Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 59
Posted: 2/4/2012 6:47:55 PM EST
[Last Edit: BurnedOutLEO]
Lately in GD we have had two different board members find themselves looking down the barrel of a gun along with the GF of another ARFCOMMER in street robberies. Also Blitz308 got shot all to pieces last year.

While many say it is better to be lucky than good, no one is lucky every time. In this post I am going to attempt to provide some insight into street encounters. Other may have different viewpoints. I am not here to argue. I will say some of the comments I have seen posted in the threads about this sort of matter make me realize that while some ARFCOMMERS are clearly street veterans others are not. This is really for those who are not.

Background

 First, my info. I worked in the street of one of America's most violent, dangerous cities for 15 years. I usually worked in the worst part of that city. I spent 15 years in patrol. I liked patrol. It was wild. Most of the time I worked in areas covered in ghetto. By that I mean large housing projects combined with run down slum housing. I have worked all shifts. Later I became an investigator including a robbery investigator. I have spent countless hours in interrogation rooms talking to hold up men. I know them. I am still an investigator but have quit playing the Robbery game because my family was starting to forget what I looked like.

The Enemy

 Some may object to me calling hold up men "the enemy". You can call them whatever you like. I can assure you however they are as deadly an enemy as you will find anywhere but the battlefield. Even many soldiers probably lack the viciousness and utter disregard for life most hold up men possess.

 No one wakes up in the morning one day and decides to become an armed robber. It is a gradual process that  requires some experience and desensitizing. Before a man will pick up a gun and threaten to kill people who have done him no harm in order to get their usually meager possessions he has to get  comfortable with some things.

 He has to get used to seeing others as objects for him to exploit. He has to accept he may be killed while robbing. He has to accept the felony conviction for Robbery will haunt him all his life. He has to accept he may need to kill a completely innocent person  to get away with his crime.

 This is a process that starts with stealing candy at the corner store as a child. It progresses through bigger property crimes that may also involve violence. But one day G gets tired of selling his stolen property for nothing and decides it would be better to steal cash. Cut out all that tiresome sales stuff.


Keep in mind many petty thieves, auto burglars, residential and commercial burglars, paper thieves, and hustlers will get to that point and decide not to become armed robbers. Most will. It is a special group of outliers who decide threatening to kill people for a few dollars is the way to go.

Once a man starts armed robbing he has crossed a line most won't. Don't forget that when you are looking these bastards in the eye. Their decision to kill you is already made. Your life means nothing to him. Only his does. His sole motivation for not killing you is he doesn't want a murder case. He has already accepted he may pick one up though.

We hunt hold up men around the clock once they are identified. We send teams of fire breathing fence jumper/door kickers to find them. We will bring their mother to the office and convince her she is going to jail if we don't have Junior in our office in an hour. We have her call her son crying hysterically for him to turn himself in before she is arrested and held without bond as a material witness and her home seized for harboring him. Most of the time they won't. Fuck their own momma.

We will hit all Juniors friends and family's houses. We make it so no one will harbor him. He is so hot no one will let him in their house or even talk on the phone with him. We put money on him so he knows he is right to be betrayed and set up. We do this because of one thing.

That thing is they WILL kill someone if they keep robbing. That is why the city is willing to pay all the overtime. They don't want the murders. Think about that when you see Junior coming. The more robberies he does the closer he is to killing someone. Maybe you.

The guys who hit you on the street are gang members. They are Gangster Disciples, Vice Lords, Crips, Sureonos, many others. They do not see themselves as part of society. The street is all they know. They don't expect to live long or stay out of prison. They take a delight in your fear and suffering. They are warped individuals for the most part. They can be extremely dangerous.

One time we were locking up a hold up man and having a conversation about how they target their victims. I was saying they pick easy ones, another guy was saying they preferred easy ones but would take anybody.

I pointed out a uniform Officer there was an NFL size guy to that hold up man. Frankly the dude was a monster. I asked hold up man if he would rob him. He said "If I needed the money".





You

Chances are good you are a law abiding person except for maybe a little light weed smoking and maybe driving a little drunk every once in a while. Most of your life you have been taught to be nice and don't point guns at people. You are the exact opposite of your enemy who was taught just the opposite. Remember a lot of street life is like prison life. Who's the man is everything. Violence is the currency of the street.

You do not possess total disregard for the lives of others and do not want to kill anyone. You are concerned about the ramifications of shooting someone. Your family, your possessions and finances on the line. Your enemy has none of these concerns.

The laws that keep you from carrying your gun in bars or where ever mean nothing to your enemy. Your reluctance to shoot someone works to is advantage. His greater experience in street violence and the element of surprise is on his side.

Everyone should call their local FBI office and get a copy of Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted. When it first came out it was ground breaking because it demonstrated to academics and other elites what street police knew all along. What did it show in interviews with cop killers? Nice guys finish dead. That's right. Most of those offenders commented that the Officer they killed set himself up to be killed because of reluctance to use force early in the encounter.

You can probably find it on line now. A lot of the victim Officers were a lot like a lot of other people, normal people. They were the opposite of their enemy.

Am I advocating becoming the enemy? No. I am saying the person who is robbing you has certain traits, attitudes, and background. That is all.

Dynamics of Encounters

 
Hold up men target victims on the street in an impulsive, opportunistic manner. They see someone and make a quick judgment call on whether to rob them. The time between when you are targeted and they are on you isn't long. Therefore, situational awareness is everything.

If you see G coming you are in good shape. If you don't you will be the victim who says "He came out of nowhere". No he didn't. There are many tricks to watching out but simply watching your back is the main thing. Watch your back. If you do it enough it becomes second nature and you won't even realize you are doing it.

Watching out is great but unfortunately many self defense courses stop there. You have parked you car in a well lit area, are aware of your surroundings, and looky here, here comes three guys across the parking lot and they start to kind of fan out.

When you lock eyes with G the very first thing you need to do it indicate you have a weapon. It doesn't matter if you do or not. If you are a woman put your gun hand in your purse and keep it there. If you are a man fan your shirt or coat tail with your gun hand. Make it clear to dude you are mentally prepared to draw and making sure your gun is clear. This will many times result in an about face by dude. It is the single best robbery avoidance tactic IMHO.

Not long ago I was walking down the sidewalk in my town to go get my car. I was holding a folding chair in my gun hand. A car slow rolled past me with 4 heads in it. The guys in the back seat turned around as they went by looking at me. They went a little farther and U turned in the street.

Here they come back. As they started to slow down I looked at them with as contemptuous a look as I could muster and switched the chair to my left hand and flicked my shirt tail with my right hand. They just drove on mad dogging me.

In another case I was at a Christmas party and walked a girl to her car about 3 am. As we said our good-byes two guys were walking across the parking lot. One went behind a dumpster. I though he was peeing. He came out from behind the dumpster with a bottle.

As they got closer I stepped clear of that girl and unzipped my jacket at those two guys. When I did the guy threw down the bottle and they walked by cussing at me. If someone challenges you after you indicate you are armed say "I don't have a gun". Then they will know you do.

Here is an opposite story. A girl my brother knows was walking her dog when a guy approached her. She was polite. Mistake. He talked to her about the dog and said she had pretty hair and reached out and touched her hair. She did not slap his hand down or aggressively object. Mistake. He asked her if her dog bit and she said "No". At that time he slapped the shit out of her, drug her into a wooded area, and raped her.

The answer in the street is always "No". Can I ask you something? No. Do you have a cigarette? No. Can you tell me what time it is? No. The answer is always "No". Don't be nice. Stop the encounter as soon as it starts.

When to draw

Despite warnings I often see on the Net I have yet to encounter an instance in which a hold up man called the police to report his intended victim threatened to shoot him. Thugs do not want to come into contact with the police. They may already be wanted or realize chances are good they have been identified in a recent robbery. Or what ever. They are not going to call the police if you draw on them.



Supposed two guys are approaching you in a parking lot and do the classic fan out maneuver. You indicate you have a weapon by clearing your gun hand and fanning your jacket at them. They are not discouraged. DRAW!

I am not saying you should pull your gun out, assume a Weaver stance, and scream "That's close enough motherfuckers!" What I am saying is draw your gun and hold it beside your leg as you start to move to cover. I am very fond of telephone poles. Anything will do though. They will see this. They will remember they have to be somewhere else. They will not call the police.

Then you can just put your gun back in the holster and go back to whatever you were doing like nothing happened. Why? Because nothing did happen. A happening is when shots are fired.

Do not hesitate to draw. If you are somewhere you are supposed to be and someone appears who is not supposed to be there like a closed business show him the end of your gun. Could it be Mother Teresa looking for her lost cat behind your closed business? No it is some motherfucker up to no good. He won't call the police to report he was prowling a location when a guy ran him off.

When to shoot


The time to shoot is immediately upon seeing his weapon. You are not a police man who has to try to arrest the guy. No need to scream at him. No exposure while you yell for him to drop the gun.

In deer hunting the experienced hunter takes the first good shot. May not be the perfect shot but it never is. Novices pass up a doable shot waiting for a better shot and then the deer is gone. Take the first good shot you are offered. Hopefully your alertness and hostile cues will prevent you ever having to fire. But once you see his weapon, shoot.

If a guy is coming at you with a gun in his hand shoot him. Shoot him right then. If you don't shoot first you may not shoot at all. I have known more than one person who was shot and received life changing injuries and also shot their attacker. Their only regret was not shooting sooner. Like Bill Jordan said "Nothing disturbs your enemy's aim like a slug delivered to the belt buckle area".  

Guns and weapons

The handgun is the best weapon you can carry easily. I understand it is not always possible to have one due to laws, restrictions, whatever. I am not telling anyone to disregard laws about carrying weapons. Each person has to decide for themselves what they are comfortable with. I will say there is no substitute for a pistol when you need one.


Also if you can not be trusted with a pistol after a few drinks you can't be trusted with a pistol period. Booze is liquid bad judgment no doubt but it shouldn't make you into a damn moron. If you are a moron sober I don't know what to tell you.

Types of guns and ammo are always debated and probably always will be. I have seen people shot with all common calibers. My conclusion is if you hit someone between the collar bone and the tip of their ribs three times with anything, they are handled. Bigger is better but something is better than nothing. Get your front sight on his shirt and stay on him as long as he is standing with whatever gun you have.

Just have a gun with sure fire ammo. Draw  early and fire immediately upon seeing his weapon. That course of action is about all you can do to up your odds of ending things favorably. Guns like the Ruger LC9, SIG 239, Glock 26/27 are examples of guns small enough to carry but with enough power and capacity to be useful. Do not be afraid to use a French Lebelle if that is the only gun you have. A gun is a gun. I like a Glock 19.

Training

We all want the best training. It can be expensive if you are having to pay for it and it can be hard to find the time to do it. There is a whole lot of BS out there. What can you do? First, pistol handling is not rocket surgery. If you will learn the basics and practice on your own you can be fine. Smooth draw, quick pairs, reload. If you know those things well you can be OK.

I know a young man who shot down two hold up men in 2010 at very close range while he and his GF were walking home from the store. He in Wyatt Earp like fashion ignored the fire coming from the gunman and killed him and wounded his accomplice. He nor his GF were injured. He like many was willing to give them the money until he picked up on nonverbal cues that because of his GF they were not quite satisfied with the money. He had a Glock 27.

He had only the most basic of training in gun handling but did do some draws and some dry fire a couple times a week and live fired maybe once a month. That basic skill combined with knowing what to do was enough. He shot at the first possible moment despite having let the guys get the drop on them. When the gunman turned his head because a car drove by that was the opening. A split second is a long time sometimes.

Work on some one hand shooting at close range. That is a skill not as popular as it once was and you want to use two hands when you can. Often you can find yourself doing something with your off hand though so be able to shoot with one hand out to 5 yards or so.




After

If it comes to pass you are forced to shoot someone do not feel bad. When the police come just tell them a guy threatened you with deadly force and you were forced to fire. I know there are bad police out there in some parts of the country who don't support self defense. I can't help you with that.

Do not talk to them until you have your attorney present. Now most young guys don't have an attorney on retainer and you may have no idea who to call. That is OK. You will figure it out but in the mean time don't talk about what happened other than to say you were forced to fire. You don't have to be an asshole just remember wait for your attorney.

Hopefully you will not give a statement for a couple days. Remember if you are put in jail that doesn't mean you are charged. Most places can hold you 48 or 72 hours on a felony before charging you or letting you go. Breath deep and get an attorney.

Expect to never get your gun back. You may get it back one day but maybe not. Do not buy expensive guns for the street. Buy yourself a nice sporting gun if you want a nice gun.  Keep your street guns basic. The factory Model 10 Smith and the GI 45 have done a lot of work over the years and aren't fancy.  

Worlds


We all live in different worlds. My world is filled with felons and gang members. Violence is common place. No one would be surprised if one of their friends called and said they shot a hold up man at a place of business or parking lot. In the past when I made calls the fact that the guy who is beating his GF is also on parole for 2nd degree murder flavored my world.

You may live in a smaller, less violent place where shootings seldom occur and it would be a rare to shoot a hold up man. I envy you and will be moving to a place like your town as soon as I can.

But be advised no matter where you are a hold man is going to be about the same. Whether he is a home boy or a guy who just exited the interstate into your town and needs some quick money. He is going to have a vicious streak and no regard for your life. Treat him like he treats you.

Giving them the money, doing what they say, all that may work but there is no guarantee. If you have never read Jeff Cooper's book The Principles of Personal Defense I suggest you order a copy immediately. It is a short book but summarizes a lot of important things.

Last year we had a trial here regarding an armed robbery that occurred. Three or four guys took a young couple from a parking garage near a college out by some railroad tracks where they raped, shot, and beat them. Their lives will never be the same.

The lesser thugs all turned on the trigger man at trial. The trigger man's statement in the paper was after all that had happened he felt like he was a victim. Think about that. That is the mindset you are up against.
















Link Posted: 12/25/2014 10:02:33 PM EST
[#1]
35 is mine.
Link Posted: 12/25/2014 10:25:36 PM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By bcauz3y:
This happened to a buddy of mine.

Keep your gun strapped on your person.

http://www.jrn.com/newschannel5/news/Police-Man-Shot-After-Catching-Burglar-Break-Into-His-Vehicle-283727841.html

View Quote



If I'm reading that right, his car was unlocked, had valuables left in plain view, including cash and a wallet, and a gun in there too?

That's just about all the things NOT to do to avoid a burglary. Was he shot with his own gun?
Link Posted: 12/25/2014 10:44:06 PM EST
[#3]
Tag
Link Posted: 12/25/2014 10:47:10 PM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By primuspilum:
35 is mine.
View Quote

Link Posted: 12/26/2014 12:18:21 AM EST
[#5]
Best thread ever on Arfcom
Link Posted: 12/26/2014 12:18:21 AM EST
[#6]
Best thread ever on Arfcom
Link Posted: 12/26/2014 12:29:15 AM EST
[#7]
Good post.  I was held up twice at a job back in the early 1980's where policy did not allow firearms.  You never forget and the world around you becomes a different place later in life.  I have been carrying since around 1994 and cannot imagine not being able to now and avoid nearly any situation that requires me to leave it at home.
Link Posted: 12/26/2014 12:32:10 AM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DukeSilver:



If I'm reading that right, his car was unlocked, had valuables left in plain view, including cash and a wallet, and a gun in there too?

That's just about all the things NOT to do to avoid a burglary. Was he shot with his own gun?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DukeSilver:
Originally Posted By bcauz3y:
This happened to a buddy of mine.

Keep your gun strapped on your person.

http://www.jrn.com/newschannel5/news/Police-Man-Shot-After-Catching-Burglar-Break-Into-His-Vehicle-283727841.html




If I'm reading that right, his car was unlocked, had valuables left in plain view, including cash and a wallet, and a gun in there too?

That's just about all the things NOT to do to avoid a burglary. Was he shot with his own gun?




And he chased after the burglar, while unarmed.
Link Posted: 12/26/2014 12:41:47 AM EST
[#9]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By phb1gt:
And he chased after the burglar, while unarmed.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By phb1gt:



Originally Posted By DukeSilver:


Originally Posted By bcauz3y:

This happened to a buddy of mine.



Keep your gun strapped on your person.



http://www.jrn.com/newschannel5/news/Police-Man-Shot-After-Catching-Burglar-Break-Into-His-Vehicle-283727841.html









If I'm reading that right, his car was unlocked, had valuables left in plain view, including cash and a wallet, and a gun in there too?



That's just about all the things NOT to do to avoid a burglary. Was he shot with his own gun?




And he chased after the burglar, while unarmed.
Shot with his own gun??

 
Link Posted: 12/26/2014 2:06:53 AM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 6winchester2:
Thank you for sharing this.

This is excellent.

It is worth sifting through hours of foolishness in GD when you find a gem like this.
View Quote

+1. good read!
Link Posted: 12/26/2014 2:17:45 AM EST
[#11]
Very insightful and educational.
Link Posted: 12/26/2014 2:21:02 AM EST
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nick1983:


The part highlighted in red is something that is so true.

So many people might be able to use a gun effectively in a scenario that requires deadly force, but far too many people find themselves in a gray area, where force is required to defend oneself, but deadly force could well be interpreted by a prosecutor as "unreasonable".

Far too few people can protect themselves with less-lethal force AND STILL RETAIN THEIR WEAPON in less lethal scenario.  

Very sadly, when you carry a handgun, if you are presented with a situation that initially requires less-lethal force, it will always be portrayed by a prosecutor as "less lethal or reasonable force" was ALL the situation ever required.  
IF the assailant ever knows you are carrying a handgun, the situation that dictates the use of "less-lethal" force, just became a situation where your assailant has decided to try use deadly force against you by trying to take your weapon off you.  

How many cops get killed every year with their own gun?

You now find yourself, literally in a "life or death physical struggle" and your response can only ever be less lethal force against an adversary who will be using or attempting to use deadly force.

For CYA, always try and de-escalate a situation where you assailant does not have a weapon.  This is what screwed George Zimmerman.

Think about yourself and your assailant too, a 100 pound woman could probably get away with using a gun against a 300 pound monster who was unarmed.  Two equally sized guys, then there is a possibility of getting indicted for manslaughter if he does not have a weapon.

For these unfortunate gray areas, it would probably do everyone good to spend less on guns & ammo and take a course on weapons retention.  Going to the gym and working out and being physically stronger and learning some sort of martial art doesn't hurt either.

There is no one thing that can guarantee your coming out on top in one of these terrible situations, but there are many little things that together, can better the odds in your favor.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nick1983:
Originally Posted By 1911SFOREVER:
This is a very good dissertation on disparate force from Andrew "The Law of Self Defense" Branca.

I just wanted to point out that my views of disparity of force in the context of lawful self-defense were forged when I attended Mas' LFI-I course way back in the early 1990s (or so, I'm getting old). I've seen nothing in 20 years since and many thousands of studied self-defense cases to change my mind on those fundamental principles. So if you've already heard what Mas has to say on the issue, you're unlikely to hear something substantively different from me.

I did want to add one observation to the thread, however. (The nature of the GATES forum prevents me from doing so in the original thread, hence this separate thread.)

That observation is that over the last 20 years, and especially the last 5-10, while the fundamental principles of disparity of force have not changed, the vigor with which the criminal justice system is punishing otherwise law-abiding citizens who violate these principles has grown CONSIDERABLY less forgiving.

Today in most jurisdictions there is VERY LITTLE slack cut for the use of disparity of force even by the "good guys" like us. This is in part a function of the explosion of CCW over that same time period--a LOT more normally law-abiding people are carrying handguns around with them, and thus a lot more defensive uses of handguns are occurring.

It is vital to keep in mind that deadly defensive force cannot be used unless one is facing a deadly offensive threat (meaning, of course, death or grave bodily harm). FBI statistics tell us that we are 5 times more likely to face a simple assault or battery (one NOT justifying a deadly force response) than an aggravated assault or battery (one that would justify a deadly force response).

This means, obviously, that most attacks are non-deadly force. If you respond with your pistol (deadly force) against a non-deadly force threat you are increasingly likely to be found to have deployed disparate force outside the bounds of lawful self-defense, AND TO BE PROSECUTED AND CONVICTED FOR IT.

Keep in mind that even merely threatening someone with the use of a gun is in itself aggravated assault, good in many jurisdictions for as much as 15 years in prison. What's it take to "threaten someone with the use of a gun"? Any behavior that would put a reasonable person in fear of the imminent use of a gun against them.

Is simply putting your hand on your pistol while facing a potential threat enough to meet this standard, under such circumstances that they can perceive an imminent threat? In many states, YES. Certainly displaying a pistol in a "defensive manner" (meaning, a manner intended to intimidate) is more than sufficient. Even worse, in many states such conduct, absent lawful justification, can make YOU the deadly force aggressor against whom THEY can use deadly force in self-defense.

Another lesson (among hundreds) that has stuck with me from LFI-I those 20 years ago is to not have a stupid-simple defensive toolbox. Not every problem is a nail, not every solution is a hammer. Give yourself options to move up the force continuum gradually as circumstances warrant, particularly including the ability to defend yourself effectively with non-deadly force.

Speaking in my own words now, anybody who is carrying a pistol for personal protection who has not also prepared themselves for NON-DEADLY self-defense is a fool, and putting themselves in great legal peril. They've left themselves with no effective defensive option between "ZERO FORCE" and "DEADLY FORCE," even though MOST attacks occur precisely within that gulf.

I see a great many otherwise law-abiding citizens who, for example, display their pistol to a perceived threat before that threat has reached the level of reasonably perceived death or grave bodily harm, and who are getting prosecuted and convicted for having done so. These citizens were in GENUINE FEAR when they acted, and because the only defensive tool in their toolbox was the gun, that's what they went to.

And, no, I'm not speaking merely of deep-blue jurisdictions like Massachusetts. I speak all over the country and have had a great many prosecutors concur with this observation--they are convicting people for such conduct (technically, usually accepting pleas to avoid jail time).

20 years ago it was far more likely that prosecutorial discretion would result in these cases not being pursued. That is less and less the case today. These are increasingly seen today as good busts, good prosecutions, and good convictions.

OK, that's it. Stay safe out there. :-)

--Andrew, @LawSelfDefense


The part highlighted in red is something that is so true.

So many people might be able to use a gun effectively in a scenario that requires deadly force, but far too many people find themselves in a gray area, where force is required to defend oneself, but deadly force could well be interpreted by a prosecutor as "unreasonable".

Far too few people can protect themselves with less-lethal force AND STILL RETAIN THEIR WEAPON in less lethal scenario.  

Very sadly, when you carry a handgun, if you are presented with a situation that initially requires less-lethal force, it will always be portrayed by a prosecutor as "less lethal or reasonable force" was ALL the situation ever required.  
IF the assailant ever knows you are carrying a handgun, the situation that dictates the use of "less-lethal" force, just became a situation where your assailant has decided to try use deadly force against you by trying to take your weapon off you.  

How many cops get killed every year with their own gun?

You now find yourself, literally in a "life or death physical struggle" and your response can only ever be less lethal force against an adversary who will be using or attempting to use deadly force.

For CYA, always try and de-escalate a situation where you assailant does not have a weapon.  This is what screwed George Zimmerman.

Think about yourself and your assailant too, a 100 pound woman could probably get away with using a gun against a 300 pound monster who was unarmed.  Two equally sized guys, then there is a possibility of getting indicted for manslaughter if he does not have a weapon.

For these unfortunate gray areas, it would probably do everyone good to spend less on guns & ammo and take a course on weapons retention.  Going to the gym and working out and being physically stronger and learning some sort of martial art doesn't hurt either.

There is no one thing that can guarantee your coming out on top in one of these terrible situations, but there are many little things that together, can better the odds in your favor.




So, it appears that this is the bottom of the reason why nowadays scumbags are getting the upperhand over normal people and even the police is falling victim of this mindset (as we are witnessing by latest events).

So, even considering that punches on the head can knock one person defenseless or even kill her, using a gun to stop the assailant either by displaying it or using it can land the normal person in hot water.   Politics now dictate ethics instead of the contrary.


What can folks who are older and in no way to get physically fit as the criminals in their 20s and 30s preying on them that spend most of their time in gyms and planning pack assault?  

I can hardly imagine myself letting an assailant punching first or even getting close enough for that, which would render a gun almost useless mostly if the criminal spends most of its time in a gym or practicing martial arts.





Link Posted: 12/26/2014 2:29:56 AM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nick1983:


I agree 100%.

That's why an assailant without a weapon is such a legal grey area.

You need to be totally certain you can use less-lethal force in a physical confrontation and come out on top or you will very probably end up dead or on trial for your life.  

Ever been in a fight you thought you were going to win and didn't?

Which is why de-escalating these types of situations is always the best option.


View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nick1983:
Originally Posted By 2tired2run:
Originally Posted By nick1983:
Originally Posted By 1911SFOREVER:
This is a very good dissertation on disparate force from Andrew "The Law of Self Defense" Branca.

I just wanted to point out that my views of disparity of force in the context of lawful self-defense were forged when I attended Mas' LFI-I course way back in the early 1990s (or so, I'm getting old). I've seen nothing in 20 years since and many thousands of studied self-defense cases to change my mind on those fundamental principles. So if you've already heard what Mas has to say on the issue, you're unlikely to hear something substantively different from me.

I did want to add one observation to the thread, however. (The nature of the GATES forum prevents me from doing so in the original thread, hence this separate thread.)

That observation is that over the last 20 years, and especially the last 5-10, while the fundamental principles of disparity of force have not changed, the vigor with which the criminal justice system is punishing otherwise law-abiding citizens who violate these principles has grown CONSIDERABLY less forgiving.

Today in most jurisdictions there is VERY LITTLE slack cut for the use of disparity of force even by the "good guys" like us. This is in part a function of the explosion of CCW over that same time period--a LOT more normally law-abiding people are carrying handguns around with them, and thus a lot more defensive uses of handguns are occurring.

It is vital to keep in mind that deadly defensive force cannot be used unless one is facing a deadly offensive threat (meaning, of course, death or grave bodily harm). FBI statistics tell us that we are 5 times more likely to face a simple assault or battery (one NOT justifying a deadly force response) than an aggravated assault or battery (one that would justify a deadly force response).

This means, obviously, that most attacks are non-deadly force. If you respond with your pistol (deadly force) against a non-deadly force threat you are increasingly likely to be found to have deployed disparate force outside the bounds of lawful self-defense, AND TO BE PROSECUTED AND CONVICTED FOR IT.

Keep in mind that even merely threatening someone with the use of a gun is in itself aggravated assault, good in many jurisdictions for as much as 15 years in prison. What's it take to "threaten someone with the use of a gun"? Any behavior that would put a reasonable person in fear of the imminent use of a gun against them.

Is simply putting your hand on your pistol while facing a potential threat enough to meet this standard, under such circumstances that they can perceive an imminent threat? In many states, YES. Certainly displaying a pistol in a "defensive manner" (meaning, a manner intended to intimidate) is more than sufficient. Even worse, in many states such conduct, absent lawful justification, can make YOU the deadly force aggressor against whom THEY can use deadly force in self-defense.

Another lesson (among hundreds) that has stuck with me from LFI-I those 20 years ago is to not have a stupid-simple defensive toolbox. Not every problem is a nail, not every solution is a hammer. Give yourself options to move up the force continuum gradually as circumstances warrant, particularly including the ability to defend yourself effectively with non-deadly force.

Speaking in my own words now, anybody who is carrying a pistol for personal protection who has not also prepared themselves for NON-DEADLY self-defense is a fool, and putting themselves in great legal peril. They've left themselves with no effective defensive option between "ZERO FORCE" and "DEADLY FORCE," even though MOST attacks occur precisely within that gulf.

I see a great many otherwise law-abiding citizens who, for example, display their pistol to a perceived threat before that threat has reached the level of reasonably perceived death or grave bodily harm, and who are getting prosecuted and convicted for having done so. These citizens were in GENUINE FEAR when they acted, and because the only defensive tool in their toolbox was the gun, that's what they went to.

And, no, I'm not speaking merely of deep-blue jurisdictions like Massachusetts. I speak all over the country and have had a great many prosecutors concur with this observation--they are convicting people for such conduct (technically, usually accepting pleas to avoid jail time).

20 years ago it was far more likely that prosecutorial discretion would result in these cases not being pursued. That is less and less the case today. These are increasingly seen today as good busts, good prosecutions, and good convictions.

OK, that's it. Stay safe out there. :-)

--Andrew, @LawSelfDefense


The part highlighted in red is something that is so true.

So many people might be able to use a gun effectively in a scenario that requires deadly force, but far too many people find themselves in a gray area, where force is required to defend oneself, but deadly force could well be interpreted by a prosecutor as "unreasonable".

Far too few people can protect themselves with less-lethal force AND STILL RETAIN THEIR WEAPON in less lethal scenario.  

Very sadly, when you carry a handgun, if you are presented with a situation that initially requires less-lethal force, it will always be portrayed by a prosecutor as "less lethal or reasonable force" was ALL the situation ever required.  
IF the assailant ever knows you are carrying a handgun, the situation that dictates the use of "less-lethal" force, just became a situation where your assailant has decided to try use deadly force against you by trying to take your weapon off you.  

How many cops get killed every year with their own gun?

You now find yourself, literally in a "life or death physical struggle" and your response can only ever be less lethal force against an adversary who will be using or attempting to use deadly force.

For CYA, always try and de-escalate a situation where you assailant does not have a weapon.  This is what screwed George Zimmerman.

Think about yourself and your assailant too, a 100 pound woman could probably get away with using a gun against a 300 pound monster who was unarmed.  Two equally sized guys, then there is a possibility of getting indicted for manslaughter if he does not have a weapon.

For these unfortunate gray areas, it would probably do everyone good to spend less on guns & ammo and take a course on weapons retention.  Going to the gym and working out and being physically stronger and learning some sort of martial art doesn't hurt either.

There is no one thing that can guarantee your coming out on top in one of these terrible situations, but there are many little things that together, can better the odds in your favor.



I'll play devils advocate on this one.

My problem with this advice is that guy may be equal size but have a bad attitude and does MMA for a hobby for an instance.  Or maybe he just likes to go around picking fights because he's good at it.  

What about age difference that's not necessarily an obvious thing either.  My gimpy shoulder and bad back up against a guy my size 10 years young may not work out well for me.  

I personally am not going to get locked up in a fist fight with someone, if I can't walk away then I can only assume they mean to do me harm.  I think with the above you are assuming the other side won't escalate from a wrestling match or minor beat down.  Also, what happens if you start winning there's a good chance the other side goes from fists to 2X4, knife bat etc.  

My opinion...if you're fighting fair you're not fighting to win





I agree 100%.

That's why an assailant without a weapon is such a legal grey area.

You need to be totally certain you can use less-lethal force in a physical confrontation and come out on top or you will very probably end up dead or on trial for your life.  

Ever been in a fight you thought you were going to win and didn't?

Which is why de-escalating these types of situations is always the best option.





That the problem.  How to deescalate a situation where the criminal chose you as its victim?

It's similar to deescalating a scenario where a pack of wolves encircled you.   These criminals are not a normal person one can reason with.  

Now add the current racial issues to the mix.  The pack is coming for the kill and know they are covered all the way to the White House.


How does one deescalate that?


The times we are living in are unprecedented.  How to defend against this?



Link Posted: 12/26/2014 2:34:23 AM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Rossi:



That the problem.  How to deescalate a situation where the criminal chose you as its victim?

It's similar to deescalating a scenario where a pack of wolves encircled you.   These criminals are not a normal person one can reason with.  

Now add the current racial issues to the mix.  The pack is coming for the kill and know they are covered all the way to the White House.


How does one deescalate that?


The times we are living in are unprecedented.  How to defend against this?



View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Rossi:
Originally Posted By nick1983:
Originally Posted By 2tired2run:
Originally Posted By nick1983:
Originally Posted By 1911SFOREVER:
This is a very good dissertation on disparate force from Andrew "The Law of Self Defense" Branca.

I just wanted to point out that my views of disparity of force in the context of lawful self-defense were forged when I attended Mas' LFI-I course way back in the early 1990s (or so, I'm getting old). I've seen nothing in 20 years since and many thousands of studied self-defense cases to change my mind on those fundamental principles. So if you've already heard what Mas has to say on the issue, you're unlikely to hear something substantively different from me.

I did want to add one observation to the thread, however. (The nature of the GATES forum prevents me from doing so in the original thread, hence this separate thread.)

That observation is that over the last 20 years, and especially the last 5-10, while the fundamental principles of disparity of force have not changed, the vigor with which the criminal justice system is punishing otherwise law-abiding citizens who violate these principles has grown CONSIDERABLY less forgiving.

Today in most jurisdictions there is VERY LITTLE slack cut for the use of disparity of force even by the "good guys" like us. This is in part a function of the explosion of CCW over that same time period--a LOT more normally law-abiding people are carrying handguns around with them, and thus a lot more defensive uses of handguns are occurring.

It is vital to keep in mind that deadly defensive force cannot be used unless one is facing a deadly offensive threat (meaning, of course, death or grave bodily harm). FBI statistics tell us that we are 5 times more likely to face a simple assault or battery (one NOT justifying a deadly force response) than an aggravated assault or battery (one that would justify a deadly force response).

This means, obviously, that most attacks are non-deadly force. If you respond with your pistol (deadly force) against a non-deadly force threat you are increasingly likely to be found to have deployed disparate force outside the bounds of lawful self-defense, AND TO BE PROSECUTED AND CONVICTED FOR IT.

Keep in mind that even merely threatening someone with the use of a gun is in itself aggravated assault, good in many jurisdictions for as much as 15 years in prison. What's it take to "threaten someone with the use of a gun"? Any behavior that would put a reasonable person in fear of the imminent use of a gun against them.

Is simply putting your hand on your pistol while facing a potential threat enough to meet this standard, under such circumstances that they can perceive an imminent threat? In many states, YES. Certainly displaying a pistol in a "defensive manner" (meaning, a manner intended to intimidate) is more than sufficient. Even worse, in many states such conduct, absent lawful justification, can make YOU the deadly force aggressor against whom THEY can use deadly force in self-defense.

Another lesson (among hundreds) that has stuck with me from LFI-I those 20 years ago is to not have a stupid-simple defensive toolbox. Not every problem is a nail, not every solution is a hammer. Give yourself options to move up the force continuum gradually as circumstances warrant, particularly including the ability to defend yourself effectively with non-deadly force.

Speaking in my own words now, anybody who is carrying a pistol for personal protection who has not also prepared themselves for NON-DEADLY self-defense is a fool, and putting themselves in great legal peril. They've left themselves with no effective defensive option between "ZERO FORCE" and "DEADLY FORCE," even though MOST attacks occur precisely within that gulf.

I see a great many otherwise law-abiding citizens who, for example, display their pistol to a perceived threat before that threat has reached the level of reasonably perceived death or grave bodily harm, and who are getting prosecuted and convicted for having done so. These citizens were in GENUINE FEAR when they acted, and because the only defensive tool in their toolbox was the gun, that's what they went to.

And, no, I'm not speaking merely of deep-blue jurisdictions like Massachusetts. I speak all over the country and have had a great many prosecutors concur with this observation--they are convicting people for such conduct (technically, usually accepting pleas to avoid jail time).

20 years ago it was far more likely that prosecutorial discretion would result in these cases not being pursued. That is less and less the case today. These are increasingly seen today as good busts, good prosecutions, and good convictions.

OK, that's it. Stay safe out there. :-)

--Andrew, @LawSelfDefense


The part highlighted in red is something that is so true.

So many people might be able to use a gun effectively in a scenario that requires deadly force, but far too many people find themselves in a gray area, where force is required to defend oneself, but deadly force could well be interpreted by a prosecutor as "unreasonable".

Far too few people can protect themselves with less-lethal force AND STILL RETAIN THEIR WEAPON in less lethal scenario.  

Very sadly, when you carry a handgun, if you are presented with a situation that initially requires less-lethal force, it will always be portrayed by a prosecutor as "less lethal or reasonable force" was ALL the situation ever required.  
IF the assailant ever knows you are carrying a handgun, the situation that dictates the use of "less-lethal" force, just became a situation where your assailant has decided to try use deadly force against you by trying to take your weapon off you.  

How many cops get killed every year with their own gun?

You now find yourself, literally in a "life or death physical struggle" and your response can only ever be less lethal force against an adversary who will be using or attempting to use deadly force.

For CYA, always try and de-escalate a situation where you assailant does not have a weapon.  This is what screwed George Zimmerman.

Think about yourself and your assailant too, a 100 pound woman could probably get away with using a gun against a 300 pound monster who was unarmed.  Two equally sized guys, then there is a possibility of getting indicted for manslaughter if he does not have a weapon.

For these unfortunate gray areas, it would probably do everyone good to spend less on guns & ammo and take a course on weapons retention.  Going to the gym and working out and being physically stronger and learning some sort of martial art doesn't hurt either.

There is no one thing that can guarantee your coming out on top in one of these terrible situations, but there are many little things that together, can better the odds in your favor.



I'll play devils advocate on this one.

My problem with this advice is that guy may be equal size but have a bad attitude and does MMA for a hobby for an instance.  Or maybe he just likes to go around picking fights because he's good at it.  

What about age difference that's not necessarily an obvious thing either.  My gimpy shoulder and bad back up against a guy my size 10 years young may not work out well for me.  

I personally am not going to get locked up in a fist fight with someone, if I can't walk away then I can only assume they mean to do me harm.  I think with the above you are assuming the other side won't escalate from a wrestling match or minor beat down.  Also, what happens if you start winning there's a good chance the other side goes from fists to 2X4, knife bat etc.  

My opinion...if you're fighting fair you're not fighting to win





I agree 100%.

That's why an assailant without a weapon is such a legal grey area.

You need to be totally certain you can use less-lethal force in a physical confrontation and come out on top or you will very probably end up dead or on trial for your life.  

Ever been in a fight you thought you were going to win and didn't?

Which is why de-escalating these types of situations is always the best option.





That the problem.  How to deescalate a situation where the criminal chose you as its victim?

It's similar to deescalating a scenario where a pack of wolves encircled you.   These criminals are not a normal person one can reason with.  

Now add the current racial issues to the mix.  The pack is coming for the kill and know they are covered all the way to the White House.


How does one deescalate that?


The times we are living in are unprecedented.  How to defend against this?





Yup not only are you up against the criminal but also the Fed Gov, the State Gov, the Media and scores of "dindu" sympathetic supporters who convict you before even hearing a shred of evidence.  Still, you gotta do what you gotta do.
Link Posted: 12/26/2014 4:38:00 AM EST
[#15]
I am glad I live in conservative rural Ohio,
I don't have to de-escalate anything.  You attack, I kill you? No bill.
Link Posted: 12/26/2014 11:24:03 PM EST
[#16]
Always worth re reading. Thanks
Link Posted: 12/27/2014 12:19:14 PM EST
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Ohio:
I am glad I live in conservative rural Ohio,
I don't have to de-escalate anything.  You attack, I kill you? No bill.
View Quote

+1. We do have meth cookers and the like in rural areas to deal with though...
Link Posted: 12/27/2014 12:40:52 PM EST
[#18]
Link Posted: 12/27/2014 3:52:37 PM EST
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TheGrayMan:
Here is a guy who "saw G coming," but lacked the will or means to do anything about it.  

http://youtu.be/ttF9nabxvTg
View Quote


Pretty much need both, I'd say. I mean, will without means in this situation still leaves you behind the power curve. Outgunned and outnumbered. All he could have tried was run. It was a better bet than just standing there, granted.
Link Posted: 12/27/2014 6:37:41 PM EST
[#20]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TheGrayMan:


Here is a guy who "saw G coming," but lacked the will or means to do anything about it.  



http://youtu.be/ttF9nabxvTg
View Quote
Goddammit that makes me mad.

 





Link Posted: 12/27/2014 6:42:52 PM EST
[Last Edit: Marie] [#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Rockdiver:


BLACKFLAGTRAINING.COM

Next Force on Force workshop is Nov. 15th in Morton Grove, IL.

It is taught by 5 ITOA members and LE instructors with years of shoothouse and simunitions experience.

It is a haul from TN, but the course is worth it, the LE version has been adopted by 21 Departments across the US as a supplement course for officer readiness.

Rocco
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Rockdiver:
Originally Posted By HermanSnerd:
There are so many instructors that teach shooting skills.

I wish there were more instructors teaching mindset and force on force scenarios so that maybe you could avoid having to shoot in the first place.

These classes wouldn't require a range or real guns.



BLACKFLAGTRAINING.COM

Next Force on Force workshop is Nov. 15th in Morton Grove, IL.

It is taught by 5 ITOA members and LE instructors with years of shoothouse and simunitions experience.

It is a haul from TN, but the course is worth it, the LE version has been adopted by 21 Departments across the US as a supplement course for officer readiness.

Rocco


I've taken Rocco's Force on Force I class, which uses Airsoft pistols. Well worth the $$. I learned a great deal. Plus, it was loads of fun. Being able to actually "shoot" at someone was a valuable experience.


ETA: taking a weapons retention class next month that Rocco is teaching.
Link Posted: 12/30/2014 3:57:40 PM EST
[Last Edit: SPQM] [#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Fooboy:He's starting you should have other options between 0 force and lethal force, not that you should be slow to use whatever force is appropriate.
View Quote


His assessment is wrong. Once you've decided that force is needed; it should be sudden, immediate, and turned up to 12 (on a scale of 1 to 10).

Messing around with less than lethal is a good way to die or get messed up.

Escalate massively, and keep a good lawyer on speed dial.
Link Posted: 12/30/2014 4:04:16 PM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By OKnativeson:most of the assaults I have worked on have been brutal, leaving the victim unable to move or defend with extremely long lasting physical issues. I don't even want to think about the psychological issues related to them.

you do not want to be beated by a street thug. they do not stop when you are down. they do not stop when you give up or become submissive. their goal is to render you useless for life.
View Quote


I got "lucky" in that the two youths (14 yrs and 15 yrs old) halted their second assault once I became submissive; and I got "lucky" again when *something* caused them to spook and take off running across a field with my wallet before they could get my phone in my other pocket, or inflict any further damage on me for "making them work for it".

But yes; I must wholeheartedly endorse the "do not want to be beat by a street thug" bit.
Link Posted: 12/30/2014 4:34:09 PM EST
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SPQM:


His assessment is wrong. Once you've decided that force is needed; it should be sudden, immediate, and turned up to 12 (on a scale of 1 to 10).

Messing around with less than lethal is a good way to die or get messed up.

Escalate massively, and keep a good lawyer on speed dial.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SPQM:
Originally Posted By Fooboy:He's starting you should have other options between 0 force and lethal force, not that you should be slow to use whatever force is appropriate.


His assessment is wrong. Once you've decided that force is needed; it should be sudden, immediate, and turned up to 12 (on a scale of 1 to 10).

Messing around with less than lethal is a good way to die or get messed up.

Escalate massively, and keep a good lawyer on speed dial.




having never been in a gunfight, but having been a bouncer for several years, and having been involved in 2 serious street fights, one of which included getting mildly stabbed,  I will echo what SPQM said,  if you determine it's time to react,   you react as fast as possible and with everything you can bring to bear.  Whether it's a table leg or a SAW or a Tank.

Almost every time I've either tried to rationally escalate force, or seen other people try to "respond in kind" it's almost always gone badly.   When it's time to react,  don't try to be fair,  try to be as overwhelmingly unfair and vicious as possible given what you have.

the OP post was fantastic and mirrors what I've personally seen from over my life.
Link Posted: 12/30/2014 6:12:23 PM EST
[#25]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DukeSilver:
If I'm reading that right, his car was unlocked, had valuables left in plain view, including cash and a wallet, and a gun in there too?



That's just about all the things NOT to do to avoid a burglary. Was he shot with his own gun?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DukeSilver:



Originally Posted By bcauz3y:

This happened to a buddy of mine.



Keep your gun strapped on your person.



http://www.jrn.com/newschannel5/news/Police-Man-Shot-After-Catching-Burglar-Break-Into-His-Vehicle-283727841.html









If I'm reading that right, his car was unlocked, had valuables left in plain view, including cash and a wallet, and a gun in there too?



That's just about all the things NOT to do to avoid a burglary. Was he shot with his own gun?
He's a dumbass, and yes he was.

 
Link Posted: 12/30/2014 7:31:29 PM EST
[Last Edit: tnriverluver] [#26]
This happened to one of my customers today and is an avid gun guy that always carries.  Guess early in the A.M. it would be quite a surprise.  Sad part is his business caters to the low income people are in serious need of health ins.  http://www.wbbjtv.com/news/local/Man--287099741.html
Link Posted: 12/30/2014 7:33:33 PM EST
[#27]
Link Posted: 12/31/2014 10:52:28 AM EST
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tnriverluver:
This happened to one of my customers today and is an avid gun guy that always carries.  Guess early in the A.M. it would be quite a surprise.  Sad part is his business caters to the low income people are in serious need of health ins.  http://www.wbbjtv.com/news/local/Man--287099741.html
View Quote


Wow.  I usually feel much safer before 0700 because I assumed that criminals were too lazy to wake up that early.
Link Posted: 12/31/2014 10:55:58 AM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By H46Driver:


Wow.  I usually feel much safer before 0700 because I assumed that criminals were too lazy to wake up that early.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By H46Driver:
Originally Posted By tnriverluver:
This happened to one of my customers today and is an avid gun guy that always carries.  Guess early in the A.M. it would be quite a surprise.  Sad part is his business caters to the low income people are in serious need of health ins.  http://www.wbbjtv.com/news/local/Man--287099741.html


Wow.  I usually feel much safer before 0700 because I assumed that criminals were too lazy to wake up that early.


No kidding.
Link Posted: 12/31/2014 11:08:14 AM EST
[#30]
I worked at a local fast food joint in the early 90s. Me and an older lady just opened up (1030am). A Hispanic dude, real little guy, came in to fill out a job application. No bells were going off for either of us, I mean its 1030am not night, right?. He parked just off to the side of the window, with a partner driving, Im assuming. I am doing the morning paperwork and next thing I know, this dude is behind the counter with a .22 in my face. He took the money bag (around $40 in cash and coins) and was gone. This store was 2 minutes from a mjaor highway and 15 minutes from 2 different states. Looking back, the location was perfect for a robbery.

What would I do different? Not sure. Im sure I missed something. I was just a teenager. This was a rare case that if I had a weapon, it wouldnt have done any good - the dude was on us before I even knew what was happening. Moral of the story is mornings and daytime may mean the threat is less than night, but not zero.
Link Posted: 12/31/2014 12:21:52 PM EST
[#31]
Link Posted: 12/31/2014 8:44:56 PM EST
[#32]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By toothandnail:


Tag
View Quote




 
Link Posted: 1/2/2015 1:09:20 PM EST
[#33]
My question about defending yourself is: If I end up having to defend myself, do I explain it to the cops or keep my mouth shut until I have an attorney present?
Link Posted: 1/2/2015 1:31:56 PM EST
[#34]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By gndmepyon:


My question about defending yourself is: If I end up having to defend myself, do I explain it to the cops or keep my mouth shut until I have an attorney present?
View Quote
Mouth shut. Especially in this political environment.

 



"I was in fear for my life, I thought he was going to kill me"

Followed by "sir ill cooperate fully once I have an attorney present"
Link Posted: 1/2/2015 1:33:42 PM EST
[Last Edit: Currently] [#35]
1.   "I was in fear for my life."

2.  "I need to speak to my lawyer."


3.   " I don't feel good, I need to go to the hospital."







Repeat ad infinitum...











 
Link Posted: 1/2/2015 2:18:23 PM EST
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By cda97:
Best thread ever on Arfcom
View Quote


I think the same thread content was the first thing I read on AR15.com... in 2003
Link Posted: 1/6/2015 10:10:26 AM EST
[#37]
Time for a bump.
Link Posted: 1/6/2015 10:41:06 AM EST
[#38]
Thanks for the bump, first time I've seen this one.
Link Posted: 1/6/2015 12:01:41 PM EST
[#39]
So glad I took the time to read this today, some really good info, always looking for good stuff like this.
Link Posted: 1/6/2015 12:08:21 PM EST
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By crashburnrepeat:




having never been in a gunfight, but having been a bouncer for several years, and having been involved in 2 serious street fights, one of which included getting mildly stabbed,  I will echo what SPQM said,  if you determine it's time to react,   you react as fast as possible and with everything you can bring to bear.  Whether it's a table leg or a SAW or a Tank.

Almost every time I've either tried to rationally escalate force, or seen other people try to "respond in kind" it's almost always gone badly.   When it's time to react,  don't try to be fair,  try to be as overwhelmingly unfair and vicious as possible given what you have.

the OP post was fantastic and mirrors what I've personally seen from over my life.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By crashburnrepeat:
Originally Posted By SPQM:
Originally Posted By Fooboy:He's starting you should have other options between 0 force and lethal force, not that you should be slow to use whatever force is appropriate.


His assessment is wrong. Once you've decided that force is needed; it should be sudden, immediate, and turned up to 12 (on a scale of 1 to 10).

Messing around with less than lethal is a good way to die or get messed up.

Escalate massively, and keep a good lawyer on speed dial.




having never been in a gunfight, but having been a bouncer for several years, and having been involved in 2 serious street fights, one of which included getting mildly stabbed,  I will echo what SPQM said,  if you determine it's time to react,   you react as fast as possible and with everything you can bring to bear.  Whether it's a table leg or a SAW or a Tank.

Almost every time I've either tried to rationally escalate force, or seen other people try to "respond in kind" it's almost always gone badly.   When it's time to react,  don't try to be fair,  try to be as overwhelmingly unfair and vicious as possible given what you have.

the OP post was fantastic and mirrors what I've personally seen from over my life.


descalation only works on rational humans.
Link Posted: 1/17/2015 5:54:12 AM EST
[#41]
This thread needs to be a sticky.

Link Posted: 1/17/2015 9:12:24 AM EST
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Finnbear:

+1. We do have meth cookers and the like in rural areas to deal with though...
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Finnbear:
Originally Posted By Ohio:
I am glad I live in conservative rural Ohio,
I don't have to de-escalate anything.  You attack, I kill you? No bill.

+1. We do have meth cookers and the like in rural areas to deal with though...


Yeah, it's the drawback to all the other awesome things about living where we do. It's also why I use an AR for home defense.
Link Posted: 1/17/2015 9:24:50 AM EST
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Currently:
1.   "I was in fear for my life."2.  "I need to speak to my lawyer."
3.   " I don't feel good, I need to go to the hospital."

Repeat ad infinitum...


 
View Quote

3 is overlooked.  
Do,it.
You are having chest pains
Link Posted: 1/17/2015 9:26:25 AM EST
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By FlyNavy75:
I worked at a local fast food joint in the early 90s. Me and an older lady just opened up (1030am). A Hispanic dude, real little guy, came in to fill out a job application. No bells were going off for either of us, I mean its 1030am not night, right?. He parked just off to the side of the window, with a partner driving, Im assuming. I am doing the morning paperwork and next thing I know, this dude is behind the counter with a .22 in my face. He took the money bag (around $40 in cash and coins) and was gone. This store was 2 minutes from a mjaor highway and 15 minutes from 2 different states. Looking back, the location was perfect for a robbery.

What would I do different? Not sure. Im sure I missed something. I was just a teenager. This was a rare case that if I had a weapon, it wouldnt have done any good - the dude was on us before I even knew what was happening. Moral of the story is mornings and daytime may mean the threat is less than night, but not zero.
View Quote


Was the car running?
Did he have hands on the wheel!0?
Link Posted: 1/17/2015 10:01:41 AM EST
[Last Edit: Gator] [#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Rossi:



That the problem.  How to deescalate a situation where the criminal chose you as its victim?

It's similar to deescalating a scenario where a pack of wolves encircled you.   These criminals are not a normal person one can reason with.  

Now add the current racial issues to the mix.  The pack is coming for the kill and know they are covered all the way to the White House.


How does one deescalate that?


The times we are living in are unprecedented.  How to defend against this?



View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Rossi:
Originally Posted By nick1983:
Originally Posted By 2tired2run:
Originally Posted By nick1983:
Originally Posted By 1911SFOREVER:
This is a very good dissertation on disparate force from Andrew "The Law of Self Defense" Branca.

I just wanted to point out that my views of disparity of force in the context of lawful self-defense were forged when I attended Mas' LFI-I course way back in the early 1990s (or so, I'm getting old). I've seen nothing in 20 years since and many thousands of studied self-defense cases to change my mind on those fundamental principles. So if you've already heard what Mas has to say on the issue, you're unlikely to hear something substantively different from me.

I did want to add one observation to the thread, however. (The nature of the GATES forum prevents me from doing so in the original thread, hence this separate thread.)

That observation is that over the last 20 years, and especially the last 5-10, while the fundamental principles of disparity of force have not changed, the vigor with which the criminal justice system is punishing otherwise law-abiding citizens who violate these principles has grown CONSIDERABLY less forgiving.

Today in most jurisdictions there is VERY LITTLE slack cut for the use of disparity of force even by the "good guys" like us. This is in part a function of the explosion of CCW over that same time period--a LOT more normally law-abiding people are carrying handguns around with them, and thus a lot more defensive uses of handguns are occurring.

It is vital to keep in mind that deadly defensive force cannot be used unless one is facing a deadly offensive threat (meaning, of course, death or grave bodily harm). FBI statistics tell us that we are 5 times more likely to face a simple assault or battery (one NOT justifying a deadly force response) than an aggravated assault or battery (one that would justify a deadly force response).

This means, obviously, that most attacks are non-deadly force. If you respond with your pistol (deadly force) against a non-deadly force threat you are increasingly likely to be found to have deployed disparate force outside the bounds of lawful self-defense, AND TO BE PROSECUTED AND CONVICTED FOR IT.

Keep in mind that even merely threatening someone with the use of a gun is in itself aggravated assault, good in many jurisdictions for as much as 15 years in prison. What's it take to "threaten someone with the use of a gun"? Any behavior that would put a reasonable person in fear of the imminent use of a gun against them.

Is simply putting your hand on your pistol while facing a potential threat enough to meet this standard, under such circumstances that they can perceive an imminent threat? In many states, YES. Certainly displaying a pistol in a "defensive manner" (meaning, a manner intended to intimidate) is more than sufficient. Even worse, in many states such conduct, absent lawful justification, can make YOU the deadly force aggressor against whom THEY can use deadly force in self-defense.

Another lesson (among hundreds) that has stuck with me from LFI-I those 20 years ago is to not have a stupid-simple defensive toolbox. Not every problem is a nail, not every solution is a hammer. Give yourself options to move up the force continuum gradually as circumstances warrant, particularly including the ability to defend yourself effectively with non-deadly force.

Speaking in my own words now, anybody who is carrying a pistol for personal protection who has not also prepared themselves for NON-DEADLY self-defense is a fool, and putting themselves in great legal peril. They've left themselves with no effective defensive option between "ZERO FORCE" and "DEADLY FORCE," even though MOST attacks occur precisely within that gulf.

I see a great many otherwise law-abiding citizens who, for example, display their pistol to a perceived threat before that threat has reached the level of reasonably perceived death or grave bodily harm, and who are getting prosecuted and convicted for having done so. These citizens were in GENUINE FEAR when they acted, and because the only defensive tool in their toolbox was the gun, that's what they went to.

And, no, I'm not speaking merely of deep-blue jurisdictions like Massachusetts. I speak all over the country and have had a great many prosecutors concur with this observation--they are convicting people for such conduct (technically, usually accepting pleas to avoid jail time).

20 years ago it was far more likely that prosecutorial discretion would result in these cases not being pursued. That is less and less the case today. These are increasingly seen today as good busts, good prosecutions, and good convictions.

OK, that's it. Stay safe out there. :-)

--Andrew, @LawSelfDefense


The part highlighted in red is something that is so true.

So many people might be able to use a gun effectively in a scenario that requires deadly force, but far too many people find themselves in a gray area, where force is required to defend oneself, but deadly force could well be interpreted by a prosecutor as "unreasonable".

Far too few people can protect themselves with less-lethal force AND STILL RETAIN THEIR WEAPON in less lethal scenario.  

Very sadly, when you carry a handgun, if you are presented with a situation that initially requires less-lethal force, it will always be portrayed by a prosecutor as "less lethal or reasonable force" was ALL the situation ever required.  
IF the assailant ever knows you are carrying a handgun, the situation that dictates the use of "less-lethal" force, just became a situation where your assailant has decided to try use deadly force against you by trying to take your weapon off you.  

How many cops get killed every year with their own gun?

You now find yourself, literally in a "life or death physical struggle" and your response can only ever be less lethal force against an adversary who will be using or attempting to use deadly force.

For CYA, always try and de-escalate a situation where you assailant does not have a weapon.  This is what screwed George Zimmerman.

Think about yourself and your assailant too, a 100 pound woman could probably get away with using a gun against a 300 pound monster who was unarmed.  Two equally sized guys, then there is a possibility of getting indicted for manslaughter if he does not have a weapon.

For these unfortunate gray areas, it would probably do everyone good to spend less on guns & ammo and take a course on weapons retention.  Going to the gym and working out and being physically stronger and learning some sort of martial art doesn't hurt either.

There is no one thing that can guarantee your coming out on top in one of these terrible situations, but there are many little things that together, can better the odds in your favor.



I'll play devils advocate on this one.

My problem with this advice is that guy may be equal size but have a bad attitude and does MMA for a hobby for an instance.  Or maybe he just likes to go around picking fights because he's good at it.  

What about age difference that's not necessarily an obvious thing either.  My gimpy shoulder and bad back up against a guy my size 10 years young may not work out well for me.  

I personally am not going to get locked up in a fist fight with someone, if I can't walk away then I can only assume they mean to do me harm.  I think with the above you are assuming the other side won't escalate from a wrestling match or minor beat down.  Also, what happens if you start winning there's a good chance the other side goes from fists to 2X4, knife bat etc.  

My opinion...if you're fighting fair you're not fighting to win





I agree 100%.

That's why an assailant without a weapon is such a legal grey area.

You need to be totally certain you can use less-lethal force in a physical confrontation and come out on top or you will very probably end up dead or on trial for your life.  

Ever been in a fight you thought you were going to win and didn't?

Which is why de-escalating these types of situations is always the best option.





That the problem.  How to deescalate a situation where the criminal chose you as its victim?

It's similar to deescalating a scenario where a pack of wolves encircled you.   These criminals are not a normal person one can reason with.  

Now add the current racial issues to the mix.  The pack is coming for the kill and know they are covered all the way to the White House.


How does one deescalate that?


The times we are living in are unprecedented.  How to defend against this?





I'm far from an expert, but I'd have to say know your state's laws, and having some sort of legal retainer on hand.  There are a few out there and the price is pretty darn reasonable.

1911SFOREVER sounds like really good and really bad advice at the same time.

If you're carrying, and give any shit at all about not landing yourself in jail, know when you are justified in using it.  Not all states are the same.  Some are as bad as 1911SFOREVER posted.  Some aren't.  BurnedOutLEO's advice sounds like great advice.  Know when you're justified, if you got a gun and you're gonna second guess shit, you could easily wind up dead.
Link Posted: 1/26/2015 9:54:41 AM EST
[#46]
Time for a visibility bump.
Link Posted: 2/11/2015 9:15:11 PM EST
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 1911SFOREVER:
Time for a visibility bump.
View Quote

Link Posted: 2/11/2015 9:34:07 PM EST
[#48]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By gndmepyon:


My question about defending yourself is: If I end up having to defend myself, do I explain it to the cops or keep my mouth shut until I have an attorney present?
View Quote
I was in fear for my life...I would like to speak to my attorney...then STFU.

 





Link Posted: 2/11/2015 9:34:10 PM EST
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tnriverluver:
This happened to one of my customers today and is an avid gun guy that always carries.  Guess early in the A.M. it would be quite a surprise.  Sad part is his business caters to the low income people are in serious need of health ins.  http://www.wbbjtv.com/news/local/Man--287099741.html
View Quote


Jackson is a Little Memphis. I work at the hospital, but live in Gibson County.
Link Posted: 2/12/2015 12:40:40 AM EST
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Gator:

I'm far from an expert, but I'd have to say know your state's laws, and having some sort of legal retainer on hand.  There are a few out there and the price is pretty darn reasonable.

1911SFOREVER sounds like really good and really bad advice at the same time.

If you're carrying, and give any shit at all about not landing yourself in jail, know when you are justified in using it.  Not all states are the same.  Some are as bad as 1911SFOREVER posted.  Some aren't.  BurnedOutLEO's advice sounds like great advice.  Know when you're justified, if you got a gun and you're gonna second guess shit, you could easily wind up dead.
View Quote


Virginia, while an overall great state in terms of gun rights, has terrible self-defense laws in some ways.

One of those is that the only acceptable defense to brandishing is imminent fear of death or grievous injury.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 59
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top