User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 2:54:31 AM EDT
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 2:57:19 AM EDT
[#1]
Not guilty, let me fuck her for her crimes. JUSTICE!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 2:57:49 AM EDT
[#2]
Depicting herself on Facebook as a coquettish housewife given to seductive, come-hither poses, Perdue admitted to police that she took up her online child porn hobby in 1999 and spent time downloading files every day. Investigators found a cache of disturbing images on Perdue’s computer, including photographs of very young children being raped by fully grown adults of both genders. How in the f*&^ can this even be construed as a hobby is beyond me. Hopefully, her prison stay will be most unpleasant. And I don't care how hot she is, she's guilty on this one. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:03:11 AM EDT
[#3]
From the article:
"She is not charged with actually creating child porn. Court documents never make clear whether she sold any of the images, or simply collected and traded them with other kiddie porn enthusiasts. Experts estimate that the sale of sexually graphic images of children brings in $50 billion per year worldwide." WTF!!?? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:06:59 AM EDT
[#4]
Well, like my Mom said years ago when I thought my next store neighbor might be running a "House" upstairs.
"Work at Home"! Quoted:
From the article: "She is not charged with actually creating child porn. Court documents never make clear whether she sold any of the images, or simply collected and traded them with other kiddie porn enthusiasts. Experts estimate that the sale of sexually graphic images of children brings in $50 billion per year worldwide." WTF!!?? I don't know if the figure is correct or not but I'm not surprised by it. Usually, when things are illegal and the dealings are under the table, it will be more costly, regardless of what is being traded. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ("Welcome to our Branch Office"--title, (w,stte), "Hawaii 5 0") |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:09:30 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well, like my Mom said years ago when I thought my next store neighbor might be running a "House" upstairs. "Work at Home"! ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ("Welcome to our Branch Office"--title, (w,stte), "Hawaii 5 0") Please adjust your meds. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:10:31 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well, like my Mom said years ago when I thought my next store neighbor might be running a "House" upstairs. "Work at Home"! I don't know if the figure is correct or not but I'm not surprised by it. Usually, when things are illegal and the dealings are under the table, it will be more costly, regardless of what is being traded. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ("Welcome to our Branch Office"--title, (w,stte), "Hawaii 5 0") Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well, like my Mom said years ago when I thought my next store neighbor might be running a "House" upstairs. "Work at Home"! Quoted:
From the article: "She is not charged with actually creating child porn. Court documents never make clear whether she sold any of the images, or simply collected and traded them with other kiddie porn enthusiasts. Experts estimate that the sale of sexually graphic images of children brings in $50 billion per year worldwide." WTF!!?? I don't know if the figure is correct or not but I'm not surprised by it. Usually, when things are illegal and the dealings are under the table, it will be more costly, regardless of what is being traded. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ("Welcome to our Branch Office"--title, (w,stte), "Hawaii 5 0") Yeah, but $50 BILLION!!?? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:12:30 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How in the f*&^ can this even be construed as a hobby is beyond me. Hopefully, her prison stay will be most unpleasant. And I don't care how hot she is, she's guilty on this one. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Depicting herself on Facebook as a coquettish housewife given to seductive, come-hither poses, Perdue admitted to police that she took up her online child porn hobby in 1999 and spent time downloading files every day. Investigators found a cache of disturbing images on Perdue’s computer, including photographs of very young children being raped by fully grown adults of both genders. How in the f*&^ can this even be construed as a hobby is beyond me. Hopefully, her prison stay will be most unpleasant. And I don't care how hot she is, she's guilty on this one. Ed Gein once took up a "wearing other people's skin" hobby. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:13:24 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeah, but $50 BILLION!!?? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Well, like my Mom said years ago when I thought my next store neighbor might be running a "House" upstairs. "Work at Home"! Quoted:
From the article: "She is not charged with actually creating child porn. Court documents never make clear whether she sold any of the images, or simply collected and traded them with other kiddie porn enthusiasts. Experts estimate that the sale of sexually graphic images of children brings in $50 billion per year worldwide." WTF!!?? I don't know if the figure is correct or not but I'm not surprised by it. Usually, when things are illegal and the dealings are under the table, it will be more costly, regardless of what is being traded. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ("Welcome to our Branch Office"--title, (w,stte), "Hawaii 5 0") Yeah, but $50 BILLION!!?? I wonder how they arrive at that figure. I mean I realize that outside the US it can often be traded freely, but those kinds of places aren't exactly swimming in cash. Silk Road? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:15:12 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
.......... I wonder how they arrive at that figure. I mean I realize that outside the US it can often be traded freely, but those kinds of places aren't exactly swimming in cash. Silk Road? Yeah, maybe it is way overvalued like they do with drug busts? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:31:37 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeah, maybe it is way overvalued like they do with drug busts? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
.......... I wonder how they arrive at that figure. I mean I realize that outside the US it can often be traded freely, but those kinds of places aren't exactly swimming in cash. Silk Road? Yeah, maybe it is way overvalued like they do with drug busts? Or maybe it is using a grand scale of things to reach that number, such as those children who are trafficked to be used in such things. Or perhaps they are estimating in the various illegal markets turnovers such as when a person steals artifacts from a burial ground to sell and then use that money to buy drugs (an example). Just speculating, mind you. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ (After being showed the menu that lists.....weapons, "This fare is too rich for our palete!"--Colonel Rhodes, (w,stte), "Uncommon Valor") |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:32:28 AM EDT
[#11]
Could be Snow.
Maybe they are doubling up so to speak because that number does seem REAL high to me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:36:43 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Could be Snow. I don't think so, she wouldn't be able to post from jail. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:41:50 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't think so, she wouldn't be able to post from jail. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Could be Snow. I don't think so, she wouldn't be able to post from jail. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Clever retort to an ambiguous comment? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:43:04 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Clever retort to an ambiguous comment? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Could be Snow. I don't think so, she wouldn't be able to post from jail. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Clever retort to an ambiguous comment? 
I meant Snow could be right in her speculation!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:52:31 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I meant Snow could be right in her speculation!! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Could be, Snow. I don't think so, she wouldn't be able to post from jail. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Clever retort to an ambiguous comment?
I meant Snow could be right in her speculation!! "I'll take commas for 1000, Alex." |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:54:41 AM EDT
[#16]
Her husband is a lawyer.
He'll probably get a better divorce settlement with his wife in prison... but that's just a coincidence, I'm sure. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:55:23 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
................. "I'll take commas for 1000, Alex."
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:58:11 AM EDT
[#18]
not terribly bad looking. I'd need a video of her for final judgment.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 3:59:25 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I wonder how they arrive at that figure. I mean I realize that outside the US it can often be traded freely, but those kinds of places aren't exactly swimming in cash. Silk Road? I think they're being a bit ridiculous with that number. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:00:05 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Her husband is a lawyer. He'll probably get a better divorce settlement with his wife in prison... but that's just a coincidence, I'm sure. Did you miss the part where she confessed and said she'd been doing this for years? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:01:43 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"I'll take commas for 1000, Alex." Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Could be, Snow. I don't think so, she wouldn't be able to post from jail. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Clever retort to an ambiguous comment?
I meant Snow could be right in her speculation!! "I'll take commas for 1000, Alex." Yep. One little comma makes the difference between agreeing with someone or accusing them of being into kiddie porn. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:06:03 AM EDT
[#22]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:06:12 AM EDT
[#23]
Either the activity is getting more popular or the police are finally able to track these people better. We have had 3 arrests recently in one very small town. One was a father and son that got busted and the other was a local .gov employee that got caught using a county computer.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:10:40 AM EDT
[#24]
$50 Billion?
 
One Problem I have with this whole Sex Offender thing is they classify people as a Sex Offender and say they had child porn.. what if the offender is looking at pictures of girls who have large breasts and grass on the field.. BUT they happen to be 17 years old? Should these 'offenders' be put in the same group as those who are looking at pictures of little girls who are you know undeveloped.. not even remotely looking like a woman yet... I'm just saying my dick was programmed to be aroused by female parts... it cannot distinguish between ages.. it just says either it looks like a woman or it doesn't.. now my brain says make sure she is LEGAL.. but I'm so old now that I don't date girls that young anyways... but I just don't like how they group these people all into one category because I see a HUGE difference in a girl that is underage who is developed and one who is underage and is also basically an infant or child physically speaking.. that's just straight up SICK in the head. I've seen girls at age 12 who are more developed than my 30+ XGF was...I think studies have shown that girls are developing at younger ages now than in the past |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:11:55 AM EDT
[#25]
She missed her calling as a high school teacher.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:21:14 AM EDT
[#26]
Those are all classic fat girl photo angles. I am guessing BMI 25+ in addition to being a sick fucking excuse for a human being.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:22:18 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: She missed her calling as a high school teacher. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:23:26 AM EDT
[#28]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:27:15 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryStill guilty |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:27:19 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Either the activity is getting more popular or the police are finally able to track these people better. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Either the activity is getting more popular or the police are finally able to track these people better. On any given day there are tens of thousands of people sharing illegal CP content through any number of methods. IRC chat rooms, certain forums at specific times of the day, and other methods pose a moving target. From the looks of things this woman had a habit of using some sort of file sharing program (I can only assume it was some form of bit torrent, perhaps an IRC client) that landed her in the same place at the same time with an investigator looking for people trading illegal content. Likely she had little technical sophistication and didn't grasp that she was probably advertising her IP to anyone she was trading content with. Once the investigator has that, it's not hard to get a warrant. The police stumbled on her by accident. At this point the police are still only catching the stupid ones. We have had 3 arrests recently in one very small town. One was a father and son that got busted and the other was a local .gov employee that got caught using a county computer. Like I said: The stupid ones. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:27:54 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: $50 Billion? One Problem I have with this whole Sex Offender thing is they classify people as a Sex Offender and say they had child porn.. what if the offender is looking at pictures of girls who have large breasts and grass on the field.. BUT they happen to be 17 years old? Should these 'offenders' be put in the same group as those who are looking at pictures of little girls who are you know undeveloped.. not even remotely looking like a woman yet... I'm just saying my dick was programmed to be aroused by female parts... it cannot distinguish between ages.. it just says either it looks like a woman or it doesn't.. now my brain says make sure she is LEGAL.. but I'm so old now that I don't date girls that young anyways... but I just don't like how they group these people all into one category because I see a HUGE difference in a girl that is underage who is developed and one who is underage and is also basically an infant or child physically speaking.. that's just straight up SICK in the head. I've seen girls at age 12 who are more developed than my 30+ XGF was...I think studies have shown that girls are developing at younger ages now than in the past |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:29:12 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not guilty, let me fuck her for her crimes. JUSTICE! Well it's obvious you don't have kids. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:29:59 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
$50 Billion?
One Problem I have with this whole Sex Offender thing is they classify people as a Sex Offender and say they had child porn.. what if the offender is looking at pictures of girls who have large breasts and grass on the field.. BUT they happen to be 17 years old? Should these 'offenders' be put in the same group as those who are looking at pictures of little girls who are you know undeveloped.. not even remotely looking like a woman yet... I'm just saying my dick was programmed to be aroused by female parts... it cannot distinguish between ages.. it just says either it looks like a woman or it doesn't.. now my brain says make sure she is LEGAL.. but I'm so old now that I don't date girls that young anyways... but I just don't like how they group these people all into one category because I see a HUGE difference in a girl that is underage who is developed and one who is underage and is also basically an infant or child physically speaking.. that's just straight up SICK in the head. I've seen girls at age 12 who are more developed than my 30+ XGF was...I think studies have shown that girls are developing at younger ages now than in the past WTF did I just read?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:33:20 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
$50 Billion?
One Problem I have with this whole Sex Offender thing is they classify people as a Sex Offender and say they had child porn.. what if the offender is looking at pictures of girls who have large breasts and grass on the field.. BUT they happen to be 17 years old? I've never heard of anyone being prosecuted for a Traci Lords video. There's a good reason for that. Most of you have never actually seen child pornography, so I can understand how you might not understand how this works. CP cases are not being made on 17 year old victims who look fully grown, at least not until some retarded prosecutors decided to have a zero tolerance policy on sexting by minors. The most popular articles of child pornography are "Vicky" videos, a series of tapes made by a police officer who was ritually sexually abusing his 10 year old daughter, Kylie Freeman. If you saw the videos you would instantly recognize that the girl was nowhere near being a consenting adult, and that she was under the influence of some form of intoxicant. That's the shit CP freaks are into trading. Sometimes worse. A ring of CP traders actually had a contest going to see who could assault the youngest victim. The winner was a dude who posted video of himself raping an infant. As for the rest of what you typed...Jesus H. Christ. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:34:39 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yeah, but $50 BILLION!!?? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Well, like my Mom said years ago when I thought my next store neighbor might be running a "House" upstairs. "Work at Home"! Quoted: From the article: "She is not charged with actually creating child porn. Court documents never make clear whether she sold any of the images, or simply collected and traded them with other kiddie porn enthusiasts. Experts estimate that the sale of sexually graphic images of children brings in $50 billion per year worldwide." WTF!!?? I don't know if the figure is correct or not but I'm not surprised by it. Usually, when things are illegal and the dealings are under the table, it will be more costly, regardless of what is being traded. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ("Welcome to our Branch Office"--title, (w,stte), "Hawaii 5 0") Yeah, but $50 BILLION!!?? Most of this occurs on the Darknet. Older and fouler things than orcs live in the deep places of the world. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:39:10 AM EDT
[#36]
The white rhino.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:42:54 AM EDT
[#37]
stupid old twat
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:44:03 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I've never heard of anyone being prosecuted for a Traci Lords video. ....... Quote HistoryQuoted:
I've never heard of anyone being prosecuted for a Traci Lords video. ....... I have. In Lords' book, "Underneath it All", there is mention of a subpena where someone tried to sell some tapes to an undercover officer. Of course, this was back in the 80's so in the current era, perhaps not.....but even that is certainly not the kind of thing I would take a risk on. Quoted:
On any given day there are tens of thousands of people sharing illegal CP content through any number of methods. IRC chat rooms, certain forums at specific times of the day, and other methods pose a moving target. From the looks of things this woman had a habit of using some sort of file sharing program (I can only assume it was some form of bit torrent, perhaps an IRC client) that landed her in the same place at the same time with an investigator looking for people trading illegal content. Likely she had little technical sophistication and didn't grasp that she was probably advertising her IP to anyone she was trading content with. Once the investigator has that, it's not hard to get a warrant. The police stumbled on her by accident. At this point the police are still only catching the stupid ones. Wow, I would hate to come across that "by accident". Occassionally, one of our departments will use some of us to look for leaks on the Internet. Ie, someone who doesn't have their information secured who should have it secured. That would be very nerve wracking if I came across such ESPECIALLY if it was a more secure site that had a leak. It's one thing when one is a dedicated investigator assigned to those tasks but when you are the little one doing what is suppose to be a little one job, there are just some "big busts" you don't want to make. That kind of discovery, who knows who might piss off, is certainly the kind of thing that you want the big guns behind you. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ("Oh, Doktor, there is no reason to beat up on the little guy. G Section may not be as important to the project as your work were, but we do have our assigned tasks."--007 impersonating Hans Hergenscheimer, (w,stte), "Diamonds are Forever") |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:46:53 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
$50 Billion?
One Problem I have with this whole Sex Offender thing is they classify people as a Sex Offender and say they had child porn.. what if the offender is looking at pictures of girls who have large breasts and grass on the field.. BUT they happen to be 17 years old? Should these 'offenders' be put in the same group as those who are looking at pictures of little girls who are you know undeveloped.. not even remotely looking like a woman yet... I'm just saying my dick was programmed to be aroused by female parts... it cannot distinguish between ages.. it just says either it looks like a woman or it doesn't.. now my brain says make sure she is LEGAL.. but I'm so old now that I don't date girls that young anyways... but I just don't like how they group these people all into one category because I see a HUGE difference in a girl that is underage who is developed and one who is underage and is also basically an infant or child physically speaking.. that's just straight up SICK in the head. I've seen girls at age 12 who are more developed than my 30+ XGF was...I think studies have shown that girls are developing at younger ages now than in the past And the apologist has made an appearance. There's always one in these threads. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 4:53:35 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Either the activity is getting more popular or the police are finally able to track these people better. We have had 3 arrests recently in one very small town. One was a father and son that got busted and the other was a local .gov employee that got caught using a county computer. Imagine what will happen, when the public figures out they have known about all these people all along, but didn't reveal them because they couldn't get an "anonymous tip" for leverage to the LEOs. "What can we tip on this?" "Not seeing any angle" "Ok, not contacting LEO then, what's old mamma Soviet doing today?" "Making cookies for her dog" "Again? She must have a fat dog." NSA has to tip out all the stuff they can to make this a statistical blip of lots of busts rather than "got caught holding a long list of pedos and did nothing about it" prison time.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 5:00:41 AM EDT
[#41]
Damn....I saw her pic and she is a dead ringer for an ex gf...same age, same face shape...girl had reddish brown hair, was a little freaky but got hooked up in a cult and lost it so not a socialite....brings back some memories
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 5:19:03 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The NSA knows about all these people. Imagine what will happen, when the public figures out they have known about all these people all along, but didn't reveal them because they couldn't get an "anonymous tip" for leverage to the LEOs. "What can we tip on this?" "Not seeing any angle" "Ok, not contacting LEO then, what's old mamma Soviet doing today?" "Making cookies for her dog" "Again? She must have a fat dog." NSA has to tip out all the stuff they can to make this a statistical blip of lots of busts rather than "got caught holding a long list of pedos and did nothing about it" prison time. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Either the activity is getting more popular or the police are finally able to track these people better. We have had 3 arrests recently in one very small town. One was a father and son that got busted and the other was a local .gov employee that got caught using a county computer. Imagine what will happen, when the public figures out they have known about all these people all along, but didn't reveal them because they couldn't get an "anonymous tip" for leverage to the LEOs. "What can we tip on this?" "Not seeing any angle" "Ok, not contacting LEO then, what's old mamma Soviet doing today?" "Making cookies for her dog" "Again? She must have a fat dog." NSA has to tip out all the stuff they can to make this a statistical blip of lots of busts rather than "got caught holding a long list of pedos and did nothing about it" prison time. The NSA doesn't give a shit about child porn. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 5:24:54 AM EDT
[#43]
The NSA doesn't give a shit about child porn. Unless it is a Congressman or Congresswoman on the approiations committee..... |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 5:40:07 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: $50 Billion? One Problem I have with this whole Sex Offender thing is they classify people as a Sex Offender and say they had child porn.. what if the offender is looking at pictures of girls who have large breasts and grass on the field.. BUT they happen to be 17 years old? Should these 'offenders' be put in the same group as those who are looking at pictures of little girls who are you know undeveloped.. not even remotely looking like a woman yet... I'm just saying my dick was programmed to be aroused by female parts... it cannot distinguish between ages.. it just says either it looks like a woman or it doesn't.. now my brain says make sure she is LEGAL.. but I'm so old now that I don't date girls that young anyways... but I just don't like how they group these people all into one category because I see a HUGE difference in a girl that is underage who is developed and one who is underage and is also basically an infant or child physically speaking.. that's just straight up SICK in the head. I've seen girls at age 12 who are more developed than my 30+ XGF was...I think studies have shown that girls are developing at younger ages now than in the past Fucking 13'r. And I guess we could take that a couple different ways from that post |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 5:45:45 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
WTF did I just read?
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
$50 Billion?
One Problem I have with this whole Sex Offender thing is they classify people as a Sex Offender and say they had child porn.. what if the offender is looking at pictures of girls who have large breasts and grass on the field.. BUT they happen to be 17 years old? Should these 'offenders' be put in the same group as those who are looking at pictures of little girls who are you know undeveloped.. not even remotely looking like a woman yet... I'm just saying my dick was programmed to be aroused by female parts... it cannot distinguish between ages.. it just says either it looks like a woman or it doesn't.. now my brain says make sure she is LEGAL.. but I'm so old now that I don't date girls that young anyways... but I just don't like how they group these people all into one category because I see a HUGE difference in a girl that is underage who is developed and one who is underage and is also basically an infant or child physically speaking.. that's just straight up SICK in the head. I've seen girls at age 12 who are more developed than my 30+ XGF was...I think studies have shown that girls are developing at younger ages now than in the past WTF did I just read?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 5:50:58 AM EDT
[#46]
She had a good idea with that suicide. She should keep trying. Eta If at first you don't succeed, try try again.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 5:52:25 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
$50 Billion?
One Problem I have with this whole Sex Offender thing is they classify people as a Sex Offender and say they had child porn.. what if the offender is looking at pictures of girls who have large breasts and grass on the field.. BUT they happen to be 17 years old? Should these 'offenders' be put in the same group as those who are looking at pictures of little girls who are you know undeveloped.. not even remotely looking like a woman yet... I'm just saying my dick was programmed to be aroused by female parts... it cannot distinguish between ages.. it just says either it looks like a woman or it doesn't.. now my brain says make sure she is LEGAL.. but I'm so old now that I don't date girls that young anyways... but I just don't like how they group these people all into one category because I see a HUGE difference in a girl that is underage who is developed and one who is underage and is also basically an infant or child physically speaking.. that's just straight up SICK in the head. I've seen girls at age 12 who are more developed than my 30+ XGF was...I think studies have shown that girls are developing at younger ages now than in the past 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 5:55:10 AM EDT
[#48]
Those shots look disturbingly similar to one of my wife's former friends who turned into a crazy bitch and accused me of stalking her online.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 5:55:37 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Those shots look disturbingly similar to one of my wife's former friends who turned into a crazy bitch and accused me of stalking her online. In. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2013 6:06:31 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
WTF did I just read?
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
$50 Billion?
One Problem I have with this whole Sex Offender thing is they classify people as a Sex Offender and say they had child porn.. what if the offender is looking at pictures of girls who have large breasts and grass on the field.. BUT they happen to be 17 years old? Should these 'offenders' be put in the same group as those who are looking at pictures of little girls who are you know undeveloped.. not even remotely looking like a woman yet... I'm just saying my dick was programmed to be aroused by female parts... it cannot distinguish between ages.. it just says either it looks like a woman or it doesn't.. now my brain says make sure she is LEGAL.. but I'm so old now that I don't date girls that young anyways... but I just don't like how they group these people all into one category because I see a HUGE difference in a girl that is underage who is developed and one who is underage and is also basically an infant or child physically speaking.. that's just straight up SICK in the head. I've seen girls at age 12 who are more developed than my 30+ XGF was...I think studies have shown that girls are developing at younger ages now than in the past WTF did I just read?
x2
|
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
