Actually, the post takes stats generated by a very, very small number of LAPD officers who went bad or were bad and slipped through the system and paints the entire department as bunch of criminals. Civilian CCW holders are by their nature, law-abiding and far less likely to engage in criminal activity. Criminals rarely apply for CCWs and few get them. It is also an unfortunate fact that some agencies are so strapped for personnel, that they have to be less "picky" about who they hire, and some agencies, like the DC police in the '90s, unknowingly hired at least one new recruit straight out of prison because their background investigations were seriously faulty.
Comparison of rogue police officers to a group CCW holders from states with relatively low violent crime rates and drawing the broad conclusion based on that limited and biased sample is as corrupt a manipulation of statistics as we constantly see from the anti-gun groups.
If you want to extend shall-issue CCW laws, then you need the support of law enforcement. You don't get that by insulting every honest cop around by throwing up manipulated stats and proclaiming CCW holders to be "safer" than police. CCW holders are far less likely to engage in violent, unlawful activity than the population as a whole. I, for one, believe that there should be a mandate that states create uniform shall-issue permit systems, and that those permits be honored in all 50 states. As a retired officer, I know that criminals fear armed, law-abiding citizens carrying concealed so much that they choose other, non-violent crimes to commit.
As a side note, in Florida, off-duty police officers who wish to carry a concealed weapon must get the same CCW as civilians. It would appear that "diss's" claimed stats can't be valid since the off-duty officers are by Florida law, among the group of CCW holders.