Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 9
Link Posted: 6/17/2023 6:53:08 PM EDT
[#1]
Model 51 .22 Magnum.   Model 34-1 .22 LR


Link Posted: 6/17/2023 11:52:21 PM EDT
[#2]
Link Posted: 6/18/2023 11:49:59 AM EDT
[#3]
Got an itch for a .357mag
I assume I can't go wrong with 4" 627 Pro, correct?
Other than getting lucky and finding a deal on a older used gun, I'm going to be looking at ~$800-$1k, yes?
Link Posted: 6/18/2023 12:49:20 PM EDT
[#4]
K-Frame is best frame. My 1951 K-22 Masterpiece, 3rd Model. I added the grip adapter.

Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File



Link Posted: 6/18/2023 12:59:19 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LordEC911:
Got an itch for a .357mag
I assume I can't go wrong with 4" 627 Pro, correct?
Other than getting lucky and finding a deal on a older used gun, I'm going to be looking at ~$800-$1k, yes?
View Quote

You're not far off on a price range, allowing for great deals and high price range locations that price range can be expanded by $200 on each end.
Link Posted: 6/18/2023 1:05:59 PM EDT
[#6]
Link Posted: 6/18/2023 1:23:20 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LordEC911:
Got an itch for a .357mag
I assume I can't go wrong with 4" 627 Pro, correct?
Other than getting lucky and finding a deal on a older used gun, I'm going to be looking at ~$800-$1k, yes?
View Quote

$900

Then a lot at $1100
Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 6/19/2023 10:56:46 PM EDT
[#8]
Do I love pain??? Yes, I do. Otherwise, I would not get a 3" 44 mag revolver...

But sometimes there is too much pain, so I traded my 460V for it! :)

Attachment Attached File



Link Posted: 6/19/2023 11:05:13 PM EDT
[#9]


Scoped revolvers count, right?
Link Posted: 6/19/2023 11:11:11 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Samal:
Do I love pain??? Yes, I do. Otherwise, I would not get a 3" 44 mag revolver...

But sometimes there is too much pain, so I traded my 460V for it! :)

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/277406/355307658_6571412629576000_6463418869036-2857597.JPG


View Quote



Looks familiar…

Link Posted: 6/21/2023 12:53:35 PM EDT
[#11]
I just can’t wait for revolver month…
Link Posted: 6/21/2023 1:08:11 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MedmanKS:
Originally Posted By Samal:
Do I love pain??? Yes, I do. Otherwise, I would not get a 3" 44 mag revolver...

But sometimes there is too much pain, so I traded my 460V for it! :)

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/277406/355307658_6571412629576000_6463418869036-2857597.JPG





Looks familiar…

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/528302/6D164742-2192-4B83-99CF-1DEA81DBD5AD-2701192.jpg

I like those wood grips. Wouldn't mind having something similar for my .500.
Link Posted: 6/23/2023 4:49:07 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By hollowhandle:
I just can't wait for revolver month
View Quote
In your heart ot hearts, every month is revolver month.

Attachment Attached File

Link Posted: 6/23/2023 5:58:36 PM EDT
[#14]
Picked up a trio of nickel Smiths this week.

581 4”
10 HB 3”
49 2”

Link Posted: 6/26/2023 10:17:20 AM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By shack357:

I like those wood grips. Wouldn't mind having something similar for my .500.
View Quote
they are actually terrible!  the fit to the frame on the top rear is so bad, it bites into the thumb every shot.  it was not just me, saw the same feedback from youtube videos.  Altamont grips are on the way
Link Posted: 6/26/2023 10:23:58 AM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Samal:
they are actually terrible!  the fit to the frame on the top rear is so bad, it bites into the thumb every shot.  it was not just me, saw the same feedback from youtube videos.  Altamont grips are on the way
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Samal:
Originally Posted By shack357:

I like those wood grips. Wouldn't mind having something similar for my .500.
they are actually terrible!  the fit to the frame on the top rear is so bad, it bites into the thumb every shot.  it was not just me, saw the same feedback from youtube videos.  Altamont grips are on the way
Current S&W wood grips fit horribly across the board.
Link Posted: 6/26/2023 10:36:51 AM EDT
[#17]
Found some old Rogers Safariland grips like what I had on an old Python years ago. Like shaking hand with an old friend.  3 and 4" Pythons should not come with targets and the gunfighter Altamonts are pretty nice.  


Attachment Attached File

Link Posted: 6/26/2023 1:35:33 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Miami_JBT:
Current S&W wood grips fit horribly across the board.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Miami_JBT:
Originally Posted By Samal:
Originally Posted By shack357:

I like those wood grips. Wouldn't mind having something similar for my .500.
they are actually terrible!  the fit to the frame on the top rear is so bad, it bites into the thumb every shot.  it was not just me, saw the same feedback from youtube videos.  Altamont grips are on the way
Current S&W wood grips fit horribly across the board.


Because they're Altamonts
Link Posted: 6/26/2023 1:42:53 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 03RN:


Because they're Altamonts
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 03RN:
Originally Posted By Miami_JBT:
Originally Posted By Samal:
Originally Posted By shack357:

I like those wood grips. Wouldn't mind having something similar for my .500.
they are actually terrible!  the fit to the frame on the top rear is so bad, it bites into the thumb every shot.  it was not just me, saw the same feedback from youtube videos.  Altamont grips are on the way
Current S&W wood grips fit horribly across the board.


Because they're Altamonts
The Altamonts that came on my 2001 Performance Center 29-9 fit perfectly.

Attachment Attached File


Helps that quality control was better two decades ago.
Link Posted: 6/26/2023 1:46:29 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Samal:
they are actually terrible!  the fit to the frame on the top rear is so bad, it bites into the thumb every shot.  it was not just me, saw the same feedback from youtube videos.  Altamont grips are on the way
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Samal:
Originally Posted By shack357:

I like those wood grips. Wouldn't mind having something similar for my .500.
they are actually terrible!  the fit to the frame on the top rear is so bad, it bites into the thumb every shot.  it was not just me, saw the same feedback from youtube videos.  Altamont grips are on the way

That sucks.
Link Posted: 6/26/2023 2:01:57 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Riter] [#21]
Mod 19 I refinished for someone.  It was only polished up to 320 grit (didn't have 400, 500 or 600).  At least I removed the scratches and most of the pits.  Stocks were lightly sanded to remove the laquer and then six coats of TruOil applied.  I did not do anything to the trigger or hammer, both of which had rust.  The rust was removed and the parts oiled.  They're casehardened and I didn't want to remove any surface metal.
Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File


Still have to put a red ramp front sight on for the owner.
Link Posted: 6/26/2023 11:18:13 PM EDT
[#22]
After WECGOGing some aluminum stock from Amazon, my fancy race holster finally fits my 8 3/8" barrel S&W 29. ICORE, here I come!


Link Posted: 6/28/2023 2:26:36 PM EDT
[#23]
Link Posted: 6/28/2023 3:16:27 PM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Riter:
Mod 19 I refinished for someone.  It was only polished up to 320 grit (didn't have 400, 500 or 600).  At least I removed the scratches and most of the pits.  Stocks were lightly sanded to remove the laquer and then six coats of TruOil applied.  I did not do anything to the trigger or hammer, both of which had rust.  The rust was removed and the parts oiled.  They're casehardened and I didn't want to remove any surface metal.
https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/53/Rev1_jpeg-2864408.JPG

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/53/Rev2_jpeg-2864409.JPG

Still have to put a red ramp front sight on for the owner.
View Quote

Looks great. Too bad you're not closer, I'd have you do the same to my model 10.
Link Posted: 6/28/2023 3:18:33 PM EDT
[#25]
Link Posted: 6/30/2023 12:27:33 PM EDT
[#26]
Link Posted: 7/17/2023 2:31:23 PM EDT
[#27]
Bump because July is revolver month, too!

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 7/17/2023 2:33:53 PM EDT
[#28]
Finally got some stocks for my 44

Link Posted: 7/17/2023 10:19:15 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MRW:
13-4

https://i.imgur.com/EL7KlMf.jpg

View Quote



Hoochie Mama!
Link Posted: 7/17/2023 11:00:14 PM EDT
[#30]
Link Posted: 7/20/2023 10:53:57 PM EDT
[#31]
My most recent acquisition, a 3" S&W 65-2:

Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File


Keen eyes might notice the recessed cylinder, but the absence of a pinned barrel. Both of those features went away in 1982 with the release of the 65-3. The serial number of 7D7xxxx reveals it was made in 1981, so it was likely they ran out of pinned barrels, and this was one of the first to be built with an unpinned barrel.
Link Posted: 7/23/2023 1:57:47 PM EDT
[#32]
Link Posted: 7/23/2023 2:08:35 PM EDT
[#33]
Oh to be 18 again.

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 7/26/2023 4:49:53 PM EDT
[#34]
Link Posted: 7/26/2023 6:33:21 PM EDT
[#35]
Attachment Attached File


My latest acquisitions, a 1961 6" Model 28 (no dash) Highway Patrolman and a 1999 642-1.
Link Posted: 8/10/2023 8:09:11 PM EDT
[#36]
Mid-1920s S&W Model 1905, 4th Change Target model in .38 Special.

Attachment Attached File


I have a 1932-vintage Colt Shooting Master in .38 Special on the way. It's one of 3,500 Shooting Masters built by Colt. Pics forthcoming after I get it, hopefully early next week.
Link Posted: 8/10/2023 9:28:53 PM EDT
[#37]
Link Posted: 8/11/2023 10:06:35 PM EDT
[#38]
Picked up a 66-8 since the Carry Comps are still ridiculously expensive. Needs action work and sights for sure. Got blisters on both index fingers from dry firing, lol. Had these grips and one of Tony's cylinder releases in the spare parts box, so they were installed after I finished the initial detail strip/clean.

Attachment Attached File


Link Posted: 8/14/2023 7:04:56 PM EDT
[#39]
Today after work I picked up my latest acquisition: a 1932 Colt Shooting Master in .38 Special. This is one of 3,500 Shooting Masters built by Colt from 1931 through 1938 and was the most expensive model in their line, at $52.50 (about $1138 today). Of them, 2,500 were chambered in .38 Special. The gun is basically the same as a New Service Target but with a slightly different grip.

Next to my S&W Model 1905, 4th Change Target K-Frame for scale:

Attachment Attached File



The front and rear grip straps are hand checkered. Note the size of the cylinder in comparison with the charge holes, reminiscent of a S&W N-Frame .357

Attachment Attached File


I happened to have an old Pachmayr size 6M grip adapter in my stash. IIRC the size 4S is correct for the New Service but this is close enough.

Attachment Attached File


I'm not sure if the grips are original since they look brand spanking new and are not serial numbered (I don't know if they should be serial numbered to the gun, however).

The bore and chambers are all excellent. Timing and lockup are spot on. The SA trigger is very light with no creep or takeup. The DA pull is very smooth but long and heavy. As a target revolver this was intended to be shot SA anyway.

The New Service / Shooting Master (and the smaller Official Police) were rated by Colt to handle the .38-44 High Speed loads intended for the S&W Heavy Duty and Outdoorsman (158 grain bullet at 1,125 FPS). I don't plan to shoot a lot of those but I will definitely give some a try.

I can't wait to shoot this next weekend.


Link Posted: 8/14/2023 7:25:24 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dave_Markowitz:
Today after work I picked up my latest acquisition: a 1932 Colt Shooting Master in .38 Special. This is one of 3,500 Shooting Masters built by Colt from 1931 through 1938 and was the most expensive model in their line, at $52.50 (about $1138 today). Of them, 2,500 were chambered in .38 Special. The gun is basically the same as a New Service Target but with a slightly different grip.

Next to my S&W Model 1905, 4th Change Target K-Frame for scale:

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54763/shooting-master-vs-k-frame-left_jpg-2919787.JPG


The front and rear grip straps are hand checkered. Note the size of the cylinder in comparison with the charge holes, reminiscent of a S&W N-Frame .357

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54763/cylinder-back-strap_jpg-2919793.JPG

I happened to have an old Pachmayr size 6M grip adapter in my stash. IIRC the size 4S is correct for the New Service but this is close enough.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54763/shooting-master-grip-adapter_jpg-2919795.JPG

I'm not sure if the grips are original since they look brand spanking new and are not serial numbered (I don't know if they should be serial numbered to the gun, however).

The bore and chambers are all excellent. Timing and lockup are spot on. The SA trigger is very light with no creep or takeup. The DA pull is very smooth but long and heavy. As a target revolver this was intended to be shot SA anyway.

The New Service / Shooting Master (and the smaller Official Police) were rated by Colt to handle the .38-44 High Speed loads intended for the S&W Heavy Duty and Outdoorsman (158 grain bullet at 1,125 FPS). I don't plan to shoot a lot of those but I will definitely give some a try.

I can't wait to shoot this next weekend.


View Quote



Wow! That's pretty. Wonder if people were shooting 38/44s through these back in the day?
Link Posted: 8/14/2023 7:27:07 PM EDT
[#41]
Been carrying my 629 quite a bit

Link Posted: 8/14/2023 7:33:50 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BillythePoet:



Wow! That's pretty. Wonder if people were shooting 38/44s through these back in the day?
View Quote

Almost certainly, especially in the New Service .38s that were adopted by several law enforcement agencies, including the US Border Patrol.

For that matter, I bet more than a few people shot .38/44s through K-Frames even though they shouldn't have.
Link Posted: 8/14/2023 7:50:19 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dave_Markowitz:

Almost certainly, especially in the New Service .38s that were adopted by several law enforcement agencies, including the US Border Patrol.

For that matter, I bet more than a few people shot .38/44s through K-Frames even though they shouldn't have.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dave_Markowitz:
Originally Posted By BillythePoet:



Wow! That's pretty. Wonder if people were shooting 38/44s through these back in the day?

Almost certainly, especially in the New Service .38s that were adopted by several law enforcement agencies, including the US Border Patrol.

For that matter, I bet more than a few people shot .38/44s through K-Frames even though they shouldn't have.



Allegedly, any "numbered" K frame can handle 38/44 and even a light diet of .357mag. At this point in history, there are too many affordable, robust guns floating around to risk damaging a classic though.
Link Posted: 8/14/2023 9:43:24 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dave_Markowitz:
Mid-1920s S&W Model 1905, 4th Change Target model in .38 Special.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54763/m1905-target-left_jpg-2915331.JPG

I have a 1932-vintage Colt Shooting Master in .38 Special on the way. It's one of 3,500 Shooting Masters built by Colt. Pics forthcoming after I get it, hopefully early next week.
View Quote
That's hot
Link Posted: 8/14/2023 9:45:58 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dave_Markowitz:
Today after work I picked up my latest acquisition: a 1932 Colt Shooting Master in .38 Special. This is one of 3,500 Shooting Masters built by Colt from 1931 through 1938 and was the most expensive model in their line, at $52.50 (about $1138 today). Of them, 2,500 were chambered in .38 Special. The gun is basically the same as a New Service Target but with a slightly different grip.

Next to my S&W Model 1905, 4th Change Target K-Frame for scale:

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54763/shooting-master-vs-k-frame-left_jpg-2919787.JPG


The front and rear grip straps are hand checkered. Note the size of the cylinder in comparison with the charge holes, reminiscent of a S&W N-Frame .357

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54763/cylinder-back-strap_jpg-2919793.JPG

I happened to have an old Pachmayr size 6M grip adapter in my stash. IIRC the size 4S is correct for the New Service but this is close enough.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54763/shooting-master-grip-adapter_jpg-2919795.JPG

I'm not sure if the grips are original since they look brand spanking new and are not serial numbered (I don't know if they should be serial numbered to the gun, however).

The bore and chambers are all excellent. Timing and lockup are spot on. The SA trigger is very light with no creep or takeup. The DA pull is very smooth but long and heavy. As a target revolver this was intended to be shot SA anyway.

The New Service / Shooting Master (and the smaller Official Police) were rated by Colt to handle the .38-44 High Speed loads intended for the S&W Heavy Duty and Outdoorsman (158 grain bullet at 1,125 FPS). I don't plan to shoot a lot of those but I will definitely give some a try.

I can't wait to shoot this next weekend.


View Quote
That's double hot!
Link Posted: 8/14/2023 10:56:22 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By chase45:
Been carrying my 629 quite a bit

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/161977/20230807_125528-2911707.jpg
View Quote


Link Posted: 8/19/2023 11:49:02 PM EDT
[#47]
Got to try out my Colt Shooting Master for the first time tonight. First 38 shots (yeah, I yanked one):

Attachment Attached File


I also fired some stouter loads: 178 grain Keith on top of 5.3 grains of Unique. The Shooting Master is a large frame revolver perfectly comfortable wiht +P or even .38/44 High Speed loads. Accuracy with these was good, too.

While I was there I also ran a bunch of the Keiths through my Model 28-2. I brought it along to see how the Shooting Master compared with an N-Frame since they are roughly comparable.



Link Posted: 8/22/2023 4:17:45 PM EDT
[#48]
I just spent about an hour and half talking to Nelson Ford The Gunsmith in Phoenix. If you are like me and geek out about the Golden Era of handgunning, he's an amazing guy. He was showing me guns and pics of people and places from when he got started in the early '80s. I mentioned Fermin Garza and his modern take on King mirror sights, which led to him telling me that he purchased Bob Chow's entire stock of King parts in '82. Nelson said it was about 45lbs of sights and such. That's probably worth a small fortune today. I ended up dropping off my 66-8 for an action job and front sight replacement. I got to finger bang some guns he's completed and impressed is an understatement. Mr. Ford says he's closing shop next summer, so don't delay if you are wanting work done.
Link Posted: 8/22/2023 4:28:50 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Nakanokalronin] [#49]
Webley "WG" in .455 Webley. The cylinder is uncut, it wears the original undamaged grips and it's the original blued finish. It's the exact configuration used in Indiana Jones. It's got a fantastic trigger and is still quite accurate.

Link Posted: 8/23/2023 8:11:24 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dave_Markowitz:
Today after work I picked up my latest acquisition: a 1932 Colt Shooting Master in .38 Special. This is one of 3,500 Shooting Masters built by Colt from 1931 through 1938 and was the most expensive model in their line, at $52.50 (about $1138 today). Of them, 2,500 were chambered in .38 Special. The gun is basically the same as a New Service Target but with a slightly different grip.

Next to my S&W Model 1905, 4th Change Target K-Frame for scale:

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54763/shooting-master-vs-k-frame-left_jpg-2919787.JPG


The front and rear grip straps are hand checkered. Note the size of the cylinder in comparison with the charge holes, reminiscent of a S&W N-Frame .357

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54763/cylinder-back-strap_jpg-2919793.JPG

I happened to have an old Pachmayr size 6M grip adapter in my stash. IIRC the size 4S is correct for the New Service but this is close enough.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54763/shooting-master-grip-adapter_jpg-2919795.JPG

I'm not sure if the grips are original since they look brand spanking new and are not serial numbered (I don't know if they should be serial numbered to the gun, however).

The bore and chambers are all excellent. Timing and lockup are spot on. The SA trigger is very light with no creep or takeup. The DA pull is very smooth but long and heavy. As a target revolver this was intended to be shot SA anyway.

The New Service / Shooting Master (and the smaller Official Police) were rated by Colt to handle the .38-44 High Speed loads intended for the S&W Heavy Duty and Outdoorsman (158 grain bullet at 1,125 FPS). I don't plan to shoot a lot of those but I will definitely give some a try.

I can't wait to shoot this next weekend.


View Quote

Very nice classic! The oversize cylinder makes it look like a .22 with nothing else for scale!
Page / 9
Top Top