Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 7
Posted: 12/8/2006 7:38:01 PM EDT
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 7:58:14 PM EDT
[#1]
The question I've always had with these is handguard compatibility.  Can KAC units or other rail-type hadguards be modded to fit over the piston assembly.

I'd just hate to have to trade out a KAC unit for the pisotn conversion...
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 7:58:37 PM EDT
[#2]
Denny, are you going to have these kits avail.?  I definitely like the "drop in" piston kit.
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:02:33 PM EDT
[#3]
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:03:14 PM EDT
[#4]
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:06:46 PM EDT
[#5]
i would also like to know what rail systems could be used with this.

also could this be used with a low profile gas block?
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:09:09 PM EDT
[#6]
how often would it need to be taken offf for cleaning,

surpressed vs unsurpressed on a 10.5,
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:11:46 PM EDT
[#7]
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:12:23 PM EDT
[#8]
hey dennys,

do you know if you need to have a standard FSB and handguard end cap for this to work properly?  I've got a Troy MRF MX with a low profile gas block.
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:15:32 PM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:19:09 PM EDT
[#10]
cool, ill have to keep my out for it, thanks for the info
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:20:28 PM EDT
[#11]
same kit/carrier for both semi and full ?

thanks

Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:21:08 PM EDT
[#12]
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:24:28 PM EDT
[#13]
interesting. so in theory a person could put this on whatever length weapon they wanted since the length of the op-rod would be the only thing different. thinking a middy might be just right..

these are a bit pricey though.
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:27:36 PM EDT
[#14]
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:29:41 PM EDT
[#15]
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:39:38 PM EDT
[#16]
Denny, thanks for the write-up.  I had read in other places about how piston uppers require precise factory this and that--and how you there's no way you could convert your upper unless it's inspected and certified, sent to the factory, close tolerances, etc.  How do you balance those comments with this kit which seems to fly in the face of all that?

I guess my question would be:  if someone wants to go with a piston upper, is there any reason why they shouldn't get this kit over other offerings which you've also tested?
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:43:28 PM EDT
[#17]
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:45:19 PM EDT
[#18]
Did I miss the price somewhere,Denny?
Clint
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:49:27 PM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:

Quoted:
interesting. so in theory a person could put this on whatever length weapon they wanted since the length of the op-rod would be the only thing different. thinking a middy might be just right..

these are a bit pricey though.


Pricey is just a state of mind with BRD

Actually, think of all you are getting with this kit.  There are some parts that are not cheap to make.  Look at the darn bolt carrier alone.  

There will be middy and rifle length models coming after SHOT.  I can't wait to get one on my personal Operator barreled upper.

Denny



true, very true.  its really pretty reasonable when you break it down. i guess i'm saying pricey because i can't get it right now. spent my fun money on a new knife so i must build up the funds yet again.  BRD is bad but having BRD AND INFI lust at the same time....its rough.
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:52:58 PM EDT
[#20]
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:54:22 PM EDT
[#21]
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 8:55:39 PM EDT
[#22]
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 9:30:50 PM EDT
[#23]
Will this system fit an HBAR or SOCCOM profile barrel?and does the bushing stay in place?is it a snug fit?and if so how do you pop it back out?..TIA Denny....Dave.I want one but I have a 14.5 HBAR and a SOCCOM profile wich is like the HBAR except the flats for the M203 and the outer barrel notch.
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 10:17:05 PM EDT
[#24]
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 10:30:24 PM EDT
[#25]

vely interesting
Link Posted: 12/8/2006 11:43:03 PM EDT
[#26]
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 12:38:40 AM EDT
[#27]
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 4:01:06 AM EDT
[#28]
Very cool! I had to send my upper away to L-W for piston conversion. They modified my upper at the FSB. This system looks much better. Thanks for the writeup!
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 4:10:12 AM EDT
[#29]
Very interesting.  I may have to get one.  I would be reluctant to use any gas block that doesn't use taper pins or some other kind of cross pin.  I'm afraid the gas block will loosen with set screws with all that pounding.  Maybe my concerns are not warranted.  What say you Denny being that you actually have experience with this product?
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 4:43:02 AM EDT
[#30]
will this sytem work with "carbine" profile handguards (Fobus, Bushmaster, etc) or will it only work with M4 profile handguards?   it looks like there is room for it to fit, and if they are making a rifle length system in the future, I assume they make it compatible with the skinnier handguards.....just wanting to make sure.
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 4:50:30 AM EDT
[#31]
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 4:53:59 AM EDT
[#32]
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 5:09:57 AM EDT
[#33]
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 5:24:17 AM EDT
[#34]
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 5:46:05 AM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:
Will this system fit an HBAR or SOCCOM profile barrel?and does the bushing stay in place?is it a snug fit?and if so how do you pop it back out?..TIA Denny....Dave.I want one but I have a 14.5 HBAR and a SOCCOM profile wich is like the HBAR except the flats for the M203 and the outer barrel notch.



I messed up thinking I could install one of these on my RRA HBAR upper, the spigot will not fit with the fat barrel behind the gas block.  Your best bet is to go with a M4 conture and have no worries or something that does not exceed the .875" barrel diameter behind the gas block.  I went ahead an ordered a LMT 16" M4 profile upper from legal transfer and installed this kit on her with out any problems.





Link Posted: 12/9/2006 5:47:32 AM EDT
[#36]

Quoted:
Well at least it keep ya out of titty bars.

You guys don't go to titty bars !!! Thats got to be un-American or something

This does look like a nice kit. Only down side seems to be it's lack of compatibilty with most rail systems. It's also remains to be seen how well these kits will hold up in the long term and also what the long term effect will be on the upper and FSB?

A year or so ago I would have bought one of these kits in a heart beat (PLW had me pretty brainwashed) but now, I'm just not as convinced about the need or usefulness? If I had a full auto and or a suppressor, I might be more interested but with a semi only non-supressed AR, the benefit vs. cost doesn't seem to be there.

I assume it's not a lot but how much weight does this kit add to the upper?
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 6:06:28 AM EDT
[#37]
Very interesting.  Starting a new mega build and was thinking of doing a SSP.  How does this compare costwise to a LW conversion??
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 6:27:13 AM EDT
[#38]
thanks meatHey Meat I just called Bushmaster they said their barrels on HBARs is .850 at that point so the ARES system should fit on a Bushmaster or SOCCOM barrel,measured my SOCCOM at that point and its the same.850
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 9:31:46 AM EDT
[#39]
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 9:35:46 AM EDT
[#40]
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 9:52:03 AM EDT
[#41]
To AR15Barrels...thats good to know that you can do that if I have troublke with barrel thicknessim getting one of these
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 9:56:57 AM EDT
[#42]
Very interesting, thanks for sharing info and pics on the GSR 35!

I'm still on the fence about  gas piston systems so it's good to see these things up close.  

You need to do an accuracy test, before and after the GSR35 to see how the gun was affected.
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 10:08:03 AM EDT
[#43]
The advantage im looking for is cleaner running,no pressure in carrier or bolt and no heat wich means longer lasting parts from less stress.And elimination of a weak part...gas rings on the bolt.As long as the bolt locks up good to the extension in the barrel I think accuracy will be fine..I think recoil impulse will change though depending on the buffer used.I dont think ill be able to run 9mm buffers with this system..but well see.
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 10:27:00 AM EDT
[#44]
OST (Old School Tag)
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 10:38:26 AM EDT
[#45]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I'm just not as convinced about the need or usefulness? If I had a full auto and or a suppressor, I might be more interested but with a semi only non-supressed AR, the benefit vs. cost doesn't seem to be there.


Bingo.
That's what I'm talking about.
Then add in the potential for vertical stringing that you get with putting the thrust on the barrel.
The Direct Impingement system removes ALL thrust from the barrel and moves it inside the bolt carrier, hence there is more accuracy potential with DI guns
.


Agreed. I have no problem with someone buying one of these, but having never had a reliability problem with any of my AR rifles, not something I will be buying. Also one of the keys to the AR's bolt gun like accuracy is no reciprocating mass moving along side the barrel. Also, AR15 Barrels, IM on the way
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 10:43:32 AM EDT
[#46]
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 10:51:34 AM EDT
[#47]

Quoted:

Quoted:
The advantage im looking for is cleaner running,no pressure in carrier or bolt and no heat wich means longer lasting parts from less stress.And elimination of a weak part...gas rings on the bolt.As long as the bolt locks up good to the extension in the barrel I think accuracy will be fine..I think recoil impulse will change though depending on the buffer used.I dont think ill be able to run 9mm buffers with this system..but well see.


It's kinda like this...

There are two kinds of barrels out there, Utility and Match.
Each have their own purpose.

Utility barrels are chrome lined, last a long time, not really accurate.
These are blaster barrels.
You shoot blaster barrels standing up with a dot sight.
You shoot surplus quality ammo.

Match barrels are not chrome lined, don't last a long time, but are really accurate.
These are precision barrels.
You shoot these with magnified optics from a bench or a steady rest.
You handload or use premium quality match ammo.

Putting on a piston system is not going to hurt the accuracy much on a chrome lined utility barrel because it has less accuracy to start with.
You would not put a piston on a Match barrel because you would be defeating the purpose of the barrel.

Using this guide, the accuracy will indeed be "fine" in your chrome lined blaster.
If you fancy yourself as a match barrel user, you might consider looking closer at what's going on in the piston system.
Ask yourself this simple question of EACH operating system: Are there any forces on the barrel during the bullet's travel down the bore?
Decide for yourself.

Randall, I agree completely.

But IMHO the piston set up will be a perfect mate for a 10.5" SBR that also used with a suppressor. It will keep the heat and crud out of the BCG, well that is the theory any way.

As far as using these piston systems on 16" barrelled rifles, and more precision guns, I think it is not necessary.
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 10:52:49 AM EDT
[#48]
Any idea when a piston kit for a AR-10 will be on the market? ( I'm going nuts for one).
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 11:07:11 AM EDT
[#49]
Link Posted: 12/9/2006 11:13:28 AM EDT
[#50]
Great minds, think alike.



Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 7
Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top