Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 6/4/2008 9:52:55 AM EDT
Hey,

Watch:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=OudveBP_Nso

See?  Don't you feel better?

Kevin ""
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 9:57:49 AM EDT
[#1]
McCain will go easy on Obama and lose.
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 9:59:06 AM EDT
[#2]

Quoted:
McCain will go easy on Obama and lose.


*cough* 527's *cough*

Kevin ""
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 10:03:42 AM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
McCain will go easy on Obama and lose.


Yep, he wants the 2 of them to travel together even. Just suck his dick why don't ya
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 10:04:17 AM EDT
[#4]
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 10:06:53 AM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:

Quoted:
McCain will go easy on Obama and lose.


Yep, he wants the 2 of them to travel together even. Just suck his dick why don't ya


I think McCain will destroy Obama, if he tries..
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 10:07:23 AM EDT
[#6]
In that case, we need to "Not go easy on Obama"
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 10:15:45 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:

Quoted:
McCain will go easy on Obama and lose.


Yep, he wants the 2 of them to travel together even. Just suck his dick why don't ya


You can't be that dense, can you?

Read the undertones...

That was a jab at Obama's idiocy on the issue of Iraq...

McCain was highlighting that he had been to Iraq since the surge several times, while Obama had not...

It was a 'Maybe you should join me on my next trip over there, you might actually get a clue as to what's going on' sort of remark...

Very well played for McCain...

P.S. 527s are the key to any modern campaign...

The candidate gets to sound positive, and to 'deny all knowledge of the actions of said organization'...

Meanwhile the dirt gets out anyway, because the 527 is 'not in any way connected with the candidate's campaign'...

527s will eat Obama for Lunch, regardless of what McCain says about their actions...
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 10:34:23 AM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
i136.photobucket.com/albums/q196/hewhoisapplauded/ObamaTaxMeMore.jpg


As opposed to the "tax stimulus" and nearly trillion dollars Bush has spent on Iraq. I wonder what we could've done in America with that money.
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 10:41:09 AM EDT
[#9]
we don't have an incumbent this time.
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 10:45:06 AM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:

Quoted:
i136.photobucket.com/albums/q196/hewhoisapplauded/ObamaTaxMeMore.jpg


As opposed to the "tax stimulus" and nearly trillion dollars Bush has spent on Iraq. I wonder what we could've done in America with that money.


Bad argument. Bush is not running. Compare Mcains with Obamas. Not that you would care, you love socialism. Bush didn't spend all that money all by himself. Your lovely Dems could cut him off but they don't.
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 11:32:55 AM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:
i136.photobucket.com/albums/q196/hewhoisapplauded/ObamaTaxMeMore.jpg


As opposed to the "tax stimulus" and nearly trillion dollars Bush has spent on Iraq. I wonder what we could've done in America with that money.


The federal government has no business spending that money 'In America'...

They *DO* have business spending it fighting a war overseas....
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 11:41:22 AM EDT
[#12]
let's see, Obama has 143 days of on the job training as a Senator...
McCain has 26 years.... plus over 1900 days as a POW...

Just who has more experience to be our next Pres?

God help us if the sheep vote Obama in.  Obama will make Jimmy Carter look like a decent president...
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 11:43:14 AM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
McCain will go easy on Obama and lose.


Yep, he wants the 2 of them to travel together even. Just suck his dick why don't ya


You can't be that dense, can you?

Read the undertones...

That was a jab at Obama's idiocy on the issue of Iraq...

McCain was highlighting that he had been to Iraq since the surge several times, while Obama had not...

It was a 'Maybe you should join me on my next trip over there, you might actually get a clue as to what's going on' sort of remark...

Very well played for McCain...

P.S. 527s are the key to any modern campaign...

The candidate gets to sound positive, and to 'deny all knowledge of the actions of said organization'...

Meanwhile the dirt gets out anyway, because the 527 is 'not in any way connected with the candidate's campaign'...

527s will eat Obama for Lunch, regardless of what McCain says about their actions...


Yep.  Lets see if the armchair politicians remember what happened to Mrs. Clinton when she went negative on Obama.  This isn't an argument on ARFCOM that McCain is trying to work, this is an election - and right or wrong, going negative on Obama will be seen in racial terms.
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 11:54:47 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:

Yep.  Lets see if the armchair politicians remember what happened to Mrs. Clinton when she went negative on Obama.  This isn't an argument on ARFCOM that McCain is trying to work, this is an election - and right or wrong, going negative on Obama will be seen in racial terms.


Oh so what? Obama get a free pass?

Screw that it can't be racial anyways Obama is not a Black man he is of mixed race. You can't be prejudice against one half of somebody.

We shouldn't let him play the race card.
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 12:02:15 PM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
i136.photobucket.com/albums/q196/hewhoisapplauded/ObamaTaxMeMore.jpg


As opposed to the "tax stimulus" and nearly trillion dollars Bush has spent on Iraq. I wonder what we could've done in America with that money.


Bad argument. Bush is not running. Compare Mcains with Obamas. Not that you would care, you love socialism. Bush didn't spend all that money all by himself. Your lovely Dems could cut him off but they don't.


Calling me names isn't going to make your argument any better and yes, the Dems are certainly a huge part of the problem. I think they're spineless for not standing up more to his out of control spending. It's one of the reasons I don't like either party.
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 12:09:08 PM EDT
[#16]

Originally Posted By badfish274

Yep.  Lets see if the armchair politicians remember what happened to Mrs. Clinton when she went negative on Obama.  This isn't an argument on ARFCOM that McCain is trying to work, this is an election - and right or wrong, going negative on Obama will be seen in racial terms.


How many primaries Obama win lately… Clinton went negative and it largely worked her problem was she went negative to late.
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 12:20:49 PM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:

Originally Posted By badfish274

Yep.  Lets see if the armchair politicians remember what happened to Mrs. Clinton when she went negative on Obama.  This isn't an argument on ARFCOM that McCain is trying to work, this is an election - and right or wrong, going negative on Obama will be seen in racial terms.


How many primaries Obama win lately… Clinton went negative and it largely worked her problem was she went negative to late.


Thats true.  This is certainly going to be an interesting election, no doubt about that.
Link Posted: 6/4/2008 12:32:17 PM EDT
[#18]
Mmmmmmm Michelle Malkin
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top