AR-fan,
Man, I don't check the board for a few days and this is what I find out?!!! Cool. I was thinking of doing the same.
Did that hi cap Sten mag show yet? The Lancaster????
Edit-I'm gonna post a link in the Sten Block topic to this..... don't want it to get lost...
Quoted: (SNIP, SNIP)
It's legal to modify a pre-ban magazine to hold more or fewer rounds than it already does. The limits on modifications are that you can't use post-ban mags to extend the capacity of an existing pre-ban mags (so no welding a pre-ban and a post-ban together to make a bigger mag) and the magazine must still fit the weapon for which it was designed, if it's being modified to also fit another firearm.
No, I don't know how Olympic gets away with modifying sten mags like they do without getting hassled by the ATF.
|
Circuits (and anyone else),
So, in theory, if one were to shorten one Sten mag- you have this section of tube from a pre ban mag. And being a good person, one doesn't want to waist things..... So, one could "weld" it to another Sten mag to make a larger capacity mag? Using your example, one is 're-using' preban mag material....
Both are "pre ban". And both will still work in the weapon it was built for.
Okay, lining it up to weld for the average 'joe' maybe a problem, but that's a whole different issue.
Edit- Well, I recall that I've seen so called pre ban 223 mags that were modifed to 10 or 5 rounders before. Those were legal. Why wouldn't this be? What, the anti's have a problem with lower capacity hi cap mags???? Or they gonna moan that it's easier to hide..... (sorry... ranting.)