Posted: 6/13/2015 10:53:51 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote History Quoted:
Well, I ran a comparison today - put ~100rds each through an MPX and a CMMG 9mm blowback AR 7.5" pistol running a Spikes ST-9X buffer and a carbine spring (along with the CMMG 9mm bolt of course). Same UMC Green Box in both, same boxes even - run 15 in the MPX then 15 in the AR, etc. Afterwards, stripped them each down and cleaned them. Neither suppressed, just an A2 style FH on the end. Oh, and I cleaned them both beforehand, so they started "clean" by my standards.
There's no other way to say this .... the MPX is freaking FILTHY. Took WAY more patches and they were COMPLETELY black Now I'm "that guy" when it comes to cleaning it seems, so I removed the MPX barrel, cleaned the gas cylinder and piston, etc. But there's no escaping the fact that the MPX got way, way, dirtier. Some of that is the whole locking bolt thing - there's locking lugs which get dirty in the MPX, while in the AR there's just a chamber and a bolt face. I'd say the two bolts were about even on filth, but the MPX upper receiver was just a mess. I was about ready to dunk the whole damn thing in the ultrasonic cleaner and call it done! As I mentioned, I run several other piston guns in .223 and .308 and *NONE* of them come anywhere near close to this level of dirty, so I don't know what SIG has done with the MPX, but they've done something .... interesting.
I didn't run the two guns to failure, so I can't say whether the MPX "cared" less about being dirty, but just from an owner/operator cleaning up after shooting perspective, the MPX is *NOT* an improvement I'll try and post an overall comparison later, but there are definite advantages to the MPX - felt recoil is way different without the huge reciprocating mass of the blowback gun, modularity is impressive, etc. So it's not like the MPX is worthless, just not cleaner.
Anyway, now you know
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
I thought the whole point of a short-stroke piston 9mm would be running *CLEAN* - like the AUG/FS2000/Adams AR/whatnot seem to. Are you MPX owners really saying this thing is blowback-dirty (like a 9mm AR)?????????
Well, I ran a comparison today - put ~100rds each through an MPX and a CMMG 9mm blowback AR 7.5" pistol running a Spikes ST-9X buffer and a carbine spring (along with the CMMG 9mm bolt of course). Same UMC Green Box in both, same boxes even - run 15 in the MPX then 15 in the AR, etc. Afterwards, stripped them each down and cleaned them. Neither suppressed, just an A2 style FH on the end. Oh, and I cleaned them both beforehand, so they started "clean" by my standards.
There's no other way to say this .... the MPX is freaking FILTHY. Took WAY more patches and they were COMPLETELY black Now I'm "that guy" when it comes to cleaning it seems, so I removed the MPX barrel, cleaned the gas cylinder and piston, etc. But there's no escaping the fact that the MPX got way, way, dirtier. Some of that is the whole locking bolt thing - there's locking lugs which get dirty in the MPX, while in the AR there's just a chamber and a bolt face. I'd say the two bolts were about even on filth, but the MPX upper receiver was just a mess. I was about ready to dunk the whole damn thing in the ultrasonic cleaner and call it done! As I mentioned, I run several other piston guns in .223 and .308 and *NONE* of them come anywhere near close to this level of dirty, so I don't know what SIG has done with the MPX, but they've done something .... interesting.
I didn't run the two guns to failure, so I can't say whether the MPX "cared" less about being dirty, but just from an owner/operator cleaning up after shooting perspective, the MPX is *NOT* an improvement I'll try and post an overall comparison later, but there are definite advantages to the MPX - felt recoil is way different without the huge reciprocating mass of the blowback gun, modularity is impressive, etc. So it's not like the MPX is worthless, just not cleaner.
Anyway, now you know
Thanks for your insight.
|