Every one of those clowns proposing the ban have once or several times bought their children a bike, which kills and injures far more children than guns do. If the Newton shooter had used a car to mow down children at a bus stop, or merely herded them onto a corner with a starter pistol, dowsed them with gasoline, and set them on fire, the anti-gun people would have been silent. If the Columbine shooters or the Islamic terrorists in CA, or the terrorist that shot up the gay nightclub, had used bombs instead of guns the anti-gunners would have been mute.
It's part of the playbook; and it's a real published game plan on paper- not just some ethereal idea, but a playbook. When there's a shooting that fits the narrative (and the daily massacre in Chicago is not) they open that book and start at step one, and follow the plan.
They DO NOT CARE about "the children" or any other victim; they only care about their agenda. In some twisted way they wake up in the morning hopeful that there has been a shooting because it furthers their goal. They want death, they want children to die and be maimed, not because they're necessarily evil, but to all liberals and progressives they feel the ends justify the means. A lie is good if it furthers the agenda, a death is an "acceptable sacrifice" if it furthers the agenda. Yes, there are some of them that are merely simpletons that believe the lies, but the ones pulling the strings are knowingly misleading the rest.
Do not for one second believe the AG is concerned about public safety, logic demonstrates otherwise.