User Panel
Posted: 3/12/2014 3:43:18 PM EDT
Is there any current updates when this will be released to the civillian market?
|
|
I asked the sig rep at Shot Show if it would ship in 6 months. He responded merely by laughing....
|
|
Did we go to the same Shot Show? I was at this years (2014) and was told by more than a couple of Sig Sauer reps that they were currently in production and would be for sale in Feb. Feb is no longer and still notta. You think all the reps would have the same exact info.
|
|
The most solid sounding dates I've heard were April-ish. Emphasis on the -ish.
|
|
I laughed back at him and told him he was the first honest rep I spoke to all day. He was one of the older guys, maybe someone important.
The younger guys tended to have more of scripted answer to everything. |
|
Sig will be selling them and should see the first one mid April. I know we have some ordered, as far as the pistol is concerned. The carbine/rifle is waiting on ATF approval for muzzle devise.
|
|
That said, they could wait till the carbine/rifle is ok'ed and do a big release.
|
|
It's my understanding that the original carbine with the suppressor baffles (that what they are) will in no way be approved. Sig has now made a carbine with a perm attached carbon fiber tube.
|
|
That is what I have heard also. The muzzle devise is the issue. Wait and see.
|
|
UNofficial word is that they will start shipping late June, early July. New products are alway an issue with ATF. Got to make 100% sure that the peasants can have them.
|
|
|
|
All the magazines that I saw at the 2014 Shot Show was like the one in the first picture. The newer magazine looks like it is a little thicker towards the top which would make scene as when the magazine was inserted in the MPX, it had a lot of wiggle play, so maybe this corrected that.
|
|
Quoted:
All the magazines that I saw at the 2014 Shot Show was like the one in the first picture. The newer magazine looks like it is a little thicker towards the top which would make scene as when the magazine was inserted in the MPX, it had a lot of wiggle play, so maybe this corrected that. View Quote I spoke to one of the Lancer reps at Shot and basically complained about the cost of the MPX magazines. The rep rolled her eyes and went on a rant about how much R&D went into making the mags work. |
|
With technology these days, I dought there was that much R&D, but yes the mags are way spendy.
|
|
|
|
I'm not surprised they are upset over the muzzle device. I can't recall if the law specifically states "easily convertible" but if it does then it will not be approved for sale,
|
|
I guess the 556XI's are already starting to hit the shelves and it was just shown for the first time at the 2014 Shot Show, yet the MPX was first shown at the 2013 Shot Show and still nothing. Very frustrating.
|
|
Quoted:
I guess the 556XI's are already starting to hit the shelves and it was just shown for the first time at the 2014 Shot Show, yet the MPX was first shown at the 2013 Shot Show and still nothing. Very frustrating. View Quote The XI was shown several years ago, shelved, and pulled out for further work last year. It's been in development longer than the MPX. |
|
Quoted:
I guess the 556XI's are already starting to hit the shelves and it was just shown for the first time at the 2014 Shot Show, yet the MPX was first shown at the 2013 Shot Show and still nothing. Very frustrating. View Quote They've been hitting snags with the ATF over the muzzle brake/baffle stack. |
|
Shouldn't stop the pistol, which is the one I want then later SBR it.
Quoted:
They've been hitting snags with the ATF over the muzzle brake/baffle stack. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I guess the 556XI's are already starting to hit the shelves and it was just shown for the first time at the 2014 Shot Show, yet the MPX was first shown at the 2013 Shot Show and still nothing. Very frustrating. They've been hitting snags with the ATF over the muzzle brake/baffle stack. |
|
A TON of work was put into getting the mags working as well as they do. View Quote I wonder how long it took Lancer to develop these mags vs. how long RRA took to develop the mags for the LAR-40. How much are the MPX mags supposed to retail for? |
|
Quoted:
I wonder how long it took Lancer to develop these mags vs. how long RRA took to develop the mags for the LAR-40. How much are the MPX mags supposed to retail for? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
A TON of work was put into getting the mags working as well as they do. I wonder how long it took Lancer to develop these mags vs. how long RRA took to develop the mags for the LAR-40. How much are the MPX mags supposed to retail for? I am hearing MSRP is right around $70.00 for the 10, 20 and 30 rounder. |
|
Quoted:
I am hearing MSRP is right around $70.00 for the 10, 20 and 30 rounder. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
A TON of work was put into getting the mags working as well as they do. I wonder how long it took Lancer to develop these mags vs. how long RRA took to develop the mags for the LAR-40. How much are the MPX mags supposed to retail for? I am hearing MSRP is right around $70.00 for the 10, 20 and 30 rounder. So far lowest advertised I have seen is $60 http://www.riflegear.com/p-3056-sig-sauer-mpx-9mm-10rd-magazine.aspx |
|
Found some for $54.90, but of course nobody has stock yet.
http://www.eurooptic.com/sig-sauer-accessories-mpx.aspx |
|
|
|
Wonder how easily you could add a stock to the pistol version (after form 1 approval)?
|
|
Wonder how easily you could add a stock to the pistol version (after form 1 approval)? View Quote I think it would be a piece of cake, given the rail at the rear of the receiver. |
|
I wish they wouldn't have put the charging handle where they did. Ugh.
I was going to buy one until I saw it. |
|
Quoted:
I wish they wouldn't have put the charging handle where they did. Ugh. I was going to buy one until I saw it. View Quote What wrong about where they put the charging handle? They made the MPX to have the same characteristics as the M4/AR platform for familiarity. I handled one at shot show and it's a pretty awesome little weapon and I can't wait to get one. As far as putting a stock on the pistol after your form 1 is approved is simple, the stock attaches to the rail in the rear just like the other ones. |
|
Quoted:
I think it would be a piece of cake, given the rail at the rear of the receiver. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Wonder how easily you could add a stock to the pistol version (after form 1 approval)? I think it would be a piece of cake, given the rail at the rear of the receiver. This just screams for the Sig arm brace stock. Problem solved. Doc Oops, just watched the video.....thats what i'm talking about. |
|
Quoted:
What wrong about where they put the charging handle? They made the MPX to have the same characteristics as the M4/AR platform for familiarity. I handled one at shot show and it's a pretty awesome little weapon and I can't wait to get one. As far as putting a stock on the pistol after your form 1 is approved is simple, the stock attaches to the rail in the rear just like the other ones. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I wish they wouldn't have put the charging handle where they did. Ugh. I was going to buy one until I saw it. What wrong about where they put the charging handle? They made the MPX to have the same characteristics as the M4/AR platform for familiarity. I handled one at shot show and it's a pretty awesome little weapon and I can't wait to get one. As far as putting a stock on the pistol after your form 1 is approved is simple, the stock attaches to the rail in the rear just like the other ones. Part of it is my dislike for the location. The piston will cut down on grit getting back to the shooter but I feel it would've been better had it been up front like an mp5. I honestly don't understand why everything has to be an m4. It does some things well, others not. The charging system is one it doesn't do well. |
|
Quoted:
Part of it is my dislike for the location. The piston will cut down on grit getting back to the shooter but I feel it would've been better had it been up front like an mp5. I honestly don't understand why everything has to be an m4. It does some things well, others not. The charging system is one it doesn't do well. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I wish they wouldn't have put the charging handle where they did. Ugh. I was going to buy one until I saw it. What wrong about where they put the charging handle? They made the MPX to have the same characteristics as the M4/AR platform for familiarity. I handled one at shot show and it's a pretty awesome little weapon and I can't wait to get one. As far as putting a stock on the pistol after your form 1 is approved is simple, the stock attaches to the rail in the rear just like the other ones. Part of it is my dislike for the location. The piston will cut down on grit getting back to the shooter but I feel it would've been better had it been up front like an mp5. I honestly don't understand why everything has to be an m4. It does some things well, others not. The charging system is one it doesn't do well. Trust me, when these finally become available and you get to handle one, you will love it. This has got to my favorite weapon system of all time and I know it's just a pistol caliber. I am 48 years old and current LEO and Army Reserves so I have been around a lot of weapons in my day and this is just sweet. |
|
Honest question, how is this better than a properly set up AR?
I want a pistol caliber carbine and need one like I need a hole in the head. The Tavor with 9mm conversion looks good too. |
|
The MPX looks like a M4 and MP5 had sex and the MPX was born. It's just a cool little rifle I guess. As far as the Tavor goes, I had one and even though it's a very nice rifle, the bulpup design just isn't for me.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Honest question, how is this better than a properly set up AR? I want a pistol caliber carbine and need one like I need a hole in the head. The Tavor with 9mm conversion looks good too. View Quote A 5.56 AR is always the way to go. Better terminal ballistics and range. I have two complete AR's and I am dying to get an MPX. It will be a range toy. The nearest public range is pistol calibers only, so this will get some play time. I'm also digging the idea of mainly stocking one caliber. |
|
I believe msrp is $1,999.00 for the pistol variant, but I saw some sites listed in the $1600.00-1700.00 range.
|
|
Quoted:
Honest question, how is this better than a properly set up AR? I want a pistol caliber carbine and need one like I need a hole in the head. The Tavor with 9mm conversion looks good too. View Quote With the advancements in PDWs, 5.56 ammo and 300blackout, not alot. One big thing for me was suppression. 9mm sure is quite with 147gr subsonics and a good suppressor. That was the main reason Im SBRing my 9mm AR. However you can get similar supression and better ballistics out of 300BO subsonics. 9mm ammo is cheaper though. |
|
Quoted:
What wrong about where they put the charging handle? They made the MPX to have the same characteristics as the M4/AR platform for familiarity. I handled one at shot show and it's a pretty awesome little weapon and I can't wait to get one. As far as putting a stock on the pistol after your form 1 is approved is simple, the stock attaches to the rail in the rear just like the other ones. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I wish they wouldn't have put the charging handle where they did. Ugh. I was going to buy one until I saw it. What wrong about where they put the charging handle? They made the MPX to have the same characteristics as the M4/AR platform for familiarity. I handled one at shot show and it's a pretty awesome little weapon and I can't wait to get one. As far as putting a stock on the pistol after your form 1 is approved is simple, the stock attaches to the rail in the rear just like the other ones. I greatly prefer just about every style of side or front charger to the AR style. I like being able to open the action easily with the gun shouldered. |
|
A little MPX action in the new Sig ammunition video
[youtube]http://youtu.be/5z5INEVwFiE[/youtube] Video link |
|
Quoted:
Honest question, how is this better than a properly set up AR? I want a pistol caliber carbine and need one like I need a hole in the head. The Tavor with 9mm conversion looks good too. View Quote This beats the tavor IMO. The tavor is just another shitty blowback design crammed into an existing form factor. This actually has a locked breach. It should shoot like a dream, and suppress well. |
|
Quoted:
This beats the tavor IMO. The tavor is just another shitty blowback design crammed into an existing form factor. This actually has a locked breach. It should shoot like a dream, and suppress well. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Honest question, how is this better than a properly set up AR? I want a pistol caliber carbine and need one like I need a hole in the head. The Tavor with 9mm conversion looks good too. This beats the tavor IMO. The tavor is just another shitty blowback design crammed into an existing form factor. This actually has a locked breach. It should shoot like a dream, and suppress well. Isn't the Tavor piston opperated or is it just the 9mm conversion that is blowback? |
|
Quoted:
Isn't the Tavor piston opperated or is it just the 9mm conversion that is blowback? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Honest question, how is this better than a properly set up AR? I want a pistol caliber carbine and need one like I need a hole in the head. The Tavor with 9mm conversion looks good too. This beats the tavor IMO. The tavor is just another shitty blowback design crammed into an existing form factor. This actually has a locked breach. It should shoot like a dream, and suppress well. Isn't the Tavor piston opperated or is it just the 9mm conversion that is blowback? Just the conversion kit. |
|
I had a Tavor and just didn't care for it or the bulpup design. With a 9mm kit, the Tavor really doesn't serve a purpose, to heavy and to large for a subgun.
|
|
Probably a stupid question but I gave been googling the heck out of it and have not found an answer. Is that hand stop removable? Is there a place on the handguard for a qd sling attachment? Can you mount rails to the carbon fiber handguard easily?
|
|
Quoted:
Probably a stupid question but I gave been googling the heck out of it and have not found an answer. Is that hand stop removable? Is there a place on the handguard for a qd sling attachment? Can you mount rails to the carbon fiber handguard easily? View Quote Yes the handstop is removable and they have rails that will attatch to both the aluminum and carbon fiber handguard for mounting flashlights, foreward grip, etc. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.