User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/26/2015 11:37:44 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
enlighten me. I'm guessing that means the size of the rear lens? Don't know enough about higher end optics to know what half those damn numbers mean. All I really know is I like my eotech and magnifier, but I like my brothers TA31F better  Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So why TA33 specifically, as opposed to a TA31? bigger eye box, lighter I still like the ta31 for its larger field of view though enlighten me. I'm guessing that means the size of the rear lens? Don't know enough about higher end optics to know what half those damn numbers mean. All I really know is I like my eotech and magnifier, but I like my brothers TA31F better it means the area in which you can position your targeting eye and still see the reticle and target is larger |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/26/2015 11:43:16 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
it means the area in which you can position your targeting eye and still see the reticle and target is larger So a bit more room for error when you're behind the optic as opposed to having to be directly behind it, correct? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 12:09:30 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So a bit more room for error when you're behind the optic as opposed to having to be directly behind it, correct? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
it means the area in which you can position your targeting eye and still see the reticle and target is larger So a bit more room for error when you're behind the optic as opposed to having to be directly behind it, correct? It's almost as forgiving as a red dot. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 12:47:06 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's almost as forgiving as a red dot. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
it means the area in which you can position your targeting eye and still see the reticle and target is larger So a bit more room for error when you're behind the optic as opposed to having to be directly behind it, correct? It's almost as forgiving as a red dot. That's impressive. I love that about my eotech, doesn't matter where the fuck my head is at, red dot on target is round on target. Holograms and shit |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 7:19:28 AM EDT
[#5]
I have a 26S on my SBR. It is essentially a batteryless red dot. I would love to see Trijicon to just do a zero power ACOG.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 7:46:47 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have a 26S on my SBR. It is essentially a batteryless red dot. I would love to see Trijicon to just do a zero power ACOG. The TA44 is pretty much that with 1.5. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 7:48:47 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The TA44 is pretty much that with 1.5. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I have a 26S on my SBR. It is essentially a batteryless red dot. I would love to see Trijicon to just do a zero power ACOG. The TA44 is pretty much that with 1.5. so is the 26. But they aren't true zero power. you lose something. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 7:48:49 AM EDT
[#8]
Enough about optics, TA33 settles that. I need a handgun, for carry/IDPA duties. G19 or G17?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 7:50:55 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Enough about optics, TA33 settles that. I need a handgun, for carry/IDPA duties. G19 or G17? Rusted will say 17 I say 19. Can't go wrong either way. But I would try for a Gen 3 if you can find it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 7:52:46 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So a bit more room for error when you're behind the optic as opposed to having to be directly behind it, correct? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
it means the area in which you can position your targeting eye and still see the reticle and target is larger So a bit more room for error when you're behind the optic as opposed to having to be directly behind it, correct? yes, relief Quoted:
Quoted:
Enough about optics, TA33 settles that. I need a handgun, for carry/IDPA duties. G19 or G17? Rusted will say 17 I say 19. Can't go wrong either way. But I would try for a Gen 3 if you can find it. but... if you have a Gen 4, go vote in the ALG magwell thread on G's Industry Forum 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 7:54:23 AM EDT
[#11]
Is a TA-31 w/RMR dumb on a 11" SBR? Otherwise it would be a 552 EoTech
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 7:54:32 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
so is the 26. But they aren't true zero power. you lose something. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have a 26S on my SBR. It is essentially a batteryless red dot. I would love to see Trijicon to just do a zero power ACOG. The TA44 is pretty much that with 1.5. so is the 26. But they aren't true zero power. you lose something. It's 1 power, dammit. You wouldn't see much out of a zero power. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 7:58:15 AM EDT
[#13]
So is anyone else thinking of building a CWAR to go with their CWW trigger? Would a lightweight receiver still be spec?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 8:00:33 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Rusted will say 17 I say 19. Can't go wrong either way. But I would try for a Gen 3 if you can find it. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Enough about optics, TA33 settles that. I need a handgun, for carry/IDPA duties. G19 or G17? Rusted will say 17 I say 19. Can't go wrong either way. But I would try for a Gen 3 if you can find it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 8:00:40 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So is anyone else thinking of building a CWAR to go with their CWW trigger? Would a lightweight receiver still be spec? Since 2A armament sponsored West, I would say go with that, and yes its in spec.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 8:02:11 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So is anyone else thinking of building a CWAR to go with their CWW trigger? Would a lightweight receiver still be spec? LW FTW Work has been keeping me too busy to actually Install the barrel and rail 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 8:05:51 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is the 17 really that much harder to conceal? It's a 1/2in taller. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Enough about optics, TA33 settles that. I need a handgun, for carry/IDPA duties. G19 or G17? Rusted will say 17 I say 19. Can't go wrong either way. But I would try for a Gen 3 if you can find it. I have both. I like the 19 better for carry. It's just a little more comfortable. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 8:06:46 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have both. I like the 19 better for carry. It's just a little more comfortable. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Enough about optics, TA33 settles that. I need a handgun, for carry/IDPA duties. G19 or G17? Rusted will say 17 I say 19. Can't go wrong either way. But I would try for a Gen 3 if you can find it. I have both. I like the 19 better for carry. It's just a little more comfortable. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 8:08:21 AM EDT
[#19]
I got the CWW gift bag SSA-E installed in my CWAR. It is NICE, VERY NICE.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 8:08:21 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is a TA-31 w/RMR dumb on a 11" SBR? Otherwise it would be a 552 EoTech That would be the tits. You got ninjas running MK18s with the ALCAN 1-4. 11"s is plenty (thats the porn talking) |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 8:08:49 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Guess I'll just have to go 19, and get a 34 for games. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Enough about optics, TA33 settles that. I need a handgun, for carry/IDPA duties. G19 or G17? Rusted will say 17 I say 19. Can't go wrong either way. But I would try for a Gen 3 if you can find it. I have both. I like the 19 better for carry. It's just a little more comfortable. thats what I did. Of course, I am no better with the 34 than I am the 19.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 8:13:21 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have a 26S on my SBR. It is essentially a batteryless red dot. I would love to see Trijicon to just do a zero power ACOG. Does that make the target disappear   Science!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 8:18:00 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
LW FTW Work has been keeping me too busy to actually Install the barrel and rail <a href="http://s748.photobucket.com/user/ragincajun1919/media/7800370E-FB35-41F6-A60D-89864A2BB544_zpslmnz8b3a.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx125/ragincajun1919/7800370E-FB35-41F6-A60D-89864A2BB544_zpslmnz8b3a.jpg</a> Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
So is anyone else thinking of building a CWAR to go with their CWW trigger? Would a lightweight receiver still be spec? LW FTW Work has been keeping me too busy to actually Install the barrel and rail <a href="http://s748.photobucket.com/user/ragincajun1919/media/7800370E-FB35-41F6-A60D-89864A2BB544_zpslmnz8b3a.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx125/ragincajun1919/7800370E-FB35-41F6-A60D-89864A2BB544_zpslmnz8b3a.jpg</a> Such parts Very privilege |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 8:19:58 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have a 26S on my SBR. It is essentially a batteryless red dot. I would love to see Trijicon to just do a zero power ACOG. Trijicon Tripower |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 8:43:52 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trijicon Tripower Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I have a 26S on my SBR. It is essentially a batteryless red dot. I would love to see Trijicon to just do a zero power ACOG. Trijicon Tripower No. Just an ACOG. But with no magnification. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 9:37:16 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I got the CWW gift bag SSA-E installed in my CWAR. It is NICE, VERY NICE. It is. Geissele rocks!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 9:44:35 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No. Just an ACOG. But with no magnification. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have a 26S on my SBR. It is essentially a batteryless red dot. I would love to see Trijicon to just do a zero power ACOG. Trijicon Tripower No. Just an ACOG. But with no magnification. I like the 1.5x a lot, past 15~20yd I consider it a major advantage |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 10:20:28 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So is anyone else thinking of building a CWAR to go with their CWW trigger? Would a lightweight receiver still be spec? My SSA-E already went into the rifle that I had at CWW, but I am considering building a CWAR and then blaspheming on the optic. I have a three power magnifier on my other AR, and I'd prefer to have 4 and no batteries. The question comes down to $. Put money into new AR, or M1A. For those in this thread, I'm sure it's a simple decision, but I'm a fool for a full length M1A with irons 
Plus California does a good job in ruining any benefit that an AR would provide with the bullet button 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 10:27:08 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I like the 1.5x a lot, past 15~20yd I consider it a major advantage Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have a 26S on my SBR. It is essentially a batteryless red dot. I would love to see Trijicon to just do a zero power ACOG. Trijicon Tripower No. Just an ACOG. But with no magnification. I like the 1.5x a lot, past 15~20yd I consider it a major advantage But its inside 15-20Yds when it really matters. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 10:38:27 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
But its inside 15-20Yds when it really matters. I have zero real life experience with it, but what my brother relayed to me was that he was taught to keep both eyes open and put the red blur that the chevron becomes on the target and it'll be close enough. Validity of this and how well it works, I don't know, but that's apparently what the USMC taught him |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 11:06:00 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
But its inside 15-20Yds when it really matters. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have a 26S on my SBR. It is essentially a batteryless red dot. I would love to see Trijicon to just do a zero power ACOG. Trijicon Tripower No. Just an ACOG. But with no magnification. I like the 1.5x a lot, past 15~20yd I consider it a major advantage But its inside 15-20Yds when it really matters. So use an offset. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 11:06:46 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have zero real life experience with it, but what my brother relayed to me was that he was taught to keep both eyes open and put the red blur that the chevron becomes on the target and it'll be close enough. Validity of this and how well it works, I don't know, but that's apparently what the USMC taught him Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
But its inside 15-20Yds when it really matters. I have zero real life experience with it, but what my brother relayed to me was that he was taught to keep both eyes open and put the red blur that the chevron becomes on the target and it'll be close enough. Validity of this and how well it works, I don't know, but that's apparently what the USMC taught him "Bindon Aiming Concept" or whatever. Works fine for me. Apparently it doesn't work for some people? *shrug* |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 11:17:28 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"Bindon Aiming Concept" or whatever. Works fine for me. Apparently it doesn't work for some people? *shrug* Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
But its inside 15-20Yds when it really matters. I have zero real life experience with it, but what my brother relayed to me was that he was taught to keep both eyes open and put the red blur that the chevron becomes on the target and it'll be close enough. Validity of this and how well it works, I don't know, but that's apparently what the USMC taught him "Bindon Aiming Concept" or whatever. Works fine for me. Apparently it doesn't work for some people? *shrug* worked fine for me on the range. Then I had multiple targets at about 25M moving and shooting at me. Didn't work as well. Maybe a training issue. But it is those type of "cola training" moments that make you reconsider your choices. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 11:41:47 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
worked fine for me on the range. Then I had multiple targets at about 25M moving and shooting at me. Didn't work as well. Maybe a training issue. But it is those type of "cola training" moments that make you reconsider your choices. I guess that makes sense. Unless you train yourself to use the "Bindon Aiming Concept" without explicitly thinking about it, it could become more trouble than it's worth. "Cola Training" taught me that while the Primary Arms magnifier works to get the job done at a good price, it can be a bit finicky. Finicky sucks when you're shooting stuff while sucking air. I took a look through codzilla's Eotech magnifier and was fucking shocked by how much more and how easily you can see through it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 11:48:22 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's 1 power, dammit. You wouldn't see much out of a zero power. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have a 26S on my SBR. It is essentially a batteryless red dot. I would love to see Trijicon to just do a zero power ACOG. The TA44 is pretty much that with 1.5. so is the 26. But they aren't true zero power. you lose something. It's 1 power, dammit. You wouldn't see much out of a zero power. If I had the money, I'd replace my T1 with the TA44. I think it's tits. TA33 is still my favorite all around. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 11:51:16 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I guess that makes sense. Unless you train yourself to use the "Bindon Aiming Concept" without explicitly thinking about it, it could become more trouble than it's worth. "Cola Training" taught me that while the Primary Arms magnifier works to get the job done at a good price, it can be a bit finicky. Finicky sucks when you're shooting stuff while sucking air. I took a look through codzilla's Eotech magnifier and was fucking shocked by how much more and how easily you can see through it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
worked fine for me on the range. Then I had multiple targets at about 25M moving and shooting at me. Didn't work as well. Maybe a training issue. But it is those type of "cola training" moments that make you reconsider your choices. I guess that makes sense. Unless you train yourself to use the "Bindon Aiming Concept" without explicitly thinking about it, it could become more trouble than it's worth. "Cola Training" taught me that while the Primary Arms magnifier works to get the job done at a good price, it can be a bit finicky. Finicky sucks when you're shooting stuff while sucking air. I took a look through codzilla's Eotech magnifier and was fucking shocked by how much more and how easily you can see through it. You know what's even better? TA33
I'm still sticking with my intermediate Leupold, though. The edge in magnification for target ID is worth losing a little speed and clarity. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 12:14:43 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You know what's even better? TA33
I'm still sticking with my intermediate Leupold, though. The edge in magnification for target ID is worth losing a little speed and clarity. Oh, I know that a TA33 would be better than what I have for those distances, based simply on the fact that I had my magnifier down for all the targets. It comes down to me buying what I could afford at the time
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 12:16:30 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That would be the tits. You got ninjas running MK18s with the ALCAN 1-4. 11"s is plenty (thats the porn talking) Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Is a TA-31 w/RMR dumb on a 11" SBR? Otherwise it would be a 552 EoTech That would be the tits. You got ninjas running MK18s with the ALCAN 1-4. 11"s is plenty (thats the porn talking) Cool, Amazon shipped an ACOG/RMR deal I ordered on Dec 31st (that I was sure they were going to welch on). Now I got this bad ass little glass and more credit card debt, just trying to figure out where to put it The likely contending hosts: 1. I have a pistol (waiting on Form 1) lower that has matching uppers (11" 5.56 EoTech and ~10" 300BLK EoTech) - this thing (ACOG) showed up and jacked up my mojo. 2. A optic-bare AAC 16" 300BLK that my dad had bought, but doesn't make sense to put an ACOG with BDC for 5.56 on it. 3. A 16" Sig 556 with a little Bushnell TRS on it, but I almost never care to shoot it. Looks like EoTech moves to 16" 300 and the ACOG on the 5.56 11" Freaking Musical chairs with damn optics Guess I have my answer though |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 1:13:39 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Cool, Amazon shipped an ACOG/RMR deal I ordered on Dec 31st (that I was sure they were going to welch on). Now I got this bad ass little glass and more credit card debt, just trying to figure out where to put it The likely contending hosts: 1. I have a pistol (waiting on Form 1) lower that has matching uppers (11" 5.56 EoTech and ~10" 300BLK EoTech) - this thing (ACOG) showed up and jacked up my mojo. 2. A optic-bare AAC 16" 300BLK that my dad had bought, but doesn't make sense to put an ACOG with BDC for 5.56 on it. 3. A 16" Sig 556 with a little Bushnell TRS on it, but I almost never care to shoot it. Looks like EoTech moves to 16" 300 and the ACOG on the 5.56 11" Freaking Musical chairs with damn optics Guess I have my answer though Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is a TA-31 w/RMR dumb on a 11" SBR? Otherwise it would be a 552 EoTech That would be the tits. You got ninjas running MK18s with the ALCAN 1-4. 11"s is plenty (thats the porn talking) Cool, Amazon shipped an ACOG/RMR deal I ordered on Dec 31st (that I was sure they were going to welch on). Now I got this bad ass little glass and more credit card debt, just trying to figure out where to put it The likely contending hosts: 1. I have a pistol (waiting on Form 1) lower that has matching uppers (11" 5.56 EoTech and ~10" 300BLK EoTech) - this thing (ACOG) showed up and jacked up my mojo. 2. A optic-bare AAC 16" 300BLK that my dad had bought, but doesn't make sense to put an ACOG with BDC for 5.56 on it. 3. A 16" Sig 556 with a little Bushnell TRS on it, but I almost never care to shoot it. Looks like EoTech moves to 16" 300 and the ACOG on the 5.56 11" Freaking Musical chairs with damn optics Guess I have my answer though I got this new sweet 18" upper with no glass. Its hard being me. So much priviledge. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 1:19:21 PM EDT
[#40]
Went to lunch. Bought a G19.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 1:40:20 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Went to lunch. Bought a G19. I hate it when that happens |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 1:41:41 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I got this new sweet 18" upper with no glass. Its hard being me. So much priviledge. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is a TA-31 w/RMR dumb on a 11" SBR? Otherwise it would be a 552 EoTech That would be the tits. You got ninjas running MK18s with the ALCAN 1-4. 11"s is plenty (thats the porn talking) Cool, Amazon shipped an ACOG/RMR deal I ordered on Dec 31st (that I was sure they were going to welch on). Now I got this bad ass little glass and more credit card debt, just trying to figure out where to put it The likely contending hosts: 1. I have a pistol (waiting on Form 1) lower that has matching uppers (11" 5.56 EoTech and ~10" 300BLK EoTech) - this thing (ACOG) showed up and jacked up my mojo. 2. A optic-bare AAC 16" 300BLK that my dad had bought, but doesn't make sense to put an ACOG with BDC for 5.56 on it. 3. A 16" Sig 556 with a little Bushnell TRS on it, but I almost never care to shoot it. Looks like EoTech moves to 16" 300 and the ACOG on the 5.56 11" Freaking Musical chairs with damn optics Guess I have my answer though I got this new sweet 18" upper with no glass. Its hard being me. So much priviledge. here you go, and it's on sale! |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 3:53:14 PM EDT
[#43]
DD 10.3" Barrel deal
http://www.westernsport.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=DD-07-077-07125&utm_source=Western+Sport+-+Volusion+Customers&utm_campaign=7abca28e03-Daniel_defense_super_buys3_27_2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_132d390254-7abca28e03-326334569 10 left ETA Went from 180 in stock to sold out in 2 hours. I just found out about it. ETA 2 Apparently it started last night, but they went from 150 to 0 as soon as GD found out about them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 3:59:47 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I got this new sweet 18" upper with no glass. Its hard being me. So much priviledge. here you go, and it's on sale! It even comes with rings! How could you not buy that? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 4:11:34 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
But its inside 15-20Yds when it really matters. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have a 26S on my SBR. It is essentially a batteryless red dot. I would love to see Trijicon to just do a zero power ACOG. Trijicon Tripower No. Just an ACOG. But with no magnification. I like the 1.5x a lot, past 15~20yd I consider it a major advantage But its inside 15-20Yds when it really matters. when you're right you're right it's not that bad up close, but red dot is faster no question |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 4:19:46 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
DD 10.3" Barrel deal http://www.westernsport.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=DD-07-077-07125&utm_source=Western+Sport+-+Volusion+Customers&utm_campaign=7abca28e03-Daniel_defense_super_buys3_27_2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_132d390254-7abca28e03-326334569 10 left ETA Went from 180 in stock to sold out in 2 hours. I just found out about it. ETA 2 Apparently it started last night, but they went from 150 to 0 as soon as GD found out about them. That was good deal. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 4:29:19 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It even comes with rings! How could you not buy that? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I got this new sweet 18" upper with no glass. Its hard being me. So much priviledge. here you go, and it's on sale! It even comes with rings! How could you not buy that? and Philips head bolts are superior for their SHTF tool availability. Do it Sylvan... |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 4:51:01 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That was good deal. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
DD 10.3" Barrel deal http://www.westernsport.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=DD-07-077-07125&utm_source=Western+Sport+-+Volusion+Customers&utm_campaign=7abca28e03-Daniel_defense_super_buys3_27_2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_132d390254-7abca28e03-326334569 10 left ETA Went from 180 in stock to sold out in 2 hours. I just found out about it. ETA 2 Apparently it started last night, but they went from 150 to 0 as soon as GD found out about them. That was good deal. I snagged one. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 6:00:28 PM EDT
[#49]
I'm working on building an SCWARish rifle out of my CWW swag. What barrel length should I go for with my 10" ALG handguard?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2015 6:10:16 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Went to lunch. Bought a G19.  Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
