User Panel
Just curious why this thread is so light on cans. Lots of nice rifles but relatively few with cans. A can is the best part of the gun!!
|
|
|
Originally Posted By AggiePhil: Just curious why this thread is so light on cans. Lots of nice rifles but relatively few with cans. A can is the best part of the gun!! View Quote A lot of folks are drawn to clone the Mk 12 in the first place because it's more exotic than an M16 or M4 but doesn't necessarily require NFA involvement. I, like you, think the can is a must, but you can technically clone it to spec and not get the can. Other clones require NFA or pinning requirements to look the part. I suspect that many gravitate toward the Mk 12 to avoid these complications. Admittedly, the Mk 12, even without the can, is a significant challenge. I know I committed to my Mk 12 build before I tried an M4A1 or CQBR clone. However, I finished those and am now still working on the Mk 12
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By CloneDiseased:
...a guess... A lot of folks are drawn to clone the Mk 12 in the first place because it's more exotic than an M16 or M4 but doesn't necessarily require NFA involvement. I, like you, think the can is a must, but you can technically clone it to spec and not get the can. Other clones require NFA or pinning requirements to look the part. I suspect that many gravitate toward the Mk 12 to avoid these complications. Admittedly, the Mk 12, even without the can, is a significant challenge. I know I committed to my Mk 12 build before I tried an M4A1 or CQBR clone. However, I finished those and am now still working on the Mk 12 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By CloneDiseased:
Originally Posted By AggiePhil:
Just curious why this thread is so light on cans. Lots of nice rifles but relatively few with cans. A can is the best part of the gun!! A lot of folks are drawn to clone the Mk 12 in the first place because it's more exotic than an M16 or M4 but doesn't necessarily require NFA involvement. I, like you, think the can is a must, but you can technically clone it to spec and not get the can. Other clones require NFA or pinning requirements to look the part. I suspect that many gravitate toward the Mk 12 to avoid these complications. Admittedly, the Mk 12, even without the can, is a significant challenge. I know I committed to my Mk 12 build before I tried an M4A1 or CQBR clone. However, I finished those and am now still working on the Mk 12 Makes sense. But jeez...suppressor ownership is easy now. That's the beauty of it! I know I'm working on a 16" Mk12-ish SPR that will have a DD RIS II rail in FDE and a Specwar 7.62 can. In the end, I think it'll look pretty close to a Mk12. I already have a Mk18 Mod 0, a CQBR, and a MK18 RIS II FSP rail that needs a host. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By USMC_FMJ: Can love http://<a href=http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/a556/USMC_FMJ/DSC_0004_zpst4iuoxd6.jpg</a>" /> View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By USMC_FMJ: Originally Posted By AggiePhil: Just curious why this thread is so light on cans. Lots of nice rifles but relatively few with cans. A can is the best part of the gun!! Can love http://<a href=http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/a556/USMC_FMJ/DSC_0004_zpst4iuoxd6.jpg</a>" /> X2 - some more love: |
|
|
Originally Posted By AggiePhil:
Makes sense. But jeez...suppressor ownership is easy now. That's the beauty of it! I know I'm working on a 16" Mk12-ish SPR that will have a DD RIS II rail in FDE and a Specwar 7.62 can. In the end, I think it'll look pretty close to a Mk12. I already have a Mk18 Mod 0, a CQBR, and a MK18 RIS II FSP rail that needs a host. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AggiePhil:
Originally Posted By CloneDiseased:
Originally Posted By AggiePhil:
Just curious why this thread is so light on cans. Lots of nice rifles but relatively few with cans. A can is the best part of the gun!! A lot of folks are drawn to clone the Mk 12 in the first place because it's more exotic than an M16 or M4 but doesn't necessarily require NFA involvement. I, like you, think the can is a must, but you can technically clone it to spec and not get the can. Other clones require NFA or pinning requirements to look the part. I suspect that many gravitate toward the Mk 12 to avoid these complications. Admittedly, the Mk 12, even without the can, is a significant challenge. I know I committed to my Mk 12 build before I tried an M4A1 or CQBR clone. However, I finished those and am now still working on the Mk 12 Makes sense. But jeez...suppressor ownership is easy now. That's the beauty of it! I know I'm working on a 16" Mk12-ish SPR that will have a DD RIS II rail in FDE and a Specwar 7.62 can. In the end, I think it'll look pretty close to a Mk12. I already have a Mk18 Mod 0, a CQBR, and a MK18 RIS II FSP rail that needs a host. How will it be close if you use a Daniel Defense RIS II rail in FDE and 16" barrel? You can't just use any rail when it is the rail that makes it a Mk12. And a 16" barrel? And a specwar 7.62 can? |
|
|
"These blistered hands will come to be the iron fist that bestows true and proper perspective."
|
|
Originally Posted By axarob44:
How will it be close if you use a Daniel Defense RIS II rail in FDE and 16" barrel? You can't just use any rail when it is the rail that makes it a Mk12. And a 16" barrel? And a specwar 7.62 can? View Quote We'll see how it turns out. There are some things I am willing to compromise on and others I am not. For example, quality is something I don't plan on compromising on. Things like the exact hand guard, scope, and suppressor I am willing to change if it better served my purposes. The OPS can is a decent can but is limited in its use due to the mount. A similarly sized can that can be moved around between platforms will suit me much better. Like I said, we'll see how it turns out in the end. On another note, how are y'all liking the second focal plane scopes on these rigs? Just about everyone is telling me to go first focal plane in this day and age. Vortex even makes a 2.5-10x32 that looks VERY similar to the Leupold Mark 4 but is FFP and mil/mil. |
|
|
Originally Posted By AggiePhil:
We'll see how it turns out. There are some things I am willing to compromise on and others I am not. For example, quality is something I don't plan on compromising on. Things like the exact hand guard, scope, and suppressor I am willing to change if it better served my purposes. The OPS can is a decent can but is limited in its use due to the mount. A similarly sized can that can be moved around between platforms will suit me much better. Like I said, we'll see how it turns out in the end. On another note, how are y'all liking the second focal plane scopes on these rigs? Just about everyone is telling me to go first focal plane in this day and age. Vortex even makes a 2.5-10x32 that looks VERY similar to the Leupold Mark 4 but is FFP and mil/mil. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AggiePhil:
Originally Posted By axarob44:
How will it be close if you use a Daniel Defense RIS II rail in FDE and 16" barrel? You can't just use any rail when it is the rail that makes it a Mk12. And a 16" barrel? And a specwar 7.62 can? We'll see how it turns out. There are some things I am willing to compromise on and others I am not. For example, quality is something I don't plan on compromising on. Things like the exact hand guard, scope, and suppressor I am willing to change if it better served my purposes. The OPS can is a decent can but is limited in its use due to the mount. A similarly sized can that can be moved around between platforms will suit me much better. Like I said, we'll see how it turns out in the end. On another note, how are y'all liking the second focal plane scopes on these rigs? Just about everyone is telling me to go first focal plane in this day and age. Vortex even makes a 2.5-10x32 that looks VERY similar to the Leupold Mark 4 but is FFP and mil/mil. I'll let the chainsaw guys respond |
|
|
Originally Posted By AggiePhil: We'll see how it turns out. There are some things I am willing to compromise on and others I am not. For example, quality is something I don't plan on compromising on. Things like the exact hand guard, scope, and suppressor I am willing to change if it better served my purposes. The OPS can is a decent can but is limited in its use due to the mount. A similarly sized can that can be moved around between platforms will suit me much better. Like I said, we'll see how it turns out in the end. On another note, how are y'all liking the second focal plane scopes on these rigs? Just about everyone is telling me to go first focal plane in this day and age. Vortex even makes a 2.5-10x32 that looks VERY similar to the Leupold Mark 4 but is FFP and mil/mil. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AggiePhil: Originally Posted By axarob44: How will it be close if you use a Daniel Defense RIS II rail in FDE and 16" barrel? You can't just use any rail when it is the rail that makes it a Mk12. And a 16" barrel? And a specwar 7.62 can? We'll see how it turns out. There are some things I am willing to compromise on and others I am not. For example, quality is something I don't plan on compromising on. Things like the exact hand guard, scope, and suppressor I am willing to change if it better served my purposes. The OPS can is a decent can but is limited in its use due to the mount. A similarly sized can that can be moved around between platforms will suit me much better. Like I said, we'll see how it turns out in the end. On another note, how are y'all liking the second focal plane scopes on these rigs? Just about everyone is telling me to go first focal plane in this day and age. Vortex even makes a 2.5-10x32 that looks VERY similar to the Leupold Mark 4 but is FFP and mil/mil. Edit-Check out my MK12 mod awesome guys! I made a few changes due to superior performance, but the spirit is there. |
|
|
Absolutely! Never said it'll be a Mk12.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By AggiePhil: We'll see how it turns out. There are some things I am willing to compromise on and others I am not. For example, quality is something I don't plan on compromising on. Things like the exact hand guard, scope, and suppressor I am willing to change if it better served my purposes. The OPS can is a decent can but is limited in its use due to the mount. A similarly sized can that can be moved around between platforms will suit me much better. Like I said, we'll see how it turns out in the end. On another note, how are y'all liking the second focal plane scopes on these rigs? Just about everyone is telling me to go first focal plane in this day and age. Vortex even makes a 2.5-10x32 that looks VERY similar to the Leupold Mark 4 but is FFP and mil/mil. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AggiePhil: Originally Posted By axarob44: How will it be close if you use a Daniel Defense RIS II rail in FDE and 16" barrel? You can't just use any rail when it is the rail that makes it a Mk12. And a 16" barrel? And a specwar 7.62 can? We'll see how it turns out. There are some things I am willing to compromise on and others I am not. For example, quality is something I don't plan on compromising on. Things like the exact hand guard, scope, and suppressor I am willing to change if it better served my purposes. The OPS can is a decent can but is limited in its use due to the mount. A similarly sized can that can be moved around between platforms will suit me much better. Like I said, we'll see how it turns out in the end. On another note, how are y'all liking the second focal plane scopes on these rigs? Just about everyone is telling me to go first focal plane in this day and age. Vortex even makes a 2.5-10x32 that looks VERY similar to the Leupold Mark 4 but is FFP and mil/mil. Personally, I think 1st focal plane is nice, but I honestly don't think it's that big of a deal on a scope that maxes out at 10X on a DMR type rifle like the MK12. When you get into competitive shooting and you're shooting precision guns with ammo that can really go the distance, then 1st focal plane is pretty much a necessity - much more practical. Not that I would turn down a 1st focal plane scope for a MK12 rifle, but a 2nd focal plane scope is plenty effective. |
|
|
Back on mk 12 subject. Do any of you who have suppressors clean them with clip or whatever. I'm sure it has been covered somewhere but I am asking again Instead of looking thru 1200+ pages for an answer. Thanks
|
|
|
No need to clean centerfire rifle cans. I do lightly clean my mounts with Fireclean though.
|
|
|
Just wanna post some pictures, I don't know why
" /> " /> |
|
|
|
http://www.amazon.com/Gentle-Propositions-J-S-Economos/dp/0615997635
|
Originally Posted By RTUtah:
If you're in this thread without a suppressed Mk12, that's bad. And you should feel bad. http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r249/RTUtah/ARs/FullSizeRender%202_zpsws6q58kd.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By RTUtah:
Originally Posted By AggiePhil:
Just curious why this thread is so light on cans. Lots of nice rifles but relatively few with cans. A can is the best part of the gun!! If you're in this thread without a suppressed Mk12, that's bad. And you should feel bad. http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r249/RTUtah/ARs/FullSizeRender%202_zpsws6q58kd.jpg That paint is sex. |
|
|
Can you purchase a can directly from Allen Engineering?
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RTUtah:
If you're in this thread without a suppressed Mk12, that's bad. And you should feel bad. http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r249/RTUtah/ARs/FullSizeRender%202_zpsws6q58kd.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By RTUtah:
Originally Posted By AggiePhil:
Just curious why this thread is so light on cans. Lots of nice rifles but relatively few with cans. A can is the best part of the gun!! If you're in this thread without a suppressed Mk12, that's bad. And you should feel bad. http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r249/RTUtah/ARs/FullSizeRender%202_zpsws6q58kd.jpg Some of us live in a commie state |
|
|
Originally Posted By AggiePhil: We'll see how it turns out. There are some things I am willing to compromise on and others I am not. For example, quality is something I don't plan on compromising on. Things like the exact hand guard, scope, and suppressor I am willing to change if it better served my purposes. The OPS can is a decent can but is limited in its use due to the mount. A similarly sized can that can be moved around between platforms will suit me much better. Like I said, we'll see how it turns out in the end. On another note, how are y'all liking the second focal plane scopes on these rigs? Just about everyone is telling me to go first focal plane in this day and age. Vortex even makes a 2.5-10x32 that looks VERY similar to the Leupold Mark 4 but is FFP and mil/mil. View Quote |
|
"Not proud of everything I've done, but at least you know I did it well."
|
"When a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully." - Dr. Samuel Johnson
|
Originally Posted By BurtSaun1049:
Probably blasphemous, but I probably wouldn't even own a Mk 12 if I couldn't suppress it. (Still waiting on Brownells to release their A1 stock kits so I can actually use the lower I have built . . .) http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c99/BurtSaun/20160111_155218_zpsawvkqdkc.jpg View Quote Brownells is releasing an A1 stock kit?? When? How have I not heard of this?! |
|
|
Originally Posted By RadOP:
My OPS Inc 12th Model purchased back in 2012 came with the brake and short collar not a long collar. MIL rifles all used the long collar, id assume its safe to say even the holland uses the long collar View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By RadOP:
Originally Posted By BurtSaun1049:
Originally Posted By HaveBlue83:
Nobody ever used short. Allen made short ones for some reason after ops stopped. Ops made the originals. They were all long. AFAIK, Ops before they folded were making short collars too. My OPS Inc 12th Model purchased back in 2012 came with the brake and short collar not a long collar. MIL rifles all used the long collar, id assume its safe to say even the holland uses the long collar Wait, I thought the MK12 Mod 1 used the short collar? AEM Collar for MK12 |
|
|
Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Brownells is releasing an A1 stock kit?? When? How have I not heard of this?! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Originally Posted By BurtSaun1049:
Probably blasphemous, but I probably wouldn't even own a Mk 12 if I couldn't suppress it. (Still waiting on Brownells to release their A1 stock kits so I can actually use the lower I have built . . .) http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c99/BurtSaun/20160111_155218_zpsawvkqdkc.jpg Brownells is releasing an A1 stock kit?? When? How have I not heard of this?! http://www.brownells.com/rifle-parts/receiver-parts/buffer-tube-parts/buffer-tubes/a1-rifle-stock-completion-kit-sku080000553-27315-53574.aspx Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Wait, I thought the MK12 Mod 1 used the short collar? AEM Collar for MK12 No issue Mk 12 or Holland used a short collar--all long. |
|
"When a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully." - Dr. Samuel Johnson
|
~2nd Battalion, 9th Marines~
13 July 2007 -- 01 April 2015 |
That Brownells kit is only the guts of the A1 stock, it says ' receiver extension. buffer, buffer spring, and upper screw'. That doesn' t include the stock body itself, the buttplate, buttplate door assembly, sling swivel, or swivel screw. The only thing different than an A2 stock setup is the upper screw is shorter on the A1 stock and there is no spacer on the A1, well the swivel screw is longer too. Swivel is the same as an A2 . Atleast that's how it reads to me. I could be wrong, but I don't think I am.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By MNRidesHonda: Couldn't post on the previous page because I have no suppressor haha http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/924/IFDh6n.jpg http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/921/YH5ZBW.jpg https://youtu.be/j-A_f9bOrr4 Group from the vid clip. Shot 5 but only 4 holes are in the picture. The 5th one was a flier and the hole is about 1.5" away at 10 o'clock.. http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/923/loiUk3.jpg View Quote This is gonna sound fruity but, that sweat shirt is badass! Where'd ya get it?? Mod 1 rocks too. Nice shootin, even with the "flier". |
|
[quote]Originally Posted By Movistar:
Shooting unsuppressed is for the birds and criminals[/quote] |
Originally Posted By rdpayne23: Some of us live in a commie state View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By rdpayne23: Originally Posted By RTUtah: Originally Posted By AggiePhil: Just curious why this thread is so light on cans. Lots of nice rifles but relatively few with cans. A can is the best part of the gun!! If you're in this thread without a suppressed Mk12, that's bad. And you should feel bad. http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r249/RTUtah/ARs/FullSizeRender%202_zpsws6q58kd.jpg Some of us live in a commie state Let's get you outta there. |
|
http://www.amazon.com/Gentle-Propositions-J-S-Economos/dp/0615997635
|
|
Please excuse my ways. Iraq Veteran. 45B.
Originally Posted By DangerJ: Pentagon should troll back, hit a few camps with drone strikes, then tag the coordinates in a post with #LOL |
It is well understood by many who frequent this forum that the mk12 is (arguably) outdated, and there may be new options that will better fill certain builds/systems. However, those in this thread have committed (with much less deviation than you plan on your build) to the clone.
That being said, 2.5-10x32ffp vortex's are very good, but they most certainly do not look like the mk4. Just do your thing man, build what you want, nothing wrong with that. edited to remove redundancies |
|
|
Originally Posted By HaveBlue83:
How to cheat at the clone game part 1: <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s12.postimg.org/sbo0whmnx/20160314_104755.jpg</a> View Quote this is the kind of content a Monday post should have. Update us with pics when it's done |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By pennsylvaniaroots:
picked rings up this past weekend. Thanks to those who suggested the height. Now just waiting on an upper and lower. http://i759.photobucket.com/albums/xx235/jrminty2021/IMG_20160314_111117126.jpg View Quote |
|
|
Please excuse my ways. Iraq Veteran. 45B.
Originally Posted By DangerJ: Pentagon should troll back, hit a few camps with drone strikes, then tag the coordinates in a post with #LOL |
Originally Posted By Zakk101abn:
This is gonna sound fruity but, that sweat shirt is badass! Where'd ya get it?? Mod 1 rocks too. Nice shootin, even with the "flier". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Zakk101abn:
Originally Posted By MNRidesHonda:
Couldn't post on the previous page because I have no suppressor haha http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/924/IFDh6n.jpg http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/921/YH5ZBW.jpg https://youtu.be/j-A_f9bOrr4 Group from the vid clip. Shot 5 but only 4 holes are in the picture. The 5th one was a flier and the hole is about 1.5" away at 10 o'clock.. http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/923/loiUk3.jpg This is gonna sound fruity but, that sweat shirt is badass! Where'd ya get it?? Mod 1 rocks too. Nice shootin, even with the "flier". Sold out a long time ago.. |
|
~2nd Battalion, 9th Marines~
13 July 2007 -- 01 April 2015 |
Originally Posted By BurtSaun1049:
http://www.brownells.com/rifle-parts/receiver-parts/buffer-tube-parts/buffer-tubes/a1-rifle-stock-completion-kit-sku080000553-27315-53574.aspx No issue Mk 12 or Holland used a short collar--all long. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By BurtSaun1049:
Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Originally Posted By BurtSaun1049:
Probably blasphemous, but I probably wouldn't even own a Mk 12 if I couldn't suppress it. (Still waiting on Brownells to release their A1 stock kits so I can actually use the lower I have built . . .) http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c99/BurtSaun/20160111_155218_zpsawvkqdkc.jpg Brownells is releasing an A1 stock kit?? When? How have I not heard of this?! http://www.brownells.com/rifle-parts/receiver-parts/buffer-tube-parts/buffer-tubes/a1-rifle-stock-completion-kit-sku080000553-27315-53574.aspx Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Wait, I thought the MK12 Mod 1 used the short collar? AEM Collar for MK12 No issue Mk 12 or Holland used a short collar--all long. Oh man... Well who sells the long collar version then? Would it still be compatible with the AEM5? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Oh man... Well who sells the long collar version then? Would it still be compatible with the AEM5? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Originally Posted By BurtSaun1049:
Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Originally Posted By BurtSaun1049:
Probably blasphemous, but I probably wouldn't even own a Mk 12 if I couldn't suppress it. (Still waiting on Brownells to release their A1 stock kits so I can actually use the lower I have built . . .) http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c99/BurtSaun/20160111_155218_zpsawvkqdkc.jpg Brownells is releasing an A1 stock kit?? When? How have I not heard of this?! http://www.brownells.com/rifle-parts/receiver-parts/buffer-tube-parts/buffer-tubes/a1-rifle-stock-completion-kit-sku080000553-27315-53574.aspx Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Wait, I thought the MK12 Mod 1 used the short collar? AEM Collar for MK12 No issue Mk 12 or Holland used a short collar--all long. Oh man... Well who sells the long collar version then? Would it still be compatible with the AEM5? ADCO had them last week. |
|
|
Originally Posted By HaveBlue83:
Booooooooooooooooom <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s11.postimg.org/gxr20jq1v/20160314_125916.jpg</a> <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s11.postimg.org/a60mxp12b/20160314_131037_HDR.jpg</a> <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s10.postimg.org/nzsiyw6qx/20160314_133733.jpg</a> View Quote Well....... How much? lol |
|
|
Originally Posted By RyanO20: Well....... How much? lol View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By RyanO20: Originally Posted By HaveBlue83: Booooooooooooooooom <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s11.postimg.org/gxr20jq1v/20160314_125916.jpg</a> <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s11.postimg.org/a60mxp12b/20160314_131037_HDR.jpg</a> <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s10.postimg.org/nzsiyw6qx/20160314_133733.jpg</a> Well....... How much? lol It is quite simple and takes 2 hours. I would be willing to do them as long as i got a picture of them before being sent to me so i can see what version they are. PM me. It wont be much at all. I enjoy doing these and have the next 8 weeks to do some if needed. |
|
Please excuse my ways. Iraq Veteran. 45B.
Originally Posted By DangerJ: Pentagon should troll back, hit a few camps with drone strikes, then tag the coordinates in a post with #LOL |
Originally Posted By HaveBlue83: http://s11.postimg.org/a60mxp12b/20160314_131037_HDR.jpgBooooooooooooooooom http://s11.postimg.org/gxr20jq1v/20160314_125916.jpg View Quote http://s10.postimg.org/nzsiyw6qx/20160314_133733.jpg |
|
"Not proud of everything I've done, but at least you know I did it well."
|
Originally Posted By HaveBlue83:
Booooooooooooooooom <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s11.postimg.org/gxr20jq1v/20160314_125916.jpg</a> <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s11.postimg.org/a60mxp12b/20160314_131037_HDR.jpg</a> <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s10.postimg.org/nzsiyw6qx/20160314_133733.jpg</a> View Quote Genius!! [insert "It's beautiful" cat meme] |
|
|
Originally Posted By HaveBlue83: http://s11.postimg.org/a60mxp12b/20160314_131037_HDR.jpgBooooooooooooooooom http://s11.postimg.org/gxr20jq1v/20160314_125916.jpg View Quote http://s10.postimg.org/nzsiyw6qx/20160314_133733.jpg |
|
|
Originally Posted By HaveBlue83:
Booooooooooooooooom <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s11.postimg.org/gxr20jq1v/20160314_125916.jpg</a> <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s11.postimg.org/a60mxp12b/20160314_131037_HDR.jpg</a> <a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank">http://s10.postimg.org/nzsiyw6qx/20160314_133733.jpg</a> View Quote Well done. Things improve here I'd love to get you to do a set for my faux Gen I. The only thing original on it is the wheeled FSB, yet everything else is or will be spec. Go figure. I don't intend to post this iteration of the rifle to this thread going forward given my intentional deviations from spec, but here is a shot for the sake of comparison. No light here today, so excuse the flash. |
|
|
|
DAT HOLLAND DOE^^^^ nicley done!
|
|
Please excuse my ways. Iraq Veteran. 45B.
Originally Posted By DangerJ: Pentagon should troll back, hit a few camps with drone strikes, then tag the coordinates in a post with #LOL |
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.