Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 59
Posted: 2/15/2024 12:04:12 PM EDT
[Last Edit: M4-AK]
Robert Goveia and Viva Frei.

Link coming.

Fani Willis DAY OF RECKONING! Trial Day 2 - Viva Frei Live WITH COMMNENTARY!


Update...


Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:33:11 AM EDT
[#1]
More proof of a clown world.    And you have to ask yourself. how bad was Wades wife to leave it for that flap of flubber.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:35:56 AM EDT
[#2]




Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:41:40 AM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By xciapup:


This argument is fatally flawed.

Your argument is based on the premise that the appeals court is not incompetent, is not corrupt, is not partisan, is not racist.

I would submit that the better argument is that this entire charade began with the infamous phone call.  The phone call that was illegally recorded.
View Quote


We are taking about a former recent President and I said if it doesn't get over turned on a state appeal the evidence
is on tape and it can't be ignored or brushed away or made to pretend the statements weren't made . It will go as high as it has to .
The conviction will be over turned , there's no two ways about it . You can't have the DA's office call the defense team a bunch of racists because they are all white

But yes I also agree on the phone call

writ of certiorari

that there is a “reasonable probability” that four Justices will grant certiorari, or agree to review the merits of the case; 2. that there is a “fair prospect” that a majority of the Court will conclude upon review that the decision below on the merits was erroneous; 3.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:44:23 AM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By xciapup:


The only benefit from this exercise is that these people were exposed for what they are on live afternoon TV.
View Quote



And that's actually a pretty big deal.  This hearing has moved the ball down the field in our favor with regards to exposing the corruption to the "fence sitters" and "undecideds"
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:45:13 AM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By weagle:

Judges's Democrat challenger in the upcoming election drops off in 3,2......
View Quote


Or another water pipe breaks during the vote count.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:46:44 AM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ranging-by-zipcode:



It's not about her it's about the jury pool in Fulton county

You had the DA's office say on national news  all the white lawyers on this case are racist .

You can't have a trial like that and it will be moved or it is ripe for appeal after the verdict .

That's just the way it is . This is not like a case where someone is being tried for a racist statement he or she used during the commission of a crime  or hate crime where the DA's office
is in their right to make statements about a charge . They made these statements against the defense council saying they were racist .

They sunk their whole case
View Quote

Perhaps in a world where justice prevailed but that is not this world.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:48:14 AM EDT
[#7]
This may now give Fani more opportunity to

incriminate herself and others to the Public.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:49:37 AM EDT
[#8]
Guess we find out if Kemp has the balls to get GSP to do the right thing.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:51:43 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By juan223:



And that's actually a pretty big deal.  This hearing has moved the ball down the field in our favor with regards to exposing the corruption to the "fence sitters" and "undecideds"
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By juan223:
Originally Posted By xciapup:


The only benefit from this exercise is that these people were exposed for what they are on live afternoon TV.



And that's actually a pretty big deal.  This hearing has moved the ball down the field in our favor with regards to exposing the corruption to the "fence sitters" and "undecideds"



One can only hope.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:52:31 AM EDT
[#10]
So what about all of wades work?…is that thrown out ?
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:53:40 AM EDT
[#11]
Will Fani now have to get Foodstamps?
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:54:24 AM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DarkStar:



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GItwGsBWUAAwyuZ?format=jpg&name=large

View Quote

What a puss
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:54:51 AM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By fosters:
So what about all of wades work?…is that thrown out ?
View Quote


They paid way too much for it just to throw it away
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:54:53 AM EDT
[#14]
Slap On The Fani: Fulton DA Told She Can Stay On Trump Case If Lover Pulls Out
View Quote
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 9:55:15 AM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By M4-AK:
Will Fani now have to get Foodstamps?
View Quote

She will have to buy dick somewhere else
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:01:10 AM EDT
[#16]
Protected class is protected
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:01:18 AM EDT
[Last Edit: BigB32] [#17]
Seems like total cop out to issue an ultimatum? I thought the case was either remove them or stay? Does Wade get to keep the 500k he made? How is only 1 disqualified when they both were the concern?
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:01:30 AM EDT
[#18]
The judge was a contributor to Fannie's campaign.  He should have recused himself.  

While Fani's perjury is important, what's more important are the meetings at the White House.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:01:50 AM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ranging-by-zipcode:


We are taking about a former recent President and I said if it doesn't get over turned on a state appeal the evidence
is on tape and it can't be ignored or brushed away or made to pretend the statements weren't made . It will go as high as it has to .
The conviction will be over turned , there's no two ways about it . You can't have the DA's office call the defense team a bunch of racists because they are all white

But yes I also agree on the phone call

writ of certiorari

that there is a “reasonable probability” that four Justices will grant certiorari, or agree to review the merits of the case; 2. that there is a “fair prospect” that a majority of the Court will conclude upon review that the decision below on the merits was erroneous; 3.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ranging-by-zipcode:
Originally Posted By xciapup:


This argument is fatally flawed.

Your argument is based on the premise that the appeals court is not incompetent, is not corrupt, is not partisan, is not racist.

I would submit that the better argument is that this entire charade began with the infamous phone call.  The phone call that was illegally recorded.


We are taking about a former recent President and I said if it doesn't get over turned on a state appeal the evidence
is on tape and it can't be ignored or brushed away or made to pretend the statements weren't made . It will go as high as it has to .
The conviction will be over turned , there's no two ways about it . You can't have the DA's office call the defense team a bunch of racists because they are all white

But yes I also agree on the phone call

writ of certiorari

that there is a “reasonable probability” that four Justices will grant certiorari, or agree to review the merits of the case; 2. that there is a “fair prospect” that a majority of the Court will conclude upon review that the decision below on the merits was erroneous; 3.


I appreciate your opinion but I think my very dark view of the GA justice system is more accurate and will prevail.

At the top is Kemp.  Kemp appoints judges.  I don't have knowledge of how the appeals and supreme court have ruled in the past, but knowing who appoints the justices informs my opinion.

The behaviors we agree on may very well be ignored and brushed away.  Remember, racism only goes one way.  It was Raffensperger who thought that signing the settlement codifying election cheating would keep voters from calling him a racist.  But it sealed the fate of Republicans including Trump.  And they still called him a racist.

Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:03:27 AM EDT
[#20]
Judge says Trump Team failed to prove an actual conflict of interest through her personal relationship with her Lead Prosecutor.

Hmmmm.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:03:41 AM EDT
[#21]
This is

How can Wade be an issue, but not Fanni?
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:05:07 AM EDT
[#22]
Judge says Wade and Willis are infected with the appearance of impropriety.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:05:34 AM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By M4-AK:
This may now give Fani more opportunity to

incriminate herself and others to the Public.
View Quote



This is true.  Although tossing the case and fani out on their asses was best move, perhaps the judge has teed up this for trump team to easily beat later.  
What is for sure now is that more mudd will be slung at trump, the legal system has been shown (again) to be a joke, and fani will have ample time to demonstrate her complete ignorance.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:05:51 AM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By xciapup:


This argument is fatally flawed.

Your argument is based on the premise that the appeals court is not incompetent, is not corrupt, is not partisan, is not racist.

I would submit that the better argument is that this entire charade began with the infamous phone call.  The phone call that was illegally recorded.
View Quote






Could you please explain why you say the phone call was illegally recorded?  

Georgia and the District of Columbia are one party.  While Florida is a two party state, I believe Trump was in DC when the call was made.  Also, Raffensperger was in Georgia and he recorded the call legally regardless from where the call came.






Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:06:16 AM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Libertas:
This is

How can Wade be an issue, but not Fanni?
View Quote


Hey man, it's a big club and you ain't a part of it!
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:07:44 AM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By M4-AK:
Judge says Trump Team failed to prove an actual conflict of interest through her personal relationship with her Lead Prosecutor.

Hmmmm.
View Quote

Andrew Weisman on Morning Joe 'splaing things .
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:07:55 AM EDT
[#27]
How is it looking on some other body in Ga sanctioning Big  Fani?
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:08:07 AM EDT
[#28]
MSNBC is nervous

Weissmann: Fani Willis should consider recusing herself from Trump RICO case
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:08:38 AM EDT
[#29]
When the "judge" let her pretty much run his court and disrespect it I doubt he has the balls to say anything let alone actually rule against her.

A good example of how the system actually works.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:09:59 AM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Hostile1:
That fat whore perjured herself in front of the whole world.

Our legal / justice system is corrupt and compromised

Fani wade is a criminal thief and should be prosecuted.
View Quote


You overlooked three important facts. The DA is a POC, woman and a democrat. With that trifecta, she can do no wrong.  
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:11:37 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Morlawn66] [#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LibertyShip:






Could you please explain why you say the phone call was illegally recorded?  

Georgia and the District of Columbia are one party.  While Florida is a two party state, I believe Trump was in DC when the call was made.  Also, Raffensperger was in Georgia and he recorded the call legally regardless from where the call came.






View Quote


Jordan Fuchs was in Florida when she recorded the call and then leaked it .   All this detailed in the book written about it .

Article in The Federalist on March 7 by Mollie Hemingway details it .
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:12:03 AM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Jack_Rackham:
The judge was a contributor to Fannie's campaign.  He should have recused himself.  

While Fani's perjury is important, what's more important are the meetings at the White House.
View Quote


Ignore the man behind the curtain. Wait, is that Big Mike?
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:12:04 AM EDT
[#33]
NEW Fani Willis Update! Judge Makes COWARDLY RULING: Either Fani Willis Or Nathan Wade Must be FIRED
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:13:50 AM EDT
[#34]
A hallmark of shithole countries is a corrupt judiciary.

Observe.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:15:19 AM EDT
[#35]
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:16:49 AM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LibertyShip:






Could you please explain why you say the phone call was illegally recorded?  

Georgia and the District of Columbia are one party.  While Florida is a two party state, I believe Trump was in DC when the call was made.  Also, Raffensperger was in Georgia and he recorded the call legally regardless from where the call came.






View Quote



That is a mainstream media talking point.

The call was not recorded by Raffensperger.  It was recorded by Jordan Fuchs, a political activist who served as Raffensperger’s chief of staff.  She was in Florida, where it is illegal to record a call without all parties consenting.  She neither asked for, nor received, consent to record.

Everything in this case is the fruit of a poisonous tree.  If this is acknowledged (which it won't be for reasons already listed) this case, and possibly even the guilty pleas, will be set aside.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:16:51 AM EDT
[#37]
Slap on the wrist for Georgia DA Fani Willis as judge rules she can STAY on Trump election case if she cuts ties with 'lover' prosecutor Nathan Wade - as he calls out her 'tremendous lapse in judgement' and 'unprofessional manner'





Fani Willis, the Fulton County district attorney, can stay on the Trump election interference case in Georgia but only if she cuts ties with her prosecutor 'lover' Nathan Wade, a judge has dramatically ruled.

In his 23-page ruling Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee slammed Willis for a 'tremendous lapse in judgment' and acting in an 'unprofessional manner' when she gave evidence in his court.

Judge McAfee made the stunning comments as he considered whether Willis should be disqualified from the case she brought against Donald Trump and 18 codefendants.

The judge ruled that her relationship with Wade did not amount to an 'actual conflict' of interest.

But he went on: 'This finding is by no means an indication that the Court condones this tremendous lapse in judgment or the unprofessional manner of the District Attorney’s testimony during the evidentiary hearing.'

He added that 'an odor of mendacity remains' in the case but the court was not 'under an obligation to ferret out every instance of potential dishonesty from each witness.'






McAfee had self-imposed a deadline of this week to rule after holding bombshell hearings featuring testimony by Willis herself about her 'romantic' relationship with Wade.

At issue in his decision was when the affair between the two prosecutors began, and whether it posed an actual conflict of interest or the appearance of one.

The judge and clashing attorneys explored those issues in sensational hearings that featured angry testimony by Willis.

She was  confronted by defense lawyers and there was conflicting testimony about whether the couple were involved in a 'romantic' relationship before Wade joined her team in 2021.

The hearings also featured details about cruises and luxury travel the pair engaged in – and whether it constituted any sort of improper benefit to Willis that allowed her to gain financially from the prosecution of Trump and his allies.

In his ruling Judge McAfee said: 'The prosecution of this case cannot proceed until the State selects one of two options.

'The District Attorney may choose to step aside, along with the whole of her office.

'Alternatively, Wade can withdraw, allowing the District Attorney, the Defendants, and the public to move forward without his presence or remuneration distracting from and potentially compromising the merits of this case.'




The judge stressed that 'no ruling of mine is ever gong to be based on politics.'

He then sorted through whether Wade and Willis had an actual financial conflict.

Judge McAfee wrote: ‘Whenever a private attorney - like Wade - is paid by the billable hour, a motive exists to extend or prolong the assignment.

'This, however, is a tension that the legal profession has long accepted.'

His ruling goes through the various trips the pair took, including to Aruba and Napa Valley.

But he found Willis did not get a ‘direct financial benefit’ from her decision to hire Wade.

He also essentially accepted her claims that she reimbursed Wade in cash for expenses during their travels.

‘Such a reimbursement practice may be unusual and the lack of any documentary corroboration understandably concerning.

'Yet the testimony withstood direct contradiction, was corroborated by other evidence (for example, her payment of airfare for two on the 2022 Miami trip), and was not so incredible as to be inherently unbelievable. However, as the District Attorney herself acknowledged, no ledger exists.

'Other than a “best guesstimate,” there is no way to be certain that expenses were split completely evenly - and the District Attorney may well have received a net benefit of several hundred dollars.'



More
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:17:33 AM EDT
[Last Edit: LibertyShip] [#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Morlawn66:


Jordan Fuchs was in Florida when she recorded the call and then leaked it .   All this detailed in the book written about it .

Article in The Federalist by Mollie Hemingway details it .
View Quote



Ok thanks, will research.



ETA.  Found it.  You are correct. (We don't hear that much on the board, huh? )  Whole thing is starting to look like "fruit of the poisonous tree."



Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:17:38 AM EDT
[#39]
Are they allowed to keep fucking?
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:18:11 AM EDT
[#40]


Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:19:10 AM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dull-shooterM4:


Not one bit. His words and actions are being twisted and misconstrued.  “What he really means “ and “dog whistle”  are constantly coming out of the mouths of his detractors.  People who act as if they know his true intent.  It’s funny. Because he is a terrible speaker in my opinion, but the msm still has to take everything out of context. Listen to the literal words, and most often, he’s spot on.

And the fucking documents case?  If it was even remotely a crime, it would be the presidential equivalent of jaywalking. Fucking joke. He could have declassified  anything and declared anything he wanted to be personal documents. His authority was above the archives. It’s fucking a process crime if that. (A vice president has no such authority however). Anyone pursuing this is doing so only out of “get trump”

All of it is get trump. It’s all bull shit and most of the country can see it for what it is.

One judge hits him with a record half billion dollar civil penalty for a fucking questionable appraisal!!????  Wtf?  How is that even remotely fair?  Or just?  It’s a fucking punishment.
View Quote



lol.

Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:20:12 AM EDT
[#42]
Both of them lied during testimony. That's perjury.

So what have we learned, boys and girls?

That it's OK for officers of the court to lie in Fulton County, GA, as long as it hurts Trump.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:20:39 AM EDT
[#43]
Can't disagree.



Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:20:40 AM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AlexAdams43:


I don't know if you're bound to a wheelchair or stuck in a hospital bed, but if either of those are true, have someone wheel you outside.  You need a break. I'm not picking sides, but I feel sorry for how invested in this you are.
View Quote


Some people care about our country, and the fact that the Republican nominee deserves to be in prison for his crimes against America.

But you do you.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:22:34 AM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By bigstick61:


Alternative in this case is clearly referring to a different one from the ones appointed.  And yes, it has happened multiple times in the past without anyone being charged with a crime or convicted of one for it. From time to time there have been elections with disputes over who the real Electors are which is what motivated Congress to pass a law (which exceeded their constitutional authority, IMO, as does the newer replacement law) specifying which ones are to be considered valid and such (picking the Governor's appointees over the legislature's is rather unconstitutional as the legislature has the ultimate authority under the Constitution with respect to who the Electors are to be).  

Choosing to make an issue of it legally now is clearly politically motivated and you do not have to be a Trump supporter for that to be obvious (I cannot stand the man and want him completely gone from our politics).
View Quote


You are not in touch with the law, or what happened in Michigan. Sorry.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:23:22 AM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By VACaver:
Both of them lied during testimony. That's perjury.

So what have we learned, boys and girls?

That it's OK for officers of the court to lie in Fulton County, GA, as long as it hurts Trump.
View Quote

This ,  now expand on that to say, elections ?
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:24:19 AM EDT
[#47]
My my my, what a surprise.

I don't say this to be a dick, but those of you who thought something would happen and called the rest of us doom and gloom defeatists, hopefully this is an important lesson.
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:24:27 AM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LibertyShip:
Could you please explain why you say the phone call was illegally recorded?  

Georgia and the District of Columbia are one party.  While Florida is a two party state, I believe Trump was in DC when the call was made.  Also, Raffensperger was in Georgia and he recorded the call legally regardless from where the call came.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LibertyShip:
Could you please explain why you say the phone call was illegally recorded?  

Georgia and the District of Columbia are one party.  While Florida is a two party state, I believe Trump was in DC when the call was made.  Also, Raffensperger was in Georgia and he recorded the call legally regardless from where the call came.

The call was recorded in Florida.
New Book Admits Fani Willis’ Get-Trump Investigation Began With Illegal Recording
However, the person who recorded the phone call wasn’t in Fulton County or even in Georgia. That’s a problem. Jordan Fuchs, a political activist who serves as Raffensperger’s chief of staff, was in Florida, where it is illegal to record a call without all parties to the call consenting to the recording. She neither asked for nor received consent to record.
....
Illegal Phone Call Recording
“Unlike many of her fellow Republican consultants with whom she had worked, Fuchs had a friendly working relationship with members of the Fourth Estate,” Isikoff and Klaidman write before describing Fuchs’ regular leaks to The Washington Post, which conservatives despise for its left-wing propaganda, hoaxes such as the Russia-collusion lie, and smears of conservatives such as Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Fuchs first gave The Washington Post fabricated quotes they later had to retract about a phone call President Trump had with someone in the elections office. Though Fuchs was not busted for her lie until March 2021, months after the fabricated quotes were used to impeach President Trump, the authors of the book say the embarrassment of being found out taught her the importance of recording phone calls such as the early January 2021 phone call that forms the basis of Willis’ investigation. They do not explain how this lesson worked in terms of the space-time continuum.

In any case, Fuchs recorded a phone call between Trump, Raffensperger, and their associates. Fuchs ended the call by saying they should get off the phone and work to “preserve the relationship” between the two offices. Instead, she immediately leaked the phone call to The Washington Post, which published it hours later.

Covering up the Crime
This is where the authors of the book admit that the very recording of the call was a crime:

Fuchs has never talked publicly about her taping of the phone call; she learned, after the fact, that Florida where she was at the time is one of fifteen states that requires two-party consent for the taping of phone calls. A lawyer for Raffensperger’s office asked the January 6 committee not to call her as a witness for reasons the committee’s lawyers assumed were due to her potential legal exposure. The committee agreed. But when she was called before a Fulton County special grand jury convened by Fani Willis, she was granted immunity and confirmed the taping, according to three sources with direct knowledge of her testimony.

Republicans had long suspected Fuchs was the source of the audiotaped call and, further, that she had illegally recorded it in Florida. Fuchs had noted in a Facebook post that she was in Florida visiting family around the time of the call. The book describes the close working relationship and “secret collaboration” of the Liz Cheney-led Jan. 6 committee and Fani Willis’ prosecutorial team. Fuchs should have been a major part of the televised show trial Cheney put on, further convincing Republicans that Fuchs had illegally taped the call and Cheney was helping cover that up. (Incidentally, the book portrays Cheney as the real leader of the Jan. 6 committee, that she viewed it as a “platform for her to resuscitate her political career” and would “provide a springboard for a Cheney presidential run.”)

The authors go on to say Fuchs would attempt to escape prosecution for the call if a Florida official brought charges by claiming she taped and immediately leaked the call to The Washington Post for “law enforcement purposes.” The authors somewhat hilariously describe this claim as an “effective defense.”
Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:24:52 AM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Low_Country:


Some people care about our country, and the fact that the Republican nominee deserves to be in prison for his crimes against America.

But you do you.
View Quote


It's funny because it's true.  

Attachment Attached File


Link Posted: 3/15/2024 10:25:17 AM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LibertyShip:



Ok thanks, will research.



ETA.  Found it.  You are correct. (We don't hear that much on the board, huh? )  Whole thing is starting to look like "fruit of the poisonous tree."



View Quote

This .
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 59
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top