Sometime not too long ago, I posted about a "semi scientific" test I did on two of my AR's. I searched my saved threads, but must have deleted it, as it's not there, so I'll try and give the Readers Digest version.
I have always run my AR's very wet, to the point of getting lube blown about for the first dozen, or so rounds. Always performed flawlessly,
but what was most noticeable was the LACK of visible wear, especially on the lugs. I finally shot out that barrel, and just ordered a new complete upper. My experiment on the new upper was to run it with less lube. Not dry by any means, but lubed where I didn't get lube blowing out for the first few rounds, but still much more than a few drops here and there.
After probably 2-3K rounds, I started seeing very slight wear on the lugs. I continued to run it with this amount of lube for probably another 2-3K rounds, and the visible wear became more noticeable.
So at this point I had somewhere between 4-6K rounds thru the new barrel, and by this time it had more visible wear than the old barrel that I had shot out.So, I decided at this point to go back to running it very wet. The wear seems to have visually slowed down, so running my AR's very wet will be SOP for me.
ETA: I didn't see the post before it was deleted, so don't know what the content was. With that said, I have a lot of respect for Quib, and his knowledge, and the effort he puts into the site. So if my post differs from his beliefs, or methods, this post is in no way a put down of his opinion. If there is a difference, it's just that and nothing more, simply a difference of opinion.