Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 2/21/2015 10:44:08 PM EDT
AB46 is a badly written bill that will only open up off duty cops to Federal prosecution if they carry a firearm on school grounds.

This bill, like it's predecessor, AB9 from last year, needs to be discarded.

The ONLY way an off duty LEO can legally carry on school grounds is for them to have a CCL issued by the state in which the school is located.

Introduce a bill that does that and doesn't limit it to off duty cops but to all 250,000+ people in Wisconsin who have taken a class and passed a background check.



The Federal GFSZ law gives exceptions to the law. They are as follows:

18 USC 922 (q) (2) (B)

(i) on private property not part of school grounds;
(ii) if the individual possessing the firearm is licensed to do so by the State in which the school zone is located or a political subdivision of the State, and the law of the State or political subdivision requires that, before an individual obtains such a license, the law enforcement authorities of the State or political subdivision verify that the individual is qualified under law to receive the license;
(iii) that is—
(I) not loaded; and
(II) in a locked container, or a locked firearms rack that is on a motor vehicle;
(iv) by an individual for use in a program approved by a school in the school zone;
(v) by an individual in accordance with a contract entered into between a school in the school zone and the individual or an employer of the individual;
(vi) by a law enforcement officer acting in his or her official capacity; or
(vii) that is unloaded and is possessed by an individual while traversing school premises for the purpose of gaining access to public or private lands open to hunting, if the entry on school premises is authorized by school authorities.

Notice, the only exception for cops is for while they are ON DUTY! So, no, there would be a Federal GFSZ violation unless the cop also met the requirements of (ii), which means they would have to get a WI CCL.

Link Posted: 2/21/2015 11:18:56 PM EDT
[#1]
Absolutely!!!!!

But the prevailing idea is that "we will look at allowing ccw's later once this is done."  If they don't go hand in hand it becomes a lot more difficult to pass a bill for ccw's later on.


Link Posted: 2/22/2015 8:11:42 AM EDT
[#2]
I'm all for equality.
The GFSZ needs to go away.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top