Quoted: Here you go. Certainly not cheap. However better heat dissipation than a fluted HBAR while weighing less than an ultralight while retaining HBAR like accuracy is nothing to sneeze at. Mine should be delivered in about 2 weeks. (PacNor 1/7 polygonal carbon fiber with lining on bore, chamber, barrel extension including the lugs etc) Thread
Thread #2
Homepage
|
I was seriously considering one of those barrels, but when I was asking around about them on another gun forum, a guy who claimed to be an engineer with a lot of knowledge about thermodynamics criticized the design. He claimed that a carbon barrel couldn't possibly dissipate heat as well as an all metal barrel.
I linked him the ABS thread so he could see for himself that they weren't using run of the mill carbon fiber, but claimed to have a thermally conductive matrix. I also told him how their tests had even showed the good results, but that didn't change his mind. He wrote a rather lengthy post about why their claims couldn't be true. In essence he thought that they were actually insulating the heat with the carbon fiber and that's why they didn't feel the heat, but that inside, where the SS and carbon touched they were probably very, very hot.
I tried to find his post but it no longer exists, otherwise I'd post it here.
Anyway, I'm not saying that what he said is true or that I agree with him. My point isn't to try and bash ABS or twl either. From what I've seen twl post, I like the guy.
My engineering background doesn't include much in the way of thermodynamics, so I don't consider myself knowledgable enough to come to a valid conclusion.
I only mention this because I'd like to get some input from some other people, preferrably engineers who know a bit about thermodynamics before I plunk down that much money for a barrel.
EDIT:Ok, I actually did find the guy's post with some more digging. I rarely post on that forum anymore, but when I finally dug it up it seems that the guy had taken back his statement about carbon not having good thermal conducting properties. Now he's saying that carbon can actually be double that of copper. (So, which is it buddy?)
But he still thinks that using a thin SS liner is a bad choice of materials, especially in colder climates. Doesn't say why though and I seem to remember twl saying that the barrel was tested in extreme cold and it worked out fine, so...
That being said, it kind of makes everything I posted above moot because the guy obviously doesn't know as much as he thinks he does.
I'm still interested to get some oppinions from some other engineers out there though. Have there been any independant testing done by ARFCOM members yet?
My interest level just jumped on the ABS stuff.