Quoted:
Quoted: I don't think that is necessarily the case. For example, federal statutes of limitations IIRC are based on local time.
|
Thats because the clock starts ticking when the crime is committed............in the local timezone.
|
This is not true. The statute of limitations does not begin ticking at a specific local time. It starts ticking on a specific date. For instance, if you committed battery at 9:00 a.m. on June 1, 1990 and there is a ten-year statute of limitations, the case can be filed at any time on June 1, 2000, not just before 9:00 a.m. That is just how time is calculated under the rules of criminal and civil procedure (Rules 45 and 6 respectively).
It is not unheard of IIRC for an action (usually civil) to be filed on the west coast or even Hawaii to beat the statute of limitations (obviously venue and jurisdiction have to be proper, but that is not necessarily where the action complained about took place).
It was stated that "FEDERAL law works off of EAST COAST TIME (D.C. time) not Local." If you have to file something in federal court in LV within 3 days of June 1, that does not mean you only have until 9pm on June 4 (midnight EST). You have until midnight LV time. This is of course just argument by analogy, like the statute of limiitations example above, but federal courts do use local time.
Seriously guys, this isn't even a question. The Law took effect at midnight DC time and it will sunset at midnight DC time. Sheesh, 9PM Pacific time IS 12PM Eastern time. It's not 3 hours earlier.
|
Can you point to a statute or case regarding this issue?
Take a look at the specific wording of the statute:
SEC. 09. EFFECTIVE DATE. This title and the amendments made by this title-- (1) shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act; and (2) are repealed effective as of the date that is 10 years after that date.
|
There is no reference to EST. It does not talk about the statute taking effect or being repealed at a specific time. It talks about dates. The key issue is not what time it is, but what day it is. I would not feel too comfortable if I had just assembled my new preban on 12:30 a.m. EST in NV and the ATF broke down my door. I might complan that the statute had expired in DC at midnight, but the friendly ATF agent might ask me to look at my watch and tell him what day it is. It would still be September 12.
Without some kind of statute or case law to the contrary, it seems like bad advice to stick with EST. I don't claim to be an expert on criminal law, but if there is some statutory or case law on the subject please cite it.
It would probably also not be wise to brag about building a preban before 9/13, even after the law has expired. See
1 USC 109. Maybe I am just risk averse, but I would wait to build until midnight my time and I would definately not be posting a pic of my new build on ARFCOM before that time.