If you were Six Flags? Would you turn away sex offenders...even if the crime happened 19 years ago and they were "reformed"
Six Flags Turns Away Sex Offenders
Linky(05.19.05- AP) — Bob Levan bought season passes to Six Flags Great America for his daughters and their best friend, but he's worried that he won't be able to ride the roller coasters with them because he's a convicted sex offender. Six Flags added wording on the back of season passes to all 30 of its U.S. amusement parks this year stating it reserves the right to refuse entry to anyone convicted of a sex crime or required to register as a sex offender, though it has no plans to check every person entering the park.
One of Levan's two daughters first saw the words about two weeks after he bought the tickets online, and she was visibly upsejavascript:document.frm.submit();
Submitt, he said. "My 13 year-old girl read this on the back of the pass and said, 'Now daddy, does this mean you can never take me to Great America?"' Levan said. "I am 350 percent for protecting children, and that just bugs me."
Debbie Nauser, a spokeswoman for Oklahoma City-based Six Flags, said the wording provides "an extra level of protection" for park visitors. Asked why the change was made this year, Nauser insisted the company was simply responding to legal advice. "We were advised by our outside attorneys that it was advisable to add that language and that it was perfectly within our right to do so," Nauser said.
Six Flags drew attention in 2000 when a 19 year-old ride operator at Great America was sentenced to four years in prison for molesting three young girls while strapping them into Yogi Bear's Yahoo River boat ride. The arrest prompted a lawsuit that resulted in $1.4 million payments to two of the victims.
U.S. amusement parks have long restricted what guests can bring into the park and reserved the right to toss out anyone caught misbehaving, but specifically reserving the right to prohibit convicted sex offenders from even setting foot inside an amusement park is unusual.
Opponents say it illustrates the day-to-day obstacles recovering sex offenders face after they've been convicted. Levan was convicted of molesting an 8 year-old relative when he was 16 years old. He served a brief jail sentence and underwent treatment in a mental health facility.
Now 35, the divorced information technology worker is trying to raise a family in a northern suburb of Chicago. He has come to terms with having the stigma of being a convicted sex offender, but he questions why the language is needed if amusement parks like Great America in Gurnee already have the authority to remove people for criminal or otherwise questionable behavior. "If anything, it is making them more liable. They are basically saying they've created a sex offender-free environment," Levan said. "I understand we are in a litigious society and people like to sue for no reason, but stupid wording like that is not going to protect someone from a lawsuit."
Illinois Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers President Andrea D. Lyon said the language does more harm than good because it sends the message that the offenders are social outcasts despite whatever steps they might have taken to rehabilitate themselves. "It just seems to me that, to some degree, it's public grandstanding to make people feel like Six Flags is safe: We can send our kids there because they are going to throw out the sex offenders," Lyon said. "If they are not going to do a background check on everyone walking through the door, what's the point?"
Six Flags is the first chain of U.S. amusement parks to specifically state on its passes or tickets that sex offenders can be denied entry or removed, said Beth Robertson, a spokeswoman for the International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions. Robertson said all of the parks have policies generally stating they can remove anyone who exhibits unsafe behavior. "They have always had that right, so this is not anything really different," she said. "All it does is really clarify their language."
Six Flags performs background checks on employees but not season pass holders, Nauser said. Park visitors seen acting inappropriately, however, could be subject to a background check under the new policy. "We're no different than your local mall or local venue where families come to have some form of entertainment. We welcome thousands of guests every day and it's just a way to have an extra level of protection," she said.
This is not the first time questions have been raised about a Six Flags security policy. Last year, the company agreed to pay $5.6 million to settle a class-action lawsuit filed in 2001 by minority parkgoers who alleged they were subjected to racial profiling and improperly searched under an anti-gang policy. Six Flags admitted no wrongdoing in the case.
This time, recovering sex offenders like Levan say Six Flags' policy helps foster a culture of discrimination that makes potential repeat offenders reluctant to register with local authorities. "The guys who have convictions aren't the ones you have to worry about, it's the ones who aren't on the books," Levan said. "It's the guys who are pre-conviction who are the most dangerous because they are still active."