I'm amused by the term "reverse hate crime". We've been conditioned to think of a hate crime as one perpetrated by the majority caucasions against the minority negroes. So when the majority is assaulted, the direction is "reversed." Crime statistics clearly show more crimes committed by the minorities against the caucasions than vice versa. Shouldn't we start thinking in terms of hate crimes committed by caucasions as "reverse hate crimes?"
Posted: 12/21/2001 5:56:30 AM EDT
[#2]
Never put yourself into a position where it looks like you're crying:
"It's not fair! I want to be a victim, too!"
If people find it necessary to make their own weaknesses and victimhood the focus of their lives, who cares?
Not me.
Posted: 12/21/2001 6:04:54 AM EDT
[#3]
"reverse hate crimes" are just more hate crimes with a fancy name. hate is hate.
Posted: 12/21/2001 6:08:58 AM EDT
[#4]
Is that a "love" crime?
Posted: 12/21/2001 6:10:25 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted: "reverse hate crimes" are just more hate crimes with a fancy name. hate is hate.
View Quote
The "Correct Term" would be "CRIME IS CRIME"!!!
It does not matter what color against what color! OR What "Sexual orientation against another"! That is the LIBERAL bull crap that the general publics starts to beleive!