User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 11/24/2008 8:13:23 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Postal0311]
Formerly the MK18 / CQBR / L119 / Variants Thread Part 2
Part 2 to this thread: http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=271832&page=1 The CQB-R is a short barrel upper for the M4 weapon system. Later the Upper on an M4A1 or rebuilt M16 lower is designated by the US Navy at the MK18Mod0 The CQB-R / MK18 Mod O is generally(but not always) 10/10.3/10.5 inch barrel KAC RIS or RAS KAC NT4 Suppressor Mount LMT Rear Sight or KAC 300m Flip Up Rear Sight LMT Sopmod stock CQD Rear sling mount CQD forward sling mount Optics are often an Aimpoint M2 or ACOG. The Block II CQBR replaces the Knights rail and the fixed front sight base with a Daniel Defense MK18RISII rail. Knights flip up front sight is often used. When rear sights are seen they are often either KAC or Matech. Our British friends have the L119 carbine. The L119 is similar to a MK18MOD0. The rifle is made in Canada, with a 10 inch barrel. Every pictures I have seen the the L119 has a Trijicon TA31 or a TA01NSN ACOG that has a piggyback Trijicon MRD. Note: There is the L119, and the L119A1. I have seen both used to refer to the carbine, and I am not sure which is the proper nomenclature. Yada yada yada, will edit inore info later. Including some of the LMT 10.5 vs Colt 10.3 argument. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 3:40:32 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Whitebrad25:
I don't care for cloning but it is a factory Daniel Defense MK18. I like it how it is. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Whitebrad25:
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Originally Posted By Whitebrad25:
Picture thread needs more pictures.... http://i43.tinypic.com/34506ko.jpg http://i41.tinypic.com/v33sxc.jpg Nice rifle - needs more Block II though. I don't care for cloning but it is a factory Daniel Defense MK18. I like it how it is. I hear ya, but the SOPMOD stock is just heavenly to shoot with, and KAC sights are as good as it gets as well. As most know, I'm far from a clone guy, but those parts of the SOPMOD program in particular I actually do find to be worth the coin. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 3:43:21 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Muad]
[#2]
Here's a DD MK18 that I got the pleasure of playing with at SHOT.
  ETA: pic |
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 3:44:43 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Whitebrad25]
[#3]
Originally Posted By AR-Ryan21:
I hear ya, but the SOPMOD stock is just heavenly to shoot with, and KAC sights are as good as it gets as well. As most know, I'm far from a clone guy, but those parts of the SOPMOD program in particular I actually do find to be worth the coin. I like the balance of the CTR stock better on my rifle. I like the interface of the Magpul MBUS better as well since they can be easily deployed with gross motor skills (which is something they have over a lot of other sights, even if they are polymer, which I don't count against them). In those regards, they beat both of the alternatives you mention. I have my rifle set up for me  .
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 3:59:35 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cschelk2:
Mine is the X300U; i honestly like it at the 12:00 position but that really makes my sight radius short with my buis. Are you running it with a tailcap switch? Mine is set up exactly like Whitebrad's. Same position, tailcap, and tapeswitch. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 4:09:08 PM EDT
[#5]
Just an honest question - is the purpose of this thread for strict mil clones only?
Or does the "variants" part of the title suggest that really anything goes as long as it fits the description or role of a Close Quarters Battle Rifle - whether thats a mil issue clone or a personal interpretation?
|
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 4:12:55 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Is that the newer B5 Coyote Brown? Or the older version of that color? Didn't B5 post here saying they changed the Coyote color a bit? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Originally Posted By Wormydog1987:
http://i416.photobucket.com/albums/pp247/wormydog1724/38955E3F-5316-48C6-BB15-EAB443294416-548-000000589D936F70_zpsee069930.jpg Is that the newer B5 Coyote Brown? Or the older version of that color? Didn't B5 post here saying they changed the Coyote color a bit? My new job really takes away from my Arfcom time. It's the newer coyote if I remember correctly. It's an older pic and I traded it for a black one. Fde furniture just isn't for me anymore. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 4:17:13 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wormydog1987: My new job really takes away from my Arfcom time. It's the newer coyote if I remember correctly. It's an older pic and I traded it for a black one. Fde furniture just isn't for me anymore. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wormydog1987: Originally Posted By wayfaerer320: Originally Posted By Wormydog1987: http://i416.photobucket.com/albums/pp247/wormydog1724/38955E3F-5316-48C6-BB15-EAB443294416-548-000000589D936F70_zpsee069930.jpg Is that the newer B5 Coyote Brown? Or the older version of that color? Didn't B5 post here saying they changed the Coyote color a bit? My new job really takes away from my Arfcom time. It's the newer coyote if I remember correctly. It's an older pic and I traded it for a black one. Fde furniture just isn't for me anymore. Ah ok gotcha - I still dig it.
|
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 6:26:09 PM EDT
[#8]
Stamp was approved today. 94 days with eFile. damn suppressor was submitted the papers, only 4-5 months more for the m42000.
Bought the LMT complete lower w/SOPMOD for just under 450, got a really good deal on the upper in the EE. Still can't get that god awful troy front buys off of there. Going to celebrate this weekend with a hog hunt. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 6:28:50 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Just an honest question - is the purpose of this thread for strict mil clones only? Or does the "variants" part of the title suggest that really anything goes as long as it fits the description or role of a Close Quarters Battle Rifle - whether thats a mil issue clone or a personal interpretation? Basic rifle needs to be as issued, COTS accessories are acceptable but the basic rifle needs... 10.3" barrel KAC RIS/RAS or DD RIS II |
|
|
|
IN, USA
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 9:40:06 PM EDT
[#10]
Posted my old M3X/SU-233 kit on the EE. Making a deal for those from this thread.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 9:49:48 PM EDT
[#11]
Pic request: Because I don't want to go looking through the entire thread and I can't remember seeing one....Does anyone have any pics stashed of a Mod0 and an SU230?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 9:54:56 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By coregon: Pic request: Because I don't want to go looking through the entire thread and I can't remember seeing one....Does anyone have any pics stashed of a Mod0 and an SU230? Still looking for a couple more that I remember, but here is one, shitty angle, but definitely an Elcan on there:  |
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 9:57:00 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Wormydog1987]
[#13]
Beat me to it
|
|
|
IN, USA
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 10:10:54 PM EDT
[#14]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 10:24:58 PM EDT
[#15]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 10:29:07 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Just an honest question - is the purpose of this thread for strict mil clones only? Or does the "variants" part of the title suggest that really anything goes as long as it fits the description or role of a Close Quarters Battle Rifle - whether thats a mil issue clone or a personal interpretation? That's how it started out: input from SMEs so one could build clones that were as close to the real thing as possible...then it turned into as close as desired...then it turned into "well, I once saw a picture of a guy with X so it's kosher", now it's "this is what I would do if it were me", so the thread has morphed over the years. Hence SOCOMike's and my suggestions (of which, Mike's was even better): Colt and convert. "Variants" used to be variants/versions of the USN's Mk18 and the USA's CQBR. I won't even go into what a "mil spec" lower is; there have been numerous threads on the subject and ARFCOM still can't decide when the answer is painfully obvious. Then again, I guess you'd have to ask Postal what his intent was.
And don't forget to check the original thread (Part 1). |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 10:36:31 PM EDT
[#17]
Another Elcan:
 |
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 10:41:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Wormydog1987]
[#18]
Kosher (enough):
BCM lower BCM upper BCM bcg DD10.3" DD RIS II KAC 99051 LMT SOPMOD EOTECH 553 CQD front and rear sling mount A2 grip Not kosher: KAC micro rear Giessele S3G Badass safety Mini scout in gear sector mount AAC brake and m4-20000 Spikes micro adjustable gas block (The middle one) 
IMG_2841 by wormydog1724, on Flickr Looks like my Noveske lower is on in that pic, lol But it has all the same parts. |
|
|
TN, USA
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 11:21:57 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 4DAIVIPAI2K5:
Do you under stand that stock??? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 4DAIVIPAI2K5:
Originally Posted By MP0117:
Originally Posted By pc-ops:
i am not sure if i like either of the afg's (put them both on to see what I like) and the pistol grip is not what I am used to. i may just get a gear sector hand stop and just go rail covers on the bottom http://i.imgur.com/G42EDnw.jpg And toss that stock while you are at it... yikes. Do you under stand that stock??? Yes I do!!! Do you understand what a clone thread is??? |
|
|
TN, USA
|
Posted: 1/21/2014 11:26:50 PM EDT
[#20]
On what page do I find the latest Mk18 component specs?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 12:52:37 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MP0117:
On what page do I find the latest Mk18 component specs? Parts list: Colt M4A1 lower with a Colt 10.3" URG, KAC RIS and LMT rear BUIS. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 8:22:42 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MP0117:
Yes I do!!! Do you understand what a clone thread is??? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MP0117:
Originally Posted By 4DAIVIPAI2K5:
Originally Posted By MP0117:
Originally Posted By pc-ops:
i am not sure if i like either of the afg's (put them both on to see what I like) and the pistol grip is not what I am used to. i may just get a gear sector hand stop and just go rail covers on the bottom http://i.imgur.com/G42EDnw.jpg And toss that stock while you are at it... yikes. Do you under stand that stock??? Yes I do!!! Do you understand what a clone thread is??? So you have an issue with it being in a pistol form if he is waiting on a stamp or is in a non SBR state? hope you got a m4a1 lower on your gun if not it needs to get tossed also. |
|
|
|
NV, USA
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 11:05:37 AM EDT
[Last Edit: new_ak_fan]
[#23]
Done*. Unless I am convinced to get a WMX-200...
*correction: ambi safety selector should arrive today. 
from page one (original configuration): 
Phased replacement: 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 12:02:32 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By new_ak_fan:
Done*. Unless I am convinced to get a WMX-200... *correction: ambi safety selector should arrive today. http://i44.tinypic.com/2zexkrt.jpg http://i39.tinypic.com/wlyi2t.jpg from page one (original configuration): <a href="http://img13.imageshack.us/i/mk18s.jpg/" target="_blank">http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/4301/mk18s.jpg</a> Phased replacement: <a href="http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/854/sl380781.jpg/" target="_blank">http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/9063/sl380781.jpg</a> I have to say, The Mod 0, PR, and CQBR all look excellent. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 12:16:45 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By new_ak_fan: Done*. Unless I am convinced to get a WMX-200... *correction: ambi safety selector should arrive today. http://i44.tinypic.com/2zexkrt.jpg http://i39.tinypic.com/wlyi2t.jpg from page one (original configuration): http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/4301/mk18s.jpg Phased replacement: http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/9063/sl380781.jpg Have any pics of your Mod 0 with the KAC NT4 suppressor attached?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 12:18:20 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By new_ak_fan:
Done*. Unless I am convinced to get a WMX-200... *correction: ambi safety selector should arrive today. http://i44.tinypic.com/2zexkrt.jpg http://i39.tinypic.com/wlyi2t.jpg from page one (original configuration): <a href="http://img13.imageshack.us/i/mk18s.jpg/" target="_blank">http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/4301/mk18s.jpg</a> Phased replacement: <a href="http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/854/sl380781.jpg/" target="_blank">http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/9063/sl380781.jpg</a> nice stick! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 3:02:31 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By KILLERB6:
That's how it started out: input from SMEs so one could build clones that were as close to the real thing as possible...then it turned into as close as desired...then it turned into "well, I once saw a picture of a guy with X so it's kosher", now it's "this is what I would do if it were me", so the thread has morphed over the years. Hence SOCOMike's and my suggestions (of which, Mike's was even better): Colt and convert. "Variants" used to be variants/versions of the USN's Mk18 and the USA's CQBR. I won't even go into what a "mil spec" lower is; there have been numerous threads on the subject and ARFCOM still can't decide when the answer is painfully obvious. Then again, I guess you'd have to ask Postal what his intent was.
And don't forget to check the original thread (Part 1). Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By KILLERB6:
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Just an honest question - is the purpose of this thread for strict mil clones only? Or does the "variants" part of the title suggest that really anything goes as long as it fits the description or role of a Close Quarters Battle Rifle - whether thats a mil issue clone or a personal interpretation? That's how it started out: input from SMEs so one could build clones that were as close to the real thing as possible...then it turned into as close as desired...then it turned into "well, I once saw a picture of a guy with X so it's kosher", now it's "this is what I would do if it were me", so the thread has morphed over the years. Hence SOCOMike's and my suggestions (of which, Mike's was even better): Colt and convert. "Variants" used to be variants/versions of the USN's Mk18 and the USA's CQBR. I won't even go into what a "mil spec" lower is; there have been numerous threads on the subject and ARFCOM still can't decide when the answer is painfully obvious. Then again, I guess you'd have to ask Postal what his intent was.
And don't forget to check the original thread (Part 1). When this thread started a lot of that stuff issued was still considered good gear which made "cloning" easy. Nowadays, technology is surpassing the block I and II gear and it is evident with the amount of pics from the field showing COTS optics, lights, etc. It is almost going the direction of the "Recce", where anything goes as long as it fills the role it is intended for. I sure as hell wont go back to a comp M2 in a Wilcox mount or a traditional Eotech, or a tan plastic light designed for a pistol. The next modification to this gun will put it well into another picture thread or two because I use it daily, and it needs to adapt... 
|
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 3:05:05 PM EDT
[#28]
Anyone thought about doing a 5.45 cqbr? Because I am.
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 3:07:44 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wormydog1987:
Anyone thought about doing a 5.45 cqbr? Because I am. With the costs of ammunition, I say go for it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 3:10:35 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wormydog1987:
Anyone thought about doing a 5.45 cqbr? Because I am. I don't see why not, people are doing .300 blk already. Not sure if the surplus 5.45 is corrosive or not but it should suppress like 5.56. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 4:47:50 PM EDT
[#31]
A page back there was a picture of a DD Mk18 from SHOT with a aimpoint M4. Were those ever issued or used "in the wild"?
|
|
|
NV, USA
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 5:23:02 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Have any pics of your Mod 0 with the KAC NT4 suppressor attached? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Originally Posted By new_ak_fan:
Done*. Unless I am convinced to get a WMX-200... *correction: ambi safety selector should arrive today. http://i44.tinypic.com/2zexkrt.jpg http://i39.tinypic.com/wlyi2t.jpg from page one (original configuration): http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/4301/mk18s.jpg Phased replacement: http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/9063/sl380781.jpg Have any pics of your Mod 0 with the KAC NT4 suppressor attached? No NT4 was on the upper then. |
|
|
BHS
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 5:53:39 PM EDT
[#33]
Just a little Mod 0-ish foolery
Stippling by hand sucks...I will never do it again 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 6:22:44 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By KnightVulture:
A page back there was a picture of a DD Mk18 from SHOT with a aimpoint M4. Were those ever issued or used "in the wild"? To big Army, yes, its the current M68 CCO. I've yet to see a CQBR upper on a big army property book, dunno if the SF/Rangers get M68s as well as their SOPMOD stuff. |
|
|
|
AL, USA
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 6:25:17 PM EDT
[Last Edit: secretwheelman]
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Mattyvac: Just a little Mod 0-ish foolery https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-Ki-qVLVx5hs/UuBLAJGp6YI/AAAAAAAAIYA/sq_DIbwa7T4/s640/2014_%25201_22_17_49.jpg Stippling by hand sucks...I will never do it again https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-mq9aAU8_AB4/UuBK6eWgiBI/AAAAAAAAIXo/7cfrVOck5BA/s640/2014_%25201_22_17_49.jpg |
|
|
BHS
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 6:47:49 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By secretwheelman:
M4-S? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By secretwheelman:
Originally Posted By Mattyvac:
Just a little Mod 0-ish foolery https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-Ki-qVLVx5hs/UuBLAJGp6YI/AAAAAAAAIYA/sq_DIbwa7T4/s640/2014_%25201_22_17_49.jpg Stippling by hand sucks...I will never do it again https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-mq9aAU8_AB4/UuBK6eWgiBI/AAAAAAAAIXo/7cfrVOck5BA/s640/2014_%25201_22_17_49.jpg Ya |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 6:52:47 PM EDT
[#37]
Just finished building the upper this morning
|
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 7:32:36 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MNRidesHonda:
Just finished building the upper this morning
<a href="https://imageshack.com/i/mk0wbfj" target="_blank">http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/812/0wbf.jpg</a> <a href="https://imageshack.com/i/nltwxuj" target="_blank">http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/849/twxu.jpg</a> Cool. But wrong thread. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 7:35:47 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By nf9648: When this thread started a lot of that stuff issued was still considered good gear which made "cloning" easy. Nowadays, technology is surpassing the block I and II gear and it is evident with the amount of pics from the field showing COTS optics, lights, etc. It is almost going the direction of the "Recce", where anything goes as long as it fills the role it is intended for. I sure as hell wont go back to a comp M2 in a Wilcox mount or a traditional Eotech, or a tan plastic light designed for a pistol. The next modification to this gun will put it well into another picture thread or two because I use it daily, and it needs to adapt... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v669/nf9648/Guns/IMG_0474_zps6be94c33.jpg Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By nf9648: Originally Posted By KILLERB6: Originally Posted By wayfaerer320: Just an honest question - is the purpose of this thread for strict mil clones only? Or does the "variants" part of the title suggest that really anything goes as long as it fits the description or role of a Close Quarters Battle Rifle - whether thats a mil issue clone or a personal interpretation? That's how it started out: input from SMEs so one could build clones that were as close to the real thing as possible...then it turned into as close as desired...then it turned into "well, I once saw a picture of a guy with X so it's kosher", now it's "this is what I would do if it were me", so the thread has morphed over the years. Hence SOCOMike's and my suggestions (of which, Mike's was even better): Colt and convert. "Variants" used to be variants/versions of the USN's Mk18 and the USA's CQBR. I won't even go into what a "mil spec" lower is; there have been numerous threads on the subject and ARFCOM still can't decide when the answer is painfully obvious. Then again, I guess you'd have to ask Postal what his intent was. And don't forget to check the original thread (Part 1). When this thread started a lot of that stuff issued was still considered good gear which made "cloning" easy. Nowadays, technology is surpassing the block I and II gear and it is evident with the amount of pics from the field showing COTS optics, lights, etc. It is almost going the direction of the "Recce", where anything goes as long as it fills the role it is intended for. I sure as hell wont go back to a comp M2 in a Wilcox mount or a traditional Eotech, or a tan plastic light designed for a pistol. The next modification to this gun will put it well into another picture thread or two because I use it daily, and it needs to adapt... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v669/nf9648/Guns/IMG_0474_zps6be94c33.jpg  |
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 8:46:39 PM EDT
[#40]
Kitted up
CQBR LoAdEd by wormydog1724, on Flickr Kitted down 
CqBr unLoAdED by wormydog1724, on Flickr 
* will be adding a vfg soon, just can't decide which one. I tried an afg for a few weeks and didn't like it too much. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 8:54:52 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wormydog1987:
Kitted up [email=http://www.flickr.com/photos/94844416@N02/12095195574/]http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5475/12095195574_bd75cc71c0_b.jpg[/email] CQBR LoAdEd by wormydog1724, on Flickr Kitted down [email=http://www.flickr.com/photos/94844416@N02/12095458596/]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7314/12095458596_7a00a56cdd_b.jpg[/email] CqBr unLoAdED by wormydog1724, on Flickr
* will be adding a vfg soon, just can't decide which one. I tried an afg for a few weeks and didn't like it too much. Dat's the secs
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 8:56:00 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Socomike]
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wormydog1987:
Kitted up [email=http://www.flickr.com/photos/94844416@N02/12095195574/]http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5475/12095195574_bd75cc71c0_b.jpg[/email] CQBR LoAdEd by wormydog1724, on Flickr Kitted down [email=http://www.flickr.com/photos/94844416@N02/12095458596/]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7314/12095458596_7a00a56cdd_b.jpg[/email] CqBr unLoAdED by wormydog1724, on Flickr
* will be adding a vfg soon, just can't decide which one. I tried an afg for a few weeks and didn't like it too much. Would smash. KAC or TD shorty or full size...doesnt matter. |
|
|
|
ID, USA
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 8:56:28 PM EDT
[#43]
Can anyone tell me what laser pointer is on the top rail of Axelson's MK18/CQBR?
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 8:57:15 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SecretSquirell:
Dat's the secs Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SecretSquirell:
Originally Posted By Wormydog1987:
Kitted up [email=http://www.flickr.com/photos/94844416@N02/12095195574/]http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5475/12095195574_bd75cc71c0_b.jpg[/email] CQBR LoAdEd by wormydog1724, on Flickr Kitted down [email=http://www.flickr.com/photos/94844416@N02/12095458596/]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7314/12095458596_7a00a56cdd_b.jpg[/email] CqBr unLoAdED by wormydog1724, on Flickr
* will be adding a vfg soon, just can't decide which one. I tried an afg for a few weeks and didn't like it too much. Dat's the secs Wrong can, wrong light, and wrong lazers. 
In the world of clones, I'm the retarded underdeveloped clone. Close, but no cigar. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 8:57:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Socomike]
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AstraPat:
Can anyone tell me what laser pointer is on the top rail of Axelson's MK18/CQBR? <a href="http://s436.photobucket.com/user/astrapat/media/photo_zpsc1524f47.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i436.photobucket.com/albums/qq82/astrapat/photo_zpsc1524f47.jpg</a> Looks like a Paq 4C. They suck my ass. I broke about 4 of them and went back to the tried and true PEQ 2A. The Dbal I2 and newer Dbals, Peq15, and as far as I am concerned the Peq 2 are all superior to the Paq 4C |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 9:00:31 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Socomike:
Would smash. KAC or TD shorty or full size...doesnt matter. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Socomike:
Originally Posted By Wormydog1987:
Kitted up [email=http://www.flickr.com/photos/94844416@N02/12095195574/]http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5475/12095195574_bd75cc71c0_b.jpg[/email] CQBR LoAdEd by wormydog1724, on Flickr Kitted down [email=http://www.flickr.com/photos/94844416@N02/12095458596/]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7314/12095458596_7a00a56cdd_b.jpg[/email] CqBr unLoAdED by wormydog1724, on Flickr
* will be adding a vfg soon, just can't decide which one. I tried an afg for a few weeks and didn't like it too much. Would smash. KAC or TD shorty or full size...doesnt matter. I liked my TD Stubby QD while I had it. |
|
|
|
ID, USA
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 9:05:54 PM EDT
[Last Edit: AstraPat]
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Socomike:
Looks like a Paq 4C. They suck my ass. I broke about 4 of them and went back to the tried and true PEQ 2A Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Socomike:
Originally Posted By AstraPat:
Can anyone tell me what laser pointer is on the top rail of Axelson's MK18/CQBR? <a href="http://s436.photobucket.com/user/astrapat/media/photo_zpsc1524f47.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i436.photobucket.com/albums/qq82/astrapat/photo_zpsc1524f47.jpg</a> Looks like a Paq 4C. They suck my ass. I broke about 4 of them and went back to the tried and true PEQ 2A Got it, thanks SM. Is it IR only? Edit: It looks shorter than the Paq-4C. Also, if it is IR only, why was he running it along with a PEQ? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 9:09:02 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Socomike]
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AstraPat:
Got it, thanks SM. Is it IR only? Edit: It looks shorter than the Paq-4C. Also, if it is IR only, why was he running it along with a PEQ? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AstraPat:
Originally Posted By Socomike:
Originally Posted By AstraPat:
Can anyone tell me what laser pointer is on the top rail of Axelson's MK18/CQBR? <a href="http://s436.photobucket.com/user/astrapat/media/photo_zpsc1524f47.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i436.photobucket.com/albums/qq82/astrapat/photo_zpsc1524f47.jpg</a> Looks like a Paq 4C. They suck my ass. I broke about 4 of them and went back to the tried and true PEQ 2A Got it, thanks SM. Is it IR only? Edit: It looks shorter than the Paq-4C. Also, if it is IR only, why was he running it along with a PEQ? Yes. Although, I am pretty sure they made/ make a VIS model as well. The plastic bodies were fragile and often snapped at the "cone" that twisted to adjust the size of the beam. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 9:15:25 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wormydog1987:
Wrong can, wrong light, and wrong lazers.
In the world of clones, I'm the retarded underdeveloped clone. Close, but no cigar. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wormydog1987:
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:
Originally Posted By Wormydog1987:
Kitted up [email=http://www.flickr.com/photos/94844416@N02/12095195574/]http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5475/12095195574_bd75cc71c0_b.jpg[/email] CQBR LoAdEd by wormydog1724, on Flickr Kitted down [email=http://www.flickr.com/photos/94844416@N02/12095458596/]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7314/12095458596_7a00a56cdd_b.jpg[/email] CqBr unLoAdED by wormydog1724, on Flickr
* will be adding a vfg soon, just can't decide which one. I tried an afg for a few weeks and didn't like it too much. Dat's the secs Wrong can, wrong light, and wrong lazers.
In the world of clones, I'm the retarded underdeveloped clone. Close, but no cigar. Who cares when it looks like that 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2014 9:18:09 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Socomike:
Yes. Although, I am pretty sure they made/ make a VIS model as well. The plastic bodies were fragile and often snapped at the "cone" that twisted to adjust the size of the beam. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Socomike:
Originally Posted By AstraPat:
Originally Posted By Socomike:
Originally Posted By AstraPat:
Can anyone tell me what laser pointer is on the top rail of Axelson's MK18/CQBR? <a href="http://s436.photobucket.com/user/astrapat/media/photo_zpsc1524f47.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i436.photobucket.com/albums/qq82/astrapat/photo_zpsc1524f47.jpg</a> Looks like a Paq 4C. They suck my ass. I broke about 4 of them and went back to the tried and true PEQ 2A Got it, thanks SM. Is it IR only? Edit: It looks shorter than the Paq-4C. Also, if it is IR only, why was he running it along with a PEQ? Yes. Although, I am pretty sure they made/ make a VIS model as well. The plastic bodies were fragile and often snapped at the "cone" that twisted to adjust the size of the beam. I think its the PEQ-5 |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
