Andre3k, those max #'s would have been from the Brown administration into the White administration. Think of it as a golden parachute for the folks who were in HPD during Brown's tenure as chief from 82-90. Why you are not seeing those kind of #'s now, see the Ron Green quote about "belt tightening" and the long term. With 25c of every $ going to legacy costs the tightening will only get worse. These #'s have been known, as the article states, since 03 at least and the city still underfunded what should have been put into those funds. IIRC, the city was putting 23-24% but needed to be putting in 28-29% per year, if you are underfunding 5% for year after year those #'s really add up, no matter what you are paying out. There was once a website(city or union, I don't recall?) up, long since disappeared, where one could run the #'s and bear witness to what was heading our way. It's interesting to me that we only get such articles around election times and that the article only talks about pension plans and not about the overall city budget.
Regards,
Hking