason, the increased cyclic mass aids in reliable feeding. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:43:15 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: For a reason, the increased cyclic mass aids in reliable feeding. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: SCAR16's reciprocating mass is gigantic. For a reason, the increased cyclic mass aids in reliable feeding. -ETA OMG please keep coming up with reasons for design features of the scar, this shit's making my day. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:46:43 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
SCAR16's reciprocating mass is gigantic. For a reason, the increased cyclic mass aids in reliable feeding. A heavier mass is harder to stop or slow down than a lighter one, but your excellent refuting statement obviously proves otherwise. Thank you for providing us with such solid concrete data. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:49:07 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For those wondering what wonders that slidefire thread contain, and why it's so funny homeboy is avoiding it... Here's one of the OP's video's. I'd put a SF on a SCAR, MPAR whatever... the things work, and work well. Are you all out of things to make up about the SCAR that you are changing subjects? Or are you just that upset that you can't adapt the slidefire to the SCAR? Is it that Tapco doesn't have vast aftermarket support for the SCAR? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:49:53 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA -ETA OMG please keep coming up with reasons for design features of the scar, this shit's making my day. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
SCAR16's reciprocating mass is gigantic. For a reason, the increased cyclic mass aids in reliable feeding. -ETA OMG please keep coming up with reasons for design features of the scar, this shit's making my day. The .mil deemed the SCAR to be a more reliable and advantageous weapon than the AR based m4 platform. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:50:42 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: For a reason, the increased cyclic mass aids in reliable feeding. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: SCAR16's reciprocating mass is gigantic. For a reason, the increased cyclic mass aids in reliable feeding. I'm no firearms designer or engineer, but I bet you could solve that problem with just a stiffer spring, rather than adding more weight.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:52:51 AM EDT
[#28]
I've been following this thread as I'm debating whether getting a 17 now, or holding off and saving up for an SR25 EC....my instinct tells me to get the 17. But then I'll probably want the 16 just because...also want a KAC LPR in the mix....so stuck on what to get next.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:53:51 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: A heavier mass is harder to stop or slow down than a lighter one, but your excellent refuting statement obviously proves otherwise. Thank you for providing us with such solid concrete data. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: SCAR16's reciprocating mass is gigantic. For a reason, the increased cyclic mass aids in reliable feeding. A heavier mass is harder to stop or slow down than a lighter one, but your excellent refuting statement obviously proves otherwise. Thank you for providing us with such solid concrete data. The AR-18 has no problem feeding with a BCG that weighs a fraction of the SCAR, it's also got a great recoil impulse, and shoots very smooth. Bigger is not always better. The g36 didn't need all that extra mass, it cycles fine. Same with AR's, and like... all sorts of other guns. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:55:56 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Are you all out of things to make up about the SCAR that you are changing subjects? Or are you just that upset that you can't adapt the slidefire to the SCAR? Is it that Tapco doesn't have vast aftermarket support for the SCAR? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
For those wondering what wonders that slidefire thread contain, and why it's so funny homeboy is avoiding it... Here's one of the OP's video's. I'd put a SF on a SCAR, MPAR whatever... the things work, and work well. Are you all out of things to make up about the SCAR that you are changing subjects? Or are you just that upset that you can't adapt the slidefire to the SCAR? Is it that Tapco doesn't have vast aftermarket support for the SCAR? You're the one in here bringing up slide fires. Madcap doesn't even own one. He was involved with my concept build as a person to bounce ideas off of—hence his involvement in my thread. You should pop in there and square us all away. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:59:01 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're the one in here bringing up slide fires. Madcap doesn't even own one. He was involved with my concept build as a person to bounce ideas off of—hence his involvement in my thread. You should pop in there and square us all away. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
For those wondering what wonders that slidefire thread contain, and why it's so funny homeboy is avoiding it... Here's one of the OP's video's. I'd put a SF on a SCAR, MPAR whatever... the things work, and work well. Are you all out of things to make up about the SCAR that you are changing subjects? Or are you just that upset that you can't adapt the slidefire to the SCAR? Is it that Tapco doesn't have vast aftermarket support for the SCAR? You're the one in here bringing up slide fires. Madcap doesn't even own one. He was involved with my concept build as a person to bounce ideas off of—hence his involvement in my thread. You should pop in there and square us all away. The slide fire does not fit on my SCAR, and I'm not putting one on my ARs, so I have no use for one. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:59:23 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The .mil deemed the SCAR to be a more reliable and advantageous weapon than the AR based m4 platform. Quote HistoryQuoted: snip The .mil deemed the SCAR to be a more reliable and advantageous weapon than the AR based m4 platform. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 11:59:50 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Must be why it was so widely adopted. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
snip
The .mil deemed the SCAR to be a more reliable and advantageous weapon than the AR based m4 platform. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ You stated yourself that the SCAR only had a slight advantage. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:00:24 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The slide fire does not fit on my SCAR, and I'm not putting one on my ARs, so I have no use for one. Why are you bringing them up so much then? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:00:28 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The slide fire does not fit on my SCAR, and I'm not putting one on my ARs, so I have no use for one. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: snip The slide fire does not fit on my SCAR, and I'm not putting one on my ARs, so I have no use for one. Sounds legit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:01:21 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, what you're saying is, you'll talk shit in threads, because you don't know anything about them, and have no interest in them. Sounds legit. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
snip The slide fire does not fit on my SCAR, and I'm not putting one on my ARs, so I have no use for one. Sounds legit. And here we are full circle. You posting in a SCAR thread where you quite obviously know jack or shit about them. Point noted. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:01:42 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ You stated yourself that the SCAR only had a slight advantage. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: snip The .mil deemed the SCAR to be a more reliable and advantageous weapon than the AR based m4 platform. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ You stated yourself that the SCAR only had a slight advantage.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:02:19 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm no firearms designer or engineer, but I bet you could solve that problem with just a stiffer spring, rather than adding more weight. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
SCAR16's reciprocating mass is gigantic. For a reason, the increased cyclic mass aids in reliable feeding. I'm no firearms designer or engineer, but I bet you could solve that problem with just a stiffer spring, rather than adding more weight. Possibly, though there are probably more factors that play into it along with potential for different problems to surface - "break in period" on some handguns and other extraction issues with stiff springs being the first that come to mind. An interesting question to that effect would be: why don't AR's always use the strongest recoil spring possible? You raise an excellent point however, none of us participating here are firearms designers or engineers. Obviously those types of people at FN had a reason for designing the SCAR the way they did. It's been proven to be an extremely reliable and capable system by the military's own testing. The real problem has always been that it's a different gun. It's apparent the detractors all expect it to feel, shoot and operate the same as an AR, but it's not... and it doesn't. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:02:39 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
And here we are full circle. You posting in a SCAR thread where you quite obviously know jack or shit about them. Point noted. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
snip The slide fire does not fit on my SCAR, and I'm not putting one on my ARs, so I have no use for one. Sounds legit. And here we are full circle. You posting in a SCAR thread where you quite obviously know jack or shit about them. Point noted. This is not a SCAR thread. It's a SCAR vs AR thread. Please note the thread title. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:02:51 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why are you bringing them up so much then? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The slide fire does not fit on my SCAR, and I'm not putting one on my ARs, so I have no use for one. Why are you bringing them up so much then? Because Madcap knows nothing about the SCAR but everything about the slidefire. So it seems relevant for me to bring up the slidefire which I have zero experience with.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:03:37 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And here we are full circle. You posting in a SCAR thread where you quite obviously know jack or shit about them. Point noted. Quote HistoryQuoted: snip And here we are full circle. You posting in a SCAR thread where you quite obviously know jack or shit about them. Point noted. Hell, I was shooting one of the first -16's to hit the civilian market. I'm also apparently one of the few people that knew the origin of the SCAR's g36 BCG copy. So, you're wrong. I know quite a bit about them. What do you know? How many have you shot? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:03:55 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This is not a SCAR thread. It's a SCAR vs AR thread. Please note the thread title. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
snip The slide fire does not fit on my SCAR, and I'm not putting one on my ARs, so I have no use for one. Sounds legit. And here we are full circle. You posting in a SCAR thread where you quite obviously know jack or shit about them. Point noted. This is not a SCAR thread. It's a SCAR vs AR thread. Please note the thread title. So let me get this straight... The SCAR is not worth the same price as a similarly optioned AR because it does not accept the Slide Fire. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:05:16 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I've shot them a lot. Hell, I was shooting one of the first -16's to hit the civilian market. I'm also apparently one of the few people that knew the origin of the SCAR's g36 BCG copy. So, you're wrong. I know quite a bit about them. What do you know? How many have you shot? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
snip
And here we are full circle. You posting in a SCAR thread where you quite obviously know jack or shit about them. Point noted. Hell, I was shooting one of the first -16's to hit the civilian market. I'm also apparently one of the few people that knew the origin of the SCAR's g36 BCG copy. So, you're wrong. I know quite a bit about them. What do you know? How many have you shot? How many have I shot? I don't know, other than my own SCAR, I have shot about 10 other SCARS. They shot the same as mine. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:06:21 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So let me get this straight... The SCAR is not worth the same price as a similarly optioned AR because it does not accept the Slide Fire. No, you do not have it right. No one in any regard mentioned bump fire stocks until you did. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:06:49 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: How many have I shot? I don't know, other than my own SCAR, I have shot about 10 other SCARS. They shot the same as mine. Quote HistoryQuoted: snip How many have I shot? I don't know, other than my own SCAR, I have shot about 10 other SCARS. They shot the same as mine. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:07:52 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No, you do not have it right. No one in any regard mentioned bump fire stocks until you did. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
So let me get this straight... The SCAR is not worth the same price as a similarly optioned AR because it does not accept the Slide Fire. No, you do not have it right. No one in any regard mentioned bump fire stocks until you did. Ok, so now we are back to the SCAR being worth WAY more than a similar optioned AR, yet selling for the same price.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:08:10 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So you knew it's just a G-36 with worse recoil? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
snip
How many have I shot? I don't know, other than my own SCAR, I have shot about 10 other SCARS. They shot the same as mine. How man G-36's have you shot? Can the slide fire fit on to one of them? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:09:01 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Ok, so now we are back to the SCAR being worth WAY more than a similar optioned AR, yet selling for the same price. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: snip Ok, so now we are back to the SCAR being worth WAY more than a similar optioned AR, yet selling for the same price. AR's have more value, SCAR's are just more expensive. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:09:32 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: How man G-36's have you shot? Can the slide fire fit on to one of them? Quote HistoryQuoted: snip How man G-36's have you shot? Can the slide fire fit on to one of them? ETA- also got to handle a few XM-8's. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2014 12:10:13 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ok, so now we are back to the SCAR being worth WAY more than a similar optioned AR, yet selling for the same price. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So let me get this straight... The SCAR is not worth the same price as a similarly optioned AR because it does not accept the Slide Fire. No, you do not have it right. No one in any regard mentioned bump fire stocks until you did. Ok, so now we are back to the SCAR being worth WAY more than a similar optioned AR, yet selling for the same price. Value is always subjective. I would buy a SCAR 17 for ~$1200. I don't hate them. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
