Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 7/24/2014 7:11:02 PM EDT
I think I've narrowed my choices to these two uppers.
I will be running a suppressor 99% of the time.
Both uppers have their own benefits, but in your opinion, which and why would be your choice for a dedicated suppressed upper?
Thanks!

Link Posted: 7/24/2014 7:52:49 PM EDT
[#1]
of those 2 i would take the Noveske.

1) i'm not a fan of piston ar's

2) the DI upper will be a bit quieter than the piston upper

3) it's Noveske , so it's bad ass approved
Link Posted: 7/25/2014 4:02:18 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
of those 2 i would take the Noveske.

1) i'm not a fan of piston ar's

2) the DI upper will be a bit quieter than the piston upper

3) it's Noveske , so it's bad ass approved
View Quote

This. If I wanted a piston system, I'd get one that was designed from the get go as a piston system. YMMV
Link Posted: 7/25/2014 7:52:49 PM EDT
[#3]
I went with the LWRC 10.5 rifle after looking at both guns at Rainier Arms. For me it was price, piston upper, ambi lower and I prefer the rail setup. I have a 14.5 LWRC IC and a 14.5 Noveske with S/B. Both are great rifles and both handle surpressed fire fine. But for me the edge goes to my LWRC and the Noveske stays in the safe now. Between the two you cannot go wrong.

Top Top