I would vote for number 2 as the better one of the two posters in regards to my personal preference and the poster's concept. The only slight problem is that usually people would transpose somebody's head on another body that is [u]totally[/u] different to maybe poke fun. IMO Well, at least here on AR15.com!
If you look at Ed in the first picture, that guy is already muscular! Check out his guns, and I don't mean the rifles in his hands, but the size of his biceps and chest! I see what McUZI meant by Ed looking like a monster! Now go back to picture # 2, transposing his head on Arnold's body almost looks like Ed just wearing a tactical vest and nothing was done [u]if[/u] the image of Ed's head was smoothly integrated on Arnold's body with no noticeable photo manipulation. Yeah, I know Arnold is more muscular, but just a tad more. Ha Ha Just my opinion and observation. [:)]
[b][u]Note to self:[/u][/b]
Don't ever get on Ed's bad side! [pissed]
BTW, TAC-GIRL, good to see you did not leave us forever! Good to hear from you. [:)]
[b]-RoadDog[/b]
[img]http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/Gif/scooby1.gif[/img]