User Panel
Great. Thank you. It is a great gun. I kinda want to wait to see how the court case goes before I jump in.
|
|
NP. I plan on buying the pistol version as soon as it is released and then hopefully the carbine that I can register for the suppressor tube . Lets hope Sig comes out victorious on this one.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Some new photos in The Truth About Guns blog. Articles coming soon. Looks like a press event at Sig Academy. Link I like the MBUS Pro and Aimpoint on it. http://i834.photobucket.com/albums/zz267/edmateo50/1397785483_zps6cdb79ec.jpg Also a Video on the Sig MCX. View Quote Glad to see they are using better accessory hardware. I wonder if that has anything to do with Kevin from AAC joining them. Always thought it didn't look good when an otherwise nice rifle has a cheap optic mounted to it. ETA: |
|
Nice slow mo of the MPX firing. I'm surprised the mag wobbles so much.
[youtube]http://youtu.be/meh1dXPtaTA[/youtube] YouTube Link |
|
Quoted:
Nice slow mo of the MPX firing. I'm surprised the mag wobbles so much. http://youtu.be/meh1dXPtaTA YouTube Link View Quote I think that is why they redesigned the magazine a little. See page 1 on this thread. |
|
I thought the mpx was shipping with some kind of sig branded reflect sight. Is this no longer the case?
|
|
|
I agree. But for the price one of these is going to go for, I could use the money I would make from selling it to some fanboy to offset dome of the cost if it is coming with the gun anyway.
|
|
Very true, good point. I guess you could always use it on airsoft as well. lol
|
|
I too would like to have seen a different charging handle setup. It's not a deal-breaker for me at all, but I would rather have a side charging handle - more along the line of a MP5
|
|
Quoted:
I too would like to have seen a different charging handle setup. It's not a deal-breaker for me at all, but I would rather have a side charging handle - more along the line of a MP5 View Quote I agree, but I understand that they probably think they will be able to sell more with the argument that cops will not have learn a new manual of arms. Is the charging handle reduced size or will I be able to substitute a BCM gunfighter? |
|
Quoted:
I agree, but I understand that they probably think they will be able to sell more with the argument that cops will not have learn a new manual of arms. Is the charging handle reduced size or will I be able to substitute a BCM gunfighter? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I too would like to have seen a different charging handle setup. It's not a deal-breaker for me at all, but I would rather have a side charging handle - more along the line of a MP5 I agree, but I understand that they probably think they will be able to sell more with the argument that cops will not have learn a new manual of arms. Is the charging handle reduced size or will I be able to substitute a BCM gunfighter? Due to how the operating system works the CH is not standard. The MPX/MCX have the AR manual of arms because 99.99% of professional users are trained on M4s and other AR platforms. It was a technical decision made by the serious end users that work in the developmental group that designed the weapons. |
|
Quoted:
Due to how the operating system works the CH is not standard. The MPX/MCX have the AR manual of arms because 99.99% of professional users are trained on M4s and other AR platforms. It was a technical decision made by the serious end users that work in the developmental group that designed the weapons. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I too would like to have seen a different charging handle setup. It's not a deal-breaker for me at all, but I would rather have a side charging handle - more along the line of a MP5 I agree, but I understand that they probably think they will be able to sell more with the argument that cops will not have learn a new manual of arms. Is the charging handle reduced size or will I be able to substitute a BCM gunfighter? Due to how the operating system works the CH is not standard. The MPX/MCX have the AR manual of arms because 99.99% of professional users are trained on M4s and other AR platforms. It was a technical decision made by the serious end users that work in the developmental group that designed the weapons. Yep. Understood. Just a personal preference on my part is all. Smart move for Sig. |
|
Why is everyone so into the side charging handle? Most people that have real world experience with like say the MP5 don't like the side charging handle as it gets hung up in gear. There is a reason that most HK weapons as of late and after the MP5, HK91/93, etc don't have side charging handles anymore.
|
|
Quoted:
Why is everyone so into the side charging handle? Most people that have real world experience with like say the MP5 don't like the side charging handle as it gets hung up in gear. There is a reason that most HK weapons as of late and after the MP5, HK91/93, etc don't have side charging handles anymore. View Quote I dont love HK charging handles(or most folding handles for that matter) but love the FAL left side chargers. Like I said earlier it is easier for me to manipulate a side charger especially when shouldered. |
|
MPX needs a better stock for the stocked versions, in the worst way. That telescoping stock is horrible. Overall I was underwhelmed.
I also can't fathom why they can't just make a 16" barrel instead of the massive "muzzle break" version and get a Title I carbine onto the market. Although no one would buy it at the price they're going to want for them. |
|
Quoted:
MPX needs a better stock for the stocked versions, in the worst way. That telescoping stock is horrible. Overall I was underwhelmed. I also can't fathom why they can't just make a 16" barrel instead of the massive "muzzle break" version and get a Title I carbine onto the market. Although no one would buy it at the price they're going to want for them. View Quote While I would love for it to be cheaper being that SIg sells everything they make rather easily I imagine a brand new carbine will do just fine. I do agree that a normal 16" barrel would be easy. |
|
I actually liked the telescoping stock and spent a lot of time playing with it at Shot Show. It was rugged and well built from what I could see.
|
|
Quoted:
I actually liked the telescoping stock and spent a lot of time playing with it at Shot Show. It was rugged and well built from what I could see. View Quote The width of the telescoping rods is very wide which puts your head way to the side, in combination with the cheekweld on the round telescoping rods, overall it's pretty atrocious IMO, YMMV, etc. |
|
Quoted:
The width of the telescoping rods is very wide which puts your head way to the side, in combination with the cheekweld on the round telescoping rods, overall it's pretty atrocious IMO, YMMV, etc. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I actually liked the telescoping stock and spent a lot of time playing with it at Shot Show. It was rugged and well built from what I could see. The width of the telescoping rods is very wide which puts your head way to the side, in combination with the cheekweld on the round telescoping rods, overall it's pretty atrocious IMO, YMMV, etc. I was afraid of that. The telescoping stock looks pretty awesome. I'll get behind one before I make a decision. |
|
The telescoping stock is a little harder to open and close than the side folder. If I could have an SBR, I would go side folder if the length of pull felt good.
|
|
|
|
View Quote Tested up to 2000rpm! The MCX definitely looks interesting. Glad to see they are still going forward with it even though it does seem to directly compete with the 556xi. http://blogs.militarytimes.com/gearscout/2014/04/17/on-the-range-with-sig-sauers-mcx-black-mamba/ |
|
|
|
Quoted:
I think that is why they redesigned the magazine a little. See page 1 on this thread. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Nice slow mo of the MPX firing. I'm surprised the mag wobbles so much. http://youtu.be/meh1dXPtaTA YouTube Link I think that is why they redesigned the magazine a little. See page 1 on this thread. I finally found a higher res photo. Looks like the newer design with the triangle hump on the back. |
|
|
View Quote They have had various versions of the MPX on their website for a while now. Are they in stock? |
|
|
Quoted:
They have had various versions of the MPX on their website for a while now. Are they in stock? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
They have had various versions of the MPX on their website for a while now. Are they in stock? Go to your local store and check. Not available online. |
|
Quoted:
Go to your local store and check. Not available online. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
They have had various versions of the MPX on their website for a while now. Are they in stock? Go to your local store and check. Not available online. That would be rather difficult since I don't have one. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
My LGS just informed me that a very large and well known distributor just told them that the civilian MPX including the pistol is on indefinite hold. I sure hope that is not the case.
|
|
Quoted:
My LGS just informed me that a very large and well known distributor just told them that the civilian MPX including the pistol is on indefinite hold. I sure hope that is not the case. View Quote Hope not. Screams of ATF getting their panties in a wad over the muzzle device lawsuit if true. Wonder if they are saying it's "too easy to convert to full auto" or some such nonsense. |
|
Quoted:
My LGS just informed me that a very large and well known distributor just told them that the civilian MPX including the pistol is on indefinite hold. I sure hope that is not the case. View Quote Two weeks from now will they say one got released somehow and you can preorder it for twice MSRP? |
|
Quoted:
Hope not. Screams of ATF getting their panties in a wad over the muzzle device lawsuit if true. Wonder if they are saying it's "too easy to convert to full auto" or some such nonsense. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
My LGS just informed me that a very large and well known distributor just told them that the civilian MPX including the pistol is on indefinite hold. I sure hope that is not the case. Hope not. Screams of ATF getting their panties in a wad over the muzzle device lawsuit if true. Wonder if they are saying it's "too easy to convert to full auto" or some such nonsense. I don't think it is for the ability to easily convert to full auto, then all the thousands of AR's out there would be in the same catagory. Hope it is just bad info. |
|
|
If I were sig and I had confidence in my case against the ATF, I would stop with my plan B and go back to my plan A in preparation for winning the case. I would not tool up for a pistol when no one will buy it and everyone will want the Rifle with the funky muzzle brake. At least that is how I am thinking about my purchase and how I would act if I were sig, which I am obviously not. Maybe it is as inacquious as that.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
My LGS just informed me that a very large and well known distributor just told them that the civilian MPX including the pistol is on indefinite hold. I sure hope that is not the case. Did they say why? They did not say why. I even said it was probably just the carbine that's in lawsuit right now and I was told it was on hold for the pistols as well. Hope it's just BS because I really want one of these badly. |
|
Quoted:
What lawsuit? View Quote Sig Sauer has a lawsuit against the BATFE for not allowing the MPX carbine with the "muzzle break" from being sold the way it was intended. So I hope Sig wins this one, but not holding my breath. http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/04/foghorn/sig-sauer-sues-atf-calling-muzzle-brake-silencer/ |
|
Quoted:
If I were sig and I had confidence in my case against the ATF, I would stop with my plan B and go back to my plan A in preparation for winning the case. I would not tool up for a pistol when no one will buy it and everyone will want the Rifle with the funky muzzle brake. At least that is how I am thinking about my purchase and how I would act if I were sig, which I am obviously not. Maybe it is as inacquious as that. View Quote I would guess that most people would prefer a short barrel than can use a suppressor they already own. |
|
Quoted:
I would guess that most people would prefer a short barrel than can use a suppressor they already own. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
If I were sig and I had confidence in my case against the ATF, I would stop with my plan B and go back to my plan A in preparation for winning the case. I would not tool up for a pistol when no one will buy it and everyone will want the Rifle with the funky muzzle brake. At least that is how I am thinking about my purchase and how I would act if I were sig, which I am obviously not. Maybe it is as inacquious as that. I would guess that most people would prefer a short barrel than can use a suppressor they already own. Consider me in that boat with the short barrels. I might buy the rifle version as well just for them going after the ATF. |
|
I'm definitely in for a SBR and probably a pistol too. I sure hope that Sig gets these to market soon. I've had my fill of "vaporware" gun stuff for a while.
|
|
Quoted:
I'm definitely in for a SBR and probably a pistol too. I sure hope that Sig gets these to market soon. I've had my fill of "vaporware" gun stuff for a while. View Quote The only reason we really have vapors are is because between how demanding we are that all these companies keep us updated to the second and the ability to spread word through the internet. Used to be you might get a little teaser but companies never used to put pre production stuff up so early. These threads are a perfect example. At least half a dozen threads with nothing but speculation. I just wait till I start seeing them on gunbroker and go from there |
|
Quoted:
The only reason we really have vapors are is because between how demanding we are that all these companies keep us updated to the second and the ability to spread word through the internet. Used to be you might get a little teaser but companies never used to put pre production stuff up so early. These threads are a perfect example. At least half a dozen threads with nothing but speculation. I just wait till I start seeing them on gunbroker and go from there View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm definitely in for a SBR and probably a pistol too. I sure hope that Sig gets these to market soon. I've had my fill of "vaporware" gun stuff for a while. The only reason we really have vapors are is because between how demanding we are that all these companies keep us updated to the second and the ability to spread word through the internet. Used to be you might get a little teaser but companies never used to put pre production stuff up so early. These threads are a perfect example. At least half a dozen threads with nothing but speculation. I just wait till I start seeing them on gunbroker and go from there I agree. I think I'd rather not have the teasers in the first place, to be honest. |
|
I like them because it gives me some time to save my pennies.
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.