Whatever....

No, I don't think if you build one fence we need to call you, "Bob the Fence Builder."

I rafffed.  

too conceptually difficult. they want chum in the water, no more.

Yep, definitely worth losing elections over.  Maybe we can ensure permanent democrat rule.  

There's a difference between homosexual and enjoying homosexual acts.

Homosexuals are only sexually attracted to one sex. But any many cultures through out history, having gay sex just to get off Prison and Arab countries are two areas that practice this still today.

Somebody needs to get that domain.



 

With so many safe queens on this board, they could specialize in "Hot young, under 18 virgins - untouched! Watch this LaRue take a dirty load of Wolf."

When they kill you for being gay, you have a wife and kids to hide it.  It's not a fucking mystery.





 

They didn't.  They also through their unwanted kids out with the garbage and considered rape a legitimate spoil of war.



I got a kick out of the people who said 300 was about Western Civilization fighting against barbarians, obviously having no clue how fucked up ancient people actually were.



 

Gayness is as old as tallywhackers and bungholes.  It's as old as ugly masculine chicks too....

 

 

Fuck y'all.

"MURICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Twins studies have shown, at a minimum, sexual orientation cannot be attributed solely to genetic factors.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation#Twin_studies

Damn gheys and their agenda!

I didn't read any of the above posts or the OP. I'm no faggot.

I read a fur trader's account of an interior Northwest Indian woman who dressed like a man and took a "wife." She/he traveled with some of the fur traders down the Columbia River to the mouth, where she/he pissed off some of the local Chinookan Indians, who would have killed her if the fur traders hadn't intervened. This was in the early 1810s if I recall correctly. I don't remember why the local Indians wanted to kill her, probably just a bunch of homophobes

I tend to agree with the view of the authors in the OP's study. Homosexual behavior appears to be pretty much universal across human societies, but how it's expressed varies. Culturally approved pederasty appears to be one of the most common expressions---wasn't just the ancient Greeks (and Romans), I've seen mentions of it in medieval Japan and China, and even among some New Guinean tribes. Some elements of the Catholic Church still seem to give tacit approval to this practice.

I'm sure butt piracy on the "down low" has also been common. Still acceptable among some groups as long as you're giving and not receiving.

It's the self-identified exclusive homosexual that's the new development. But given the choice between gay pride parades and culturally accepted pederasty, I say bring on the homos.

The people who simply cannot pass up a gay thread to tell others they're obsessed about gays crack me up.

It's a hot social topic right now.  Calling the other side is "obsessed" is juvenile; no thread goes 10 pages without both sides contributing.

I stand up for my gay friends and relatives when folks want to persecute them for being different.  

Why are you here?

Right, so it's a topic you're interested in. My comment is aimed at those who claim others are obsessed, meanwhile they post in every gay thread. I don't know if it's a hipster thing or what, but it's silly.

Ok.  Why are you interested though?

Because it's guaranteed that regardless of who comes in and says what about who, it'll turn into one huge circle jerk.

I'm only interested in the legal aspects of it, which is why I only commented in this thread on the "obsession" angle.  The legal aspect affects all of us; the "why" may be interesting from a clinical aspect, but it doesn't interest me that much personally.  I certainly don't want to see anybody "persecuted" for sleeping with a consenting adult, but then I suspect our definitions of the word may differ.