User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
USA
|
Posted: 9/1/2014 4:23:31 PM EDT
[#1]
I wondered who would be the first to grind it off. :-) I have considered doing the same.
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 9/1/2014 4:32:26 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sunnybean:
Also spent some time with a file. 
http://i897.photobucket.com/albums/ac180/AssSupt/ARX100/5d87b869f019d53effa7cb89da306e6c_zps91fc939d.jpg That's how it should be, looks good. Would you have attempted that if the lower was the serialized part? |
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 9/1/2014 4:33:44 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 556Cliff]
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sunnybean:
Labored through another round of fun today. I can't wait for the micro dot and PWS FSC brake to arrive, http://i897.photobucket.com/albums/ac180/AssSupt/ARX100/f3229858d170c38161ea12d5d46de026_zps98c593af.jpg Since you have them all how does the ARX compare? I know the technical differences. I'm mostly looking for a comparison of feel and usability in your opinion. |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/1/2014 4:37:56 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
That's how it should be, looks good. Would you have attempted that if the lower was the serialized part? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By sunnybean:
Also spent some time with a file.
http://i897.photobucket.com/albums/ac180/AssSupt/ARX100/5d87b869f019d53effa7cb89da306e6c_zps91fc939d.jpg That's how it should be, looks good. Would you have attempted that if the lower was the serialized part? Probably. I didn't really give it much thought. I've screwed up more expensive guns doing less. 
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 9/1/2014 4:38:21 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Fig:
I've been waiting for two years for the ARX 100. Damn it, I think I'm getting a Tavor instead  .What about the ARX is steering you away from it? |
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 9/1/2014 4:40:59 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 556Cliff]
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sunnybean:
I've screwed up more expensive guns doing less. That makes two of us. 
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/1/2014 4:45:08 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
Since you have them all how does the ARX compare? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By sunnybean:
Labored through another round of fun today. I can't wait for the micro dot and PWS FSC brake to arrive, http://i897.photobucket.com/albums/ac180/AssSupt/ARX100/f3229858d170c38161ea12d5d46de026_zps98c593af.jpg Since you have them all how does the ARX compare? They're all different. I'm still getting the ARX setup the way I want it. I need to get the FSC brake before comparing the recoil, albeit limited to begin with. Out of that group it's hard to pick a favorite. The ARX is the definitely lightest.
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/1/2014 5:43:02 PM EDT
[Last Edit: sunnybean]
[#8]
Is anyone else wondering which plastics expert will be the go to guy for doing this?
You could stop about a 1/2" short on the picatinny rail so that part of the cover could be modified and reused to cover the back. 
I realize Beretta plans to release a slide on rail but I think it will make an already bloated gun fatter. ETA, And since they're at it cut the front side rails down to three rails per section to create a more open forearm. 
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 9/2/2014 8:05:08 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Fig:
I've been waiting for two years for the ARX 100. Damn it, I think I'm getting a Tavor instead .I feel your pain. It's been probably four years for me. I gave up waiting in Summer of 2012 and bought a LWRC M6A2 instead without any buyer's remorse. |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/5/2014 4:51:08 PM EDT
[#10]
In an effort to make a little more hand room, I modified the side rails. I didn't commit to completely milling off the rear rail lug (yet) but I did end up chopping the rail a bit.
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/5/2014 9:04:53 PM EDT
[#11]
The unfortunate bit is that those smaller rails are still right where I want to put my hand when shooting it. I'm a bit irked that they initially said the side rails were removable. Well yeah, they technically are, but then the front end falls apart. It's like saying the AR has a removable barrel nut. Technically true, but misleading.
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/5/2014 11:53:01 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Conqueror:
The unfortunate bit is that those smaller rails are still right where I want to put my hand when shooting it. I'm a bit irked that they initially said the side rails were removable. Well yeah, they technically are, but then the front end falls apart. It's like saying the AR has a removable barrel nut. Technically true, but misleading. True, but its better than before. My thumb now rest naturally without hitting the rail. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2014 1:23:49 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
What about the ARX is steering you away from it? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By Fig:
I've been waiting for two years for the ARX 100. Damn it, I think I'm getting a Tavor instead .What about the ARX is steering you away from it? I have a feeling that it will be greatly improved in a year or so, that's the one I'll get. It's sort of like when Sig first came out with the fish scale 556 and then improved the design. I see it here. |
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 9/6/2014 1:36:30 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Fig:
I have a feeling that it will be greatly improved in a year or so, that's the one I'll get. It's sort of like when Sig first came out with the fish scale 556 and then improved the design. I see it here. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Fig:
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By Fig:
I've been waiting for two years for the ARX 100. Damn it, I think I'm getting a Tavor instead .What about the ARX is steering you away from it? I have a feeling that it will be greatly improved in a year or so, that's the one I'll get. It's sort of like when Sig first came out with the fish scale 556 and then improved the design. I see it here. That's pretty much what I'm waiting to see also, plus it will probably be available in FDE as well. Though I really wonder how much more they can improve a design that is already in it's third generation. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2014 2:56:04 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
That's pretty much what I'm waiting to see also, plus it will probably be available in FDE as well. Though I really wonder how much more they can improve a design that is already in it's third generation. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By Fig:
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By Fig:
I've been waiting for two years for the ARX 100. Damn it, I think I'm getting a Tavor instead .What about the ARX is steering you away from it? I have a feeling that it will be greatly improved in a year or so, that's the one I'll get. It's sort of like when Sig first came out with the fish scale 556 and then improved the design. I see it here. That's pretty much what I'm waiting to see also, plus it will probably be available in FDE as well. Though I really wonder how much more they can improve a design that is already in it's third generation. Well, the current rifle we are being sold is actually the V2.1 version. The genuine V3 with the larger upper cooling holes ( and only Beretta knows what else is improved ) is only sold to Gov and Mil buyers looking for a full auto rifle. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/6/2014 3:26:02 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
That's pretty much what I'm waiting to see also, plus it will probably be available in FDE as well. Though I really wonder how much more they can improve a design that is already in it's third generation. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By Fig:
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By Fig:
I've been waiting for two years for the ARX 100. Damn it, I think I'm getting a Tavor instead .What about the ARX is steering you away from it? I have a feeling that it will be greatly improved in a year or so, that's the one I'll get. It's sort of like when Sig first came out with the fish scale 556 and then improved the design. I see it here. That's pretty much what I'm waiting to see also, plus it will probably be available in FDE as well. Though I really wonder how much more they can improve a design that is already in it's third generation. If/when they are released I will buy one of those as well.
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 9/6/2014 3:44:44 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Bullet_:
Well, the current rifle we are being sold is actually the V2.1 version. The genuine V3 with the larger upper cooling holes ( and only Beretta knows what else is improved ) is only sold to Gov and Mil buyers looking for a full auto rifle. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Bullet_:
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By Fig:
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By Fig:
I've been waiting for two years for the ARX 100. Damn it, I think I'm getting a Tavor instead .What about the ARX is steering you away from it? I have a feeling that it will be greatly improved in a year or so, that's the one I'll get. It's sort of like when Sig first came out with the fish scale 556 and then improved the design. I see it here. That's pretty much what I'm waiting to see also, plus it will probably be available in FDE as well. Though I really wonder how much more they can improve a design that is already in it's third generation. Well, the current rifle we are being sold is actually the V2.1 version. The genuine V3 with the larger upper cooling holes ( and only Beretta knows what else is improved ) is only sold to Gov and Mil buyers looking for a full auto rifle. True, externally the only difference between them is the large vent holes and a bayonet lug. |
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 9/6/2014 3:48:20 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 556Cliff]
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sunnybean:
If/when they are released I will buy one of those as well. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sunnybean:
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By Fig:
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By Fig:
I've been waiting for two years for the ARX 100. Damn it, I think I'm getting a Tavor instead .What about the ARX is steering you away from it? I have a feeling that it will be greatly improved in a year or so, that's the one I'll get. It's sort of like when Sig first came out with the fish scale 556 and then improved the design. I see it here. That's pretty much what I'm waiting to see also, plus it will probably be available in FDE as well. Though I really wonder how much more they can improve a design that is already in it's third generation. If/when they are released I will buy one of those as well. You will probably also have it modified before I even have a chance to see one in person.
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/6/2014 8:07:52 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sunnybean:
If/when they are released I will buy one of those as well. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sunnybean:
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By Fig:
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By Fig:
I've been waiting for two years for the ARX 100. Damn it, I think I'm getting a Tavor instead .What about the ARX is steering you away from it? I have a feeling that it will be greatly improved in a year or so, that's the one I'll get. It's sort of like when Sig first came out with the fish scale 556 and then improved the design. I see it here. That's pretty much what I'm waiting to see also, plus it will probably be available in FDE as well. Though I really wonder how much more they can improve a design that is already in it's third generation. If/when they are released I will buy one of those as well. Pretty much why I'm holding off. There's also been mention of an improved stock with cheek riser in the works. |
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2014 2:32:05 AM EDT
[#20]
|
|
|
MI, USA
|
Posted: 9/10/2014 8:50:57 PM EDT
[Last Edit: RedFox1911]
[#21]
Originally Posted By sunnybean:
In an effort to make a little more hand room, I modified the side rails. I didn't commit to completely milling off the rear rail lug (yet) but I did end up chopping the rail a bit.
http://i897.photobucket.com/albums/ac180/AssSupt/ARX100/7f5c7cfce191c2efd874c083f2d4e24e_zps3b0602ea.jpg http://i897.photobucket.com/albums/ac180/AssSupt/ARX100/94678ed4d8cee263bc4293c430ff0be6_zps44206320.jpg Try tbostic possibly? The guy that does hk g36 conversions from SL8s |
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 9/10/2014 11:45:46 PM EDT
[#22]
+1 Tom does excellent work!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2014 8:21:59 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By FullAssault:
I like my ARX better than my Tavor. The poly feel stronger more solid. The Tavor had great balance and is very compact but it's not as light or as accurate as my ARX. <a href="http://s847.photobucket.com/user/samuraijesse/media/Mobile%20Uploads/IMG_20140710_141928_zpswmggasxd.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i847.photobucket.com/albums/ab36/samuraijesse/Mobile%20Uploads/IMG_20140710_141928_zpswmggasxd.jpg</a><a href="http://s847.photobucket.com/user/samuraijesse/media/20130612_103054_zps100b129b.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i847.photobucket.com/albums/ab36/samuraijesse/20130612_103054_zps100b129b.jpg</a> Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By FullAssault:
Originally Posted By Fig:
I've been waiting for two years for the ARX 100. Damn it, I think I'm getting a Tavor instead .<a href="http://s847.photobucket.com/user/samuraijesse/media/Mobile%20Uploads/IMG_20140710_141928_zpswmggasxd.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i847.photobucket.com/albums/ab36/samuraijesse/Mobile%20Uploads/IMG_20140710_141928_zpswmggasxd.jpg</a><a href="http://s847.photobucket.com/user/samuraijesse/media/20130612_103054_zps100b129b.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i847.photobucket.com/albums/ab36/samuraijesse/20130612_103054_zps100b129b.jpg</a> Grrrrrrrr  Now I gotta buy both! I'll buy the Tavor this year and get the ARX next year. Thanks for your input! I want a cheek riser on the ARX, please please please Beretta do it!
|
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 9/19/2014 12:28:35 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 556Cliff]
[#24]
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/09/17/gun-review-beretta-arx-100-review/
Lots of  in the comments section, as with any comments section on anything. 
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/19/2014 9:22:31 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/09/17/gun-review-beretta-arx-100-review/ Lots of in the comments section, as with any comments section on anything. Not the most inspiring review. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2014 10:57:28 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TheKahn:
Not the most inspiring review. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TheKahn:
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/09/17/gun-review-beretta-arx-100-review/ Lots of in the comments section, as with any comments section on anything. Not the most inspiring review. An honest one though. The observation that the ARX sights make Magpul MBUS look like Knight's armament sights is funny. He's also right that the CH is too small and the front side rails and it's mounting need to both come off. His complaints about the disassembly however, come off as poorly as those who complain that the ARX didn't anachronistically copy the AR15's controls like the SCAR does. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2014 11:03:34 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Advance]
[#27]
The reviewer was totally discredited as soon as he said that the ambi features were "gimmicks".
Yes, I am left handed. "Also, we appreciate the gimmicks such as the ejection selector and swappable charging handle:" |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2014 11:16:14 PM EDT
[#28]
Missed that comment. You're right, his opinion that LH mirroring is a "gimmick" is outdated at best and foolish at worst.
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/21/2014 4:34:17 PM EDT
[#29]
I'm not that interested in any gun review where they only fire 180 shots, and were planning on firing less but had to return to the range because they forgot to take pics the first time. They think 100 rounds is an adequate test of a new combat rifle? What a joke.
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 9/23/2014 10:57:45 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 556Cliff]
[#30]
For anyone that wants to mess with the rails on the ARX-100 I just received this in an e-mail from Beretta.
"The top rail should never be removed. It is a Picatinny rail, and the screws are held in place with a red+ type loctite. The side rails are also Picatinny, and they are held on with blue loctite. They may be removed if necessary. They should be retorqued to between 25 and 30 inch pounds. The screws are Torx." |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/24/2014 10:24:53 PM EDT
[#31]
I had the opportunity to handle the 160A3 the other day. I like the larger vent holes on the A3, otherwise it really seems like the 100 reflects most of the development that went into the A3.
|
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 9/24/2014 11:53:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: FullAssault]
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By vellnueve:
I had the opportunity to handle the 160A3 the other day. I like the larger vent holes on the A3, otherwise it really seems like the 100 reflects most of the development that went into the A3. |
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 9/25/2014 12:19:58 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By vellnueve:
I had the opportunity to handle the 160A3 the other day. I like the larger vent holes on the A3, otherwise it really seems like the 100 reflects most of the development that went into the A3. How did you get that opportunity? Did the one you handled have the roll pin under the rear of the rail? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/25/2014 9:24:44 AM EDT
[Last Edit: vellnueve]
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
How did you get that opportunity? Did the one you handled have the roll pin under the rear of the rail? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By vellnueve:
I had the opportunity to handle the 160A3 the other day. I like the larger vent holes on the A3, otherwise it really seems like the 100 reflects most of the development that went into the A3. How did you get that opportunity? Did the one you handled have the roll pin under the rear of the rail? They had one on display at an exposition on base. I honestly didn't even look for the roll pin. One thing I really did like was the add on larger charging handle. Obviously has to be removed to swap sides, but should alleviate that complain for pretty much all the naysayers. |
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 9/25/2014 5:25:29 PM EDT
[#35]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/27/2014 4:35:54 AM EDT
[Last Edit: AEROMechanic]
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Bullet_:
Missed that comment. You're right, his opinion that LH mirroring is a "gimmick" is outdated at best and foolish at worst. Mirroring for controls if a plus, to be sure. In his defense though, that whole ejecting from the left is kind of ridiculous. As a left-hander myself i've never once had a problem with my AR15 or SCAR17 firing left-handed. ETA: Lets hope Geissele makes a trigger for this thing. Honestly I though my SCARs stock trigger was bad (and it is, which is why I got a super SCAR trigger for it), but this trigger, it's ass. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/27/2014 7:39:08 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AEROMechanic:
Mirroring for controls if a plus, to be sure. In his defense though, that whole ejecting from the left is kind of ridiculous. As a left-hander myself i've never once had a problem with my AR15 or SCAR17 firing left-handed. ETA: Lets hope Geissele makes a trigger for this thing. Honestly I though my SCARs stock trigger was bad (and it is, which is why I got a super SCAR trigger for it), but this trigger, it's ass. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AEROMechanic:
Originally Posted By Bullet_:
Missed that comment. You're right, his opinion that LH mirroring is a "gimmick" is outdated at best and foolish at worst. Mirroring for controls if a plus, to be sure. In his defense though, that whole ejecting from the left is kind of ridiculous. As a left-hander myself i've never once had a problem with my AR15 or SCAR17 firing left-handed. ETA: Lets hope Geissele makes a trigger for this thing. Honestly I though my SCARs stock trigger was bad (and it is, which is why I got a super SCAR trigger for it), but this trigger, it's ass. LH ejection is really useful for vehicle use. Further, the twin extractor/ejector with huge springs is theoretically far more reliable than classic designs. We'll see if it actually pays off. Can't wait for a Geissele trigger. I have the Super dynamic Combat ( flat trigger ) on my AR pistol and won't be going back to lesser stuff. |
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 9/27/2014 11:20:59 AM EDT
[#38]
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/27/2014 12:08:39 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AEROMechanic:
Mirroring for controls if a plus, to be sure. In his defense though, that whole ejecting from the left is kind of ridiculous. As a left-hander myself i've never once had a problem with my AR15 or SCAR17 firing left-handed. I'm a southpaw and if you use a support-hand-forward type of grip, my AR and ACR both fire hot brass directly into my right forearm, especially the AR. I either have to use a less-optimal grip or wear a long-sleeve shirt when shooting those with purpose. I'm a big fan of leftward-eject. In ARX news, my Form 1 was approved and my receiver s on its way to Ident for engraving. :) |
|
|
ND, USA
|
Posted: 10/13/2014 9:07:31 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Parliament]
[#40]
MAC's full review:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf-iw24cAhw[/youtube] ETA: No idea why it won't embed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf-iw24cAhw |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2014 9:29:27 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Parliament:
MAC's full review:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf-iw24cAhw
ETA: No idea why it won't embed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf-iw24cAhw You need to delete the "s" from https 
|
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 10/13/2014 3:21:40 PM EDT
[#42]
Thanks for posting that!
I need to see more of the factory tour though.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2014 5:26:06 PM EDT
[#43]
Watched it and I like what he had to say (usually do). Pretty much sums up my thoughts on the rifle. I've had a chance to handle and shoot one so i'll probably pick one up once i have some free cash that the SO won't notice missing.
|
|
|
|
OH, USA
|
Posted: 10/13/2014 11:13:21 PM EDT
[#44]
How is it for smoke/gas being vented toward the shooter? Standard and suppressed?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2014 9:07:17 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By KnightofTheOldeCode: How is it for smoke/gas being vented toward the shooter? Standard and suppressed? Suppressed you'll get gas in the face like most every other semi-auto I've fired. Some will measure degrees of gas in the face, I really don't. If you fire 30 round fairly quickly you're going to get a little teary eyed. :)
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 10/14/2014 8:36:38 PM EDT
[#46]
Mac, did the Beretta guys give you any scoop on the ETA of short barrels? I have an approved Form 1 for mine and it's at Ident Marking being engraved right now. If factory barrels are two months out I would wait, but if they have no idea when they are coming, I'll do the chop myself. I've tried asking them in a couple ways and never get a response.
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 10/14/2014 10:38:32 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Conqueror:
Mac, did the Beretta guys give you any scoop on the ETA of short barrels? I have an approved Form 1 for mine and it's at Ident Marking being engraved right now. If factory barrels are two months out I would wait, but if they have no idea when they are coming, I'll do the chop myself. I've tried asking them in a couple ways and never get a response. This would be my next gun if factory short barrels came out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2014 10:44:59 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Conqueror: Mac, did the Beretta guys give you any scoop on the ETA of short barrels? I have an approved Form 1 for mine and it's at Ident Marking being engraved right now. If factory barrels are two months out I would wait, but if they have no idea when they are coming, I'll do the chop myself. I've tried asking them in a couple ways and never get a response. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2014 11:26:55 PM EDT
[Last Edit: vellnueve]
[#49]
Got mine today. No pics, it looks exactly the same as the others in this thread. Trigger is heavy but crisper than earlier ones, and the roll pin is in place.
|
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 10/15/2014 7:52:06 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By vellnueve:
Got mine today. No pics, it looks exactly the same as the others in this thread. Trigger is heavy but crisper than earlier ones, and the roll pin is in place. I wonder if they are actually trying to make the trigger feel better or if it is just the luck of the draw as it is with standard mil-spec style AR triggers. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
