Quoted:
Edited ~Cold ....
LOL, shorse!!
(Until you try the AR-Gold, don't be so sure of the Geisselle.)
The purpose of MY trigger is to:
1. be reliable
2. not disrupt the sight picture as you caress it to move
3. provide enough resistance to insure you don't sneeze and blow off your penis
A quality trigger is a thing that is unlikely to break, especially in the rarified air at $300 elevation. I cannot believe ANY model available in that category has any significant chance of "breaking". A solution in search of a problem?
If the sight disruption prevents you from defending yourself, that is a more dangerous flaw than the slim likelihood of the thing breaking, or accidentally discharging from impact.
So I value the "feel" VERY highly. I really want to HIT what I am aiming at.
I can do that very well with a Geisselle or AR-Gold, and use both (second AR-Gold on the way). If the subjective action of this Wilson trigger cannot meet that standard, all of the reliability in the world is wasted as the trigger waggles the front sight as you squeeze it, missing the damn zombie who eats you alive.
Hard to believe that part of the product development was not to test it subjectively against the others in the space. Somebody at Wilson must have considered HOW IT FELT when shot. Certainly the RELIABILITY engineers don't so dominate the product dev/marketing that nobody there cares for the "feel"??? Seems like a pretty basic "use case" for a new product.
If it is merely reliable and not particularly sweet to tickle, it is worthless. An encouraging word from someone who has used REAL WORLD triggers to compare it would be a requirement for my consideration. Has anyone at Wilson shot the Geisselle and AR-Gold? You are our conduit into the vast resources of the company. I hadn't expected you to necessarily have shot them all...
Unless you have a 60 day money-back guarantee???