Hey fellow shooters...I picked up some 20 round mags from each source, and as I do with every new mag, pulled them apart right out of the pkg. carefully checking them over for burrs (none on either) cleaning them inside and out for grease, dirt...ect. (the W mags had alot of dust inside) closely compared the shape of the feed lips (identical) follower; here there is some difference...the CMI follower being polished smooth, the W mag rough parkerizing...but the edges of the followers on both had no burrs...I laid the micrometer on both and they are identical specs there. So to me, the main difference I see is in how rhe W mags are finished in a very rough, thick abrasive parkerizing inside,so I cleaned, polished with a dremel, and VERY lightly lubed them both. The springs seem to be equal, but i had a few spare GI ones laying around brand new to switch out if I had problems.
Bottom line? I took both to the range after that, and they both worked fine in my M1A Scout Squad...I only load 18 rounds...and I shot both steel cased and brass cased ammo...no problems.
Conclusion? I will only purchase CMI mags or GI surplus mags from now on...but having said this, the W mags seem to work ok for me, so far. I see them as range mags, or for spare parts...how long will the springs last? The feed lips? Don't know...but for what they cost, are acceptable. I would not leave W mags laying around loaded for a long period of time. Also if you change out the springs with GI ones, you may solve any potential problems there...just my .02