User Panel
Very nice build!
...so in theory, you could switch out the grip, if you to travel to a neighboring free state? or does that grip need to be permanent? |
|
Quoted:
Very nice build! ...so in theory, you could switch out the grip, if you to travel to a neighboring free state? or does that grip need to be permanent? View Quote In a Free State, a man is Free to do as he wishes (with his grip). ETA: Frankly, the pinned stock may turn out to be more of an inconvenience than the grip. |
|
So by removing the pistol grip and putting a weird horizontal grip, you just made that rifle go from CHILD KILLING DEATH MACHINE to standard everyday range plinker.
Nice! |
|
|
|
I mean really? I'm in KommieFornia but is a bullet button really the bane of our existence? Sorry I don't get it?
So you have pre ban mags that you can prove? I will take the bullet button over that thing. Sorry |
|
Quoted:
I mean really? I'm in KommieFornia but is a bullet button really the bane of our existence? Sorry I don't get it? So you have pre ban mags that you can prove? I will take the bullet button over that thing. Sorry View Quote Have you ever competed in a run-n-gun Rifle match or 3-Gun competition using a Bullet Button'd rifle? Probably not, or you'd know why and not have to ask. Prove to who? You? You can have all the bullet button'd rifles you want. More power to you. ETA: Hope you never need to use your BB'd rifle to defend yourself and need more than 10-rounds. |
|
So you're able to use new receivers for a featureless build, in order to use pre-owned baby-killing 30 round magazines?
I'm working on a hopper for you guys. The Hickenlooper hopper. |
|
|
The rifle looks fine. I have a couple detachable featureless CA rifles too.
It would be pretty difficult to "prove" that Magpul PMAG 30 is a pre-ban (2000) magazine since Pmags weren't invented until 2007. -W |
|
Easy Hollywood. You Southern California guys are so sensitive. To each his own right? I have cop buddies who look at the magazines first. They couldn't care less about stocks and such. I was told you had to prove the pre ban mags were purchased by you Before the ban.
I didn't mean to touch a nerve. I understand LA makes normal people freaky deaky after a while. It was just my opinion your rifle was fugly. Even parents of ugly kids love them and tell them they are beautiful Good luck at the running and gunning rootin tootin shootin 3 gun matches. I have plenty of magazines for "defending" myself!! And I won't get defensive either PasoGunner PS I mill all my lowers from 80%ers. That way Gov Moonbeam don't even know I have them. Good Luck and God Bless |
|
There is no burden of proof on the owner of high capacity magazines that they were owned prior to the ban. The burden is on the state that you didn't. -W
|
|
Quoted:
The rifle looks fine. I have a couple detachable featureless CA rifles too. It would be pretty difficult to "prove" that Magpul PMAG 30 is a pre-ban (2000) magazine since Pmags weren't invented until 2007. -W View Quote They were purchased as rebuild kits to repair my older magazines |
|
Well I wish you all luck sticking it to the man getting to use your "pre-ban" Magpul polymer magazine. I also with you luck proving the government wrong. We all know in KommieFornia how warm and pleasant law enforcement is here. I'm sure when you tell them that these polymer 30 round magazines are "pre ban" and it's their problem to burden of proof that you did not buy them pre ban I'm sure they will just slap you on the back and let you use your 30 rounders. I know after you set them straight they would not dare mess with u again.
I really like my zombie green AR15 with the 10 rnd and bullet button. I'm so far below you I even have an VFG and AFG, a bipod, greens and red lasers, acog and a eotech with magnifyer on .45° angle. I wish I could learn from you someday. Your parts list is my "Holy Grail" Thanks for schooling us underlings with your helpful and awesome attitude. PS what's your ugly kids name anyway? PasoGunner |
|
Quoted:
Easy Hollywood. You Southern California guys are so sensitive. To each his own right? I have cop buddies who look at the magazines first. They couldn't care less about stocks and such. I was told you had to prove the pre ban mags were purchased by you Before the ban. I didn't mean to touch a nerve. I understand LA makes normal people freaky deaky after a while. It was just my opinion your rifle was fugly. Even parents of ugly kids love them and tell them they are beautiful Good luck at the running and gunning rootin tootin shootin 3 gun matches. I have plenty of magazines for "defending" myself!! And I won't get defensive either PasoGunner PS I mill all my lowers from 80%ers. That way Gov Moonbeam don't even know I have them. Good Luck and God Bless View Quote Actually I was taking it easy on you. I could care less that you think the rifle is ugly. What I have is a problem with is your eagerness to accept the limiting use of the bullet button and outright dismissal of a featureless. Your comments sound like you enjoy being restricted, and have no understanding of why someone else would want to be free of this obvious handicap. Do you enjoy licking the boots of your overlord masters? I do not. |
|
Well thanks for taking it easy on my. I hear you West Hollywood men can get pretty rough.
I hate being restricted as much or more than you. What I build from 80% lowers I build for me and my family. I do not put pictures on Facebook, Twitter, and crap like that to advertise. What I build are Solid tools that do their job Every time. I have a couple rifles I take to ranges. The rest I shoot on land in the country. Of course my builds are not advertised along with their list of superior parts (more expensive anyway) My rifles are 100% USA made parts, made milled by Me (USA born) on an USA made mill. I shoot USA made ammo. Also I don't pay 4X as much so I can feel superion. You da man. I am not worthy to carry your spent brass............NOT |
|
Quoted:
Well thanks for taking it easy on my. I hear you West Hollywood men can get pretty rough. I hate being restricted as much or more than you. What I build from 80% lowers I build for me and my family. I do not put pictures on Facebook, Twitter, and crap like that to advertise. What I build are Solid tools that do their job Every time. I have a couple rifles I take to ranges. The rest I shoot on land in the country. Of course my builds are not advertised along with their list of superior parts (more expensive anyway) My rifles are 100% USA made parts, made milled by Me (USA born) on an USA made mill. I shoot USA made ammo. Also I don't pay 4X as much so I can feel superion. You da man. I am not worthy to carry your spent brass............NOT View Quote I think you're mistaking this thread for GD, and mistaking me for someone who cares. |
|
Quoted:
They were purchased as rebuild kits to repair my older magazines View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: The rifle looks fine. I have a couple detachable featureless CA rifles too.
It would be pretty difficult to "prove" that Magpul PMAG 30 is a pre-ban (2000) magazine since Pmags weren't invented until 2007. -W They were purchased as rebuild kits to repair my older magazines So how does the rebuild thing work? You had to get rebuild kits in before they banned rebuild kits, and you can rebuild your pre-owned pre-ban magazines with the rebuild kit? You replace everything but the spring, and then a while down the road you replace the spring when it wears out? |
|
Quoted:
So how does the rebuild thing work? You had to get rebuild kits in before they banned rebuild kits, and you can rebuild your pre-owned pre-ban magazines with the rebuild kit? You replace everything but the spring, and then a while down the road you replace the spring when it wears out? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: The rifle looks fine. I have a couple detachable featureless CA rifles too.
It would be pretty difficult to "prove" that Magpul PMAG 30 is a pre-ban (2000) magazine since Pmags weren't invented until 2007. -W They were purchased as rebuild kits to repair my older magazines So how does the rebuild thing work? You had to get rebuild kits in before they banned rebuild kits, and you can rebuild your pre-owned pre-ban magazines with the rebuild kit? You replace everything but the spring, and then a while down the road you replace the spring when it wears out? Correct |
|
Quoted:
Raddlock. Problem solved. View Quote Not really. Legally speaking, you shouldn't be running in a match in CA with the raddlock in "position 2 / standard mode" as this mode is intended for use outside California. Additionally, you would still be limited to 10-round mags while using the Raddlock. Further the Raddlock has not actually been approved by the CA DOJ, so, there's that. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted: So how does the rebuild thing work? You had to get rebuild kits in before they banned rebuild kits, and you can rebuild your pre-owned pre-ban magazines with the rebuild kit? You replace everything but the spring, and then a while down the road you replace the spring when it wears out? Correct And did they ban the magnetic tool that sat on the bullet button? Or are some folks still using that? |
|
Quoted:
And did they ban the magnetic tool that sat on the bullet button? Or are some folks still using that? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: So how does the rebuild thing work? You had to get rebuild kits in before they banned rebuild kits, and you can rebuild your pre-owned pre-ban magazines with the rebuild kit? You replace everything but the spring, and then a while down the road you replace the spring when it wears out? Correct And did they ban the magnetic tool that sat on the bullet button? Or are some folks still using that? Ban it? No. But you're "supposed" to only have the "tool" attached to the rifle when you're actually using it during the act of reloading the magazine, and not leaving it attached while you're shooting, which effectively negates the intent of the 'bullet button'. ETA: i.e. the "tool" is not supposed to be part of the rifle, even if not permanently attached. Of course, there has been no test cases yet that I'm aware of. |
|
|
Can I ask where you found the NSR at? been on the hunt for either a 15" or ideally the 16.7". No luck though.
|
|
Quoted:
These work pretty well for matches. as long as you keep track of what direction its going in. It would be nice not to have the bb here http://www.calegalmags.com/assets/images/ARtoolringbanner.jpg View Quote I have (and tried) something similar, but mine isn't a steel ring and post....it's an elastic band ring, with a pin through it....I got tired of stabbing myself with it while I was shooting. I've pretty much tried all the gizmos out there....and it was my desperate search for a solution that led me to the RifleGrip.com grip....which I'm very happy with. |
|
Quoted:
Can I ask where you found the NSR at? been on the hunt for either a 15" or ideally the 16.7". No luck though. View Quote I bought that upper like 2 or 3 years ago as part of a complete Rogue Hunter rifle with a 13.5" NSR handguard, and then bought a separate 15" NSR shortly there after. I put the 15" NSR on the 16" barrel, and put the 13.5" NSR on another Noveske 14.5" upper I have. Then I took the NSR that came on the 14.5" (I think it was a 12" NSR) and sold it in the EE. I like the look and functionality of the handguard extending nearly to the end of the barrel. Even if I could remember where I got the NSR, it was so long ago I doubt that would help you now. I think it might have been http://RIFLEGEAR.COM or http://RAINIERARMS.COM, which are both good places to check anyway. |
|
|
Quoted:
Pretty much. Thank Diane Feinstein & Friends View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So by removing the pistol grip and putting a weird horizontal grip, you just made that rifle go from CHILD KILLING DEATH MACHINE to standard everyday range plinker. Nice! Pretty much. Thank Diane Feinstein & Friends Nice looking rig!! Question, does your middle finger ride just below the trigger guard? I can see how that would work out pretty good. Is Ms. Feinstein still alive? Last time I saw her on TV she didn't look so well. You can't ever tell now days. I heard on the news the other day that some guy out west there was still on the city council even though he had been dead for 2 years. |
|
Quoted:
Nice looking rig!! Question, does your middle finger ride just below the trigger guard? I can see how that would work out pretty good. Is Ms. Feinstein still alive? Last time I saw her on TV she didn't look so well. You can't ever tell now days. I heard on the news the other day that some guy out west there was still on the city council even though he had been dead for 2 years. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So by removing the pistol grip and putting a weird horizontal grip, you just made that rifle go from CHILD KILLING DEATH MACHINE to standard everyday range plinker. Nice! Pretty much. Thank Diane Feinstein & Friends Nice looking rig!! Question, does your middle finger ride just below the trigger guard? I can see how that would work out pretty good. Is Ms. Feinstein still alive? Last time I saw her on TV she didn't look so well. You can't ever tell now days. I heard on the news the other day that some guy out west there was still on the city council even though he had been dead for 2 years. Yes, your middle finger rides in the "hook" of the grip just behind the trigger guard. While conceptually very similar to the Monsterman grip, the ergos of the RIfleGrip seem much more natural. PLUS, I like that the maker has stamped the grip with "RIFLE GRIP" right on the base of the grip. If DOJ were to look at it and ask "is that a 'pistol' grip", you can answer will full confidence "No, that's a "RIFLE GRIP", says so right on it, duh!" ETA: DiFi has always been dead to me. |
|
Can you explain the use of the telescoping stock on the rifle. I am reading the OP as stating that a telescoping stock is an evil feature and therefore doesn't make the rifle featureless...
...also, I may have to look into that grip...
|
|
Quoted:
Can you explain the use of the telescoping stock on the rifle. I am reading the OP as stating that a telescoping stock is an evil feature and therefore doesn't make the rifle featureless... ...also, I may have to look into that grip... View Quote The Featureless Build requires a non-telescoping stock. In this case the CTR's adjustment mechanism has been disabled, rather than pinning it which would require drilling through the stock and receiver extension. I detail the steps to disable in this thread |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.