User Panel
Posted: 9/2/2013 12:09:56 PM EDT
|
|
Does anyone know, at this point, what this EO really means for existing trusts?
|
|
As I understand it this is not an EO but a changing of the 'rules' by ATF.
Also as I "understand" there is currently no change to existing trusts but, I wouldn't doubt that a year or two down the road all legal entities will need come into compliance with the new rules. I also expect prices to drop and or plummet sooner than later. Hope I'm wrong. just my .02¢ / YMMV / Etc, etc... |
|
It's a no-go in Orange County. I requested before I went the trust route.
|
|
I could have sworn that someone (maybe slug-o) posted up a pic of Rutherford's signature on a form 1 from here in Duval. I remember something about him only signing for sbr's but not suppressors.
|
|
Sheriff Snyder in Martin County WILL sign off. Picked up my 5320.1 for my SBR this past Friday. He told me personally during his bid for office he had no problem with suppressors either. Of course YMMV.
Edited for clarity. |
|
The dickhead Gualiteiri in Pinellas County won't sign. Don't know about any of the police chiefs as I am in unincorporated Pinellas. Maybe we should just have people respond based on who will sign as Osprey alluded to.
|
|
Quoted: The dickhead Gualiteiri in Pinellas County won't sign. Don't know about any of the police chiefs as I am in unincorporated Pinellas. Maybe we should just have people respond based on who will sign as Osprey alluded to. View Quote I wonder if Bernie McCabe will, or if there are any local judges who would do it? I'm in the same boat as you.
|
|
Quoted:
As I understand it this is not an EO but a changing of the 'rules' by ATF. Also as I "understand" there is currently no change to existing trusts but, I wouldn't doubt that a year or two down the road all legal entities will need come into compliance with the new rules. I also expect prices to drop and or plummet sooner than later. Hope I'm wrong. just my .02¢ / YMMV / Etc, etc... View Quote The way it was explained to me, and I could be wrong, trusts are going to need to be signed off also soon. |
|
Quoted:
The way it was explained to me, and I could be wrong, trusts are going to need to be signed off also soon. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
As I understand it this is not an EO but a changing of the 'rules' by ATF. Also as I "understand" there is currently no change to existing trusts but, I wouldn't doubt that a year or two down the road all legal entities will need come into compliance with the new rules. I also expect prices to drop and or plummet sooner than later. Hope I'm wrong. just my .02¢ / YMMV / Etc, etc... The way it was explained to me, and I could be wrong, trusts are going to need to be signed off also soon. Correct, this EO is exclusive in place to force signature on Trust. |
|
I was under the impression sheriff Rutherford in Duval would sign for sbr and sbs but not for suppressors.
|
|
Quoted: Correct, this EO is exclusive in place to force signature on Trust. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As I understand it this is not an EO but a changing of the 'rules' by ATF. Also as I "understand" there is currently no change to existing trusts but, I wouldn't doubt that a year or two down the road all legal entities will need come into compliance with the new rules. I also expect prices to drop and or plummet sooner than later. Hope I'm wrong. just my .02¢ / YMMV / Etc, etc... The way it was explained to me, and I could be wrong, trusts are going to need to be signed off also soon. Correct, this EO is exclusive in place to force signature on Trust. Corporations as well. |
|
Judd in Polk is touch and go - sometimes he will, sometimes he won't. I know many people that went the Trust route because they were refused.
|
|
Hillsborough is a no-go........
Pasco used to be.....till just before I moved from Odessa across the county line into Land O Lakes......now it's a no-go too....... |
|
|
I thought that the purpose of the sign-off was to state that the item is legal to own.....
Not to ask permission...... If these Sheriffs can not do their job and support their voters, then the voters need to vote them out! Red |
|
Quoted:
I thought that the purpose of the sign-off was to state that the item is legal to own..... Not to ask permission...... If these Sheriffs can not do their job and support their voters, then the voters need to vote them out! Red View Quote Well that is the purpose. It becomes permission because they HAVE to give an answer for the process to proceed. In ancient days of yore the sheriff likely did have some insight into the goings on and character of most of the people in their jurisdictions and there was no centralized repository of data on people's past. They were the go-to source as to the character of the people living around them. Those days are long gone and this antiquated attitude about their knowledge is being used to beat on us. The way they keep their jobs is the other party always seems to find someone less palatable. I'm not a Nocco fan. His campaign against the spice sellers seems a massive waste of resources since it's a county prohibition, not even state or federal. It also seems to say there's no real drugs to chase around here anymore. Add on the cops don't look like cops anymore. OD green coveralls just don't say "cop" to me. But that's WAAAAAAY off topic. And I started this topic. |
|
Put simply... There are millions of dollars that have spleen spent on trusts and collections by law abiding citizens over the years in the Tampa area. I for one intend to continue to spend... If not on NFA... Then I'll spend on lawyers and lobbiests to bend over police chiefs and sheriffs that don't sign. It only takes a few hundred of us to make political life difficult via mayor offices and sheriff campaigns.
|
|
Quoted: Then trusts will be essentially useless. View Quote Going forward, correct. It'll soon be a matter of the NFA stuff you already have on a trust will be the last of it....be grateful for getting in while you could. Anyone who didn't get NFA stuff before this goes through will be SOL....as CLEO sign off is rare in most places.
|
|
Quoted:
Going forward, correct. It'll soon be a matter of the NFA stuff you already have on a trust will be the last of it....be grateful for getting in while you could. Anyone who didn't get NFA stuff before this goes through will be SOL....as CLEO sign off is rare in most places. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Then trusts will be essentially useless. Going forward, correct. It'll soon be a matter of the NFA stuff you already have on a trust will be the last of it....be grateful for getting in while you could. Anyone who didn't get NFA stuff before this goes through will be SOL....as CLEO sign off is rare in most places. when will this kick in? I may need to get a couple silencers if I still have time. |
|
Quoted: Going forward, correct. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Then trusts will be essentially useless. Going forward, correct. It'll soon be a matter of the NFA stuff you already have on a trust will be the last of it....be grateful for getting in while you could. Anyone who didn't get NFA stuff before this goes through will be SOL....as CLEO sign off is rare in most places. I was thinking this was retroactive? |
|
Quoted: View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Then trusts will be essentially useless. Going forward, correct. It'll soon be a matter of the NFA stuff you already have on a trust will be the last of it....be grateful for getting in while you could. Anyone who didn't get NFA stuff before this goes through will be SOL....as CLEO sign off is rare in most places. I was thinking this was retroactive? Bassed on what? DOJ/NFA stamps that have already been issued and have satisfied the requirements at the time of submission/approval. Requirements satisfied, stamp issued. To retroactively require CLEO sign off would essentially mean confescation as CLEO sign off is simply not an option for most people. I don't see retroactive CLEO sign off as being a condition. |
|
Will a sign off then restrict you to processing those NFA items only in that county now?
|
|
Quoted:
Put simply... There are millions of dollars that have spleen spent on trusts and collections by law abiding citizens over the years in the Tampa area. I for one intend to continue to spend... If not on NFA... Then I'll spend on lawyers and lobbiests to bend over police chiefs and sheriffs that don't sign. It only takes a few hundred of us to make political life difficult via mayor offices and sheriff campaigns. View Quote I like the cut of your jib, sir. |
|
|
Quoted:
Judd in Polk is touch and go - sometimes he will, sometimes he won't. I know many people that went the Trust route because they were refused. View Quote I was wondering about him. Just have to dress up nice, like you're going to church, and have a camera rolling. I bet he'll sign. |
|
|
From what I understand, neither steube in manatee or knight in sarasota will sign for sbr as they claim they don't understand why anyone needs one, not sure where they stand on suppressors.
|
|
|
Quoted: Nothing gets signed off on in Manatee or Sarasota. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: From what I understand, neither steube in manatee or knight in sarasota will sign for sbr as they claim they don't understand why anyone needs one, not sure where they stand on suppressors. Nothing gets signed off on in Manatee or Sarasota. Politicians of a feather... |
|
Do the forms need to be signed by the CLEO in the county we live in or can we go to any CLEO?
|
|
Is there an effective date upon which NFA trusts will require LEO signatures?
|
|
Quoted:
Do the forms need to be signed by the CLEO in the county we live in or can we go to any CLEO? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Do the forms need to be signed by the CLEO in the county we live in or can we go to any CLEO? Q: What law enforcement officials’ certifications on an application to transfer or make an NFA weapon are acceptable to ATF?
As provided by regulations, certifications by the local chief of police, sheriff of the county, head of the State police, or State or local district attorney or prosecutor are acceptable. The regulations also provide that certifications of other officials are appropriate if found in a particular case to be acceptable to the Director. Examples of other officials who have been accepted in specific situations include State attorneys general and judges of State courts having authority to conduct jury trials in felony cases. [27 CFR 479.63 and 479.85] |
|
If I remember correctly, St. John's county will only sign off on machine guns. They just don't want to be inundated with applications.
|
|
I heard Sheriff Darnell in Alachua County is signing these days. Can't confirm it for sure, but that's what I heard. Cervone will sign if you ask nicely.
|
|
How about Volusia?
Does it have to be someone located in the same county you reside? |
|
Quoted:
You won't have to keep the stuff locked away from you wife. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Then trusts will be essentially useless. That's not an issue. I just keep it with my porn. |
|
|
It sounds like we all have to pitch in together, and buy a house in Osceola Co. HOMETOWN FLORIDA HQ.
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.