Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » Ammunition
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Site Notices
Posted: 4/29/2004 7:38:00 PM EDT
Which provides better framentation at close range such as 3 yards to 75 yards?
Link Posted: 4/29/2004 9:01:28 PM EDT
[#1]

Quoted:
Which provides better framentation at close range such as 3 yards to 75 yards?



77 Grain.  Zero Doubt.

Link Posted: 4/30/2004 7:37:22 AM EDT
[#2]

Quoted:

77 Grain.  Zero Doubt.




I concure.
Link Posted: 4/30/2004 8:18:34 AM EDT
[#3]
The 77, 75, 69 and 68 OTM loads will make the 55 gr cry in shame...
Link Posted: 4/30/2004 12:32:00 PM EDT
[#4]
Both will "fragment" dramatically.

The better questions are:
which will cause more damage
create the bigger wound channel
have the shortest neck
penetrate the farthest
defeat barriers effectively.

Fragmentation is a means to an end.
Both bullets could fragment completely and have very different results.

Wish the Best of B&T ammo labs thread was back
Link Posted: 4/30/2004 12:57:44 PM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
Both will "fragment" dramatically.

The better questions are:
which will cause more damage



77 grain.


create the bigger wound channel


77 grain.


have the shortest neck


77 grain (more reliable neck too).


penetrate the farthest


77 grain.


defeat barriers effectively.


77 grain.
Link Posted: 4/30/2004 1:58:41 PM EDT
[#6]
IIRC M855 is better for terminal performance AFTER defeating light barrier.
Link Posted: 4/30/2004 2:10:10 PM EDT
[#7]
Been shooting 55gr M193 since (well forever!).

Where can I buy this 77 gr. bullet ammo?

Can I buy the bullet and handload it?

If the answer to both is no, the 77 gr stuff is unavailable, then 55gr is still best!

PLEASE ADVISE!!
Link Posted: 4/30/2004 3:08:28 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
IIRC M855 is better for terminal performance AFTER defeating light barrier.



Can you show some citations to this assertion?
Link Posted: 4/30/2004 3:39:12 PM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 4/30/2004 3:43:36 PM EDT
[#10]
http://www.georgiaprecision.com/cart/LoadedAmmo.htm
Link Posted: 4/30/2004 4:51:50 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:
IIRC M855 is better for terminal performance AFTER defeating light barrier.



Can you show some citations to this assertion?



No, I don't remember.

However,  I saw the pic on Tacticalforums and I did save the picture.



Sorry I don't remember who posted this, and I'm posting it without permission.


Link Posted: 4/30/2004 5:30:56 PM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
IIRC M855 is better for terminal performance AFTER defeating light barrier.



Can you show some citations to this assertion?



No, I don't remember.

However,  I saw the pic on Tacticalforums and I did save the picture.

www.prism.gatech.edu/~gtg483p/barrier.jpg

Sorry I don't remember who posted this, and I'm posting it without permission.




Excellent.  Thanks.  Looks like Dr. Roberts' work perhaps.
Link Posted: 4/30/2004 11:02:49 PM EDT
[#13]
Not that I want to spoil the consensus, but I do recall reading not that long ago of an incident in Iraq when an Iraqi was engaged at close range (25 yards) by US troops. Despite apparently being shot several times, he carried on fighting and killed two of his opponents before he was finally dropped with a .45. When he was examined he was found to have sustained seven solid body hits from 5.56mm weapons - and the ammo being used was reportedly the 77 grain Mk 262.

Now that might have been just the kind of freak incident that sometimes occurs, but SOCOM can't be that pleased with the 5.56mm or they wouldn't have sponsored the development of the 6.8x43.

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and Discussion forum
Link Posted: 5/1/2004 6:10:43 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:
Not that I want to spoil the consensus, but I do recall reading not that long ago of an incident in Iraq when an Iraqi was engaged at close range (25 yards) by US troops. Despite apparently being shot several times, he carried on fighting and killed two of his opponents before he was finally dropped with a .45. When he was examined he was found to have sustained seven solid body hits from 5.56mm weapons - and the ammo being used was reportedly the 77 grain Mk 262.

Now that might have been just the kind of freak incident that sometimes occurs, but SOCOM can't be that pleased with the 5.56mm or they wouldn't have sponsored the development of the 6.8x43.

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and Discussion forum



There is absolutely no "spoling the consensus."

We want to know about these thingg BADLY because they can modify our approach to choosing defensive ammo.

If you can get any citiations to this report that would be a good thing.

I don't know about anyone else but my goal is just to get the best ammo in my weapon.  In order to do that I need to know what the best ammo is.
Link Posted: 5/1/2004 9:19:34 AM EDT
[#15]
Link Posted: 5/1/2004 10:24:58 AM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:
Not that I want to spoil the consensus, but I do recall reading not that long ago of an incident in Iraq when an Iraqi was engaged at close range (25 yards) by US troops. Despite apparently being shot several times, he carried on fighting and killed two of his opponents before he was finally dropped with a .45. When he was examined he was found to have sustained seven solid body hits from 5.56mm weapons - and the ammo being used was reportedly the 77 grain Mk 262.

Now that might have been just the kind of freak incident that sometimes occurs, but SOCOM can't be that pleased with the 5.56mm or they wouldn't have sponsored the development of the 6.8x43.

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and Discussion forum



I read recently that that whole incident was mis-reported and the BG was struck dead with the first round and didn't fall over and was mistakenly shot repeated times afterwards.
Link Posted: 5/1/2004 11:36:52 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
...Despite apparently being shot several times, he carried on fighting and killed two of his opponents ... the ammo being used was reportedly the 77 grain Mk 262.



Quoted:
I read recently that that whole incident was mis-reported and the BG was struck dead with the first round and didn't fall over and was mistakenly shot repeated times afterwards.



Regardless of what happened, there are too many variables involved to make assumptions about the effectiveness of a specific round based on a single field event.

The issue of penetration through a loaded AK mag is similar: too many variables.
did the round go through the base of the mag and only penetrate springs?
did it go through the actual bullet or just the brass?
did it center punch a single cartridge or hit the seam between 2?

loaded ak mags make an interesting "real world" test, but they are an inherantly inconsistent barrier, and prone to great fluctuations in results.

I'd rather see the bullet pass through plate steel or layered windshield glass before hitting the gelatin.
At least those are consistant.

I am flattered that austrian replied in my post
I guess my simple response is
77
Link Posted: 5/1/2004 12:59:20 PM EDT
[#18]
Who else is selling the BlackHills 77gr match ammo?   Georgia Precision is out
Link Posted: 5/1/2004 1:53:49 PM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:
Not that I want to spoil the consensus, but I do recall reading not that long ago of an incident in Iraq when an Iraqi was engaged at close range (25 yards) by US troops. Despite apparently being shot several times, he carried on fighting and killed two of his opponents before he was finally dropped with a .45. When he was examined he was found to have sustained seven solid body hits from 5.56mm weapons - and the ammo being used was reportedly the 77 grain Mk 262.

Now that might have been just the kind of freak incident that sometimes occurs, but SOCOM can't be that pleased with the 5.56mm or they wouldn't have sponsored the development of the 6.8x43.

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and Discussion forum



I looked into this a bit and talked with a colleague of mine who is in the biz.

That particular incident involved 77 grain Sierra Match King rounds.  (This back and forth between Nosler and SMK was a result of SMK's early rounds having no cannelures and then putting them in when Nosler was specified).

Sergeant First Class Bennett and Master Sergeant Morehead (may their service never be forgotten) were killed in September by an Iraqi with an AKM who received multiple hits of 5.56 77 grain Sierra Match King.

Versus 77 grain Nosler rounds the Sierra Match King rounds are a bit more accurate but have longer (and erratic) necks before yaw and fragmentation.  This means that, as with M855, malnourished or skinny aggressors can get lucky.

You can read more about the heroes in this article from the Leaf Chronicle.

[edited to add the article link, remove some idiocy, improve my typing.]
Link Posted: 5/1/2004 9:30:00 PM EDT
[#20]
Page AR-15 » Ammunition
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top