User Panel
Quoted: I'm dealing with the same problem, certain companies just won't and that's fine I'll never buy anything from them. 44mag sells to police so does Top Gun Supply I buy through them.... what companies are giving you issues? |
|
No 44mag will sell 30 rd rebuild kits to citizens which is all they can legally do. I believe they were one of the first large distributor with a pair big enough to do it so continue to suppoort them
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm dealing with the same problem, certain companies just won't and that's fine I'll never buy anything from them. 44mag sells to police so does Top Gun Supply I buy through them.... Are you saying that 44mag will sell 30 rounders to cops in CA but not citizens?! If so, I won't be ordering anything from them any more. I wish I had known this earlier. That's fine, more mags for me. 44mag is L/E friendly oh the horror...Guess you on't buy any manufacturers that sell to L/E like Colt/ Bushmaster/S&W/Springfield/HK just about anyone who sells to California which is just about everyone... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm dealing with the same problem, certain companies just won't and that's fine I'll never buy anything from them. 44mag sells to police so does Top Gun Supply I buy through them.... what companies are giving you issues? EAA wouldn't sell me mags once..No big deal, that's thier policy. I'm fine with it. I'll go elsewhere to buy, and for the record I don't agree with the mag limits or the ban... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
No 44mag will sell 30 rd rebuild kits to citizens which is all they can legally do. I believe they were one of the first large distributor with a pair big enough to do it so continue to suppoort them Oh, yeah––they put it off on The People to get arrested for not following the law (using "rebuild" kits) while they sit behind their lawyers saying: "Hey––we followed the law." If they REALLY had "a pair" they'd refuse to sell to LEOs while Citizens are DENIED the right to have them, while donating big $$ to get the law changed. I'll repost this just to make my point clear: http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/ff303/Gyrene8490/funny%20stuff/unconstitutional.jpg No more orders from me, 44mag.com. Expand your list to just about everyone then.. |
|
Quoted: I guess that because you're a LEO you have more rights than the other citizens of your state. The "horror" is that you actually believe that you have more rights than other citizens of your state, and won't stand up for the rights of your fellow Californian citizens. As long as you get what you want, fuck The People, huh? Quoted: Quoted: I'm dealing with the same problem, certain companies just won't and that's fine I'll never buy anything from them. 44mag sells to police so does Top Gun Supply I buy through them.... Are you saying that 44mag will sell 30 rounders to cops in CA but not citizens?! If so, I won't be ordering anything from them any more. I wish I had known this earlier. That's fine, more mags for me. 44mag is L/E friendly oh the horror...Guess you on't buy any manufacturers that sell to L/E like Colt/ Bushmaster/S&W/Springfield/HK just about anyone who sells to California which is just about everyone... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I guess that because you're a LEO you have more rights than the other citizens of your state. The "horror" is that you actually believe that, and won't stand up for the rights of your fellow Californian citizens. As long as you get what you want, fuck The People, huh?
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm dealing with the same problem, certain companies just won't and that's fine I'll never buy anything from them. 44mag sells to police so does Top Gun Supply I buy through them.... Are you saying that 44mag will sell 30 rounders to cops in CA but not citizens?! If so, I won't be ordering anything from them any more. I wish I had known this earlier. That's fine, more mags for me. 44mag is L/E friendly oh the horror...Guess you on't buy any manufacturers that sell to L/E like Colt/ Bushmaster/S&W/Springfield/HK just about anyone who sells to California which is just about everyone... I'm a member of the NRA and against the ban and the mag limits even though I can still get just about anything I want. I've made numerous calls to my congressman to complain about gun legislation. So I guess I do stand up for my fellow citizens. . |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I guess that because you're a LEO you have more rights than the other citizens of your state. The "horror" is that you actually believe that, and won't stand up for the rights of your fellow Californian citizens. As long as you get what you want, fuck The People, huh?
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm dealing with the same problem, certain companies just won't and that's fine I'll never buy anything from them. 44mag sells to police so does Top Gun Supply I buy through them.... Are you saying that 44mag will sell 30 rounders to cops in CA but not citizens?! If so, I won't be ordering anything from them any more. I wish I had known this earlier. That's fine, more mags for me. 44mag is L/E friendly oh the horror...Guess you on't buy any manufacturers that sell to L/E like Colt/ Bushmaster/S&W/Springfield/HK just about anyone who sells to California which is just about everyone... I completely agree Gyrene. I dont know 44mags policy towards leo but atleast they are willing to sell rebuilds to cali. Dont worry though im sure the good people at calguns.net will do away with that unconstitutional "law" which happens to be almost impossible to enforce |
|
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. |
|
Do you sell rebuild kits? Most companies that do it charge a dollar or 2 to disassemble.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I lost a lot of respect for BC when I was told they would not sell me full capacity mags! I was good enough to buy a $500 upper for my duty rifle but not good enough to buy a $15 mag! It's legal for me to buy it per CA law, you would think a company like bravo would be pro 2nd am but yet they take it in their own hands to restrict my rights! Thanks bravo vote Obama! Your legislature restricts the rights of every non LEO citizen of your state Yet, your worried about Bravo restricting sales to your exempted self "You don't like the laws? Vote to change them." Guess you won't be saying that to anyone anymore |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. woooohooooooo |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
If this guy's LE, I'm the queen of England. I thought the same thing +1 |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! Why is it that standing up to the current political state in CA is anti-police? Maybe if it affects enough police too, the fight on our side will become stronger, or are you saying that all CA cops are as proactve and have the same attitude towards citizens as you? Why is it so bad that certain companies make a stand against CA's hypocrisy? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. Why not? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! Why is it that standing up to the current political state in CA is anti-police? Nothing in the post idicates his refusal to sell to the cops is out of political activism. He simply stated he wont sell to cops from California. His reasons are completly unknown. Maybe he got a ticket in Cali once? Maybe he thinks magazine capacity restrictions are a good idea? Maybe he dislikes Californians? Maybe he dislikes cops? Maybe its a combination of all of those things? We don't know why. All its says it he wont sell to cops from California. |
|
Quoted:
Good! Why don't you move to a state that doesn't have such shitty gun laws? If an upstanding citizen of your state can't own a 30 rounder, why should you be able to? Theres no law in California preventing him from buying normal capacity mags. Has Bravo Co explained why they will not sell a lawfull product to a person who is not prohibited from purchasing said product by state or federal law? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! Why is it that standing up to the current political state in CA is anti-police? Maybe if it affects enough police too, the fight on our side will become stronger, or are you saying that all CA cops are as proactve and have the same attitude towards citizens as you? Why is it so bad that certain companies make a stand against CA's hypocrisy? Look I don't have issue with ADCO's policy just the attitude that's all. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! Why is it that standing up to the current political state in CA is anti-police? Nothing in the post idicates he refuses the sell the cops out of political activism. He simply stated he wont sell to cops from California. His reasons are completedly unknown. Maybe he got a ticket in Cali once? All its says it he wont sell to cops from California. I guess I am assuming that when he reffered to GSG mags he was talking about a detachable "hi-cap" mag that would be outlawed for nnormal citizens in CA. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! Why is it that standing up to the current political state in CA is anti-police? Nothing in the post idicates he refuses the sell the cops out of political activism. He simply stated he wont sell to cops from California. His reasons are completedly unknown. Maybe he got a ticket in Cali once? All its says it he wont sell to cops from California. I guess I am assuming that when he reffered to GSG mags he was talking about a detachable "hi-cap" mag that would be outlawed for nnormal citizens in CA. Yeah, GSG-5 mags are high cap .22 magazines. I doubt that they were going to be used "in the line of duty". Homeboy just thought he was special.... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! Why is it that standing up to the current political state in CA is anti-police? Nothing in the post idicates he refuses the sell the cops out of political activism. He simply stated he wont sell to cops from California. His reasons are completedly unknown. Maybe he got a ticket in Cali once? All its says it he wont sell to cops from California. I guess I am assuming that when he reffered to GSG mags he was talking about a detachable "hi-cap" mag that would be outlawed for nnormal citizens in CA. Yes it appears he was taking about a "hicap" GSG mag. He does not explain why he wont sell it though. Theres no statement indicating its has anything to do with politics or any law. Just "Fuck him" which makes it look like he has a problem with cops or cops from California specifically. He refusing to sell a legal product to a person who is not prohibited from receiving them. With no explanation why beyond essentially "fuck the police." |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! Why is it that standing up to the current political state in CA is anti-police? Nothing in the post idicates he refuses the sell the cops out of political activism. He simply stated he wont sell to cops from California. His reasons are completedly unknown. Maybe he got a ticket in Cali once? All its says it he wont sell to cops from California. I guess I am assuming that when he reffered to GSG mags he was talking about a detachable "hi-cap" mag that would be outlawed for nnormal citizens in CA. Yeah, GSG-5 mags are high cap .22 magazines. I doubt that they were going to be used "in the line of duty". So he will sell to cops from cali if they are going to be used for work? FWIW there is no requirement in any state or federal law that the lawfull purchase of a normal/full capacity magazine be for work use. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! Why is it that standing up to the current political state in CA is anti-police? Nothing in the post idicates he refuses the sell the cops out of political activism. He simply stated he wont sell to cops from California. His reasons are completedly unknown. Maybe he got a ticket in Cali once? All its says it he wont sell to cops from California. I guess I am assuming that when he reffered to GSG mags he was talking about a detachable "hi-cap" mag that would be outlawed for nnormal citizens in CA. Yeah, GSG-5 mags are high cap .22 magazines. I doubt that they were going to be used "in the line of duty". Homeboy just thought he was special.... Exactly, StevenH, if not using in the line of duty why does he need a hi-cap mag anymore than normal CA citizens? Don't really have the excuse of needing this to fight the bad guys! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! Why is it that standing up to the current political state in CA is anti-police? Nothing in the post idicates he refuses the sell the cops out of political activism. He simply stated he wont sell to cops from California. His reasons are completedly unknown. Maybe he got a ticket in Cali once? All its says it he wont sell to cops from California. I guess I am assuming that when he reffered to GSG mags he was talking about a detachable "hi-cap" mag that would be outlawed for nnormal citizens in CA. Yeah, GSG-5 mags are high cap .22 magazines. I doubt that they were going to be used "in the line of duty". Homeboy just thought he was special.... Exactly, StevenH, if not using in the line of duty why does he need a hi-cap mag anymore than normal CA citizens? Don't really have the excuse of needing this to fight the bad guys! So only people who "need" hicap mags should be allowed to buy them? Thats the Policy of Bravo Co, ADCO and you? Is that what you are saying? Because whats been stated here is you have a vendor who without explanation refuses to sell a lawfull product and then says "fuck him" about the person trying to buy that product. |
|
I posted a thread in BOTS about ADCO's remarks and it got locked, probably because ADCO is a site sponsor, but when I post the remarks in the L/E websites I'm on he won't have the same luxury....You don't want to sell to California L/E fine I'll pass the word along for you..
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! Why is it that standing up to the current political state in CA is anti-police? Nothing in the post idicates he refuses the sell the cops out of political activism. He simply stated he wont sell to cops from California. His reasons are completedly unknown. Maybe he got a ticket in Cali once? All its says it he wont sell to cops from California. I guess I am assuming that when he reffered to GSG mags he was talking about a detachable "hi-cap" mag that would be outlawed for nnormal citizens in CA. Yeah, GSG-5 mags are high cap .22 magazines. I doubt that they were going to be used "in the line of duty". Homeboy just thought he was special.... Exactly, StevenH, if not using in the line of duty why does he need a hi-cap mag anymore than normal CA citizens? Don't really have the excuse of needing this to fight the bad guys! So only people who "need" hicap mags should be allowed to buy them? Thats the Policy of Bravo Co, ADCO and you? Is that what you are saying? Because whats been stated here is you have a vendor who without explanation refuses to sell a lawfull product and then says "fuck him" about the person trying to buy that product. I am pretty sure the "spirit of the law" in making LEO's exempt from mag restrictions is for them to have to use in the line of duty. So yeah I'd say fuck him too, seeing how it is something the guy wants just to toy around with while his counter part citizens don't have that same right. |
|
If ADCO and Bravo Company are refusing to sell these mags to police officers who live in Cali as a form of political protests, then I fully support them in that.
However nothing has been posted by Bravo Co or ADCO to indicate that is the case. In fact ADCO has posted a vulgar slur which indicates its a personal not political motivated decision. There is simply not enough info to determine their motives at this point. All we know is they wont sell a lwfull product to a lawfull purchaser. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! Why is it that standing up to the current political state in CA is anti-police? Nothing in the post idicates he refuses the sell the cops out of political activism. He simply stated he wont sell to cops from California. His reasons are completedly unknown. Maybe he got a ticket in Cali once? All its says it he wont sell to cops from California. I guess I am assuming that when he reffered to GSG mags he was talking about a detachable "hi-cap" mag that would be outlawed for nnormal citizens in CA. Yeah, GSG-5 mags are high cap .22 magazines. I doubt that they were going to be used "in the line of duty". Homeboy just thought he was special.... Exactly, StevenH, if not using in the line of duty why does he need a hi-cap mag anymore than normal CA citizens? Don't really have the excuse of needing this to fight the bad guys! So only people who "need" hicap mags should be allowed to buy them? Thats the Policy of Bravo Co, ADCO and you? Is that what you are saying? Because whats been stated here is you have a vendor who without explanation refuses to sell a lawfull product and then says "fuck him" about the person trying to buy that product. I am pretty sure the "spirit of the law" in making LEO's exempt from mag restrictions is for them to have to use in the line of duty. So yeah I'd say fuck him too, seeing how it is something the guy wants just to toy around with while his counter part citizens don't have that same right. So ADCO thinks the mag ban is a good law and is going above and beyond the restrictions of the law? In order to try to enforce "the spirit of the law?" |
|
Californian's bitching about Bravo, bitching about ADCO, bitching about LaRue....... you guys will be lucky if you have anyone left to sell to you by the end of the year.
|
|
Quoted:
If ADCO and Bravo Company are refusing to sell these mags to police officers who live in Cali as a form of political protests, then I fully support them in that. However nothing has been posted by Bravo Co or ADCO to indicate that is the case. In fact ADCO has posted a vulgar slur which indicates its a personal not political motivated decision. There is simply not enough info to determine their motives at this point. All we know is they wont sell a lwfull product to a lawfull purchaser. I have no issue with Bravo Co. wish em the best, ADCO on the other hand is a different story altogether.. |
|
Quoted:
Californian's bitching about Bravo, bitching about ADCO, bitching about LaRue....... you guys will be lucky if you have anyone left to sell to you by the end of the year. LaRue has been educated about the law and in fact just gave us $12,000.00 to fund upcomming court challenges. Many times when vendors like CTD, sportmans guide, Bravo co, ADCO refuse to sell to California its out of ignorance not malice. In this case we simply dont know why. |
|
Quoted:
So ADCO thinks the mag ban is a good law and is going above and beyond the restrictions of the law? In order to try to enforce "the spirit of the law?" Now you are just intentionally being an idiot and trolling. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Californian's bitching about Bravo, bitching about ADCO, bitching about LaRue....... you guys will be lucky if you have anyone left to sell to you by the end of the year. LaRue has been educated about the law and in fact just gave us $12,000.00 to fund upcomming court challenges. Many times when vendors like CTD, sportmans guide, Bravo co, ADCO refuse to sell to California its out of ignorance not malice. In this case we simply dont know why. And a big THANK YOU!! To Mark Larue |
|
Quoted:
snip No but it is hard to justify needing that item for law enforcement purposes. Bottom line is it is his buisness whether he sells to CA cops or not, just like it is your right not to buy from him because of it. I think most here understand why some vendors don't want to deal in CA and have distain for the LEOs there that believe they are more equal than others. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
So ADCO thinks the mag ban is a good law and is going above and beyond the restrictions of the law? In order to try to enforce "the spirit of the law?" Now you are just intentionally being an idiot and trolling. You're the one that said ADCO is trying to enforce the spirit of a magazine restriction law. Unlike others I wont make assumptions about their motives. I'll ask questions and allow them to speak for themselves. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! Why is it that standing up to the current political state in CA is anti-police? Nothing in the post idicates his refusal to sell to the cops is out of political activism. He simply stated he wont sell to cops from California. His reasons are completly unknown. Maybe he got a ticket in Cali once? Maybe he thinks magazine capacity restrictions are a good idea? Maybe he dislikes Californians? Maybe he dislikes cops? Maybe its a combination of all of those things? We don't know why. All its says it he wont sell to cops from California. Are you really that naive, or are you deliberately being obtuse? As a resident of a shitty (albeit not as shitty as CA) state, I fully understand why many dealers don't want to deal with MD on certain things. I don't like it, but I completely understand. This is also their livelihood, and why should they potentially destroy their business because of differences in the interpretation of an unconstitutional law. Cops are citizens and should be subject to the same law as everyone, so Paul is following the law. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So ADCO thinks the mag ban is a good law and is going above and beyond the restrictions of the law? In order to try to enforce "the spirit of the law?" Now you are just intentionally being an idiot and trolling. You're the one that said ADCO is trying to enforce the spirit of a magazine restriction. Unlike others I wont make assumptions about their motives. I'll ask questions and allow them to speak for themselves. I said what? I guess you could quote that for me? I'll wait. His motives are clear, you are the one trolling to try to get a rise out of the user base which, might I add, is against the CoC. |
|
Quoted:
I think most here understand why some vendors don't want to deal in CA... I'm trying to understand but no explanation beyond "fuck him" has been offered. Speculation on your part does not equal explanation by the vendor(s). |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So ADCO thinks the mag ban is a good law and is going above and beyond the restrictions of the law? In order to try to enforce "the spirit of the law?" Now you are just intentionally being an idiot and trolling. You're the one that said ADCO is trying to enforce the spirit of a magazine restriction law. Unlike others I wont make assumptions about their motives. I'll ask questions and allow them to speak for themselves. No, I said it, and as I said most people here support this posistion and you are being obtuse now and just trying to be a PITA. Have fun. I'll let some others take over from here. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So ADCO thinks the mag ban is a good law and is going above and beyond the restrictions of the law? In order to try to enforce "the spirit of the law?" Now you are just intentionally being an idiot and trolling. You're the one that said ADCO is trying to enforce the spirit of a magazine restriction. Unlike others I wont make assumptions about their motives. I'll ask questions and allow them to speak for themselves. I said what? I guess you could quote that for me? I'll wait. My mistake, it was ACOGless, not you. |
|
Quoted:
My mistake, it was ACOGless, not you. Well then, now that we have cleared that up. Since you seem to be educated about the LaRue shitstorm thread then you should understand what bullshit vendors have to go through to sell restricted items to exempt persons in CA. For one, it is not worth the hassle of possibly being tied up in federal court when the CA DOJ gets a wild hair up their ass. You can understand that, right? You understand the vendors do this for a living, correct? Second, why should a vendor sell items to law enforcement when the very laws they enforce prohibit the vendor from selling their product, hence costing the vendor a potential profit? |
|
I dont give any special treatment to anyone based on their chosen profession. When someone claiming to be a LEO in CA contacted me about shipping 22rd GSG mags, I said sure, I just need a signed letter by the chief on Dept. letter head that it was for duty use and I would send the mags to the address on the letterhead. The reply I received was that as a LEO, he was exempt from the CA laws and the signed letter by the chief was not necessary. I asked around and found as a cop he was "entitled" to items fellow, unworthy CA gun owning residents could not posess. That, IMO is bullshit.
I politely told him to pound sand. My policy for LE discounts is the same. Dept. Letterhead signed by the chief stating its for duty use, shipped to the Dept. I'm not going to help anyone fund their hobby, because their resume includes the word "Law Enforcement Officer". It's not a hate thing, I dont treat anyone different based on their occupation. Ditch diggers get the same pricing and service as Dentists or Electrical Engineers.... ETA - yes, Dept. Letterhead for the mags would have gotten them shipped, and still would today. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good for Bravo Co. for sticking up for what they believe. I wish more gun manufacturers and stores would follow in their footsteps. Bravo Co. and Barrett FTW!! Also, their policy makes them much more pro 2nd ammendment than if they chose to sell to the priveledged few over there I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. So you're anti police, good for you! I said fuck him, not fuck cops. I'm anti anyone who thinks they are entitled to special privileges because of their job no matter what it is. |
|
Quoted:
I dont give any special treatment to anyone based on their chosen profession. When someone claiming to be a LEO in CA contacted me about shipping 22rd GSG mags, I said sure, I just need a signed letter by the chief on Dept. letter head that it was for duty use and I would send the mags to the address on the letterhead. The reply I received was that as a LEO, he was exempt from the CA laws and the signed letter by the chief was not necessary. I asked around and found as a cop he was "entitled" to items fellow, unworthy CA gun owning residents could not posess. That, IMO is bullshit. I politely told him to pound sand. My policy for LE discounts is the same. Dept. Letterhead signed by the chief stating its for duty use, shipped to the Dept. I'm not going to help anyone fund their hobby, because their resume includes the word "Law Enforcement Officer". It's not a hate thing, I dont treat anyone different based on their occupation. Ditch diggers get the same pricing and service as Dentists or Electrical Engineers.... ETA - yes, Dept. Letterhead for the mags would have gotten them shipped, and still would today. Thanks for clearing that up. |
|
Quoted:
I dont give any special treatment to anyone based on their chosen profession. When someone claiming to be a LEO in CA contacted me about shipping 22rd GSG mags, I said sure, I just need a signed letter by the chief on Dept. letter head that it was for duty use and I would send the mags to the address on the letterhead. The reply I received was that as a LEO, he was exempt from the CA laws and the signed letter by the chief was not necessary. I asked around and found as a cop he was "entitled" to items fellow, unworthy CA gun owning residents could not posess. That, IMO is bullshit. I politely told him to pound sand. My policy for LE discounts is the same. Dept. Letterhead signed by the chief stating its for duty use, shipped to the Dept. I'm not going to help anyone fund their hobby, because their resume includes the word "Law Enforcement Officer". It's not a hate thing, I dont treat anyone different based on their occupation. Ditch diggers get the same pricing and service as Dentists or Electrical Engineers.... ETA - yes, Dept. Letterhead for the mags would have gotten them shipped, and still would today. That's more eloquent than your original quote I dont sell mags to cops in CA either. One cop wanted me to send him GSG Mags. Fuck him. I posted about it in BOTS, but since you're an Industry partner site staff locked the thread. I'll go ahead and post on the L/E websites I'm on and you won't have that luxury. Lots of places have a no sales to California policy and that's fine, you don't need to be a jerk about it, just state your reasons why... |
|
Quoted:
Californians bitching about Bravo, bitching about ADCO, bitching about LaRue....... you guys will be lucky if you have anyone left to sell to you by the end of the year. Indeed California LEO's protect their residents. These same residents have voted for legislators whom wish to restrict the individual liberties of not only Californians, but all Americans. All Californians receive absolutely zero sympathy from me. I fully support LaRue, ADCO, Bravo Company, Barrett, and any/all Companies who will do not do business with California's protected classes... |
|
Quoted:
I have zero problem with a private company making their own policy regarding where they will and will not ship products. I also believe that LEO's and law abiding citizens should have no distinction in what each can and cannot own. One is no more special or deserving than the other. ^This! |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.