User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 10:08:06 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
In other words, Breitbart being Breitbart. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. In other words, Breitbart being Breitbart. But the actual quote was the "Israeli regime" no matter who the pm of israeli is, iran says it. and that is what they said in english. Their farsi quotes are a much more accurate insight into what they really think. Its the "zionist regime" that must be destroyed. Regime change would be the most accurate way to describe it, but not simply exchanging a likud candidate for a labour candidate. more like removing the jews and replacing them with muslims. it is the destruction of israel as a jewish state. if you accept that israel IS a jewish state, then the destruction of that status is an existential threat. iran doesn't want all the jews dead, of course. just under the control of a proper muslim government. death to america, btw. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 10:14:38 PM EDT
[#2]
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 10:54:34 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Don't make me get out the list. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I feel the "its happening" gif may be realistically appropriate in the near future. 
Don't make me get out the list. Lol |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 10:57:27 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeah, the Iranians have pinky promised to use their nuclear bombs to annihilate only the Netanyahu regime and no other Jews. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. Yeah, the Iranians have pinky promised to use their nuclear bombs to annihilate only the Netanyahu regime and no other Jews. What nuclear bombs? Do you know something the CIA and Mossad don't know? If you do, you should call them and present your Intel on Iranian possession of nukes. Iran doesn't even admit to wanting nuclear weapons, let alone wanting nuclear weapons to destroy Israel with. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 10:57:35 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I think Israel will end up striking first. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Israel should will strike first. FIFY I think Israel will end up striking first. Good. Time to bring down the Hebrew Hammer!!!!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:02:12 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. Yeah but.....reading is for faggots. If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. Iran's leadership knows that would lead to their destruction. They aren't stupid or irrational. iran's Leaders are not Suicidal |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:02:37 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Israel should strike first. I'd bet they do. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:02:41 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I feel the "its happening" gif may be realistically appropriate in the near future.
QFT |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:05:45 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Y'all realize that if either country nukes the other...it's very likely the beginning of the end? Everybody will pick sides and WW III will be underway? In that vein...who do you think would ally with the US against the rest of the world? I have to imagine that Russia, China, NORKland, Pakistan, all the muslim countries, etc. won't be shoving each other out of the way to get in line to help the USA. The rest will be looking for the least destructive outcome for their countries. ... Most of those countries would be on our side. China needs the USA to honor their bonds, and needs to keep Chinese citizens employed by manufacturing iPhones. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:07:59 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They did in '67 when faced with similarly long odds. IMO; Obama's recent activities have provided Israel with a workable pretext to strike Iran, and Netenyahu did just say that Israel would, if necessary, "stand alone". Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Israel should strike first. They did in '67 when faced with similarly long odds. IMO; Obama's recent activities have provided Israel with a workable pretext to strike Iran, and Netenyahu did just say that Israel would, if necessary, "stand alone". Do it. Iran would be happier than a clam if Israel bombed them. It would be a weak strike, setting their program back a year or so at best, and it would give the Iranians the perfect pretext to abandon the NPT and go nuclear. The international community would look the other way as Iran crossed the nuclear threshold because Israel sabotaged the international diplomacy the P5+1 had worked so hard to achieve. Of course, the Israelis aren't stupid, they know that this would be the result... Which is why they aren't going to do a god damned thing. Lol |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:10:39 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't recall anyone saying that they want to "annihilate" Iran's leaders. Who are these "plenty of people"? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. Yeah but.....reading is for faggots. If you don't think that the Iranian leaders want to literally wipe Israel off the map you are delusional. There are plenty of people who want to do the same to Iran. And too bad these "wipe Israel off the map" stories are exaggerations at best. I don't recall anyone saying that they want to "annihilate" Iran's leaders. Who are these "plenty of people"? People often call for regime change in Iran. Do you think Iran's leaders are going to be ushered out of office with a parade, flowers, and a tearful goodbye from the Iranian people thanking them for their service when they are finally removed. Lol! |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:12:45 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Israel should strike first. They did in '67 when faced with similarly long odds. IMO; Obama's recent activities have provided Israel with a workable pretext to strike Iran, and Netenyahu did just say that Israel would, if necessary, "stand alone". Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. You only believe that because you are totally naive about Iran's nuclear infrastructure and what their current capabilities are. Read up on Fordo and get back to us. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:13:35 PM EDT
[#13]
This video is a great allegorical depiction of the situation in the middle east. The guy with no shirt is Iran. The guy he assaults is Israel. The spectators are all the rifraff in the region.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yxu0ZIL3wdA |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:13:46 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Israel should strike first. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:16:12 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If Israel believes that the mullahs represent an existential threat, that will be something they are willing to accept. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Israel should strike first. They did in '67 when faced with similarly long odds. IMO; Obama's recent activities have provided Israel with a workable pretext to strike Iran, and Netenyahu did just say that Israel would, if necessary, "stand alone". Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. Iran will fight back. If Israel believes that the mullahs represent an existential threat, that will be something they are willing to accept. They aren't going to do shit. You've even said it yourself in other threads. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:18:12 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I dunno, Iran has been improving their air defenses for decades....they could get lucky. I say we use the ultimate in "**** your defenses".... http://media.defenceindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_SSBN_726_USS_Ohio_Tubes_Open_lg.jpg Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If Iran wants a nuke, lets give them a couple. We can even deliver. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f6/B-1B_B-2_and_B-52.jpg I dunno, Iran has been improving their air defenses for decades....they could get lucky. I say we use the ultimate in "**** your defenses".... http://media.defenceindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_SSBN_726_USS_Ohio_Tubes_Open_lg.jpg Russia just recently offered to sell Iran their latest air defense system |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:21:15 PM EDT
[#17]
Easter is almost here.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:21:26 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It is about time the Jews got off of their high horse and stopped believing that violence is constrained to one race. Remember when the Maccabees committed horrible deeds in the name of God, to rebuild Judea? Yeah, samesies with Iran now. Therefore, we should turn a blind eye... Oh, and racism.... something about racism.... probably that YOU are a RACIST unless you agree with me!  Going to be hard to turn a blind eye now since our entire strategy for confronting ISIS is dependent on the Iranians. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/06/world/middleeast/us-strategy-in-iraq-increasingly-relies-on-iran.html?_r=0 |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:23:07 PM EDT
[#19]
I'm glad our President wouldn't make a deal just to make a deal.....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:24:02 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
But the actual quote was the "Israeli regime" no matter who the pm of israeli is, iran says it. and that is what they said in english. Their farsi quotes are a much more accurate insight into what they really think. Its the "zionist regime" that must be destroyed. Regime change would be the most accurate way to describe it, but not simply exchanging a likud candidate for a labour candidate. more like removing the jews and replacing them with muslims. it is the destruction of israel as a jewish state. if you accept that israel IS a jewish state, then the destruction of that status is an existential threat. iran doesn't want all the jews dead, of course. just under the control of a proper muslim government. death to america, btw. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. In other words, Breitbart being Breitbart. But the actual quote was the "Israeli regime" no matter who the pm of israeli is, iran says it. and that is what they said in english. Their farsi quotes are a much more accurate insight into what they really think. Its the "zionist regime" that must be destroyed. Regime change would be the most accurate way to describe it, but not simply exchanging a likud candidate for a labour candidate. more like removing the jews and replacing them with muslims. it is the destruction of israel as a jewish state. if you accept that israel IS a jewish state, then the destruction of that status is an existential threat. iran doesn't want all the jews dead, of course. just under the control of a proper muslim government. death to america, btw. It doesn't want all the Jews gone, it just wants a multi-confessional state and not the current Jewish apartheid with Palestinians living in refugee camps. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:30:00 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Mind blown  Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well with iran cutting across iraq to "attack isis" they are one step closer to Israel, what if they are meeting up with isis to join forces? Mind blown Yeah, not gonna happen. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:31:27 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: People often call for regime change in Iran. Do you think Iran's leaders are going to be ushered out of office with a parade, flowers, and a tearful goodbye from the Iranian people thanking them for their service when they are finally removed. Lol! Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: There are plenty of people who want to do the same to Iran. And too bad these "wipe Israel off the map" stories are exaggerations at best. I don't recall anyone saying that they want to "annihilate" Iran's leaders. Who are these "plenty of people"? People often call for regime change in Iran. Do you think Iran's leaders are going to be ushered out of office with a parade, flowers, and a tearful goodbye from the Iranian people thanking them for their service when they are finally removed. Lol! Regime change is different from "annihilation". I'd like to see a regime change in the USA, but no "annihilation". |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:31:45 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Iran will fight back. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Israel should strike first. They did in '67 when faced with similarly long odds. IMO; Obama's recent activities have provided Israel with a workable pretext to strike Iran, and Netenyahu did just say that Israel would, if necessary, "stand alone". Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. Iran will fight back. Iran learned from Syria, and Iraq. Their nuclear facilities are much better protected. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:34:48 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Regime change is different from "annihilation". I'd like to see a regime change in the USA, but no "annihilation". Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There are plenty of people who want to do the same to Iran. And too bad these "wipe Israel off the map" stories are exaggerations at best. I don't recall anyone saying that they want to "annihilate" Iran's leaders. Who are these "plenty of people"? People often call for regime change in Iran. Do you think Iran's leaders are going to be ushered out of office with a parade, flowers, and a tearful goodbye from the Iranian people thanking them for their service when they are finally removed. Lol! Regime change is different from "annihilation". I'd like to see a regime change in the USA, but no "annihilation". In the case of Iran, regime change is annihilation for their leaders. It's just a politically correct way of saying we want to see them all hanging from lamp posts. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:35:11 PM EDT
[#25]
S-300 is being phased out in Russia. It's not even close to their top of the line.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:37:35 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You only believe that because you are totally naive about Iran's nuclear infrastructure and what their current capabilities are. Read up on Fordo and get back to us. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Israel should strike first. They did in '67 when faced with similarly long odds. IMO; Obama's recent activities have provided Israel with a workable pretext to strike Iran, and Netenyahu did just say that Israel would, if necessary, "stand alone". Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. You only believe that because you are totally naive about Iran's nuclear infrastructure and what their current capabilities are. Read up on Fordo and get back to us. Actually, you are the one that's totally naive about Iran's nuclear infrastructure. It's spelled "Fordow", and that's not where Iran's reactors are located. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:39:00 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
S-300 is being phased out in Russia. It's not even close to their top of the line. S-400 is currently top of the line, but it is more of a ABM system than air-defense. The Antey-2500 is the most recent version of the S-300. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/5/2015 11:45:05 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Actually, you are the one that's totally naive about Iran's nuclear infrastructure. It's spelled "Fordow", and that's not where Iran's reactors are located. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Israel should strike first. They did in '67 when faced with similarly long odds. IMO; Obama's recent activities have provided Israel with a workable pretext to strike Iran, and Netenyahu did just say that Israel would, if necessary, "stand alone". Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. You only believe that because you are totally naive about Iran's nuclear infrastructure and what their current capabilities are. Read up on Fordo and get back to us. Actually, you are the one that's totally naive about Iran's nuclear infrastructure. It's spelled "Fordow", and that's not where Iran's reactors are located. Lmao. Iran isn't using their "reactors" to produce fissile material. It's producing enriched uranium in centrifuge plants. It can be spelled Fordo, or Fordow. It doesn't matter because it is an English spelling of a Farsi name. Both are technically wrong. Btw, you are clearly uninformed on their program and the nuclear fuel cycle so just stop. They are a long way off from completing the Arak heavy water reactor. It is not currently a viable route to producing fissile material. Their centrifuges are. The centrifuge plants are the main concern. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 12:07:52 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Lmao. Iran isn't using their "reactors" to produce fissile material. It's using enriched uranium produced in centrifuge plants. It can be spelled Fordo, or Fordow. It doesn't matter because it is an English spelling of a Farsi name. Both are technically wrong. Btw, you are clearly uninformed on their program and the nuclear fuel cycle so just stop. They are a long way off from completing the Arak heavy water reactor. It is not currently a viable route to producing fissile material. Their centrifuges are. The centrifuge plants are the main concern. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. You only believe that because you are totally naive about Iran's nuclear infrastructure and what their current capabilities are. Read up on Fordo and get back to us. Actually, you are the one that's totally naive about Iran's nuclear infrastructure. It's spelled "Fordow", and that's not where Iran's reactors are located. Lmao. Iran isn't using their "reactors" to produce fissile material. It's using enriched uranium produced in centrifuge plants. It can be spelled Fordo, or Fordow. It doesn't matter because it is an English spelling of a Farsi name. Both are technically wrong. Btw, you are clearly uninformed on their program and the nuclear fuel cycle so just stop. They are a long way off from completing the Arak heavy water reactor. It is not currently a viable route to producing fissile material. Their centrifuges are. The centrifuge plants are the main concern. LOL. No one's saying that Iran is using their "reactors" to produce fissile material. Now you're really showing your ignorance in this field. The Arak heavy water reactor is not relevant. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 12:14:17 AM EDT
[#30]
Is Iran still 6 months away from making a bomb?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 12:21:57 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeah, not gonna happen. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well with iran cutting across iraq to "attack isis" they are one step closer to Israel, what if they are meeting up with isis to join forces? Mind blown Yeah, not gonna happen. Probably not, and I would put odds on Isreal being smart enough to go into Iraq to take care of "ISIS" first, and kill two birds with one stone. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 12:39:16 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So they are just repeating what they say every week, right? Yea kinda like the midget in North Korea.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 12:39:32 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
LOL. No one's saying that Iran is using their "reactors" to produce fissile material. Now you're really showing your ignorance in this field. The Arak heavy water reactor is not relevant. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Israel struck first and bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq. They could do the same in Iran. You only believe that because you are totally naive about Iran's nuclear infrastructure and what their current capabilities are. Read up on Fordo and get back to us. Actually, you are the one that's totally naive about Iran's nuclear infrastructure. It's spelled "Fordow", and that's not where Iran's reactors are located. Lmao. Iran isn't using their "reactors" to produce fissile material. It's using enriched uranium produced in centrifuge plants. It can be spelled Fordo, or Fordow. It doesn't matter because it is an English spelling of a Farsi name. Both are technically wrong. Btw, you are clearly uninformed on their program and the nuclear fuel cycle so just stop. They are a long way off from completing the Arak heavy water reactor. It is not currently a viable route to producing fissile material. Their centrifuges are. The centrifuge plants are the main concern. LOL. No one's saying that Iran is using their "reactors" to produce fissile material. Now you're really showing your ignorance in this field. The Arak heavy water reactor is not relevant. OMG. This is like arguing with a 3 year old. You don't know you're wrong because you don't know what you are talking about. Lol. You're the one who brought up Iraq and Syria's reactors being bombed by Israel, as if that indicated they could stop the Iranians' program if they were to launch similar strikes. However, those strikes are in no way analogous to striking Iran. Iran has dozens of nuclear sites that would have to be hit, the distance is much much further, and Iran has hardened sites that would require multiple sorties to have any hope of destroying them. Striking Iran wouldn't be like those single, solitary strikes over Syria and Iraq. The Israelis don't have the loiter time, the necessary refueling capabilities, or the forward basing assets necessary to pull off such a strike. The could only do a one time limited strike that would not set the Iranians back more than year at most. And if they didn't destroy Fordo(w)  , Iran could likely still go nuclear despite the Israeli strike.
But, don't back peddle now son. Just stop digging. Hahahaha |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 8:20:41 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It doesn't want all the Jews gone, it just wants a multi-confessional state and not the current Jewish apartheid with Palestinians living in refugee camps. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. In other words, Breitbart being Breitbart. But the actual quote was the "Israeli regime" no matter who the pm of israeli is, iran says it. and that is what they said in english. Their farsi quotes are a much more accurate insight into what they really think. Its the "zionist regime" that must be destroyed. Regime change would be the most accurate way to describe it, but not simply exchanging a likud candidate for a labour candidate. more like removing the jews and replacing them with muslims. it is the destruction of israel as a jewish state. if you accept that israel IS a jewish state, then the destruction of that status is an existential threat. iran doesn't want all the jews dead, of course. just under the control of a proper muslim government. death to america, btw. It doesn't want all the Jews gone, it just wants a multi-confessional state and not the current Jewish apartheid with Palestinians living in refugee camps. 
straight off the dailykos talking points. Do you pick it up at your california school everyday? Iran is the model of religious tolerance, isn't it? Do you love Iran or do you just really hate jews? I Who built those refugee camps, btw? And when? millions of refugees from the 40s but only the arabs keep their fellow arabs in cages. there were refugee camps in israel. and they were filled with jewish refugees. but they stopped making them live in camps. you know this, of course. easy from the beach to be a billy bad ass. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 1:42:31 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
straight off the dailykos talking points. Do you pick it up at your california school everyday? Iran is the model of religious tolerance, isn't it? Do you love Iran or do you just really hate jews? I Who built those refugee camps, btw? And when? millions of refugees from the 40s but only the arabs keep their fellow arabs in cages. there were refugee camps in israel. and they were filled with jewish refugees. but they stopped making them live in camps. you know this, of course. easy from the beach to be a billy bad ass. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Their headline says one thing, then in the text of the story they say 'The Netanyahu regime ‘should be annihilated’. That makes a difference. Saying the Obama regime should be wiped out might just get me to buy you a beer, whereas saying America should be wiped has rather different connotations. In other words, Breitbart being Breitbart. But the actual quote was the "Israeli regime" no matter who the pm of israeli is, iran says it. and that is what they said in english. Their farsi quotes are a much more accurate insight into what they really think. Its the "zionist regime" that must be destroyed. Regime change would be the most accurate way to describe it, but not simply exchanging a likud candidate for a labour candidate. more like removing the jews and replacing them with muslims. it is the destruction of israel as a jewish state. if you accept that israel IS a jewish state, then the destruction of that status is an existential threat. iran doesn't want all the jews dead, of course. just under the control of a proper muslim government. death to america, btw. It doesn't want all the Jews gone, it just wants a multi-confessional state and not the current Jewish apartheid with Palestinians living in refugee camps.
straight off the dailykos talking points. Do you pick it up at your california school everyday? Iran is the model of religious tolerance, isn't it? Do you love Iran or do you just really hate jews? I Who built those refugee camps, btw? And when? millions of refugees from the 40s but only the arabs keep their fellow arabs in cages. there were refugee camps in israel. and they were filled with jewish refugees. but they stopped making them live in camps. you know this, of course. easy from the beach to be a billy bad ass. Straight from AIPAC's talking points. See... I can do that too. 
How's publishing articles going for you. Has Cicero Online magazine made you famous as a strategic guru yet? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 2:28:04 PM EDT
[#36]
How does a nursing student in california who has never worn a military uniform (cop doesn't count) love iran so much? I really don't get it.
for those who have worn a uniform, iranians tried to kill us. Whats the matter? jews didn't give you a loan or something? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 2:41:25 PM EDT
[#37]
Libertarians will sell them the uranium, Democrats the hardware. There's no difference between libertardian, green and democraps, they're all progressives now.
Iran has enough fossil fuel to power their economy and get rich selling to the world market for 1000 years. The ONLY rational deal is no nuclear power. To Get Ron Paul's Insanity, You Have To Understand Libertarianism |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 2:51:20 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How does a nursing student in california who has never worn a military uniform (cop doesn't count) love iran so much? I really don't get it. for those who have worn a uniform, iranians tried to kill us. Whats the matter? jews didn't give you a loan or something? I'm not a nursing student, nor do I hate Jews, and I certainly don't love Iran. I just don't subborn US foreign policy or US interests to Israel. You should try it sometime. It might be cathartic for you. The US and Israel do not have the same interests. Here, this might be educational for you. http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/02/bibi-blows-up-the-special-relationship/ Perhaps if you cared more for US interests than Israel's, I wouldn't have to explain this to you.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 3:05:02 PM EDT
[#39]
I see that the usual suspects have already posted.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 3:08:37 PM EDT
[#40]
Iran is not going to try and nuke Israel any time soon.
Iran having nukes is bad. Iran is not our friend. Does that cover everything? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 3:14:52 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: How does a nursing student in california who has never worn a military uniform (cop doesn't count) love iran so much? I really don't get it. for those who have worn a uniform, iranians tried to kill us. Whats the matter? jews didn't give you a loan or something? Just repeating the liberal claptrap. And too ignorant to know that Israel is already a "multi-confessional" state, for example. Anyone that believes Iranians are using the word "annihilate" to express their love for some poor Palestinians is just plain stupid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 3:14:53 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote History |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 3:19:41 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Funny that we're discussing the very countries listed in Ezekiel 38:1-6 as attacking Israel. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Funny that we're discussing the very countries listed in Ezekiel 38:1-6 as attacking Israel. Ethiopia? Pretty sure Magog refers to Georgia/Armenia and that region, by the way. Russia wasn't really a country then. It wasn't even a civilization at the time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/6/2015 3:31:33 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just repeating the liberal claptrap. And too ignorant to know that Israel is already a "multi-confessional" state, for example. Anyone that believes Iranians are using the word "annihilate" to express their love for some poor Palestinians is just plain stupid. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
How does a nursing student in california who has never worn a military uniform (cop doesn't count) love iran so much? I really don't get it. for those who have worn a uniform, iranians tried to kill us. Whats the matter? jews didn't give you a loan or something? Just repeating the liberal claptrap. And too ignorant to know that Israel is already a "multi-confessional" state, for example. Anyone that believes Iranians are using the word "annihilate" to express their love for some poor Palestinians is just plain stupid. Yeah. South Africa under apartheid was a true multi-confessional state too, with all the rights and freedoms that a multi-confessional state should entail.
Kicking people off their land and forming an artificial Jewish majority sounds like a true multi-confessional state to me. In before someone claims the Palis left their land and Israelis didn't kick them off... and in before someone claims there is no such thing as a Palestinian. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/7/2015 10:08:57 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If Iran wants a nuke, lets give them a couple. We can even deliver. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f6/B-1B_B-2_and_B-52.jpg yes.. lets..
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
